Noun

@doctor_rahmeh Al Jazeera is hardly independent. For a supposedly intelligent person you’re pretty stupid aren’t you?

They don't like 'independent' journalism.

@PhilipProudfoot Don’t be a “Richard” we know exactly why you’re posting it, bigot..!!!

Just posting this again, for no particular reason

‘Why the apartheid?’ Maybe because Jews are becoming if not have become Britain’s #1 target for religious hate crimes. Bigots like those who just torched these Hatzolah ambulances prove exactly why self-reliance is necessary. Also, Hatzolah & Shomrim = privately-funded volunteer charities (your NHS taxes untouched), lightning-fast response in tight Orthodox communities that value modesty and speed, treating anyone who calls, Jewish or not. That’s the official policy. They do it in 15 countries because history (and people like you) taught them not to depend on hostile majorities. The US ‘non-Jews died’ smear? Tired antisemitic fiction from a distorted 30-year-old Crown Heights incident; not policy, not repeated, debunked endlessly. Self-defence isn’t ‘apartheid’. Your obsessive conspiracy about Jews protecting Jews is. Facts don’t care about your suspension-worthy bigotry.

Jews are the only group who operate their own ambulances (hatzola) and police (shomrim) in Britain. They do this in 14 other countries, mostly European. In the US, Hatzola has been accused of tending to jews while non-jews have died at the same scene. Why the apartheid?

@Patrickqz3 @CraigMurrayOrg I didn’t need to share anything new Statement made with no evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. Have a great day. 😊

@anaspeptic @CraigMurrayOrg What were the facts? You didn’t share anything new

Could they make the false flag any more obvious? There is only one entity I have ever heard of which routinely and deliberately destroys ambulances - the state of Israel.

@BenSmit49787810 @CraigMurrayOrg Oh dear Ben, 1. You assume too much 2. You don’t read too well Hope you get the help you need

@anaspeptic @CraigMurrayOrg Yo zio Noun? You claim Israel doesn’t attack or murder ambulance crew members or destroy hospitals and health facilities here is that undeniable evidence truth fact based on actual evidence caught on camera of the Israeli committing those atrocities!

You’re perfectly happy when the UK government rolls out a selective, non-statutory definition of ‘anti-Muslim hostility’, created exclusively for your religion just last week. But when someone calls out Trafalgar Square not being turned into an open-air mosque for mass Iftar prayers, suddenly it’s ‘dog-whistle politics’? The hypocrisy is deafening.

I noticed you dodged the question about whether you would support the banning of Jewish and Christian events at Trafalgar Square! So perhaps you would like to clarify? Yes to all banning or does it apply to only one faith?

Spare us the fake selective outrage. You’ve spent years simping for the Iranian regime that bankrolled Hamas’s Oct 7 massacre, then cry “genocide” when Israel fights back, and “illegal war” when the US uses their bases in the UK (unconfirmed by your pretty video) to take military action against those who arm every jihadist proxy from Gaza to Yemen. Same selective script: zero tears for the women they stone and hang for “improper hijab,” gays executed from cranes, protesters gunned down by the thousands, or Assad’s half-million dead Syrians with Iranian Quds Force boots and missiles all over them. Your “anti-imperialism” only activates when the West or Jews attempt to deal with the Tehran tyrants? Hollow, predictable, fraudulent. Your narrative just got bodied.

After aiding Israel's genocide in Gaza, Keir Starmer is now aiding the illegal war on Iran.

@crypstonk @tumblinfields @Lowkey0nline The US doesn’t need parliamentary approval 🤔

@tumblinfields @Lowkey0nline Parliamentary approval?

@ZackPolanski No Zack, they’re in a relay race and the bombs are the baton. 👍

Trump has just held up a model of a B2 fighter plane and declared these are dropping the biggest bombs on Iran you’ll ever see. B2s are reportedly taking off from British bases. Keir Starmer must answer my simple question. Are these planes attacking Iran?

Oh Jonesy, Still hawking that worn-out leftist spin? Give it a rest. “Death to the IDF” fuels calls to kill troops shielding against Hamas savagery. The IDF isn’t genocidal, it’s eliminating militants cowering behind civilians. True genocide? Hamas’s Oct. 7 slaughter of 1,200 Israelis and yet you still dont call it out. #Idiot

The problem isn't the chant 'Death to the IDF'. The problem is the IDF committing genocide against the Palestinian people.

@SholaMos1 Here we have Shola with another balanced view. At least she does have a chip on each shoulder. You can have one, but not both Shola, keep up with the programme you educated fool.

Islamophobia & anti-muslim hate is far worse & rampart in Britain than antisemitism. Attempted murder of this young British muslim woman is on Nigel Farage, Tommy Robinson, Keir Starmer, Rupert Lowe, etc who weaponise Muslims & Islam for political fodder. There is a concerted campaign against British Muslims at every level by Politicians, Institutions, White Nationalists & Zionists.

