ATC

6K posts

ATC banner
ATC

ATC

@atcsplashPRMR

Following the white rabbit

Deep end Katılım Mayıs 2019
857 Takip Edilen851 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
Explore or exploit Both lead to success
English
0
0
13
791
AlphaWolf
AlphaWolf@AlphaWolfPRMR·
one of the more extensive writeups about the Coinbase x Hyperliquid news today > Hyperliquid forced THE stablecoin giant to share revenue at the protocol level > ANY stablecoin issuer can stake 500K $HYPE and share yield to become an aligned quote asset > Coinbase tears down their perp platform and enables Hyperliquid builder codes? SPECULATION Hyperliquid
Yaugourt.hl@Yaugourt

Everyone is arguing about $USDH dying. They're missing the point entirely. What happened today is the single most important business move in Hyperliquid's history. Let me explain. Revenue, liquidity, politics, lobby, and what it means for the USDH vote debate. Coinbase is now the official treasury deployer of $USDC on Hyperliquid under AQAv2. Circle handles the technical side (CCTP, cross-chain infra). Both are staking hyperliquid:native. Native Markets agreed to sell the USDH brand assets to Coinbase. $USDH is sunsetting. But the mechanics it pioneered are not. They just got applied to a $4.7B asset instead of a $100M one. Let's break down why this is a win on every single front. LIQUIDITY The biggest complaint from traders and builders for months: fragmentation. $USDH had the alignment but not the liquidity. $USDC had the liquidity but not the alignment. You had to choose. That choice is gone. One stablecoin. One orderbook per pair. No split liquidity. No confusion for HIP-3 deployers picking a quote asset. No friction for new users bridging in. $4.7B in USDC on Hyperliquid, 2x year over year. That is the base generating yield now, not $100M. REVENUE Under AQAv2, the treasury deployer shares 90% of the reserve yield revenue with the protocol. Run the numbers on the current $USDC supply: $4.7B at 3.8% interest rate, 90% shared with the Assistance Fund = $160M+ per year flowing directly into HYPE buybacks. That is $440K per day. Every day. For context, USDH at peak supply was generating a fraction of this on $100M. The AQA model worked. It just needed to be applied at the right scale. POLITICS AND LOBBYING This is the angle most people are sleeping on. Coinbase is the largest publicly traded crypto company in the US. They spent over $100M on crypto lobbying and political action in the last cycle. They are the single most powerful voice for crypto regulation in Washington. The CLARITY Act markup is happening today. Coinbase has been one of its strongest advocates. Having them financially aligned with Hyperliquid, staking HYPE, operating as treasury deployer, is not just a liquidity play. It is a regulatory shield. Every conversation about "is Hyperliquid a US regulatory risk" just got a lot harder to make when Coinbase is literally staked into the network. Circle staking 500K HYPE and moving toward becoming a validator. Jeremy Allaire posting "Hyperliquid." That is institutional endorsement at the highest level. THE USDH QUESTION "Was USDH a failure?" "Was the vote theater?" "Did Native Markets just flip an asset?" No. USDH was a weapon. It was a credible threat that proved a protocol can demand yield sharing from stablecoin issuers. Before USDH, Hyperliquid had $5B+ in USDC generating $150-200M/year for Circle and Coinbase. The protocol saw none of it. USDH launched. The AQA model proved that yield can be redirected onchain, transparently, back to the protocol. It only reached $100M in supply but that was never the point. The point was forcing incumbents to the table. Basit said it best: the entire lifecycle of USDH from launch to sunset should be studied. Coinbase didn't come to Hyperliquid out of goodwill. They came because USDH proved they would lose the venue if they didn't align. "But Paxos offered better economics during the vote." Maybe on paper. But 95-100% of a stablecoin that might have also struggled to reach $100M in supply is still less revenue than 90% of $4.7B. The vote was never about picking the best yield split on a small asset. It was about creating the leverage to capture yield on the dominant one. WHAT THIS MEANS FOR BUILDERS USDC becomes the canonical quote asset for HIP-4 outcome markets. No more guessing which stablecoin to build around. Hyper Foundation is issuing grants to HIP-3 and HIP-1 deployers who integrated USDH to cover migration costs. Feeless conversions from USDH to USDC during the transition. For HIP-3 deployers running equity perps, commodity perps, outcome markets: one liquidity pool, one collateral asset, deeper books. SECOND ORDER EFFECTS Coinbase operating perps through Hyperliquid via builder codes? Not confirmed, but now structurally possible. Their existing perp product is weak. Hyperliquid's infrastructure is the best in crypto. The incentive alignment is there. Tether now has a clear path to compete. AQAv2 is an open spec. Any stablecoin issuer can stake 500K HYPE and share yield to become an aligned quote asset. Competition is good. AQAv2 becomes a blueprint for every other chain. Hyperliquid just proved that a protocol can force the largest stablecoin issuers in crypto to share revenue at the protocol level. No one has done this before. Hyperliquid.

English
1
0
3
173
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
I always wondered how Coinbase and Hyperliquid would coexist in the United States I’m surprised and happy to see Coinbase/Circle working with Hyperliquid now The fact that $HYPE ETFs are launching as well show that they’ll be apart of US regulations soon thanks to @HyperliquidPC
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong

USDC is becoming the standard across crypto markets. Coinbase is deploying USDC on @HyperliquidX to help grow the ecosystem and scale how capital moves. Hyperliquid.

