Brevy Spett
5.3K posts

Brevy Spett
@americanminivan
Christian, Dad, Biblical Unitarian, American Worker, Filet-O-Fish Nationalist
Katılım Nisan 2022
735 Takip Edilen313 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet

@IFindTheLost @americanminivan "The Jews answered him, We have a law, and by our law he ought to die, because he made himself the Son of God." -- John 19:7
English

@americanminivan He is speaking of God the Father as the God-man Jesus as our federal head and example of man perfectly submitting to God.
English

@bobmcnap Doesn’t Jesus pray for those who were given to him that they would all be one “even as we are one”? (John 17) Weird. I wonder if that means we’re all one person 🤔
English

@Lainezor Doesn’t Jesus pray that we would be one just as he and God are one? Does that mean we’re all the exact same person?
English

@americanminivan Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.
1 John 2 : 23
English

@xenovigor It’s a great section with a clear distinction between God and Jesus. Verse 28 esp because it basically says “God put everything under Jesus obviously excluding Himself”.
English

No. It obviously does matter that you believe in the correct Jesus as defined by the whole counsel of the Bible. My argument is that the Trinity is not preached nor found in the volume of the Word.
DK@darknytPB
So, since Jesus is the object of saving faith, one may believe in “Jesus” and be “saved,” regardless if he is the adopted son from Mary of Unitarianism, or the prophet of Islam, or the archangel Michael/the first creation of Jehovah of the WTBTS, or the spirit child of Elohim of the LDS, or the misunderstood Nazarene of secularism - it really doesn’t matter, right?
English

@ThomBradley8 So when I read “God” in the gospels, I should think of the Father alone? What of the epistles? When I read “God” there, should I be thinking three-in-one?
English

@americanminivan The father alone. Jesus and the father are consubstantial, one in being with the other. The father is God the son is God the holy spirit is God. Three persons, one being.
English

@SawtelleAn5682 @americanminivan That word didn't exist 2000 years ago, or maybe Jesus would have used it. He called a lot of people a lot of names.
Stop being a wilting flower. It's a perfectly excellent word.
And no, retarded people don't need people like you standing up for them.
English

@DJ_truth_seeker You just committed a heckin’ heresy, dude.
English

@americanminivan Yes. 💯 wonderful, counselor, mighty God, everlasting Father, Prince of peace. All refer to one and the same or in this case the trinity. Father, Son and Holy Spirit. All written by Isaiah before Christ’s birth. Who is the King of Kings? Prince of Peace? Everlasting Father? Duh
English

@MrEncouragement Errrmmm ackshually the whole thing is correct
English

@americanminivan The sentence is correct. You go off the rails after that period. Everything else in that second sentence is factually incorrect.
English

@LetsDiscuss2024 @americanminivan Yeah, 325 it was devised, and 381 CE, 4th century, it was finalized.
Like almost everything in Christianity, it's just made up stuff.
English

@DJ_truth_seeker *9:6 . And what’s your point? Do you believe this verse calls Jesus the Everlasting Father? Does Trinitarianism say that Jesus is the Father?
English

@LetsDiscuss2024 Have you checked other translations for verse 7?
English

@americanminivan W R O N G
1Jo 5:7-8
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
English

@LetsDiscuss2024 @SawtelleAn5682 Why is the second part of verse 7 omitted in modern translations?
English

@SawtelleAn5682 @americanminivan First century, in the BIBLE
1 John 5:7-8
For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.
English

You’ve conceded my point, making your earlier claim errant. For, ‘the Bible does give a pattern for salvation (John 14:6) which one must believe if one is to be saved.’ You’ve conceded an Islamic Jesus, or a Watchtower Christ, and so on, can’t save you.
So, your implicit claim is the Unitarian model for Jesus is required in contrast to the Trinitarian worldview, revealed in the Person of Jesus Christ and the coming of the Holy Spirit.
That you are not persuaded by the Christian evidence for our claim is irrelevant to the reality that a biblical Jesus is required for rescue from condemnation (Jn 8:24). Hence, it is our contention you have embraced an αντικριστός, which brings not grace, but the biblical anathema. Get Jesus wrong and you will die in your sins.
English

@americanminivan "Baptize in the name of the Father, The Son and the Holy Spirit" do not teach falseness, repent of this now.
English












