anileh
3.7K posts


There’s no evidence they’re being forced to do anything.
The reality is millions of Iranians are willing to sacrifice themselves for their country. Whatever one’s views on it.
When that’s Britain some find it admirable. But when it’s other countries it’s… ‘sick’?
Patrick Christys@PatrickChristys
You might disagree with what Trump’s saying he’s going to do…but it’s also pretty sick to deliberately use women and children as human shields like this - there’s even a baby there.
English

@LoftusSteve People opt out of the public sector scheme( which lets remember they pay contributions too) to keep their state pension then.
English

Amazing How this just got swept under the carpet and everyone already forgotten about it.
Turns out he ran over them people with intent and was also in possession of a knife.
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK
🚨 BREAKING: Indian national Sandhu Ponnachan, 36, has been charged over the Derby car ramming - Six counts of GBH with intent - One count of attempted GBH with intent - One count of dangerous driving - One count of possession of a bladed article
English
anileh retweetledi

Officers were not “called out” to people’s homes over tweets!
Police deliberately visited people like me to intimidate us on the basis of flimsy accusation which didn’t come near the threshold for criminal investigation.
A shameful Orwellian period which appalled the public.
Home Office@ukhomeoffice
Over recent years, guidance has failed to keep pace with the digital age and has led to officers being called out to people’s homes over insults and routine arguments.
English
anileh retweetledi

I will speak more plainly than most
Those Brits who peacock as left wing opponents of the far right are among the most disgusting people in humanity
The fact that you march alongside the Islamic fundamentalist supporters of the ayatollahs - those who stabbed Salman Rushdie in the eye, who hang gays and butcher women, who fire rockets upon Israeli civilians and funded Hamas, who massacred thousands on the streets of Tehran - makes you champions of the most reactionary forces on earth
The fact that our media is captured by idiots like you and thus you are never held to account does not change this
You - the most pompous, the most self-aggrandising, the most preachy and hectoring - are the scum of Britain
English

@chris_kratovil @clarescastle He’s personally responsible for several thousand rapes but they are good socks
English

It’s not every day that one gets to listen to a former British Prime Minister recite from memory the opening passages of The Iliad in Ancient Greek, with no notes, in response to a random question from an undergraduate—and all while wearing what appear to be Thomas The Tank Engine socks. But today was one such day.
My thanks to my good friend Brad LaMorgese for the opportunity to see the colorful and comic Boris Johnson speak tonight at the University of Dallas.


English

I’m asking @attorneygeneral Lord Richard Hermer to refer this sentence to the Court of Appeal as an Unduly Lenient Sentence. bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
English

BREAKING: Transgender women athletes banned from female Olympic events
news.sky.com/story/transgen…
English
anileh retweetledi
anileh retweetledi

....meanwhile at Labour HQ
"Sir! There are are 48k Islamic terrorists on the watch list, and Islamists have raped over 250k British girls, the British are becoming increasingly angry about this! What shall we do?"
"Let's make taking about it illegal, arrest anyone who does, and remove Jury's so they dont even get a fair hearing - all agreed, sat aye!"
"AYE!"
English
anileh retweetledi

