Andor

@XFreeze @elonmusk Boring

Grok Imagine image and video generation are truly incredible The realism is insanely good to the point where it starts blurring the line between AI generation and reality

@BrilynHollyhand Didn't Trump brag he grabs women by the pussy?

First Lady Melania Trump: “What [my husband] wants is for everyone to be able to walk down the street without being harassed or killed, and for women not to be assaulted.” Michelle wishes she was as great a First Lady as Melania. Now we just need to deport all illegals!

@glennbeck Awful. And islamists should not copy Maga. Remember when Trump's Jan 6 crowd put up gallows to hang the Vice President?

Canada is lost.

@JackPosobiec Pray for Charlie. During his life he spread so much hate, hell is a terrible place. Pray God may have mercy on his troubled soul.

He didn’t die in the military, but he did die for his country

@WhiteHouse A Commander in Chief who dodged the draft, and calls the brave "stupid". Sad.

Home of the free because of the brave. 🇺🇸

@MrJohnJnr Except if you are Russia. Or Belarus. Those Trump loves, never mind they not only chant Death to America, they also help our enemies target and kill our troops.

🚨 ALERT: The Trump-Vance administration has dropped a bombshell on America’s enemies, announced that “No more taxpayer dollars for hostile nations that hate America. If you vote against us at the UN, chant ‘Death to America,’or fund anti-American NGOs, you’re cut off. Period.” FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING

@mehdirhasan @MalcolmNance Shame on Musk, shame on Trump, and shame on their enablers.

@mikepompeo Russia is America's enemy. Brave Ukrainians weaken that enemy. Europe pays. American defense industry profits. Never before did we get so much effect for so little money. Not helping Ukraine would be plain stupid.

Putin’s attack - including a hypersonic missile - was designed to terrorize and kill civilians. Pure evil. Now, even with its advance stopped, Moscow’s desire to invade Europe remains. Deterrence requires the West to impose costs on Russian military and dual use infrastructure. The people and leaders of Ukraine are defending their nation’s sovereignty.  All of Europe should support them, and American sovereignty benefits from Ukrainian security and victory as well.

@sarobertson_ Indeed, Pete Hoekstra, why does the President do everything he can to get the Canadian public to rally against America?

Pete Hoekstra: You've got folks who are doing everything they can to get the Canadian public to rally against America. Just doesn't make any sense. Radio-Canada: But do you understand where that frustration is coming from? Hoekstra: Absolutely, no.

@elonmusk @magattew Elon, you appear to be rather ignorant? Or do you just spread lies for fun?

@magattew With rare exceptions, the countries colonized by Europe were actually unprofitable. More was spent on building up their infrastructure and creating cities than was earned from exports.

Walter Rodney was wrong. Africans are poor because too many African countries make it hard to start businesses, get permits, access reliable electricity, trade freely, protect property, enforce contracts, attract investment, and keep the rewards of hard work. Singapore is richer than Britain, its former colonizer. Switzerland, which never built a colonial empire, is richer than Spain and Portugal, two of the greatest imperial powers in history.

@KatieMiller Britain is a lot safer than the USA, Katie. And if you are concerned about young girls, ask your husband to get some distance between your family and Trump.

Britain is importing future voters and forever sanctioning the brutality of these migrants on their women and girls.

@SenLummis Sadly, Trump tore up the Iran deal of President Obama, which had given the US much better terms than the "deal" Trump now negotiates. And Trump's failed war has cost the American taxpayer 40 billion dollars. Such a failure!

@DAGToddBlanche @CNN It is very concerning to see the President's former personal lawyer apparently abusing his new position to act as the President's personal lawyer in his job as DAG.

Dear @CNN- DOJ ethics rules around recusal are black and white, and rest assured, I’m fully compliant. When reckless reporting relies on the faulty word of disgruntled former employees, it is a disservice to the public. Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to, yet again, correct your reporting.

@DAGToddBlanche Why does the President's former personal lawyer nit prosecute those who attacked federal officers on Jan 6?

We are grateful to the first responders and community members who courageously came to the aid of those attacked. The FBI, ATF, and the U.S. Attorney’s Office are working with local law enforcement partners to fully investigate the circumstances around this horrific and senseless attack on a religious institution.

