apsk32

4.6K posts

apsk32 banner
apsk32

apsk32

@apsk32

Engineer. Bitcoin, data viz., space, art

Katılım Ekim 2022
586 Takip Edilen39.5K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
Bitcoin - Power Curve - Time Contours
English
37
248
1.2K
140K
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
3
5
80
4.6K
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
@kanemcgukin If price follows your trace the underlying power curve fit would be in jeopardy. Possible, but I would be extremely disappointed. I think it's more likely that price increases at least 50-100% over the next twelve months.
English
1
0
1
133
BitKane
BitKane@kanemcgukin·
@apsk32 Let’s see if the second time turns out like the first.
BitKane tweet media
English
1
1
3
203
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
8
7
110
7.2K
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
2
5
40
3.2K
Fourtrades
Fourtrades@fourtrades·
@apsk32 Doesn't the min/max change drastically now that we are way outside the blue zones?
English
1
0
2
354
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
On 1 Feb 2027 Bitcoin is worth $180,000. That is 2.2 years ahead of the power curve fit. On 1 Feb 2029 Bitcoin is only 1 year ahead of the power curve fit, which corresponds to a price of $224,800. That's an average yearly gain of 11.8% over two years, which would be disappointing for many. More plainly, if the power curve remains a good forecast of Bitcoin's future price, then frontloading gains means we will need to stall for a while so that the trendline can catch up.
English
0
0
1
85
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
5
9
103
4.8K
alex
alex@tankov1ch·
@TylerDivv @apsk32 @DurdenBTC I believe what he means is that if it were to rip that high; it would be overextended based on this power curve extrapolation and to 'fit' it would underperform for a few years.
English
1
0
1
66
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
@extropic_vc The power curve is still holding up well. I think the time contours will remain useful. I'm least confident in the 4-year timing. I use this to gauge expectations but weigh it as one of many signals.
English
0
0
1
133
E𝓧tropic
E𝓧tropic@extropic_vc·
@apsk32 If the previous cycle still aligned with prior years, BTC could have reached above $150K in November and December of last year. It clearly deviated at the start of October 2025. If it has deviated, then how much analytical weight should we still assign to it going forward?
English
1
0
1
158
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
@DurdenBTC I think that's possible. But if we do, we'd be ~2.5 years ahead of the power curve. I'd expect Bitcoin to underperform after that.
English
1
0
5
259
DurdenBTC
DurdenBTC@DurdenBTC·
@apsk32 watch this cycle flip the script.. disappointing to start but rips to $180k+ into 2027
English
1
0
13
456
Hydra Badger
Hydra Badger@HydraBadger·
@apsk32 Y-axis label on the right would be a small improvement
English
1
0
1
32
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
8
14
115
6.5K
RESM Cycles
RESM Cycles@RESMcycles·
@apsk32 Make the shifted chart already! Use cross-correlation or concordance analysis if you want to make it unbiased.
English
1
0
2
110
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
@willfightnaked Wifey getting something nice if we touch that circle, that's all i know.
English
1
0
2
69
SLOP DETECTIVE
SLOP DETECTIVE@willfightnaked·
@apsk32 if we touch that circle will anyone be able to say the cycles have not been broken?
SLOP DETECTIVE tweet media
English
1
0
1
222
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
6
8
89
5.4K
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
@mindslikeseeds If we ever end up back inside the cloud I'm going to post "called it" and disappear.
English
0
0
2
171
JD
JD@mindslikeseeds·
@apsk32 Power curve cloud is lava
English
1
0
2
204
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
1
2
43
3.7K
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
apsk32 tweet media
ZXX
6
14
151
12.3K
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
@bitcoinmark21 Quantiles, especially for the upper range, require constant fiddling. Do not recommend.
English
1
0
1
56
apsk32
apsk32@apsk32·
Cycle recap
English
4
2
52
6.8K