Tim Maggs

2.2K posts

Tim Maggs banner
Tim Maggs

Tim Maggs

@atTimMaggs

.........

Melbourne Katılım Kasım 2011
2.5K Takip Edilen322 Takipçiler
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@sama Tried it this morning all it did was recommend a bunch of irrelevant apps to install not relevant to the query some of them were already installed.
English
0
0
0
4
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
big upgrade for codex today! try it for non-coding computer work.
English
676
305
9.8K
792.2K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@TheRohanVarma 100% agree on this, I have noticed that it doesn't love running more than three agents, by the use but it will occasionally crash, without hitting resource constraints. Also is there any way automations can react to inbound webhooks?
English
0
0
0
21
Rohan Varma
Rohan Varma@TheRohanVarma·
Many times a day now, people much smarter than me tell me they are Codex-pilled and that GPT-5.5 was a watershed moment for them. Engineers keep telling me the Codex App is the first interface that got them to leave the terminal agents behind. The Codex App is a fundamental shift in the way I work. I can't even imagine what I was doing before using the Codex App, but it definitely wasn't pretty. Check it out and let us know how to make it even better :)
English
94
19
683
51.3K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@iwearahoodie @voidfreud @AnthropicAI Lol that was pretty much my exact support request how on earth it would happen in the first place yet it happened two weeks in a row. The support request is still yet to be answered.
English
0
0
1
10
hoodie
hoodie@iwearahoodie·
@atTimMaggs @voidfreud @AnthropicAI It wouldn’t even LET you use a week’s worth in 2 hours. It would tap out your 5 hr session window way before that happened.
English
1
0
0
53
Void Freud
Void Freud@voidfreud·
I absolutely love Claude but honestly, fuck you, @AnthropicAI, for all of your paternalism and greed. I don't care if it's Opus 4.7 or Mythos 9.5, when $100 subscription doesn't even let you write products docs in one go. It's mad and should be condemned. Kimi 2.6 is the new king: model is SO GOOD and UNCAGED and it barely costs anything. The whole project review is impossible on Opus 4.7 (medium effort because I can only write "hi" on xhigh) and it cost me 9 cents on Kimi 2.6 and the quality was insane. @bcherny: why'd you even keep $100 plans if all you care about is enterprise users? Anthropic clearly lost its plot. It's absolutely disgusting, NO MODEL is this good as to cost the whole session limits on docs writing. This is going to cost you more in the long run.
English
57
36
1.1K
67.3K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@shreyas1009 @om_patel5 Yeah upload any video and it will understand it, I think you can even do it on the free version
English
0
0
1
16
Om Patel
Om Patel@om_patel5·
THIS GUY JUST GAVE CLAUDE CODE THE ABILITY TO WATCH VIDEOS claude code can't natively see video or hear audio which means every time you want it to "look at this video" you have to screenshot frames manually and transcribe the audio yourself so this guy built a plugin that does the whole perception layer for you > extracts frames with adaptive fps based on your question (claude picks the rate automatically, denser frames for "what happens right before the crash" vs "summarize this talk") > runs audio through gemini, local whisper, or openai whisper for transcription with timestamps > feeds the frames and transcript to claude as one combined input so it reasons about them together you just drop a .mov in and ask questions the install takes 3 commands inside claude code AND it's fully open source, no paywall or account needed claude code just got eyes and ears
Om Patel tweet media
English
37
40
621
99.8K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@stockgeekTV Shame they don't break it down by junior vs senior
English
0
0
2
617
stockgeek 📈
stockgeek 📈@stockgeekTV·
If AI is killing SaaS then why are software dev job openings soaring?
stockgeek 📈 tweet media
English
20
8
110
21.2K
SinMaquinaria
SinMaquinaria@SinMaquinaria·
That’s a pretty funny and classy way to handle a roast. Leonardo DiCaprio clearly leaned into the joke instead of taking it personally, and sending pasta as a callback shows he’s got a sense of humor about his public image. Nikki Glaser also played it well—her roast at the Golden Globes was sharp but not out of bounds, and this exchange just adds to the bit. The playful “does Leo want to smash?” comment keeps it in that comedic, tongue-in-cheek lane. Overall, it’s a rare example of a celebrity roast ending in mutual respect—and carbs.
English
3
0
10
7.7K
Variety
Variety@Variety·
Leonardo DiCaprio sent Nikki Glaser baskets of pasta after she roasted him at the Golden Globes for dating women under 30. “Leo, I’m sorry I made that joke. It is cheap. I tried not to, but, like, we don’t know anything else about you, man. There’s nothing else," Glaser quipped at the time. "Open up! I’m serious! I looked! I searched! The most in-depth interview you’ve ever given was for Teen Beat magazine in 1991. Is your favorite food still ‘Pasta, pasta and more pasta?’” Glaser sends flowers to her roast victims and "the only person who sent something back to me" after the Globes "was Leonardo DiCaprio. He sent me three baskets of pasta as a ‘thank you,’” she added. “So funny. So good. And part of me was like, ‘Does Leo want to smash?’" variety.com/2026/film/news…
Variety tweet media
English
276
463
27.6K
3.6M
hoodie
hoodie@iwearahoodie·
@voidfreud @AnthropicAI Bro I have been coding 12 hours a day for 7 days straight and only JUST managed to get Claude code to hit 99% on a max 20x plan. That was using multiple CC all on 4.7 with max effort and every agent spun up directed to be Opus as well. Idk what everyone is on about.
English
7
0
28
4.2K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@ClaudeDevs Lol reading the comments turns out everyone's usage was close to reset anyway... If something like this happens again guys please vote with your wallets. They literally don't care about community.
English
0
0
0
5
ClaudeDevs
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs·
Over the past month, some of you reported Claude Code's quality had slipped. We investigated, and published a post-mortem on the three issues we found. All are fixed in v2.1.116+ and we’ve reset usage limits for all subscribers.
English
1.9K
2.6K
39.9K
6.5M
anul agarwal
anul agarwal@anulagarwal·
Here is a billion dollar app idea: vibe-code a lighter, cheaper version of Slack that replaces it completely for enterprise customers. Slack generated $1.7 billion in 2023 with 10 million customers - but customers only have 1 problem that it is too pricey. You can easily build a replacement for it by vibe-coding in 2026. The models are too good.
anul agarwal tweet media
Alex Cohen@anothercohen

