ally28

3.5K posts

ally28 banner
ally28

ally28

@allyv28

Prolific non-tweeter. Politically homeless. Hetty Mono. North of 40. WOW FrostDK. #ForTheHorde 🇬🇧🇬🇩

England, United Kingdom Katılım Mayıs 2011
58 Takip Edilen50 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
Journey's end reached, not unexpected, but the loss is no less. #dementia
ally28 tweet mediaally28 tweet mediaally28 tweet media
English
0
1
1
0
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@donniebenjamin @davidfrum Europe imports 3.8% of its oil through the Strait versus the US's 2.5%. The UK imports none that way. I've no idea why so many Americans think they're holding Europe/UK over a barrel here.
ally28 tweet media
English
1
1
3
338
Donald Benjamin
Donald Benjamin@donniebenjamin·
@davidfrum I agree that Trump has done serious damage to relations with European countries (tariffs, Greenland, Ukraine, etc). My question is this: why aren't European countries willing to help for the sake for their own good? Closure of the Strait of Hormuz hurts Europe more than the US.
English
29
1
6
4.7K
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
If you wonder why Europeans flinch from helping US in Gulf - in January, NATO allies were seriously preparing for a US sneak attack on Greenland, planning to blow up runways to prevent a Trump re-enactment of Putin's failed strike on Kyiv.
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
541
2K
8.2K
523.9K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@JamesGibson1138 @bmay Covid had a fatality rate of 0.02% for young people, so it made sense to question a vaccine with a 0.1% chance of causing pericarditis etc. Meningitis has a 10% fatality rate and the most severe side effect(anaphylaxis) occurs in 1 in 900000 cases(0.000111%) Apples and oranges.
English
0
0
0
244
James Gibson
James Gibson@JamesGibson1138·
@bmay Some people have an attack of the vapors when anyone has the temerity to question any vaccine. It is an indisputable fact that every vaccine ever produced has side effects. It is also an indisputable fact that some of those side effects can cause serious issues, including death
English
13
0
6
7.7K
Brendan May
Brendan May@bmay·
New level of fuckwittery unlocked.
Brendan May tweet media
English
495
535
5.2K
293.9K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@DullHargraves @Micronova2040 @demi_mighty @JChimirie66677 Rupert Lowe is as hardline a politician as you can get over here when it comes to immigration. He wants mass deportations. He doesn't like Starmer and he doesn't like Muslims. He doesn't want the UK involved either. Nobody cares about your 'test': x.com/RupertLowe10/s…
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10

I would vote against any British military intervention in Iran. I wish them well, I detest the regime. But it is not our fight, and we should have the courage to say so. Sanctions, pressure, whatever else. Fine. But no strikes, no troops, no shots. No war.

