Anthony

7.5K posts

Anthony banner
Anthony

Anthony

@anthony_codes

✝️ Software Engineer Creator of Local Container Registry

🇺🇸 Katılım Mart 2016
933 Takip Edilen577 Takipçiler
Anthony
Anthony@anthony_codes·
@zeeg I had to stop listening after the first 31 seconds.
English
0
0
0
25
Barrett
Barrett@SledgeDev·
who do you think you are.. i am
Barrett tweet media
English
13
0
23
494
Darren Shepherd
Darren Shepherd@ibuildthecloud·
The codex GUI app is basically garbage. Who is the user for this? I feel like they drank too much of the "everyone can code" koolaid. Basically some designer created this and kept telling the developers using it that they were wrong and didn't understand the actual user.
English
5
0
6
1.2K
Dan Garfield
Dan Garfield@todaywasawesome·
OpenCode is very cool but it's definitely struggling more than Claude code.
English
2
0
1
570
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
these ai videos are getting crazy
English
54
106
1.7K
129.9K
CJ Avilla
CJ Avilla@cjav_dev·
@aarondfrancis CTRL+a to start CTRL+e to end CTRL+u delete before the cursor I think these are all from readline? I expect most CMD hot keys to impact the application. CMD+d new vertical pane to the right CMD+t new tab CMD+{ move to the tab to the left CMD+} move to the tab to the right Etc
English
5
0
9
1.1K
Aaron Francis
Aaron Francis@aarondfrancis·
Help me understand how you use hotkeys in terminals. Some people expect Cmd+Arrow to go to the start or end of a line, but Cmd is consumed by the terminal emulator, it never gets sent to the PTY. If it works, it’s because the terminal is remapping it What do you expect?
English
34
0
43
19.9K
Sahaj
Sahaj@iamsahaj_xyz·
if you're a dev, and you're building a website, and you're not using v0, why? be brutally honest, I'll reply to every piece of feedback and share it internally as well
English
251
1
206
101.7K
Anthony
Anthony@anthony_codes·
@NousResearch I need a full album of this so I can listen to it while I work.
English
0
0
1
29
Eli Gaultney
Eli Gaultney@eligaultney·
I'm the kind of guy who, if you catch me on the right day, will give you my car if I think you need it more than me. I've been scammed a lot in my life.
English
2
1
2
54
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
New pfp for the Ghostty vouch bot. lol.
Mitchell Hashimoto tweet media
English
9
1
245
27.1K
AWS Developers
AWS Developers@awsdevelopers·
Reply to this tweet with "AWS" and we’ll tell you which AWS Service you are
English
3.3K
55
2K
547.1K
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
@HasanKhxnx I am not suicidal. I eat healthy food. The brakes on my car and truck are in good shape. I practice good trigger discipline and never point a gun at anyone, including myself. There are no deep pools of water on my farm and I’m a pretty good swimmer.
English
7.2K
45.9K
293.1K
17.4M
Thomas Massie
Thomas Massie@RepThomasMassie·
Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.
Thomas Massie tweet mediaThomas Massie tweet media
English
1.9K
9.5K
63.2K
2.4M
Dan Garfield
Dan Garfield@todaywasawesome·
@mitchellh Good code doesn't require someone to vouch for it. The code speaks for itself.
English
1
0
1
342
Mitchell Hashimoto
Mitchell Hashimoto@mitchellh·
AI eliminated the natural barrier to entry that let OSS projects trust by default. People told me to do something rather than just complain. So I did. Introducing Vouch: explicit trust management for open source. Trusted people vouch for others. github.com/mitchellh/vouch The idea is simple: Unvouched users can't contribute to your projects. Very bad users can be explicitly "denounced", effectively blocked. Users are vouched or denounced by contributors via GitHub issue or discussion comments or via the CLI. Integration into GitHub is as simple as adopting the published GitHub actions. Done. Additionally, the system itself is generic to forges and not tied to GitHub in any way. Who and how someone is vouched or denounced is up to the project. I'm not the value police for the world. Decide for yourself what works for your project and your community. All of the data is stored in a single flat text file in your own repository that can be easily parsed by standard POSIX tools or mainstream languages with zero dependencies. My hope is that eventually projects can form a web of trust so that projects with shared values can share their vouch lists with each other (automatically) so vouching or denouncing a person in one project has ripple effects through to other projects. The idea is based on the already successful system used by @badlogicgames in Pi. Thank you Mario. Ghostty will be integrating this imminently.
English
223
363
4K
590K
ThePrimeagen
ThePrimeagen@ThePrimeagen·
you may not like this, but this is what peak male performance looks like
ThePrimeagen tweet media
English
62
64
2K
56.3K
Cloudflare
Cloudflare@Cloudflare·
What's an "old" technology (like LaTeX, IRC, or maybe even assembly language) that you still find fascinating or even use? #CloudflareChat
English
162
16
507
76.4K
patagucci perf papi
patagucci perf papi@kenwheeler·
i don’t know how, but i summoned electrician twitter. i hope they stick around. we used to have slurs for them when i did framing.
English
20
0
120
6.1K
Anthony
Anthony@anthony_codes·
@jessfraz Thank you for making tech twitter fun. Lol
English
0
0
0
326
Jessie Frazelle
Jessie Frazelle@jessfraz·
I joke that codex is autistic but this literally makes me laugh because what is this if not a case of the ‘tism Sometimes we joke 😂
Jessie Frazelle tweet media
English
4
2
77
9.3K