asefweca

20 posts

asefweca

asefweca

@asefweca

Katılım Şubat 2025
4 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Wallpaper Keith
Wallpaper Keith@WallpaperKeith·
@asefweca @G0ffThew Everyone else who has to make a choice without knowing what others have picked is being emotionally blackmailed by blue pushers who need others to save them.
English
2
0
6
210
Geoff Thew
Geoff Thew@G0ffThew·
The calculus to press red is, to put it kindly, short-sighted idiot math. It begins and ends with “what input gives me the best odds of living” with no regard for what the world you’d be living in - where everyone you can trust is dead and everyone else knows it - would look like
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
633
318
6.8K
319.8K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@WallpaperKeith @G0ffThew aren't YOU are the one who put others into danger by convincing people to vote more red, trying to overthrow the result?
English
0
0
1
21
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@WallpaperKeith @G0ffThew my theory of mind say there must be blue pushers, and my instinct say most would press blue the logic already converged, so I pick blue instead of diverge it
English
1
0
16
197
Wallpaper Keith
Wallpaper Keith@WallpaperKeith·
@asefweca @G0ffThew Having thoughtlessly done so, you are now forcing others to risk their life to save you. And not for any good reason either.
English
1
0
10
203
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@WallpaperKeith @G0ffThew force other people to risk their lives? in that situation, I'm risking my lives to save blue pushers
English
1
0
21
327
Wallpaper Keith
Wallpaper Keith@WallpaperKeith·
@asefweca @G0ffThew Why is it dignified to force other people to risk their lives to save you from the consequences of your own poor choice?
English
1
0
11
337
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@BobTheMutant @mykola a good system promote efficiency and simplicity do you think a trust-based, self-governed community like old japan would lose to a communnity where one-upping others is normalized like india?
English
0
0
0
7
Strange Mutant
Strange Mutant@BobTheMutant·
@mykola A good system is one where the incentive structure promotes good behavior. If producing goods and services which people desire and will pay you for, results in you getting what you want, then you have an incentive to strive to learn what you can do that others desire.
English
2
0
16
293
Your Friend Myk
Your Friend Myk@mykola·
Ah this one again. To my dear rationalist friends who are so confused as to why anyone would press the blue button: I don't want anyone's blood on my hands. "But if everyone just presses red then everyone lives" yeah but that's also true for blue, plus no complicity in murder.
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

English
669
75
2.5K
96.4K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@ItsRobbAllen I press blue because red pushers are dumb faggots and I refuse to be a dumb faggot
English
0
0
0
247
Robb Allen
Robb Allen@ItsRobbAllen·
New Trolley problem has arrived, only it's dumber. Pres Red - 100% chance of living. Blue - Non-zero chance of dying. It has nothing to do with empathy for others unless you're stuck on suicidal empathy, which is YOUR fault, not mine. There is ZERO logical reason for ANYONE to press blue. NONE.
vittorio@IterIntellectus

why would anyone even press blue?!?

English
918
148
4.2K
602.9K
Dera II
Dera II@Neutral_OC·
This is the face of a man who who just realized that he won in life.
English
85
1.4K
41.5K
1.7M
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@noriakishikin one dude from that squad just carried the tokyo arc the swords are just that strong, I don't think any wielder have lost to ordinary sorcerer, on screen or in the lore
English
0
0
0
15
reze. 🐈‍⬛ #TENOÍ
reze. 🐈‍⬛ #TENOÍ@noriakishikin·
the anti cloud gouger forces was probs the most secondhand embarrassment ive ever felt whilst reading bachi ngl
English
6
2
202
6.3K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@bitcloud because the western "fundamental human rights" are stupid
English
0
0
0
12
Beff (e/acc)
Beff (e/acc)@beffjezos·
"Ok Codex, clean up this Claudeslop"
English
31
20
585
15.4K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@theNyx__ >no asian in video >account based in south asia
English
0
0
0
142
×
×@theNyx__·
Asian dude violated Black dude at the laundry mat this how it ended🤯
English
1.2K
2.3K
26.8K
4.1M
mike64_t
mike64_t@mike64_t·
This is one of the most frustrating things about Codex. It validates everything three bajillion times, it is scared of dirty state to the point where it avoids introducing derived state so badly that it would rather write incorrect code before it would ever consider not accessing some variable directly it considers a golden source of truth. It will not *ever* introduce derived state even when that’s a good idea, or the only way to solve a problem. It *loves* the SRP wayyyy too badly. Everything becomes goDoExactlyOneThingFrom(source_data), and you end up doing 17 passes over your data in the process. It is a capable programmer but it’s just so f*cking scared of everything. The meme of RL producing three nested try catch blocks to do a single operation still holds, it has just changed form. Not everything is up for validation at all times because there are implied contracts as to where in the architecture that burden is shifted. It does not understand this nuance. With sufficient arguing, yes, but there are more complicated things it understands a lot faster so that really is just RL induced stubbornness because it thinks it knows better.
Sebastian Aaltonen@SebAaltonen

Normal day: Codex again wrote defensive code inside hot inner loops. All of the data is already validated when the object enters the data structure. Super important to always check AI written code and ask it to clean up all the mess. Otherwise technical debt increases gradually.

English
23
23
427
57.2K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@iseelines @reddit_lies Claude is the overhyped one, so when victims start using the real better product it create this wave. GPT 5.4 and codex is not too smart but it works throughly and almost never wrong
English
0
0
0
124
biz
biz@iseelines·
@reddit_lies Codex any good ? I’m getting sus from the amount of posts recommending it over Claude
English
8
0
1
1.4K
Reddit Lies
Reddit Lies@reddit_lies·
Patiently waiting for Grok Code so I can stop forking over $200/month to Anthropic.
English
110
31
2.2K
95.2K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@rohanvarma built in GUI/pop up, agent could add buttons to it, so user don't have to copy-paste commands into terminal
English
0
0
0
70
Rohan Varma
Rohan Varma@rohanvarma·
Every time I ask yall for feedback on Codex, you say two things: 1. SSH dev box support in the app 2. View your files in the app Both are now available with our launch yesterday!! What’s left?
English
365
14
853
58.5K
Zengyi Qin
Zengyi Qin@qinzytech·
How can Codex control Apps you can't even see? 1. Screenshots via macOS system API. Works even when minimized or hidden behind other windows. 2. Clicks and types go directly to the target process. Nothing else is affected. It's operating at the OS level, not the UI level.
English
12
28
856
808.8K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@chetaslua bro this test is insane a non-rubik person would probably never get it right even if they are smart this seems like it benchmarking something else than general intelligence
English
0
0
0
166
Chetaslua
Chetaslua@chetaslua·
OpenAI Image V2 - Maskingtape Alpha failed the test as usual and current all gen also failed it , i hope one day we will get this passed Prompt : A validly scrambled Rubik's cube placed by a mirror, clearly showing its mirror reflection. No harsh light reflections.
Chetaslua tweet media
English
26
12
186
18.5K
asefweca
asefweca@asefweca·
@MissMi1973 @karpathy I have like 1 tech query for every 10 non tech query across different AI even though tech is my main use
English
0
0
2
524
M
M@MissMi1973·
According to OpenAI's own data and a Harvard NBER study, coding queries account for only about 4% of ChatGPT messages, while non-work queries make up over 73%. For non-coding use cases, even $200/month subscribers have experienced stagnation or regression from 2025 through today, precisely because the entire AI industry has mistakenly treated coding as the sole standard for true intelligence. This perhaps reveals a real choice: should AI development serve more people, or more profit?
M tweet media
English
10
45
223
32.9K