Samta
1K posts


再过三年,甚至不要三年,我会感谢自己现在看到了这条内容。
可能大神他自己都不知道,我一直觉得他是从未来回到现在的人,在给我们一些指引。
不管你感不感兴趣,我都建议你读一读,这跟我们每个人都有关,非常真诚的内容了。
有福报的人才能刷到❤️
AI最严厉的父亲@dashen_wang
中文
Samta retweetledi
Samta retweetledi
Samta retweetledi

@artryio @ourmanourmed @forallcurious If we still cannot explain how a single living cell began,
how can we demand to comprehend the origin of existence itself?
English
Samta retweetledi
Samta retweetledi

A purely logical question:
Is it reasonable to believe that a universe with no mind, no awareness, and no intelligence
could generate everything within it —
including human beings who possess consciousness, reason, and intent?
More strikingly,
this human — with all of science and technology —
is completely incapable of creating a single living cell from nothing.
As science advances,
the problem does not become simpler — it becomes more complex.
A single living cell contains a DNA strand carrying billions of precise instructions,
where even the smallest error can lead to catastrophic failure.
So the real question is not whether nature did it,
but how something without intelligence or awareness
could produce systems more intelligent than the mind itself.
Can the unintelligent generate intelligence?
Can the unconscious give rise to consciousness?
Or, as the Qur’an asks with profound clarity:
“Were they created by nothing?
Or were they themselves the creators?”
(Surah At-Tur, 52:35)
English
Samta retweetledi

@StuartHameroff It's not tragic; your research is ahead of its time. Be patient!
English

I’m sure DeepMind will do just fine, especially if they emulate biological time crystals (fractal deep learning).
The sad thing is the cartoon neuron straw man is actually the party line in neuroscience and philosophy for how the brain works.
Come-from-Beyond@c___f___b
@StuartHameroff @ShaneLegg I guess DeepMind is cooked if they not only had to stand up a straw man for biological brain but also to use a popular misconception about integrated circuits (x.com/c___f___b/stat…).
English
Samta retweetledi

Marvin Minsky was (sarcastically) the ‘Emperor’ in Roger Penrose’s ‘The emperor’s new mind’. Pat Churchland became a severe, obnoxious and ill-informed critic of Orch OR. But the most disappointing dumbing down was by neuroscientist Christof Koch who, following Francis Crick, pushed membrane only, slow, algorithmic, non-biological ‘cartoon neurons’.
Mona@pushtruth
@StuartHameroff @davidchalmers42 The dumbing down began in the 1990’s with Pat Churchland, Minsky, and their Society of Mind, at MIT. Funding computer science with grand, romantic ideas about the brain working like a computer. What a loss to neuroscience.
English
Samta retweetledi
Samta retweetledi





















