Mr. Linton

Wes Streeting wants to run Britain, and I think he may be even more dangerous than Starmer. I’ve been doing some research, and here’s what I’ve discovered about Streeting's background and his links to Morgan McSweeney…🧵

@Neets21 @SkyNews He did know. Front page of The Independent last September.

I see @SkyNews are still going with Starmer should resign 🙄 You said he knew. He didn’t You said he lied. He didn’t Move the fuck on, stop this relentless attacking of the PM and maybe start reporting with some integrity, for a change. #ScumMedia #Starmer #Mandelson

And no-one seems to have answered the very pertinent question: What was it about a twice-disgraced, paedophile-adjacent, self-styled Prince of Darkness than made him so attractive to Starmer to be US Ambassador?

.@TalkTV The PM’s office say they found out about Mandy’s vetting failure last Tuesday. But David Maddox of the Independent told them last September, and indeed ran a front page splash. So that’s a lie, then; but one no-one seems to be focussing on. 1/2

@TRobinsonNewEra I assume she didn’t get an answer to that very pertinent question?

NI MP Sorcha Eastwood hits two tier Keir in Parliament: "What was it about the twice disgraced paedophile adjacent self styled prince of darkness that you found so attractive to put into this job?"

@AlastairMorgan Er, yes!

Can you ever imagine Boris Johnson or Nigel Farage being subjected to the vicious media savaging that the PM has just been subjected to?

@jonsopel @LoftusSteve What was he actually fired for?

I have listened to Sir Olly Robbins evidence for last hour and forty minutes and am seeing the very best of the civil service. I am left incredulous that the decision was made to fire him. Has there been a more egregious and shameful decision by a political master desperate to save his own skin?

@SandyofSuffolk Yes. There must be stuff. Otherwise why was Starmer so intent on appointing him, as soon as possible. It’s an important question no-one is asking.

So the big question is: What did Mandelson have on Starmer to make Starmer so determined to appoint him come what may?

@crypto_dragonz @benonwine Can I have two, please?

Only 1 word please 👇👇👇

@Jenny_1884 You’re right.

I’ve gone back to drinking full fat milk, use real butter & lard because I think we were wrongly advised these products were bad for you when in fact they aren’t. Have others changed back?

So this is going to be very interesting. Next week, these three Ukrainian men will go to court in London. They are charged with arson against properties owned by Keir Starmer, including his home. There is an injunction in place - the media will not be discussing the case. The men are Petro Pochynok, Roman Lavrynovych and Stanislav Carpiuc. The rather strong rumour is that Starmer is bi-sexual and this was personal. I wonder how many of the details will be released following the hearing.

🚨HUGE: Olly Robbins is going to reveal tomorrow that Keir Starmer "pressured" the Foreign Office to approve Peter Mandelson. Another absolute bombshell that contradicts EVERYTHING Keir Starmer said. He's NOT going to hold back and it's going to be "Box Office". GLORIOUS! 🔥

@JenniferJS_ @Keir_Starmer They’ve spent a week working out what he should say, and he read it quite well. But when questioned, he fell apart and stammered and stuttered. Obviously lying.

Brilliant speech from @Keir_Starmer which, I have no doubt, will be twisted every which way by clickbait frenzy reporters. But it doesn't matter. Starmer has done his homework and his report to Parliament is factual. I'm so proud of him! #TenYearKeir

@TalkTV “no-one in No. 10 knew before Tuesday? Not even in Sept ‘25 when Independent journo asked them to confirm it, and published an article about? Does no-one there read the papers?

@daveatherton We all know what he did. The anal assault that caused serious damage to the boy who will now forever have a colostomy bag. This needs publicly publishing along with how and why he persuaded Starmer to pull strings to cover it up.

Keep an eye 👁 out tonight, I have an update on former Labour Chief Whip Nick Brown who resigned in disgrace in 2022. "Rough sex".

@LeeHarris @elayne706 That’s the most intelligent thing I’ve ever heard that woman say.

Ooft! Diane Abbott just ended Keir Starmer political career. "Knowing Peter Mandelson's history, going back 30 years, it's one thing to say 'nobody told me', the question is WHY DIDN'T THE PM ASK?" When Diane Abbott, of all people, has the moral high ground, you know it's over