English
0
0
1
30
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@DullHargraves @Micronova2040 @demi_mighty @JChimirie66677 The Iraqis, Afghans, Syrians, Libyans were all going backas well. How did that turn out?🧐 Yanks don't get how deeply unpopular the Iraq War was and still is over here. Not having troops come back in body bags from the Middle East yet again, isn't a failure for a British PM.
English
1
0
0
25
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
Trump Has Just Told NATO Allies They Are On Their Own. Starmer Did This. Donald Trump has just posted the most consequential statement about the Western alliance since its foundation. NATO allies, he wrote, privately agreed that Iran could not be allowed a nuclear weapon but refused to help when asked. America no longer needs or desires their assistance. We never did. Let that land. This is not bluster. It is a doctrine. Trump is telling every European government that the Article 5 guarantee they have sheltered under for seventy years was always conditional, and that they have now demonstrated they will not honour their side of the arrangement when it matters. The mutual defence alliance that kept the peace in Europe since 1949 has just been publicly declared a one way street by the President of the United States. Every adversary watching, Russia, China, Iran, will draw the same conclusion simultaneously. Britain's fingerprints are all over this moment. Starmer blocked Diego Garcia. He needed a drone on his own runway to reverse the decision. He consulted his team on minesweepers. He watched France, Greece and Spain defend a British base while HMS Dragon sat in Portsmouth. He offered an aircraft carrier after the war was won and was told it was no longer wanted. He issued a joint humanitarian statement about Lebanon that did not mention Hezbollah once. At every stage of this crisis he chose the path of least domestic political resistance over the obligations of the oldest and most important bilateral relationship in British foreign policy. Trump's post also hands every adversary a strategic map. A Western alliance whose European members privately agree on the threat but publicly refuse to act against it is not an alliance. It is a talking shop with a defence clause nobody intends to honour. Putin will have read this post with considerable satisfaction. So will Beijing. The fracture that Starmer and his European counterparts have opened is not merely reputational. It is structural. And it will not be repaired by a press conference or a carefully worded statement about the special relationship being in operation. Churchill understood that alliances are maintained by behaviour not words. You show up or you do not. Britain did not show up. Trump has noticed. And he has said so, in capital letters, for the entire world to read. The consequences of Starmer's calculations are no longer theoretical. They are here, on Truth Social, signed by the President of the United States of America. "At every stage of this crisis [Starmer] chose the path of least domestic political resistance over the obligations of the oldest and most important bilateral relationship in British foreign policy."
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet mediaJim Chimirie 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
724
2.2K
5.8K
232.8K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@Micronova2040 @demi_mighty @DullHargraves @JChimirie66677 "Help us bomb yet another Middle East country so you can deal with even more Muslim immigrants & refugees our wars create" isn't the winning argument that Americans seem to think it is. Why do you guys keep on making it?
English
1
0
0
10
Micronova20440
Micronova20440@Micronova2040·
@demi_mighty @DullHargraves @JChimirie66677 Enjoy the prospect of converting to Pislam do you. Have fun with that. You were warned about the immigration/migration issue by your own citizens but you turned a blind eye and within two decades you will be a Muslime nation. Allahu Akbar, mate
English
2
0
1
41
Solo vino
Solo vino@followthetwee·
@Dr_da_Vinci @JChimirie66677 How is this misleading? The U.S. covers a disproportionately high share, especially for a single non-European country.
English
2
0
0
58
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@HLC_actual The EU gets about 3-4% of its oil through the Strait, a little more than the US at 2.5%. 90% goes to Asian countries. There is no upside to sending EU/UK troops & warships to a certain death in yet another Middle East conflict just so your president can insult them again.
ally28 tweet media
English
0
1
1
13
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@HLC_actual The overwhelming majority of terrorist attacks in Europe have come from Sunni/Salafi related groups - ISIS, Al'Quaeda, Taliban etc. The millions of refugees fleeing the Middle East courtesy of US bombing it didn't end up in the US, they went to Europe. Join the dots.
English
1
0
0
63
Habitual Linecrosser
Habitual Linecrosser@HLC_actual·
Maybe it’s because I’m American but I can’t understand these European countries. Yall have terror attacks and threats almost all of which come from Iran and when the US steps up to handle it the strait gets clogged and you don’t want to step in and help secure your national stability? Explain it to me. it’s just wild to see yall look at global stability and shipping as a spectator sport.
English
904
250
4.5K
143.2K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@AngryBritain @Keir_Starmer @UKLabour The UK doesn't even import oil through the Strait, the EU gets next to none that way, China, India & the other Asian countries who get 90% of it already have free passage. But you want Starmer to send British warships & troops to get blown up, just to impress the Americans.?🧐
English
0
0
3
28
AngryBritain.com
AngryBritain.com@AngryBritain·
So rather than send a couple of Royal Navy ships to the Strait of Hormuz to get oil flowing, @Keir_Starmer would rather ration your fuel and completely destroy what's left of Britain's fragile economy. That tells you everything you need to know about @UKLabour.
English
233
488
2.3K
36.1K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@Lena178159 @afneil Genuine question - how much do you think the US actually pays into NATO? Because it's not the $980 billion per year that's on that pie chart knocking around.
English
0
0
0
91
Lena
Lena@Lena178159·
@afneil The US needs to absolutely leave NATO. If it cannot get congressional approval then do not pay anything or reduce payment to Spain levels and let it implode. Remove sanctions from Russia, and let them do whatever they want with Europe. Let's play this game.
English
20
0
14
6.4K
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
You want the NATO allies to join you in a war you started without ever consulting these allies about the war or explaining your war aims. We’re meant just to meekly fall in line. You recently supported a US invasion of a NATO ally (Denmark/Greenland) but now you want these same allies to join your war. Your president disparaged and misrepresented the role of NATO allies in Afghanistan. But now you want them to join with you again in a war of your making. You went to war with Iran without a thought of how to keep the Strait of Hormuz open and without involving your allies in the matter. But now you want the NATO allies to bail you out, even though there’s still no plan for Hormuz. You want the NATO allies to join you in a war in which you still cannot articulate the endgame. Or what victory would look like. You went to war thinking the Iranian regime would quickly topple, that Tehran would not attack the Gulf States or close Hormuz. Why would we align with such Epic Stupidity? You and other know-nothing blowhards started this war all on your own. You can finish it on your own. If you’re able to …
Lindsey Graham@LindseyGrahamSC

Just spoke to @POTUS about our European allies’ unwillingness to provide assets to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning, which benefits Europe far more than America. I have never heard him so angry in my life. I share that anger given what’s at stake. The arrogance of our allies to suggest that Iran with a nuclear weapon is of little concern and that military action to stop the ayatollah from acquiring a nuclear bomb is our problem not theirs is beyond offensive. The European approach to containing the ayatollah’s nuclear ambitions have proven to be a miserable failure. The repercussions of providing little assistance to keep the Strait of Hormuz functioning are going to be wide and deep for Europe and America. I consider myself very forward-leaning on supporting alliances, however at a time of real testing like this, it makes me second guess the value of these alliances. I am certain I am not the only senator who feels this way.

