aninfinitearc

@RenfailSoL "NO ONE ever complained about the loading screens" Well this just isn't true

The Hypocrisy of the Loading Screen Argument is so hilarious when you look at Mass Effect /KOTOR and how NO ONE ever complained about the loading screens, lack of space flight, or lack of manual ship landings and take offs compared to Starfield. #starfield

@MAGAMAHACindy @mattsobalvarro But the president is?

@mattsobalvarro The point is, the pope is not God

You can’t be American and stand against the President.

@BasedMikeLee Because war never leads to rationing and low-quality healthcare.

Socialized medicine always leads to rationing and low-quality healthcare

@EMurotake @anabelle_dawn @Agusta1 She is also A SPACE WIZARD

@anabelle_dawn @Agusta1 And on top of that, she's also spent most of her life around Unkar AND around ships. She probably knows the technical stuff pretty well. She's an adequate pilot, but a VERY TALENTED mechanic

two characters, established as pilots, attempt to fly an unfamiliar ship, have trouble at first, but after a learning curve, figure out the controls and fly better. one is acceptable, the other is brought up in every discussion about why a character is so "awful". why is that?

@FatOldBitter @PhilWhittlesee @gnukeith It is literally true that every pancreas in the universe is attracted to, and pulled towards, every other pancreas in the universe with a force that is equal to the product of their masses, but is inversely proportional to the distance between them.

@PhilWhittlesee @gnukeith I wanted this so bad to be true

Stupid question, is there gravity inside the body because like how are they able to swallow stuff?

@DrDiGiorgio @drsmithy Literally nobody has ever suggested that, and you are perfectly aware of that.

@drsmithy You expect the neurosurgeon to work for free?

If there are 50 people who want to see the neurosurgeon but he only has 10 appointments available, how does one guarantee that right to healthcare?

@WhatNowDoc @g4vyn The spacecraft being operated by SpaceX were not designed to go to the moon, and are not capable of going to the moon.

@g4vyn They already carry humans to and from the space station, they land every rocket they launch. They have commandeered the very best brains, I think they could cope. AI did the 10x calculation based on recorded data, it wasn’t a guess.

I’m sorry, I used to think the “conspiracy theorists” were just nutters. This week I’ve decided we were conned. Hear me out. That 1969 spacecraft I watched on my black and white TV had less computing power than your wristwatch, less than some thermostatic controllers I have on my walls. This week NASA sent a $93billion spacecraft to *orbit* the moon, just orbit, in preparation for an actual moon landing in a few years time. Why on earth would it take us 57 years, and a $93b test flight, with the compute power and comms facilities we have today, if we’d already done it successfully, once before, with so little, 57 years ago. Nah, I’m now with the conspiracy theorists.

@albert971 @AdrianaVeterin We can do it now. The Artemis spacecraft was designed to go to the moon, and is capable of doing so. We can't go to the moon on the Apollo spacecraft because we don't have any Apollo spacecraft.

@AdrianaVeterin Siempre he dicho que eso de que el hombre llegó a la luna, es un engaño. Si antes supuestamente llegaron con muy poca tecnología, porque ahora no lo hacen? Yo esperaré el final de ese viaje para decir que sigo con ese pensamiento.

Perdonen mi ignorancia: pero ¿por qué la nave no va en camino directo a la luna?

Beleza, e como enviar essa energia toda pra terra???

@KookCapitalLLC @dieselbabyy This is ignoring the fact that even if we could just spin up the dozens of assembly lines that built the Apollo and build more, and even if we had qualified personnel who knew how to operate one... after all this time we'd still have to do test flights like we are doing now.

@KookCapitalLLC @dieselbabyy We simply don't have the machine we built to go to the moon anymore, and nobody was willing to spend the money to keep that program going for 57 years. So we built a new machine to go to the moon, and we are now testing it.

artemis is flying around the moon they arent even landing on the moon and we are supposed to believe they landed on the moon 100 years ago????? before we had color tvs and calculators???? and we could never do it again???? sure bro ya we landed on the moon 👍

@MikeTheGambler_ @KookCapitalLLC It's a test flight and the Artemis lander isn't done yet. Genuinely why are people to mystified by the idea that they test spacecraft?

@KookCapitalLLC Lol, why can't they land on it this time around?

@Cryptoking @BriefAside China also acknowledge the moon landing, with the leader of their lunar program publicly stating the moon landing was "indisputable". Why would the soviets and Chinese lie in favor of our government?

@Cryptoking @BriefAside The soviets, who had not only the technology but great motivation to call us out if the landing was a hoax, also acknowledged the moon landing. Their response was basically, "Cool they won a race against themselves, we didn't want to go to the moon anyway."

Serious question, are u dumb enough to think we ever went to the moon? This is the ORIGINAL Apollo 17 Liftoff Confetti flys out its arse… We went 50+ years ago and just didn’t have a budget to return? The U.S. govt prints $$ it is literally free.

@WayneWaldropW @Lanius_Nox Even if they did just recommission the Apollo spacecraft, it would still take a decade to rebuild the infrastructure, train the new engineers and other staff, and actually build them, and they would still have to be tested and retested. Or we can make something new and better.

@WayneWaldropW @Lanius_Nox There are no servicable Saturn 5 rockets, Apollo CSMs, or lunar modules. The specialized facilities, equipment, and tools required were long ago decommissioned, and the personnel has mostly retired or died. This is like asking why we don't build Model Ts anymore.

We are flying by the moon this time instead of landing on it despite it being 50 years since we last "landed on the moon". Why does this seem like a step back instead of progress?

@DMRuth4 @MJTruthUltra Artemis II is a crewed test flight. The Apollo missions didn't land on the moon on their first flight (nor did they claim to), either. They are still testing the Orion spacecraft. That's what that's all about. The intent is to land an Orion on the moon once it's been tested.

@MJTruthUltra They put a man on the moon 57 years ago, and with our current technology they are only slingshotting around it this time round?? What’s that all about?

Do you believe we once Landed on the moon?

@Scotty_watching @MikeJohnson624 @KariLake @NEWSMAX @SchmittNYC The constitution gives the judicial the right to interpret and apply the law. You don't really get to disagree with that. You swore an oath to defend the constitution, not the president. An oath to defend the judicial branch's constitutional powers.

@MikeJohnson624 @KariLake @NEWSMAX @SchmittNYC So angry - put your misplaced rage away. I disagree with you - you’ll be ok. Calling someone who served in the Marine Corps anti-American is laughable.

Now the President can't even renovate the White House with private funds? When do we finally say enough with these activist judges? The President is fed up. The American people are fed up watching district court judges act like they were elected to run the executive branch. Something has to give.