ana

My bounty is as boundless as the sea, My love as deep; the more I give to thee, The more I have, for both are infinite.

Drake vs Michael Jackson isn’t a social media created argument —it’s actually a conversation intentionally created by his own propaganda and PR teams to get his name attached to MJ. Social media participates in it —but it wasn’t created here.

Every person you meet is a frequency test. If they drain you, you've outgrown their dimension. If they expand you, they mirror your next level.

don’t use ai to write. use childhood trauma like a real poet.

Niggas fighting against Michael Jackson ghost and losing.

You know who this generation’s Michael Jackson is? It’s Michael Jackson.

Gracias. A todos los que leéis, compartís, citáis, corregís, debatís y suscribís. La acogida del proyecto en estos meses ha sido muy por encima de lo que esperaba, y el agradecimiento es justo y necesario. A los que estáis desde hace años y a los que habéis llegado en las últimas semanas, por igual. Sobre lo que viene. La dinámica del proyecto se consolida así. Serie temática semanal de siete capítulos publicados en X a lo largo de la semana, cada uno como pieza autónoma sobre un aspecto del tema. Al cerrar la serie, un artículo largo en Patreon y a partir de mañana también aquí, ahora que tengo acceso a los artículos de X, que unifica, amplía y profundiza los siete capítulos con bibliografía completa, datos adicionales y desarrollos que no caben en el formato corto. Tengo listos los dos primeros sobre las series ya compartidas: Dragones de Cuera y las "razas" malditas de España. Las siguientes en preparación, los visigodos, Mujeres en la historia de España y Samuráis cristianos. Hay un hito más previsto para otoño. La reactivación del canal de YouTube, en paralelo a las publicaciones de aquí. Un vídeo largo por cada artículo de Patreon y un formato corto por cada publicación temática. Mismo rigor, mismo enfoque y otro soporte que entiendo que a muchos os entre mejor. Y al margen de las series, seguirán las publicaciones sueltas de circunstancias, efemérides, polémicas, reseñas, contenido regional, lo que pida cada momento. La idea es generar un espacio de contenido riguroso pero accesible a todo el mundo en X que complemente el proyecto de Youtube y no usar esto solo como lanzadera que es lo que hace la mayoría. Aquí tendréis todo el contenido menos los vídeos largos que tendréis que ver en Youtube por motivos de formato. Seguimos. 🫡🫡

@whatisaging Its pretty wild. And yet we keep talking to ourselves like words, intention, energy etc doesn't matter 😭

@anaca78 That's really cool, I didn't know words would do it too. This one uses touch, basically she holds the bottle and focuses awareness into it. I'll try these experiments too.

We can't fly, but maybe we can stop entropy. A "rejuvenation" superpower. This lady claims that energy healing stopped her rice from going moldy. After 1 month, the healed rice stayed fresh. The other rice changed color, got moldy, and fermented. Here's 10 days: 🧐

@PROMAKOS_ Gracias a ti por el esfuerzo, la pasión y el rigor. 145 verbal IQ legend. Also hot (respectfully).1

I hope I wasn't just preemptively banned because they're planning to fake another pandemic and they're silencing the few who called out COVID. I was about to republish my song "Pandemic Dance" on the day YouTube removed my channel. They can't let the public find out it's theater.

Hellas/Greece and the Hellenes gave us everything. Culture, language, myths, architecture, art, knowledge, and laid the foundation for Western civilization. They deserve better. Shame on Nolan.

Henry Nowak was 18 years old. A first year accountancy and finance student at the University of Southampton, walking home from a night out with his football team on December 3rd, 2025. On Belmont Road he was met by a 23 year old named Vickrum Digwa, carrying a 21cm ceremonial blade across his chest. Digwa stabbed him four times. One wound went eight centimeters into his lung. Henry climbed over a fence trying to escape. There was already a blood trail on the street behind him. When police arrived, Digwa told them he had been racially abused. Henry told them he had been stabbed. He told them he could not breathe. The officer told Henry he was under arrest on suspicion of assault. Henry repeated that he had been stabbed. A voice on the body cam replied, "I don't think you have, mate." Henry drowned in his own blood on Belmont Road in handcuffs. By the time CPR began his lungs were already full. A doctor flew in by helicopter. There was nothing left to do. The knife was at the killer's mother's house. She had walked it home. Henry's phone, the one he had filmed the whole encounter on, was in Digwa's pocket. All of this came out in Southampton Crown Court last week. The bodycam was played to the jury. This is sworn testimony in a live murder trial. A teenager was killed by a man who then told the police the teenager was the racist. The police arrested the boy who was bleeding out instead of the man who had been carrying the blade. Whatever you believe about institutions, that is what happened on that street. Henry Nowak. Remember the name.