English
980
2.6K
15.5K
1.3M
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@blingsabato @DingDong_doodle @PolitlcsUK I get the scepticism around Covid, but meningitis has a completely different risk profile when it comes to young people. It's got a 10-15% fatality rate versus Covid's 0.002% for people under 30, even with treatment. Different ball game entirely.
English
0
0
1
54
blingsabato
blingsabato@blingsabato·
@DingDong_doodle @PolitlcsUK My thoughts exactly. A convenient narrative for another vaccine rollout - “100% safe & effective,” of course, barring a shopping list of side effects, all for a disease that hardly constitutes a serious national risk.
English
6
0
9
7.5K
ally28 retweetledi
Politics UK
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK·
🚨 BREAKING: The UK Health Security Agency says MenB bacteria is the strain behind the meningitis outbreak in Kent Most teens are only vaccinated against MenACWY strains, not the MenB strain Only babies born after 2015 were offered the MenB vaccine on the NHS
English
153
857
8.6K
6M
Michael B. Currie
Michael B. Currie@MichaelBCurrie·
@HansMahncke @JasonBedrick Those most worrying thing is that the "allies" were not even willing to make a symbolic contribution. Even sending a small ship. It shows just how much domestic politics in these countries is now favorable to anti-American stances, like Carney's in Canada.
English
3
0
4
913
Hans Mahncke
Hans Mahncke@HansMahncke·
This is a great example of the failure of credentialism. Random people have to explain basic political science to a so-called “Professor of Political Science.” The Strait of Hormuz issue is the perfect “allies” test. The United States has very little direct interest in the strait, as almost none of its ships or energy flows pass through there. So before the United States starts doing all the heavy lifting, it is the ideal moment to ask those who actually benefit from the strait being open what they are willing to contribute. The fact that they all said nothing is proof of what Trump has been saying all along, that supposed “allies” are really just freeloaders. So this was never about whether the Europeans could actually help with a handful of dilapidated frigates. It was a test, and they all failed.
Michael McFaul@McFaul

The United States has the greatest navy in the world. Not really sure why Trump is begging for help to execute his war in the Strait of Hormuz. Can someone explain this to me?

English
870
2.5K
12.3K
535.7K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@HansMahncke It's not the 'perfect allies' test, because the EU imports only a fraction more through the Strait than the US does(3.8% versus 2.5%) and the UK imports none that way. 90% of those oil shipments go to Asian countries and China/India currently have free passage anyway.
ally28 tweet media
English
1
0
0
170
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@mj_yorks @KemiBadenoch @christopherhope European nations only import 3.8% of their oil via the Strait, the UK gets none from there, and China/India etc already have access. No-one's asking the US to do anything other than to stop bombing the sh*t out of the Middle East (yet again).
ally28 tweet media
English
0
0
0
286
Kemi Badenoch
Kemi Badenoch@KemiBadenoch·
I’m Keir Starmer’s biggest critic, but the war of words coming from the White House is childish.
English
1K
447
3.8K
828K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@QeenKGino @RidgeandFrost @SophyRidgeSky @Dan4Barnet The UK doesn't import oil through the Strait, and Europe gets less than 4% that route, so why is Trump expecting EU/British warships to protect China & India bound oil tankers, that Iran are already allowing through anyway?
ally28 tweet media
English
0
0
0
34
Gino
Gino@QeenKGino·
What 😂 This isn't about joining a war or being dragged into a war this is about defending our national interests, Trump's called on the countries who depend on the Strait & i'm sure our dithering fool of a PM with regret this when he has to deal with the consequences of abandoning our single biggest ally on the planet, the one who we depend on for intelligence, trade & more.
English
6
15
137
3.2K
Ridge & Frost
Ridge & Frost@RidgeandFrost·
'Why does the UK govt think it is not the right thing to send ships to the Strait of Hormuz?' @SophyRidgeSky 'It is dangerous...PM has been putting the national interest, but the safety of British people in the Middle East as well as in the UK, first.' @Dan4Barnet
English
267
35
112
318.7K
ally28
ally28@allyv28·
@Sheepdog1266281 @AspieJames @Amockx2022 90% of the oil shipped through the Strait goes to Asian countries, and the most reliant of them(China & India) are still getting their ships through, with the rest making deals. 3.8% goes to Europe (versus 2.5% to the US). And you think Trump holds the cards here?
ally28 tweet media
English
0
0
3
91
Sheepdog1234
Sheepdog1234@Sheepdog1266281·
@AspieJames @Amockx2022 You do realize that Europe is highly dependent on that oil 😂 to bring yall to your knees, all Trump has to do is not fight to open the Straight. He’s giving yall one last chance to prove you’re worth a 💩 as Allie’s and yet again, you fail
English
6
0
6
655
Amock_
Amock_@Amockx2022·
BREAKING : UK 🇬🇧 Prime Minister Kier Starmer refused to support US-Israel despite threats from Trump "We are not going to be drawn into wider war. My priority is British interest so i want war to be ended" 🔥 First Spain and Italy, now UK showing spine to the world. RESPECT 🫡
English
1.4K
4.9K
30.6K
1.3M