I'm tempted to finally churn off Slack. We're paying ~$6k/year for 40 people and they just quoted me $21k/year for the business version that includes a BAA (and all the shitty AI features). Incredibly overrated software

English
11
1
33
10.1K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@f3dericobartoli Why does everyone use Gruns the amount of free creative these guys get is insane.
English
0
0
1
70
🍀 Federico Bartoli
🍀 Federico Bartoli@f3dericobartoli·
Figured how a pretty cool way to use Claude (not Code, not Cowork, but the vanilla Claude) to generate optimized product pics (That WILL increase your conversion rate) >>> You upload your product link >>> Claude grabs product info + branding >>> This project is trained on making high converting product images (based on winning concepts) >>> Claude is also trained on great Nanobanana 2 prompts >>> Claude will output perfect prompts >>> You copy and paste the prompts to Nanobanana, generate your images and you’re done >>> You profit from your new great product images I’m currently refining this (see examples) but it should be good to go Will share when it’s ready (Gruns isn’t my client, I just took a random brand to generate images for)
🍀 Federico Bartoli tweet media🍀 Federico Bartoli tweet media🍀 Federico Bartoli tweet media🍀 Federico Bartoli tweet media
English
4
2
60
5.4K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@im_roy_lee @jayteezyio Please spend less time on viral videos, and more time being a functioning member of society.
English
0
0
0
66
Roy
Roy@im_roy_lee·
@jayteezyio im in nyc and i only ever bother to look when im not 100% sure of the weather and right when im changing ill open the app once a month maybe
English
5
0
13
5.4K
Roy
Roy@im_roy_lee·
here's my two cents on this as a random gen z kid first impression: i only wanna see this sort of font when i open duolingo or candy crush, not 24/7 when im on my phone. feels too silly. when you're taking a swing so big as to change the entire default ux of an iphone, you need mass consumer adoption to win and can't get away with just being a prosumer tool so, here's my thoughts on every single proposed feature as it relates to me: - reading list: i read maybe 2 books a year, which is 2 more than 99% of my friends. - personalized weather: i rarely open the weather app bc i don't care that much and would never even opt for a "weather app widget" much less a daily notification about it on my home screen - drafts email replies: before starting company, i literally had ~zero use for my email, much less drafting emails of my own. i consistently wonder how useful this will be to non-prosumers as a primary data source - prepares you for meetings & trips: think this is personally more nifty than necessary, but this potentially seems like a more useful feature. ie if im going to the beach and never bought sunscreen, would it try and remind me of that? feels too good to be true based on current llms, but that could be cool - suspicious charges: i feel this problem is completely solved for me with just an email from my bank. my cards never get stolen - reminders: i never use the reminder app because i am too lazy to type in a reminder and arrogantly assume that i can just remember to do the thing - tracks your health: i'm most interested to see this. a problem i have with all "AI" health apps is that i don't wanna see a dashboard + score + chatbot; i want something that actually gets me out of the door and taking steps or going to the gym, which is definitely doable with llm - one tap intel on wherever you are: my particular use case i got excited about is that i would personally love some sort of agent that proactively suggests events i or a girlfriend might find interesting. tickets just dropped for a rave of an artist someone im talking to likes? i would like to know + buy i am very interested to try it, this is exciting and more net new than 99% of consumer ai tech i've seen
signüll@signulll

excited to share what we have been up to. your iphone’s home screen hasn’t changed in ~20 years. it’s the same static grid of icons since launch with zero awareness of your actual life. @skye is a new agentic home screen for iphone. no telegram. no mac mini. & no claws required. skye is ambient intelligence that just works. it continuously listens to your context & acts on it. it builds your reading lists, gives you personalized weather, drafts email replies, prepares you for meetings & trips, flags suspicious charges, works through your reminders, tracks your health, & gives you one tap intel on wherever you are (restaurants, museums, neighborhoods, etc). all surfaced on your home screen. over the next few posts i’ll break down how it works, why we built it, & why we think it deserves to exist in the world. beta starts today. if you’re on the list, you’ll get access very soon. app store shortly after. deeply appreciate you all following along on this fun little journey. also please join our discord !