@BongsMahlangu_ In rooms where image is god, truth is heresy. And the one who speaks it gets crucified quietly, socially, completely.

If the Israeli casino lady can just buy the seats in your government- you don’t have a government- you belong to the Israeli casino lady.

Once you reach a certain level of consciousness it becomes impossible to tolerate working a job. It requires a deliberate self-numbing to endure the nonsense, performance, and office politics required to keep it. Your first taste of freedom will make you unemployable.

When the co-host of The View suggested Greeks plagiarized their entire culture from Africans, she cited the Jewish author, Martin Bernal, and his dubious, discredited, and rejected book of historical vandalism, Black Athena. This purely fictional work continues to maintain relevancy solely on the strength of anti-White activists and commie Jews trying to deconstruct and destroy the identities of White people under the guise of "anti-racism." Of course, Bernal called the multitude of anthropologists, classicists, linguists, historians, and scholars "anti-Semitic" for refuting his book, reality be damned. Homer's epics functioned as a mirror of Greek culture. They featured the same gods, sacrificial rituals, laws, traditions, and political realities already present in Greek culture. They were not "fairy tales" insofar as almost everything presented in these stories were genuinely held beliefs of Ancient Greeks - e.g. existence of Zeus, Poseidon, and even Cyclopes. They were as much of a fairy tale to Ancient Greeks as Jesus is to Christians. Fiction is not the same as "fairy tale," and those referring to these epics as fairy tales are doing so cynically to shoehorn in the biggest fairy tale of all: that Helen was African. Homer described Helen as "white-armed" with "fair hair" in The Iliad. This is simply not a description of a sub-Saharan African. To suggest otherwise is delusional. Greeks were not Africans and held a self-conception of "Greekness" on the basis of shared blood, shared language, shared religion, and shared customs – all transcribed by Herodotus in his book, Histories. This is not up for debate or interpretation. If someone stood in Ancient Greece and didn't check all of these boxes, they were considered a foreigner and had no political rights. This is why Adolf Hitler called the Greeks the first volkisch people.

You know, it's bad enough being erased out of your own homeland, but being written out of your own history and myth is an insult and crime beyond measure, something perhaps never attempted before in history.

The weakest part of this article is that it treats every objection to casting as bigotry before it deals with the actual question. A serious reader can reject racist or cruel attacks on actors and still ask whether a modern adaptation is being faithful to the world it claims to inherit. That question does not disappear because The Odyssey contains gods, monsters, ghosts, and mythic creatures. Myth is not a free for all. Homer’s world has ancestry, geography, lineage, beauty standards, family honor, sacred memory, and cultural identity built into it. Calling Achilles and Helen fictional does not settle the question. Fictional characters can still carry centuries of meaning. Achilles is bound to Greek heroic culture and glory. Helen is bound to beauty, desire, war, and the memory of Troy. A serious adaptation can reinterpret them, but it has to show artistic judgment. They were fictional is an escape from the argument. The whole point of adaptation is judgment. What do you preserve? What do you change? What do your changes reveal about the age making the film? The article also plays a dishonest game with Troy. Yes, Troy changed Homer for the reasons mentioned in the article. That does not prove every new change is automatically wise. One bad adaptation does not become a license for another. If anything, Troy proves the opposite. When filmmakers strip ancient stories of their religious, moral, and cultural structure, they make the myth smaller. The Oscar argument is also too perfect. The Academy rules may not require diverse casting in every film, but Hollywood plainly rewards certain ideological signals. A film can meet those rules through crew, training programs, or studio leadership, but that does not erase the wider pressure on prestige filmmakers to make ancient stories fit modern representation politics. The most revealing part is the tone. The article spends more energy mocking critics, Elon Musk, Kevin Sorbo, and Twitter trolls than explaining why these casting choices serve Homer’s story. That is usually a sign the argument is weak. If the casting is artistically strong, defend it on artistic grounds. Show how it deepens the myth. Show how it clarifies Achilles, Helen, Odysseus, Ithaca, longing, glory, grief, and homecoming. Ancient stories survive because people return to them with reverence and imagination. That is the real issue. Modern Hollywood often treats inheritance as raw material for its own moral performance. Then, when people notice, it calls them backward for caring about the thing being inherited.