Drew Stephen

2.5K posts

Drew Stephen banner
Drew Stephen

Drew Stephen

@archidapp

Senior engineer @circle | formerly @interop_labs, @phi_labs

Toronto Katılım Nisan 2023
181 Takip Edilen3K Takipçiler
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@nic_carter Yet it can't generate without being prompted, something even a newborn baby can do. Checkmate.
Drew Stephen tweet media
English
0
0
0
57
nic carter
nic carter@nic_carter·
The “it’s not AGI because machine intelligence is jagged” is dumb cope. It’s obviously AGI. If you had a friend who had a 130 IQ, could write production code flawlessly, could write academic papers of a high research caliber, pass any exam in any field with flying colors, create a sophisticate LBO model, draw technical diagrams perfectly, compose poetry in any language, and could find solutions to significant unsolved mathematical problems, you would call that person a world historical genius. Certainly, no single human has ever had intelligence that “general” before. Now you think it’s “not AGI” because it sometimes slips up and makes mistakes - so does any human that you would consider “extraordinarily intelligent.” The professor might forget a colleagues name that he has known for a decade. He is still considered intelligent. The math genius might be a little autistic and shy, unable to maintain polite conversation. Still intelligent. You might stare at the fridge for 30 seconds unable to find the butter, despite 5 million years of evolution perfecting your visual intelligence. We give intelligent humans a pass when they have jagged intelligence. So why the double standard? The qualities people list as “necessary for AGI” are important traits to have, but no longer pertain to intelligence. People will say things like “true AGI requires agency, long term goal setting, embodiment, self-direct action”. But none of those things are intelligence. Those are “things that humans have that AI lacks”. Raw intelligence, AI has it in spades. That other stuff - important yet, but broader than and different from intelligence. The unwillingness of people to acknowledge that AGI obviously exists and has existed for a while is due to a kind of anthropic chauvinism - a psychological need to believe that humans are superior in every respect, that we possess soft skills that no machine could replicate. Yes humans are different from machines, but if we are limiting the discussion solely to general intelligence, AI has it already. That battle is over. If you want to reframe the discussion to matters of human dignity and personhood, fine, but that’s not an AGI question. That’s something else. Just take the loss on AGI already. It’s over.
English
494
230
2.4K
667.2K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@DeplorableSEO @ElsienotElisee This argument fails for the same reason big accounts can go viral just stealing content from small accounts that aren't going viral. Velocity and pace matters more for reach than quality does. Formerly, you had more clarity for building an audience.
English
0
0
2
86
SEOforDeplorables
SEOforDeplorables@DeplorableSEO·
Yes, in fact it’s going to be more important than ever to have a website. The difference is that websites that succeed in this new world will not be the ones that focus on high level “head terms”, which has been the focus of bad SEO for the last 30 years. Those that succeed will be the ones that contain truly unique, thoughtful, and original content and focus on the “long tail”, exploring specific, detailed things that people are searching for. The key to success is to build a brand and a critical mass of content of such high quality that people share your work and seek you out. This is what the concept of “link building” was supposed to be until Google ruined it. I also see too many people creating fantastic content, but hosting it only on Substack, Medium, or X. These are great platforms, but they have big limitations that hurt the ability to discover you. In many ways, AI can finally break the monopoly that Google had on great content getting discovered. But in order to succeed you need to create great content and host it (at least the master copy) yourself. I could go on and on :) Bottom line, the specific tactics of SEO might be changing, but the principles will be more important than ever.
English
7
8
179
68.1K
Elsie not Elise 💿
Elsie not Elise 💿@ElsienotElisee·
So with this new Google update is there a point of having a website anymore ?
English
366
307
10.8K
1.8M
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@typesfast Because coding hasn't been improved, it's been automated. The software we use daily is markedly worse for it, because shipping faster does not equal shipping better.
English
0
0
0
37
Ryan Petersen
Ryan Petersen@typesfast·
With all these AI coding improvements why isn't the software I use everyday getting better?
English
373
57
1.6K
136.8K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
Accidentally copied an entire post from Reddit. It wasn't just autocomplete, I changed a couple words around to fool search engines. I was still logged into Reddit, Private account, no company code/credentials involved. I did this! Am I overthinking engagement bait, or is this something people still fall for?
Drew Stephen tweet media
English
0
0
8
148
Aish
Aish@AishwaryaDevv·
Accidentally used my company GitHub Copilot account on a personal project for 1–2 hours before realizing I was still logged into my work account. Used Copilot chat/CLI, not just autocomplete. Private repo, no company code/docs/credentials involved, project is completely unrelated to work. Already switched accounts. Am I overthinking this or is this something companies actually care about? How visible is this to enterprise admins/security teams?
English
188
1
509
545.3K
Rho Rider
Rho Rider@RhoRider·
So I went all in on automating my job the last 3 months…spent 200+ hours and burned $1000s in Claude Code credits on a company API plan. Set up >25 agents and analysis / reporting routines with meticulously developed skill files to drive. Today, I only use maybe 5% of the tools I built. tbh I got burnt out of the endless loop of manually verifying every data point & math output, debugging, iterating, arguing with the LLM prompt cycle. I got sick of constantly re explaining context despite having hard coded context files. While it *feels* like I’m getting far more done with AI, i’ve added up the time it takes to get polished results, and found in many cases i’m only modestly saving time vs a “good enough” manual equivalent. I can’t deny AI has unlocked new capabilities for me to do my job…but it’s also adding on scope that cancels out efficiency gains YMMV
English
102
67
1.5K
247.4K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@0xgaut We're living through an age where it's humans that don't pass the Turing test 🙈
English
0
0
0
92
gaut
gaut@0xgaut·
I swear some people are starting to talk like LLMs in real life
English
263
40
1.1K
58.2K
Mo
Mo@atmoio·
The Unethical Guide to Surviving AI Layoffs
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong

This is an email I sent earlier today to all employees at Coinbase: Team, Today I’ve made the difficult decision to reduce the size of Coinbase by ~14%. I want to walk you through why we're doing this now, what it means for those affected, and how this positions us for the future. Why now Two forces are converging at the same time. We need to be front footed to respond to both. First, the market. Coinbase is well-capitalized, has diversified revenue streams, and is well-positioned to weather any storm. Crypto is also on the verge of the next wave of adoption, with stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenization, and more taking off. However, our business is still volatile from quarter to quarter. While we've managed through that cyclicality many times before and come out stronger on the other side, we’re currently in a down market and need to adjust our cost structure now so that we emerge from this period leaner, faster, and more efficient for our next phase of growth. Second, AI is changing how we work. Over the past year, I’ve watched engineers use AI to ship in days what used to take a team weeks. Non-technical teams are now shipping production code and many of our workflows are being automated. The pace of what's possible with a small, focused team has changed dramatically, and it's accelerating every day. All of this has led us to an inflection point, not just for Coinbase, but for every company. The biggest risk now is not taking action. We are adjusting early and deliberately to rebuild Coinbase to be lean, fast, and AI-native. We need to return to the speed and focus of our startup founding, with AI at our core. What this means To get there, we are not just reducing headcount and cutting costs, we’re fundamentally changing how we operate: rebuilding Coinbase as an intelligence, with humans around the edge aligning it. What does this mean in practice? - Fewer layers, faster decisions: We are flattening our org structure to 5 layers max below CEO/COO. Layers slow things down and create coordination tax. The future is small, high context teams that can move quickly. Leaders will own much more, with as many as 15+ direct reports. Fewer layers also means a leaner cost structure that is built to perform through all market cycles. - No pure managers: Every leader at Coinbase must also be a strong and active individual contributor. Managers should be like player-coaches, getting their hands dirty alongside their teams. - AI-native pods: We’ll be concentrating around AI-native talent who can manage fleets of agents to drive outsized impact. We’ll also be experimenting with reduced pod sizes, including “one person teams” with engineers, designers, and product managers all in one role. In short: AI is bringing a profound shift in how companies operate, and we’re reshaping Coinbase to lead in this new era. This is a new way of working, and we need to leverage AI across every facet of our jobs. To those who are affected I know there are real people behind these decisions — talented colleagues who have poured themselves into this company and our mission. To those of you who will be leaving: thank you. You’ve helped build Coinbase into what it is today, and I am sincerely grateful for everything you've done. All impacted team members will receive an email to their personal account in the next hour with more information, and an invitation to meet with an HRBP and a senior leader in your organization. Coinbase system access has been removed today. I know this feels sudden and harsh, but it is the only responsible choice given our duty to protect customer information. To those affected, we will be providing a comprehensive package to support you through this transition. US employees will receive a minimum of 16 weeks base pay (plus 2 weeks per year worked), their next equity vest, and 6 months of COBRA. Employees on a work visa will get extra transition support. Those outside of the US will receive similar support, based on local factors and subject to any consultation requirements. Coinbase prides itself on talent density. Our employees are among the most talented people in the world, and I have no doubt that your skills and experience will be highly sought after as you pursue your next chapters. How we move forward To the team that is staying, I know this is a difficult day. We’re saying goodbye to colleagues and friends you've been in the trenches with. But here’s what I want you to know as we move forward together: Over the past 13 years, we have weathered four crypto winters, gone public, and built the most trusted platform in our industry. We’ve made it this far by making hard decisions and by always staying focused on our mission. This time will be no different – nothing has changed about the long term outlook of our company or industry. And most importantly, our mission has never been more important for the world. Increasing economic freedom requires a new financial system, and we’re building it. The Coinbase that emerges from this will be more capable than ever to achieve our mission. Brian