📣🚨The Free Speech Union is mounting a legal challenge against the Government over its official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as 'anti-Muslim hatred' — and its appointment of a new 'tsar' to punish people who fall foul of it.
This amounts to a Muslim blasphemy law via the back door. The definition is vague and subjective, and will be weaponised to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam, Muslims, and Islamic practices and history.
The FSU’s General Secretary, Lord Young of Acton, said: “This is the most serious threat to free speech the Government has come up with so far — the only area in which it’s achieving any success.
“If we don’t win this fight, tens of thousands of people a year could lose their jobs at the say-so of a Labour-appointed ‘tsar’. It’s dystopian.”
Public bodies will adopt this definition — despite it being non-statutory — with the same zeal the police have shown in investigating and recording non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs). It is predicted by one of the drafters of the definition that it could lead to around 20,000 reports of 'anti-Muslim hostility' a year. At present, the number of recorded anti-Muslim hate crimes is around 4,000.
In a free society, no religion should be shielded from legitimate criticism. This proposal places one faith above the rest.
The Free Speech Union is bringing a legal challenge on two grounds.
First, the definition relies on nebulous, legally undefined terms such as “negative and prejudicial stereotyping of Muslims”, making it incoherent and irrational — and ripe for weaponisation.
Second, adopting such a definition cuts across legislation already enacted by Parliament and therefore breaches the public law principle known as “occupying the field”. Under this established public law doctrine, new regulations, put in place by ministers, must not replace existing legislation. It is constitutionally unlawful. In this case, the body responsible for protecting Muslims from discrimination is the Equality and Human Rights Commission, not an anti-Muslim hostility 'tsar'.
Parliament voted to abolish blasphemy laws 18 years ago. We can't let this Government resurrect them via the back door.
This is one of the biggest battles the Free Speech Union has ever taken on in its six years — and we need your help. Judicial reviews are expensive, but this is a fight we felt we had to take on.
Donate to our crowdfunder below👇
English
anileh retweetledi
anileh retweetledi
anileh retweetledi

🚨BOMBSHELL EXPOSÉ: TREVOR PHILLIPS RIPS LID OFF LABOUR'S GROOMING GANGS COVER-UP 💣
Keir Starmer and the Labour Party Sabotaging National Inquiry to Hide Racial Targeting of White Girls and Decades of Failure in Their Own Councils
In a devastating intervention, Sir Trevor Phillips has blown the whistle on what he calls a deliberate political cover-up at the heart of Britain's grooming gangs scandal.
The former Equality and Human Rights Commission chair accuses Labour of sabotaging the national inquiry because of its explosive racial implications — and because so much of the abuse took place under Labour-controlled councils that did nothing to stop it.
“The government clearly never wanted these two things to be put together,” Phillips declared. He points to Labour's efforts to downplay “the intersection of race and sexual predation,” insisting the perpetrators deliberately targeted victims because they were white and outside the groomers' community.
“These children are chosen because of their race. They are chosen because they are white and because they’re outside the community of the groomers.”
Phillips highlights the chilling uniqueness of these crimes: unlike typical child abuse kept hidden, grooming gangs operate in plain sight — with perpetrators knowing they are shielded.
“The other thing is these people know that they are protected. They’re protected politically, they’re protected by social workers, they’re protected by local police. That is the scandal here.”
He pulls no punches on why a full reckoning has been avoided: “Much of this took place in local Labour councils and the authorities who were supposed to be watching over this, stopping it, monitoring it and all the rest of it were controlled by those councils and they did nothing.”
This is not just institutional failure — it's a politically motivated shield thrown over horrific, racially aggravated sexual exploitation that went on for years under Labour's watch.
Right now, they deserve justice — and Britain deserves the full, fearless national inquiry that has been denied for far too long.
English
anileh retweetledi

He lost his papers so they had to import him.
He committed the crime because he's mentally ill.
He cannot be tried because he's legally retarded.
He cannot be deported because his home country will arrest him.
He must be housed because he's unemployable.
He cannot be named because it's racist.
You cannot talk about it because it's a hate crime.
His critics will be portrayed in the media as the perpetrators.
POSIWID: The Purpose of a System is What it Does.
And the purpose of this system appears to be to create the most efficient and unchallenged machinery of child rape, murder and terror the Western world has ever seen.
English

@whitepilledpage Provided intelligence on planned terrorist attacks on UK soil. Let’s hope they don’t stop.
English

@cathynewman @TimesRadio This woman went to Oxford university believe it or not!
English

BREAKING on @TimesRadio : we’ve unearthed social media posts by a senior officer at the MHRA, the regulator overseeing the puberty blockers trial.
English