English
0
0
0
50
Luke Cannon
Luke Cannon@lukecannon727·
There has not been a BTC trade on @Coinbase in more than an hour The last 1 minute candle is from 75 minutes ago The orderbook is currently displaying prices hundreds of dollars above Binance & Hyperliquid My orders fail to go through on both web & mobile, both advanced & simple trading Guess those 14% of employees they just laid off might have been crucial?
Luke Cannon tweet media
English
160
127
2.1K
496.4K
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
$NBIS $200 is close with earnings next week Market cap has finally caught up with its backlog at around $49B which was part of the reason why I preferred this one over others when it had $20B market cap Future revenue is good to focus on especially if it’s from $META $MSFT Also $NVDA helping them scale and become a strategic partner is great news for credibility. Not to mention their data center buildouts in the US I can only label this insane pump as the market repricing how valuable $NBIS is to the ai infrastructure and it’s still just trading at 1x their backlog
ATC tweet media
ATC@atcsplashPRMR

Trimmed as it’s now touching the 1.272

English
0
0
2
1.3K
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
$HOOD Seems to be the laggard and I think it’s cause crypto (it tends to follow) is also lagging a little (or being pulled up by equities) but with a lot of ai/tech at highs I don’t see why it’s not a buy here Especially with the Trump accounts they seem to be leading to capture the next generation and if you’re young this can be a long term play because of that Above $85-90 and it looks good
ATC tweet media
English
0
0
0
66
DontRunImAsian
DontRunImAsian@DontRunImAsian·
Ten years from now, I want to look back and say I was successful every single year for two decades. Success isn't calling the top or bottom. It isn't sharing a $1k PNL publicly and hiding that you're down 50k. It's having a real robust long term strategy. Build your portfolio like it's going to be passed down to the next generation and not just the next quarter.
DontRunImAsian tweet media
English
2
0
9
177
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
@Nstr_tj Thank you
English
0
0
1
34
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
@The_JDK99 Lovely explanation thank you
English
0
0
0
78
JDK Analysis 🇪🇺
JDK Analysis 🇪🇺@The_JDK99·
Passive (Limit) vs. Aggressive (Market) Order; When you place a limit sell order, you act as a passive seller: You’re providing liquidity and waiting for price to come to you, execution is not guaranteed. (This is the role market makers typically play) When you place a market sell order, you execute immediately at the best available bid = the highest price where passive buyers are providing liquidity. In doing so, you take liquidity. Price’s only function is to facilitate trade; matching aggressive (market) orders with passive (limit) liquidity. For a market sell order to execute, it requires sufficient passive buy liquidity. If enough liquidity exists at the current price, price does not need to adjust. However, if the order size exceeds available liquidity, price must move lower to access additional bids. The order effectively "walks the book" consuming liquidity until fully filled. Only market orders can move price. Limit orders determine how easily price can move. So when passive sellers absorb new longs, it means aggressive buyers (market buy orders opening longs) are being met by limit sell orders that prevent price from moving higher. (check my pinned post for more detail).
JDK Analysis 🇪🇺 tweet media
English
2
6
47
2.7K
JDK Analysis 🇪🇺
JDK Analysis 🇪🇺@The_JDK99·
$BTC OrderFlow 📊 Earlier today, a passive spot buyer was absorbing significant aggressive spot selling, supporting price. At the NY open, spot selling slowed and flipped into buying, effectively releasing the ‘brake’... price snapped higher, further fueled by new longs entering. At the range high, passive sellers began absorbing those incoming longs. These longs became trapped, and as they started to unwind, price moved lower with ease, especially as the earlier passive buyer was no longer present to provide support. Overall, the current move appears rather weak: lower volume, limited spot participation, and primarily driven by long unwinds rather than intentional selling (i.e., new shorts). This results in a rather unconvincing move back into the previous range low. (NFA!) #Bitcoin #BTC
JDK Analysis 🇪🇺 tweet media
English
4
1
44
3.8K
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
@The_JDK99 You said passive sellers absorbed the longs at the top so I’m wondering what is a passive seller If they’re passive it sounds like sell orders being being hit so I can only assume it’s longs closing but not sure
English
1
0
0
158
Stefan
Stefan@Stefan_B_Trades·
Market stands by 5 fundamental truths… 1st: Anything can happen
English
12
5
105
7.9K
Skewga.hl
Skewga.hl@skewga_capital·
It’s been incredibly frustrating being long oil and explorers in last few days. It’s like there’s a seller with infinite barrels sitting on the ask.
English
27
9
316
23.2K
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
@Nstr_tj Sorry didn’t know if you meant on the orderflow cause recently I’ve seen it on ltf only
English
1
0
1
21
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
@Nstr_tj I’d prefer something in the middle of those options, 10-20k seem like weekly levels for htf swings so something like a D/4h would be nice to see once in a while for swing focused traders I know you focus on intraday but updating on htf areas would be cool to see
English
1
0
2
60
ATC
ATC@atcsplashPRMR·
Trimmed as it’s now touching the 1.272
English
0
0
1
1.3K