English
356
1K
13.1K
1.8M
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
Let me break it down for the non-technical folks: The velocity of code review and ability to synthesize generated code at scale into your full understanding of the software, bottlenecks AI velocity to human scale. But wait, you might say! The developers skip writing code and just have to review. Well, what actually happens in practice is not writing code delays learning, placing a greater burden on the reviewer to synthesize PRs into their understanding of the system. You get one of three outcomes: - AI speed bottlenecked to human speed (e.g. no benefit, with an increase in laziness) - Reviewer fatigue and burnout from trying to keep up with AI velocity (e.g. huge benefits, but they aren't sustainable) - Low quality or irresponsible code review (e.g. the YOLO problem, trading velocity gains up front for technical debt to fixed later. Like giving in to auto-approval mode in Claude Code) x.com/archidapp/stat…
English
3
7
79
18.5K
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
@MonetSupply @moo9000 It goes without saying that all AI generated code has rigorous human reviews. No one is vibe coding directly to production. We're increasing speed of shipping and innovation, while continuing to raise the bar on security.
English
470
25
771
273.5K
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
This is an email I sent earlier today to all employees at Coinbase: Team, Today I’ve made the difficult decision to reduce the size of Coinbase by ~14%. I want to walk you through why we're doing this now, what it means for those affected, and how this positions us for the future. Why now Two forces are converging at the same time. We need to be front footed to respond to both. First, the market. Coinbase is well-capitalized, has diversified revenue streams, and is well-positioned to weather any storm. Crypto is also on the verge of the next wave of adoption, with stablecoins, prediction markets, tokenization, and more taking off. However, our business is still volatile from quarter to quarter. While we've managed through that cyclicality many times before and come out stronger on the other side, we’re currently in a down market and need to adjust our cost structure now so that we emerge from this period leaner, faster, and more efficient for our next phase of growth. Second, AI is changing how we work. Over the past year, I’ve watched engineers use AI to ship in days what used to take a team weeks. Non-technical teams are now shipping production code and many of our workflows are being automated. The pace of what's possible with a small, focused team has changed dramatically, and it's accelerating every day. All of this has led us to an inflection point, not just for Coinbase, but for every company. The biggest risk now is not taking action. We are adjusting early and deliberately to rebuild Coinbase to be lean, fast, and AI-native. We need to return to the speed and focus of our startup founding, with AI at our core. What this means To get there, we are not just reducing headcount and cutting costs, we’re fundamentally changing how we operate: rebuilding Coinbase as an intelligence, with humans around the edge aligning it. What does this mean in practice? - Fewer layers, faster decisions: We are flattening our org structure to 5 layers max below CEO/COO. Layers slow things down and create coordination tax. The future is small, high context teams that can move quickly. Leaders will own much more, with as many as 15+ direct reports. Fewer layers also means a leaner cost structure that is built to perform through all market cycles. - No pure managers: Every leader at Coinbase must also be a strong and active individual contributor. Managers should be like player-coaches, getting their hands dirty alongside their teams. - AI-native pods: We’ll be concentrating