I have updated the sequence of events on Mandelson's appointment. It's worse than I thought. Here's why. 1. UKSV vet Mandelson, they collate a vetting file, and fail him. The vetting file is confidential and is NEVER shared with anyone except the Security Services. 2. The Propriety and Ethics Team in the Cabinet Office (PET) conduct a due diligence process and produce a report. [See link] The PET report uses mostly open-source information, and it is not as rigorous as the UKSV formal vetting process. It is NOT vetting by any means. 3. The FCDO *DO NOT* take part in the PET process! 4. FCDO have the UKSV decision (as allowed by the process) to overrule UKSV. [This sets a process in train...] 5. UKSV will inform the Security Services based on the evidence in the vetting file. This is HIGHLY confidential, no-one except UKSV or the Security Services can see it. ***Remember this - it is VERY important.*** 5. FCDO grant DV clearance to Mandelson. ***Olly Robbins IS NOT IN POST*** The FCDO might have the PET report. The FCDO have the UKSV vetting fail result. The FCDO will not have the UKSV vetting file, that is standard practice. 6. FCDO inform Starmer (as this is his political appointment) that they have cleared Mandelson. We know Starmer has the PET 'due diligence'. Again, Olly Robbins is not in post. ***Remember this - it is very important*** 7. Starmer asks some questions using the PET report, being a lawyer and all that 🙄 He will know the nature of the PET report, its lack of rigour, and he knows the UKSV DV process. It is not vetting by any means. It is inconceivable he does not ask Mandelson if he passed UKSV vetting. 8. Starmer appoints Mandelson as US Ambassador. These are the facts, and this is the process. Look it up, Grok it to validate if you need to. [HOWEVER....] 8. The UKSV have passed the vetting file to the Security Services, bearing in mind who this is, AND, the importance of the role of US Ambassador, it's not unreasonable to think they investigate further. 9. The US are told, and they would also vet Peter Mandelson. This is standard practice for access to US government documents. 10. Later, we know the US published evidence about Mandelson's involvement with Epstein. In this, Mandelson shared UK state secrets. This is information (formerly secret) that would result in him failing US vetting. 11. The UK Security Service with the UKSV vetting file are also investigating Mandelson. 12. Cue a huge mess - Mandelson resigns, and is interviewed under caution. So: a) the UKSV vetting failure is HUGELY important, this is the only information that the FCDO have, and very little else on Mandelson's vetting. The FCDO do not contribute to the PET report. b) the PET reports no objection to Mandelson taking up the role. c) Bearing in mind, Labour are mired in one scandal after another. It is inconceivable that FCDO did not share the UKSV result to Starmer. d) David Maddox reported in the Independent months ago that Mandelson failed UKSV vetting from Security Services source (remember the UKSV have to pass on their vetting file if they were over-ruled). e) The US vetted Mandelson independently. No doubt, the US shared their findings on Mandelson with the UK Security Services and FCDO. Any strong objections would have to be reported to the PM. Later, they published the Epstein papers showing Mandelson passed on State secrets. f) The Security Services have the UKSV vetting file and they were investigating. Again, inconceivable they would not inform the PM of a potential security risk. It is beyond incredible that Starmer did not know until a few days ago. he is lying. New information here, look at the Annex of the letter. committees.parliament.uk/committee/78/f….

‼️ THEY HAVE BEEN LYING TO YOU ABOUT OIL FOR 150 YEARS. 🛢️ Oil is not rare. It is not made from dead dinosaurs. It is the second most common liquid on Earth after water and it is literally the planet’s lifeblood. The entire “fossil fuel” scam was invented by the Rockefellers and the Smithsonian in the late 1800s to create artificial scarcity and jack up prices to insane levels. They fed you the biotic lie so you would believe oil is some finite dinosaur soup that is about to run dry. Total fabrication. Oil is abiotic. It is a liquid mineral cooked deep in the Earth’s mantle under crushing pressure and scorching heat. It is the natural lubricant for tectonic plates and the grease that keeps the planet’s massive gears turning smoothly. That is why wells drilled dry in the 1970s are filling back up again today. The Earth is pumping fresh oil from below and regenerating it nonstop. It does not run out. We are sucking the lubricant out of the planet’s engine and now the whole machine is starting to shake. More earthquakes. Creaking faults. Grinding plates. Coincidence? No. We are stripping the oil that keeps the Earth’s crust sliding properly and the system is literally seizing up. The so-called “fossil theory” is the greatest economic hack in human history. Real crude oil has almost zero biological markers. No nitrogen, no phosphorus, nothing that would survive if it came from dead organisms. It is pure polymeric hydrocarbons, primordial stuff from the Earth’s own formation. Thomas Gold tried to warn the world. He proved hydrocarbons like methane and oil rise from the deep mantle, not from ancient swamps. The establishment destroyed his reputation because the truth would collapse their entire control grid. If people knew oil is basically tap water for the planet, endlessly generated from below, the entire parasitic geopolitics of wars, sanctions, and price manipulation would evaporate overnight. They do not want you to know the Earth makes its own oil. They need you scared, dependent, and paying through the nose while they bleed the planet dry. Wake up. The dinosaurs had nothing to do with it. This is the biggest lie they ever sold us and it is killing the engine of the world.

@welshroots He shouldn’t be so bent, then.

We are on the edge of a World War and Right Wing Media go after Keir Starmer incessantly with Barage of Criticism Give the Bloke a break for a couple of days Never in my lifetime have I ever seen a Primeminster treated so badly If I was him I would tell the bloody lot of us to SOD OFF

@TheBritishIntel That was a while back. But it’ll be interesting to see if he changes his story.

This is completely fatal for Keir Starmer. Olly Robbins has now admitted the Prime Minister personally insisted on appointing Peter Mandelson himself. This proves Starmer lied to the public about the security vetting process. Watch it all the way to the end. He’s finished.