Peidugree

@hymetsu33727 @Gotcha_GoFire Suck it, Sentard

@Gotcha_GoFire TRUE Despite this, this ass nigga is more popular than any SS character.

i love power rangers

@jin_saeyoung @Big_Daddy_Johns @Gotcha_GoFire WHERE THE FUCK ARE YOU LIVING MAN? UNDER THE SEA?

@Big_Daddy_Johns @Gotcha_GoFire There's only three roleplay toys

@Gaisoulg RPM SEZ WHAT?

There’s no lore without Sentai though, and btw, it’s been worse off without the Sentai each time they’ve done it so

@SpaceKitaaRiSE Fuck off sentard.

Power Rangers been around 35+ years. Name one big Power Rangers project that succeeded without Super Sentai. Like not even a drop

@agnes_meri93192 @Panathinatikos Ada trump sih

@Panathinatikos Betul dia gk ada rasa malu menyebarkan halu dan omong besar bahkan di forum internasional dimana banyak resarcher yg bisa cek kebenaran omongan dan reputasi dia. Malu bgt rakyat indo

Mulyono's incapability in IR was actually a blessing. At least he sent actual experts and diplomats from Kemlu to handle this nation's international relations and affairs This criminal doesn't even know his own limitations

@aro_arox @Eon1Eno No, that's Fantastic four one, Different animated universe, T'challa never appears in X-men-Spidey 90's verse

@Eon1Eno It was also as dumb when they had Black Panther be his father in X-Men 97 despite him appearing before

Chadwick Boseman will never rest in Peace if they make every Black Panther appearance about him. I'm so glad Marvel Rivals and Netease are not part of Marvel studios, because they treat T'challa like a character, and not a never ending tribute to Chadwick. Let the man rest.

@BatmanWolvie @Eon1Eno *Ryan Coogler and Crew Insist it

@Eon1Eno Marvel studios has done irreparable damage to the Black panther because of Chadwick boseman... His family wanted the character recasted but they did not listen or honor their wishes

I study Mesoamerica: This is wrong Half of those groups didn't even ally with Spain against the Aztec (Spain used Aztec forces against some of them even!) And even the ones who did, also did sacrifices themselves too: They allied against the Aztec to get status, not from hating the Aztec in particular (at least for most of them) -------------- To clarify, sacrifice was universal in Mesoamerican: All civilizations (not "tribes": Cities, writing etc had been a thing in the region for thousands of years, see pic) there did it, including every single group listed here. The Mexica of the Aztec capital of Tenochtitlan it the most, but that's (mostly) just because they were the most militarily successful. The Mexica were also not particularly onerous rulers: They were hardcore militaristic conquerors, yes, but usually left local rulers, laws etc in place and just demanded taxes of economic goods. The fact subject states retained their political interests and agency is what enabled opportunistic defection and side switching. This was common in Mesoamerica, especially if a capital or rival became weak or a power struggle broke out, states would pledge themselves to other states (since, again, even pledging yourself as a subject meant you didn't lose much) to collaboratively take out their own capitals or rivals, to then have more power in the new kingdom they helped prop up: This is basically what happened with Cortes. Plus, the Tlaxcalteca, Huextozinca, Choloteca, and Texcoca were all Nahua like the Mexica: They WERE "Aztecs", to varying arguable extents. Also, of the groups listed, the only ones which allied with Cortes against the Mexica were the Tlaxcalteca, Huextozinca, Texcoca, Totonaca, and Choloteca, and even then, the latter 3 didn't do so unconditionally or in their entirety. To briefly go over each state that was allied with Cortes against the Mexica that had a notable role: ---- * -- The Totonac of Cempoala were a distant Aztec subject, and claimed to want Cortes's help against onerous Mexica taxes, but they claimed their rival Totonac city Tzinpantzinco was an "Aztec fort", and after the ruse was discovered, basically ditched the Conquistadors to get attacked by the Tlaxcalteca * -- Tlaxcala legitimately did ally with the Conquistadors (after initial hostilities) primarily out of resenting/resisting Mexica aggression, but Tlaxcala wasn't an Aztec subject state, it was an enemy state the Mexica were at war with at the time. * -- Cholula was traditionally a major ally of Tlaxcala and Huextozinco, but had recently switched to become a Mexica ally. It provided lodging to the Conquistadors and Tlaxcalteca as they traveled to Tenochtitlan, but the Conquistadors/Tlaxcalteca massacred people there due to an alleged planned ambushed, which the Tlaxcalteca then used as an excuse to put the city back within their sphere of political influence, and they supplied some aid to them later as a result. * -- Huextozinco constantly flip-flopped from being aligned with the Mexica or Tlaxcala as it was located in a narrow pass that provided access between their valleys. It's plausable it resented the Mexica some, but it's also plausable they were just going with the flow at the time, TBH they didn't do much and I'm only mentioning them because you did * --Texcoco was a secondary capital within the Aztec empire, and benefitted from Mexica conquests, tho it's own influence within the empire shrank as Mexica power grew. Ixtlilxochitl II was a specific prince that lost a succession dispute against a Mexica-backed rival heir a few years before Cortes arrived. Ixtlilxochitl II and his followers (either out of personal bitterness from losing the throne, or seeking to make Texcoco more influential within the empire) allied with the Conquistadors and Tlaxcalteca after Moctezuma II died, Tenochtitlan was ravaged by smallpox etc, but the rest of Texcoco's royalty and other Acolhua Nahua towns they had influence over in the eastern half of the valley stayed loyal to the Mexica, until the invaders/separatists won battles and occupied them There's a few other states that played a notable role in the Fall of Tenochtitlan like Chalco or Xochimilco, but they, like Texcoco, only did so after Tenochtitlan was vulnerable anyways and they had more to gain and less to lose politically by switching sides at that point (again, they were trying to gain or hold onto status/power) , and/or even then only switched sides conditionally or with other motives involved: Xochimilco for example stayed loyal even as Tenochtitlan was weakened, and only switched sides when it was forced to due to the Conquistadors, Tlaxcalteca, and Acolhua forces beating and occupying it By contrast, Zapotec, Mixtec, Maya states, and the Purepecha Empire weren't involved in the fall of Tenochtitlan to almost any extent (actually the Mexica tried to ally with the Purepecha against Cortes, but they refused), and as I alluded to earlier, Spanish campaigns against those states and empires actually relied on subject/allied Mexica, Tlaxcalteca etc armies. They also allied with the Spanish against each other: The Zapotec kingdom of Tehuantepec allied with Conquistadors/their subject native forces to defeat their rival, the Mixtec kingdom of Tututepec; the Iximche Mayas allied with Spanish + their native forces to defeat their rival Kiche Maya etc= As I stated, this kind of opportunistic maneuver was common in Mesoamerica, and really has little to do with the Mexica of the Aztec capital in particular: They were not uniquely hated or rallied against, at least not more then many big military superpowers were --------------- For more info: x.com/majora__z/stat… on how Cortes was used by local kings & officials like Xicomecoatl, Ixtlixochtlli II, Xicotencatl, and even Moctezuma II as much as Cortes used them x.com/majora__z/stat… Touches on the motives behind Moctezuma II's actions a bit and his attempt to use Cortes (I should do a more in depth version of this) x.com/Majora__Z/stat… Is a more in depth version of the explanation above re: Aztec being hands off and it enabling opportunistic side switching, and docs.google.com/document/d/1PE… is an even MORE-more in depth version x.com/Majora__Z/stat… and x.com/majora__z/stat… are me addressing people who were skeptical of the above info, in case you want to see me further clarify on things x.com/Majora__Z/stat… has more info on Aztec vs Mexica vs Tenochca vs Nahua etc as terms/their definitions x.com/Majora__Z/stat… is a directory of general Mesoamerican infodumps I've done, including some of the above links, but also stuff on cities, architecture, engineering, warfare, etc