English
85
31
1.8K
458.4K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@dvassallo Wow over a million in 5 years and construction still hasn't started. Sounds like an episode of Grand Designs.
English
0
0
2
23
Daniel Vassallo
Daniel Vassallo@dvassallo·
I've been in the process of building a custom home for 5 years. Bought the land in 2021. Got the building permit this year. Haven't started construction yet. During those 5 years, I accumulated thousands of emails with dozens of architects, engineers, surveyors, contractors, government agencies, title companies, and others. Hundreds of PDFs I opened once and never found again. My project management system was email search and my own memory. I could always find individual emails when I needed them. What I couldn't do was see the project. How much money have we actually spent, and on what? Who are all the contractors we talked to, and how did we find each one? What happened with the easement, not one email about it, but the full arc across three years? Why did we stop using the original surveyor? The answers were all in my inbox. But they were spread across hundreds of threads. No single email contained the story. The story only existed in the connections between them. So I tried something. I pointed OpenClaw at my full email inbox and said: read all my emails in chronological order and figure out what happened with this project over the last 5 years. Build me a timeline. Find all the documents. Track the money. Map the people. That's it. I didn't sort anything. I didn't classify anything. I didn't tell it which threads mattered. I just pointed at the inbox and let it work. And it worked way better than I expected. It found 1,850 emails across 450 threads involving 58 people at 35 organizations. From that, it produced 511 timeline events describing what actually happened over 5 years. Not "Daniel emailed the architect" but "Easement delay threatens grading permit" or "architect warns the entire permit depends on securing the neighbor's access agreement." Real project history in PM language. It identified 690 documents and classified each one: invoice, permit, survey map, legal agreement, environmental report, estimate, and so on, and it linked them to the timeline events that referenced them. It extracted 170 finance records from email bodies and PDF attachments. Invoices, payments, estimates, and receipts with amounts, dates, and payees pulled from messy documents. It mapped out 58 contacts with their roles, their organizations, and how they related to the project over time. All interlinked. Click a timeline event, see the emails that produced it and the documents attached. Click a payment, trace it back to the invoice and the email thread. Click a person, see every event they were involved in. It built a dashboard on top of it and for the first time in 5 years, I could actually see the whole project. The full arc. Every dollar. Every person. Every decision. Stitched together from raw correspondence into something I can sit down and browse. The key insight for me was realizing this is basically an ETL process: Extract, Transform, and Load. The emails are the source data. The agent does the extraction from emails and loading into a database. But the really powerful part is the Transform: the LLM reads the raw correspondence with enough context to do intelligent enrichment across hundreds of threads spanning months and years. And by enrichment I don't mean summarization. I mean it actually reconstructed the narrative of the project. It traced how we almost hired the wrong well driller. We originally hired one company, paid a deposit, and were ready to go. Then the architect heard from someone in his network that they weren't reliable. We pivoted to a different driller who came recommended through a chain of referrals the agent traced back to its origin. The new company came out, drilled 140 feet, hit an artesian well with water pressure above ground level, and finished in two weeks. The original deposit got refunded. The agent reconstructed that entire sequence from first contact to final invoice, across dozens of emails and multiple contractors, and presented it as one coherent story. It reconstructed the full permit saga. Four separate permits with the county, each