around AI-native talent who can manage fleets of agents to drive outsized impact. We’ll also be experimenting with reduced pod sizes, including “one person teams” with engineers, designers, and product managers all in one role. In short: AI is bringing a profound shift in how companies operate, and we’re reshaping Coinbase to lead in this new era. This is a new way of working, and we need to leverage AI across every facet of our jobs. To those who are affected I know there are real people behind these decisions — talented colleagues who have poured themselves into this company and our mission. To those of you who will be leaving: thank you. You’ve helped build Coinbase into what it is today, and I am sincerely grateful for everything you've done. All impacted team members will receive an email to their personal account in the next hour with more information, and an invitation to meet with an HRBP and a senior leader in your organization. Coinbase system access has been removed today. I know this feels sudden and harsh, but it is the only responsible choice given our duty to protect customer information. To those affected, we will be providing a comprehensive package to support you through this transition. US employees will receive a minimum of 16 weeks base pay (plus 2 weeks per year worked), their next equity vest, and 6 months of COBRA. Employees on a work visa will get extra transition support. Those outside of the US will receive similar support, based on local factors and subject to any consultation requirements. Coinbase prides itself on talent density. Our employees are among the most talented people in the world, and I have no doubt that your skills and experience will be highly sought after as you pursue your next chapters. How we move forward To the team that is staying, I know this is a difficult day. We’re saying goodbye to colleagues and friends you've been in the trenches with. But here’s what I want you to know as we move forward together: Over the past 13 years, we have weathered four crypto winters, gone public, and built the most trusted platform in our industry. We’ve made it this far by making hard decisions and by always staying focused on our mission. This time will be no different – nothing has changed about the long term outlook of our company or industry. And most importantly, our mission has never been more important for the world. Increasing economic freedom requires a new financial system, and we’re building it. The Coinbase that emerges from this will be more capable than ever to achieve our mission. Brian
English
5.3K
2.4K
20.1K
23.5M
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@brian_armstrong @MonetSupply @moo9000 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Arthur C. Clarke sitting in a hot tub with Kurt Vonnegut, sipping malt whiskey, couldn't have come up with a more hilariously hubristic timeline
English
0
0
2
82
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@theCTO Haven't met a single "CTO" on X who's not rage baiting.
English
0
0
1
45
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@zooko Welcome to the modern reality of locally chunked stream data
English
0
0
0
44
zooko🛡🦓🦓🦓 ⓩ
Youtube just scammed me. I need to download a video to clip it. There's a download widget, I clicked, and then saw "You have to pay for Premium to download". So I paid, then tried again. It said "Okay, you've downloaded it". It isn't downloaded—just saved on Youtube. Scammed.
English
18
3
140
12.3K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@atmoio IBM called it in 1979 amirite? Incredible how desperate our species has become that we prefer to learn lessons the hard way nowadays.
Drew Stephen tweet media
English
0
1
8
163
Mo
Mo@atmoio·
The greatest con of the decade was calling autocomplete “AI”. The second greatest is calling autocomplete-in-a-loop an “agent”.
JER@lifeof_jer