@CyborgTofu Battlized much?

i think it has always been consistent with sentai that the first power up will always clear the second power up

@renjanaharubiru @icykids Gak, gak paham, kismin.....

@icykids Bukan soal dia udah kaya sejak sebelum jadi anggota DPR, tp ini soal empati karena dia pejabat publik. Rakyatmu banyak yg kelaparan, knp mesti flexing harta. Kalo mau pamer ga usah jadi wakil rakyat, jadi selebriti aja malah bebas. Bab sesederhana ini masak ga paham sih.

Not to support DPR in general but as far as I know this gal is one of the most vocal representative out there. She talked a lot about lots of issues. More than that, she used to be an actress, so 40 mio bag isn't too much for her.

@Aochhii @mahirusoldier rot alive on earth, shitbag

@Aochhii Fuck you @ChibiReviews, you bitch ass punk shit

@Ritawaldunya Groypers indo jahanaaaaaaaam

Welcome to Indonesia, a magical place full of contradictions that somehow managed to pull off being both neoliberal (Sri Mulyani’s economic policies) and crony capitalist (behind the scenes politics) at the same time. Logic does not work in this land.

Palestinians, I'm so sorry. Your brothers in faiths hate LGBTQ more than they love you. They easily will choose to throw you under the bus if it means they could k!ll more queer people.

@CelticsGotNext @NebsGoodTakes From itself, you wrong ya dumbfuck, son of a bitch.

@NebsGoodTakes it doesn’t matter what you believe, what side you’re on, celebrating the death of someone (that doesn’t even have any power just their opinion) is wrong.

dc comics cancelling a trans woman's book for celebrating the death of a fascist while employing a war criminal who planned the invasion of iraq

@eryghi_ @asiacchi @nusantaran_chud Hooo gupblok sombong

@asiacchi @nusantaran_chud mana? gw anti lgbt jg ga suka kirik tod

indon conservative always thinking they sit on the same side of table as western conservative like girl ur whole existence is woke for them😭

@firstletterisY Well, Shit x.com/AdityaRajKaul/…

Personally I think the reason why 🇮🇩 revolution failed is 'cause people here are pushover & people pleaser. As someone who got into alot of fights; online & offline, verbal & physical people here avoid direct confrontations even if it's for what is right or even their own sake.

jadi, kalau ada yang bilang film ini “buat edukasi” atau bahkan “keren”? sorry but… edukasi apaan ege? sinopsisnya aja udah misleading, isinya malah parade fetish, queerphobia, ableism, plus victim-blaming. SAMA SEKALI nggak nyambung. edukasi tuh seharusnya ngasih ruang empati dan pemahaman gak sih guys? bukan nge-portray queer people sebagai predator yang maksa dan melecehkan orang lain. apalagi yang bikin makin miris, karya kaya gini justru keluar dari program studi Televisi & Film fakultas ILMU BUDAYA. imagine “ilmu budaya,” tapi hasilnya malah menggambarkan queer dan penyintas Tuli dengan cara paling tidak manusiawi. well this isn’t representation of anything, this is just propaganda dressed up as art.