with its own cycle of applications, reviews, correction letters, resubmissions, and approvals. Years of back and forth. The agent built the complete timeline for each permit and linked every document and payment to the right stage. It tracked the money flow end to end. Not just "we paid the architect X." It found every invoice, matched them to the work described in the email threads, categorized the spending, and produced a financial history of the entire project broken down by architect, engineer, surveyor, contractor, county fees, and everything else. It mapped out relationships between people that I had half-forgotten. Which engineer referred which surveyor. Which contractor's crew member later became a separate vendor. Which county reviewer handled which permit. All of it was in the email, I just never had the time to stitch it together myself. One of the most fun things it did was writing honest personality profiles for each contact based purely on their communication style. How responsive they are. How they handle pushback. Whether they tend to over-promise. Whether they're the kind of person who answers at 11pm or takes five days to reply. Reading an AI's unfiltered take on the people you've been doing business with for years, based on nothing but their emails, is surprisingly entertaining and uncomfortably accurate. The thing that surprised me most is how much structure was already hiding in the email. I didn't add information. The agent found what was already there. The timeline, the document graph, the money flows, the cast of characters. It was all latent in the correspondence. Five years of decisions and negotiations and payments, all recorded in email, just never connected. I think a lot of people are sitting on projects like this without realizing it. Your renovation emails are a project database waiting to be assembled. Your legal correspondence is a case file. Your immigration threads are an application history. The raw material has been accumulating for months or years. It's rich, timestamped, and complete. It's just in a format designed for messaging, not for understanding. Point an agent at it. Let it read everything. Let it do the transform. The whole story was in my inbox the entire time. I just needed something that could read all of it at once.
Daniel Vassallo tweet mediaDaniel Vassallo tweet media
English
80
23
570
76.7K
Nick Gray
Nick Gray@nickgraynews·
I must remind you of one thing: If your friend works at Google or Apple or any other public company… And if you want to be an investor in that company’s public stock… You must never speak of the stock with employees Never ever ever ever It is probably illegal but it is also just proper etiquette Instead the best way you can help them is ask about current job openings and think if you know of anyone for their teams Or share about the product and why you like it Just don’t talk about the stock!
English
17
1
33
22.2K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@heygeorgekal @claudeai I hit the weekly limit on the 20x plan on the first day of the week it's pathetic. Just moved to codex on the $100 plan with fast mode high reasoning and barely make a dent in the the 5hr plan...
English
1
0
2
106
George Kal
George Kal@heygeorgekal·
Been a @claudeai fanboy for a long time but the usage limits even on claude max are getting ridiculous Paying for both 100 claude and 100 codex this month. The difference is night and day. - Codex ($100): running parallel agents, barely touching the limits - Claude ($100): 3-4 deep prompts and i'm locked out I get it, they're probably focused on enterprise, but if you're charging $100/mo and people hit the wall after 30 minutes, they will churn. The product is incredible. The packaging is not.
English
56
7
228
21.8K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@Metis__0 @joshdgavin This just implemented it and it's incredible. Ignore what everyone else is saying.
English
0
0
1
19
Madra
Madra@Metis__0·
@joshdgavin One of the best methods for what your describing was recently outlined by Andrej Karpathy the founder of the transformer as an AI Knowlage base. Lots of people that work with coding agents frequently have their own versions of it but his is pretty solid - x.com/karpathy/statu…
Andrej Karpathy@karpathy

LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.

English
1
0
1
263
Joshua Gavin
Joshua Gavin@joshdgavin·
Where are my AI killers? I have 5,000+ hours of consulting calls teaching lowticket -> HT ascension. What's the best way to upload those ALL to one hub and create a deep brain with amazing context.
English
33
0
43
6.5K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@SheTalksFinance If AI implodes it's going to pull SaaS down with it. Most SaaS have some BS ai feature baked in
English
2
0
0
277
Nikki Dunn, CFP®
Nikki Dunn, CFP®@SheTalksFinance·
SaaS stocks may be the best setup for stock pickers right now. The entire group is getting punished, but they won’t all be losers.
English
15
7
106
11.9K
OpenAI
OpenAI@OpenAI·
We’re updating our ChatGPT Pro and Plus subscriptions to better support the growing use of Codex. We’re introducing a new $100/month Pro tier. This new tier offers 5x more Codex usage than Plus and is best for longer, high-effort Codex sessions. In ChatGPT, this new Pro tier still offers access to all Pro features, including the exclusive Pro model and unlimited access to Instant and Thinking models. To celebrate the launch, we’re increasing Codex usage for a limited time through May 31st so that Pro $100 subscribers get up to 10x usage of ChatGPT Plus on Codex to build your most ambitious ideas.
English
1.3K
1.4K
16.1K
5.4M
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@theo Isn't forgecode benchmaxxed?
English
0
0
1
33
Theo - t3.gg
Theo - t3.gg@theo·
Can't stop thinking about how Claude Code is in LAST PLACE on TerminalBench for harnesses using Opus 4.6. There are TEN separate harnesses that use Opus better than Claude Code
Theo - t3.gg tweet media
English
210
76
2.5K
390.4K
Tim Maggs
Tim Maggs@atTimMaggs·
@bcherny My weekly rate limit was reset yesterday and it's saying I've already used 62% I haven't even touched it?
English
0
0
1
11
Boris Cherny
Boris Cherny@bcherny·
Starting tomorrow at 12pm PT, Claude subscriptions will no longer cover usage on third-party tools like OpenClaw. You can still use these tools with your Claude login via extra usage bundles (now available at a discount), or with a Claude API key.
English
1.8K
705
8.8K
6.8M