x.com/i/article/2048…

English
90
186
1.9K
139.1K
S. Coburnicus
S. Coburnicus@sdotcoburnicus·
@hunvreus Not really. Not all apps I’ve created have users but others have hundreds. Granted it’s not huge but people are using it,
English
3
0
0
3.2K
Ronan Berder
Ronan Berder@hunvreus·
Talking to smarter folks than me, I'm convinced many of the AI folks in my timeline are full of shit. Nobody is "running 20 agents over night" and building stuff for actual users. Maybe some are building internal tools or disposable software. Maybe. But building software people like using? That doesn't get hacked on day one or blow up after the 3rd user? Nope. I don't even understand what that's supposed to look like. Do you work out a 57 pages document that perfectly describes what you want to build and then summon 14 agents and have them run wild for 6 hours? And what comes out on the other end isn't a broken pile of shit? Nope. Not buying it. PS: it may also be that I have an IQ of 82 and can't figure it out.
English
665
269
4.9K
851.6K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
Just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should. The hard reality is increasing the amount of code output does not increase the amount of code that can be properly reviewed. AI hype men will say something like "bro, I've got 12 agents reviewing my PRs", but that's just kicking the can down the road. Let's imagine a world where everything, including review and deployment, can be automated, at the end of the day a human still needs provide the credit card payment for the server and should probably actually understand what they're deploying before opening it up to the world. Using agents this way is just trading fast productivity up front, for delayed understanding and reaction time down the road. It's an increase in technical debt that could come back to haunt you.
English
0
0
0
18
TeamYouTube
TeamYouTube@TeamYouTube·
Aside from submitting a counter-notification, you can also wait 90 days and complete Copyright School goo.gle/48cRSFm or get a retraction directly from the claimant goo.gle/4e0C0tf to resolve the copyright strike on your channel. Totally understand your frustration with this
English
60
0
11
11.7K
Sabine Hossenfelder
Sabine Hossenfelder@skdh·
I received a false copyright claim on one of my videos and YouTube removed the video because of this. It's a video about the Riemann Hypothesis. The claim comes from some person who submits a link to their paper about "The Continuity Engine: A Formally Verified Framework Prime Resonance Unification with Medical, Physical, Mathematical Evidence" with links to two unpublished papers that are completely unrelated to my video content. It's obviously some crackpot work, I receive dozens of those a day. YouTube took the video down based on this false claim. The only way they allow me to react to this requires me to submit my personal contact information to some random crank on the internet. Alternatively, I am supposed to hire a lawyer (!!) on my own costs, to track down some random guy from whom I then have to extract my up-front expenses. I have complained to YouTube support about this multiple times. No success, the video is still down. This procedure is completely unacceptable. It allows random people to try and blackmail me into responding to them. I have no time for this bullshit and no patience either. Frankly the only sensible course of action forward that I see is to sue YouTube for facilitating fraudulent DCMA claims. @YouTubeCreators @YouTube
English
432
802
8.7K
459.9K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@sopharicks "best of the best", nah more like "grift of the grift". It will only "best" in the same way that the post ranking algorithm on X is mostly about farming
English
0
0
0
15
Sophia
Sophia@sopharicks·
In a post-singularity world, I see three groups of people in the economy. Group 1: the best of the best (artists, creators, performers, chefs - anything where human talent, mastery, and skillfulness excel). Group 2: humans who create value for AI (robotics maintainers, useful data generators). Group 3: humans relying on government support (either as UBI, UHI, or whatever it would be). Any other groups I missed?
English
194
10
140
27.2K
rosey🌹
rosey🌹@thechosenberg·
MIT pays that guy?
rosey🌹 tweet media
English
43
7
909
153.5K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@davepl1968 The only time you get the same answer is when you have set `temperature` to 0, aka "greedy sampling"
English
0
0
2
60
Dave W Plummer
Dave W Plummer@davepl1968·
A lot of people don't seem to understand that if you ask an AI the SAME question, you will get the SAME answer. Every. Single. Time. To avoid that, the models "salt" your prompt by adding random input params so that the model does not take the same path. But LLMs are not random or unpredictable - if you ask it the name of TinTin's dog, and it gives you an answer, then the same model with the same weights and the same input will ALWAYS say Snowy.
Anthony Eckert@EckertAnthony

@davepl1968 The difference between ai and a calculator is that the calculator doesn't change depending on if you tell it there's a ghost in the machine or not moreright.xyz/pages/ghost-te…

English
176
15
392
100.9K
Drew Stephen
Drew Stephen@archidapp·
@s_r_constantin Until we have AI that spontaneously generates text (instead of only responding to user inputs) the consciousness argument will always be a stretch.
English
0
0
0
32
Sarah Constantin
Sarah Constantin@s_r_constantin·
My problem with "machines can never be conscious, only living things can be" is kinda hard to explain, so I want to try to articulate it and see if somebody can poke holes in it.
English
55
3
97
12.8K