abraxas
351 posts
@amheredom
militant unionist we will always love you
From a first principles point of view, why should a group of employees be able to hold their employer to ransom? Why should they be able to force negotiations, entrenching their position as employees over that of people who might want to work for the employer on the terms that the employer is offering? Why do we forbid the employer hiring people who might accept their terms or pay? Why do we force the employer to keep on staff who have refused new offered terms of work, and who walk out over those terms? Why do we entrench incumbents and kneecap efficiency in the process?
Two nights in San Francisco 🎥 Johann Rashid
WATCH: Massive warehouse fire in Compton, California
Young voters, except men ages 18-22, swing towards Democrats