@shopatvalcero Horrible

Surprise your loved ones with our customizable gift box! Shop Now.

@nicksortor Abusing our allies again? Is that why they let us have Landstuhl and Ramstein base? They even take our Ebola patients, and the President says they are of no help?

🚨 BREAKING: The Trump admin has CONFIRMED an American has tested POSITIVE for Ebola, but they will NOT be brought back to the US They will be treated in GERMANY The CDC also confirmed they implemented a TRAVEL BAN on foreigners who've passed through Uganda, Congo, and South Sudan.

@RepDonBacon Trump has taught them that a nuclear weapon must be the ultimate goal. Look how Trump treats North Korea compared to other rogue states.

These guys need some more humbling. They’re not negotiating in good faith and will become a dangerous threat again in a few years. They’re hellbent on getting a nuclear weapon so they can hold the world captive.

@elonmusk @ProfRobAnderson Too many businessmen today are actually political activists pretending to be entrepreneurs.

@ProfRobAnderson Too many judges these days are actually activists pretending to be jurists

Today there is concerning new evidence of bias in the Delaware Chancellor's handling of Elon Musk's cases in the Chancery Court. Again, the evidence is a LinkedIn "reaction" by Chancellor McCormick to a post about a case involving Musk. This time is different, however, because it involved a case the Chancellor herself was actively presiding over at the time of the reaction--the $55 billion Musk compensation case. By way of background, you may remember the recent incident where Chancellor McCormick's LinkedIn account "supported" a derogatory post about Musk's loss in a California case. After Musk's attorneys moved for recusal, the Chancellor blamed "suspicious activity" for the LinkedIn reaction and said she did not "support" the post. However, the Chancellor reassigned the Musk cases anyway. The Chancellor has never disclosed what, if anything, was resulted from the "suspicious activity" report she said she filed with LinkedIn. Unfortunately, it turns out the "support" reaction to a derogatory post about Musk wasn't even close to the most problematic of Chancellor McCormick's reactions on LinkedIn. And if this had been known at the time, it is likely that McCormick would have needed to recuse or reassign the Musk cases. Two years ago, after Chancellor McCormick handed down her $55 billion decision against Musk, the BLBG law firm that litigated the matter against Musk posted about the win McCormick handed them in the case. They boasted about their "recent victory in the headline-grabbing case against Tesla, a historic decision that nullified CEO Elon Musk's $55.8 billion compensation package." Chancellor McCormick reacted to the plaintiffs' lawyers post with the "celebration" reaction, as shown in the screenshot. Just to be clear, this "celebration" was in reaction to a post about the victory of the plaintiffs' lawyers regarding the case the Chancellor herself decided. She "celebrated" a post by one side about her own decision in a case. More disturbingly, the case was not even over. Chancellor McCormick was still presiding over this case for the attorneys' fees and ratification stages. She later awarded these very plaintiffs' lawyers $345 million in fees and rejected Tesla's shareholder ratification. The case was later reversed by the Delaware Supreme Court and the fee was slashed. In light of this additional evidence, Chancellor McCormick's "suspicious activity" explanation for her "support" reaction on a derogatory Musk post seems less credible. We now know that Chancellor McCormick has a record of "celebrating" anti-Musk posts, in this situation in a case she was actively presiding over. One might also question whether she operates her LinkedIn account in a deceptive way. The account is clearly operated as a professional account (almost all the posts and reactions relate to the Chancery Court or Delaware practitioners), yet the Chancellor lists her name as "Katie M.", and her occupation as "Delawarean." This makes it difficult for the public to find and scrutinize the account. Although these are open secrets in Delaware, it seems this is her way of communicating support for favored constituencies. I'm sure everyone will draw their own conclusions from this based on their priors. I personally think it is time for the Delaware legislature or Supreme Court to take action. Every time the Chancellor does something like this, businesses lose confidence in Delaware's courts.

@elonmusk No Elon, we do not want hate crimes. Whether online or not.

Free the political prisoners in Britain!

@elonmusk Jan 6

The left is the party of violence