@DillyHussain88 Does silly Dilly have evidence? If not, it can be dismissed without evidence.

“MOSQUE THUGS” ATTACK “PEACEFUL HINDUS” DURING HOLI IN HARROW What actually happened: Foreign national Indian Hindus threw red and orange dye at passing Muslim women leaving the mosque, and then got their arses kicked by the sons and brothers of the women. London is not Bihar.

Let’s break it down then: 1. Muslim voices on the war are treated not as participants in debate but as suspects within it. What are you suggesting? Are you suggesting a systemic bias where instead of engaging ideas on merit, your identity seeks to turn the conversation into a security or loyalty check? Maybe you’re implying that forums like media, politics, or social platforms frame these voices as potential threats rather than equals? Maybe ask you to give specific examples of times when your views on the Middle East were dismissed as suspicious rather than debated on facts, say, in interviews, council meetings, or online? 2. Our motives are interrogated.
 So what are you pointing to here, a scrutiny that goes beyond the argument itself, probing why a Muslim might hold certain views (e.g., anti-war stances) as if they’re driven by hidden agendas rather than principle or evidence? 
What do you see as your primary motives for speaking out on these wars, solidarity with civilians, religious duty, or something else and how have they been unfairly twisted? 3. Our loyalties are questioned.
 Are you tapping into a clumsy common trope here where Muslims are asked to “prove” allegiance, pitting national identity against global or faith-based ties, as if they can’t coexist? So what are your loyalties, where do they lie, what, as an MP do you list as the duties and priorities of an MP in the UK parliament? 4. Our words are interpreted through a presumption of bad faith.
 What does this mean, does it start from an assumption of deceit or malice, reading statements in the worst possible light instead of charitably, which poisons open dialogue? 
I mean, if we shouldn’t assume bad faith, how would you prefer your statements (like those on Gaza or Israel) to be interpreted, purely as calls for peace, or with some acknowledgment of the complexities involved? Come on Mothin, let’s open the debate for clarity, honesty and integrity.

Muslim voices speaking about war in the Middle East are treated not as participants in democratic debate but as suspects within it. Our motives are interrogated, our loyalties questioned, and our words interpreted through a presumption of bad faith. thenational.scot/politics/25917…

Oh dear… Who and how many were polled? What were their age groups, gender, race, ethnicity, income, education, location, political bias, what newspapers do they read, where do they get their information, what do they have for lunch? You and others thrive on the three levels of untruth don’t you; lies, damned lies and statistics [Various]

The vast majority of British people oppose Netanyahu and Trumps war on Iran

@ThePosieParker @Polytikles I was probably going to be less eloquent.

@Polytikles What a cunt.

@tetanusrot @AdinHaykin1 @amnesty @hrw @UNHumanRights @UKParliament @EUCouncil And there you have it.. If the arguments are unreliable here, then it can be assumed that your mention of other allegations being thrown around like confetti are unreliable there Who knew…

@AdinHaykin1 @amnesty @hrw @UNHumanRights @UKParliament @EUCouncil oh so now the UN is a reliable source, but its "antisemitism" when we point out the UN calling it a genocide? amazing.

"Palestinians raped" (@amnesty) "Palestinians raped" (@hrw) "Palestinians raped" (@UNHumanRights) "Palestinians raped" (Dinah Project) "Palestinians raped"(@UKParliament) "Palestinians raped" (ICC) "Palestinians raped" (@EUCouncil) "Palestinians raped" (ARCCI) "Palestinians raped" (@PHRIsrael) "My friends in Hamas said they didn't" (@aaronjmate)

@zarahsultana So says, Zarah Sultana (MP), “Moaning Puppet” for Coventry South.

Keir Starmer is gaslighting the country. The UK has followed the US into an illegal war against Iran.

@richimedhurst Hey Dick, Been a while QQ: You did read the Hamas version of the FIBUA playbook didn’t you? @Mr_Andrew_Fox, Maybe you can help Dick out on this one…

Notice how Iran and Hezbollah are constantly hitting military/strategic targets -- whereas you have no idea what the Americans and Israelis are hitting. Completely random, mass-murder.

@nicolelampert You know that “MP” when referring to Zarah Sultana means “Moaning Puppet,” don’t you?

This woman is a sitting MP spouting the modern iteration of the blood libel. Jews do not love to kill kids. Israelis do not love to kill kids. I don’t think anyone wants a single kid killed. Our story is one of loving life and loving humanity but often people want to kill us, forcing us to fight them to protect ourselves. @CommonsSpeaker @holland_tom @simonmontefiore