David Lockhart

1.8K posts

David Lockhart banner
David Lockhart

David Lockhart

@avicenna

Statistician. Gamer. Multi-purpose geek. thinking about thinking learning about learning talking about talking

Katılım Nisan 2007
1.2K Takip Edilen330 Takipçiler
Chris Altamura
Chris Altamura@caltamura3·
@instrumenthull Could you link to a peer-reviewed article that elaborates on this? Just tryna educate myself
English
1
0
0
146
Peter Hull
Peter Hull@instrumenthull·
Apropos of nothing, here is a problem set question from one of my undergrad econometrics courses
Peter Hull tweet media
English
25
77
1.2K
148.2K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Dave Richeson
Dave Richeson@divbyzero·
Here's a technique I just learned for creating random-feeling bijective functions between finite sets of the same size—like for assigning tasks to people. I will use it the next time I have to randomly assign students to groups. • Put the names of students along the top in
Dave Richeson tweet media
English
2
4
30
5.7K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Michael Friendly @datavisfriendly.bsky.social
An antidote for: If you've got too many people coming to your door, saying, "A quick stats question; it'll only take a minute" ...
Michael Friendly @datavisfriendly.bsky.social tweet media
English
8
76
431
52.5K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Jay Cummings
Jay Cummings@LongFormMath·
In case you ever wonder what REALLY goes on at bachelor parties…
Jay Cummings tweet media
English
97
254
7.8K
711.8K
David Lockhart
David Lockhart@avicenna·
@lathropa It is not my area but I was taught that parents cannot correctly classify recorded cries of their child (gold standard is what action calmed the crying) and that parents typically use context cues (eg long time since feeding, probably hungry) not info in the actual cries
English
0
0
1
9
David Lockhart retweetledi
Health Psychology Review
Health Psychology Review@healthpsychrev·
📢New article alert!📢 Have a look at this impressive scoping review by @louisepoppe_ et al on how to develop causal DAGs within health psychology research, including valuable guidance and recommendations on creating DAGs! Read the full article here: doi.org/njzz
Health Psychology Review tweet mediaHealth Psychology Review tweet media
English
0
18
49
19.4K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Vince Buffalo
Vince Buffalo@vsbuffalo·
Step aside Monty Hall, Blackwell’s N=2 case for the secretary problem is way weirder.
Vince Buffalo tweet mediaVince Buffalo tweet mediaVince Buffalo tweet media
English
50
265
2.4K
280.4K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Experimental Philosophy
Experimental Philosophy@xphilosopher·
Experimental studies keep giving us more and more evidence against the theory that people have two concepts of causation (dependence vs. production) This is a nice window into how recent work in cognitive science of causal judgment is going beyond previous approaches A thread
Experimental Philosophy@xphilosopher

There’s a famous theory that people have two different concepts of causation (production vs. dependence) Experimental studies keep providing more and more evidence against this theory Here’s the very latest: @TadegQuillien @paul_henne @kevingoneill osf.io/preprints/psya…

English
3
16
59
8.9K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Almost Sure
Almost Sure@Almost_Sure·
everybody asks *what* is probability. Nobody asks *how* is probability
English
11
18
168
13.9K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Arthur Spirling
Arthur Spirling@arthur_spirling·
Don’t want to be that guy but this is technically a “causes of effects” question and thus the relevant ATE is not well defined
Nassim Nicholas Taleb@nntaleb

@ben_golub Why don't you fuck off?

English
2
3
63
13.6K
Midterms are Nov. 3rd 2026. Go register voters
anyone done alot of time intelligence functions in R? eg. year over year, week over week, month over month, Current ytd vs. prior year ytd, etc? lubricate is really helpful but not sure if there are other packages that also help here
English
7
7
59
12K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Ashley Fitzgerald
Ashley Fitzgerald@RizomaSchool·
I just discovered something called accidental baroque which are photographs that feel like baroque paintings. I love this as a genre so much. Send me your accidental baroques.
Ashley Fitzgerald tweet mediaAshley Fitzgerald tweet mediaAshley Fitzgerald tweet mediaAshley Fitzgerald tweet media
English
257
1.9K
17.4K
879K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
#Today in 1982, in a posting made to a Carnegie Mellon bulletin board, Professor Scott Fahlman proposes the first known use of emoticons While they became famous in 1980s & beyond, their origin remained unknown until 2002, when the original message was retrieved from backup tape
Massimo tweet media
English
6
19
112
37.4K
David Lockhart retweetledi
Peyman Milanfar
Peyman Milanfar@docmilanfar·
“when a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure”
Peyman Milanfar tweet media
English
20
233
1.8K
112.1K
David Lockhart
David Lockhart@avicenna·
@IsabellaGhement @ChelseaParlett Thanks for the explanation. I agree with a lot of it, but to paraphrase Bill James "the alternative to good CI is bad CI not no CI". It is hard to do right but CI theories clarify how to tell the good from the bad. But there's no magic wand that tada makes a param causal.
English
1
0
5
123
Isabella R. Ghement
Isabella R. Ghement@IsabellaGhement·
@avicenna @ChelseaParlett Just because you think upfront about something, it doesn’t mean you are going to get it “right”. That’s ultimately what it boils down to. We all know human thinking is flawed at the best of times. 🤭
English
1
0
4
146
Chelsea Parlett
Chelsea Parlett@ChelseaParlett·
Why isn’t EVERYONE doing causal inference??? But also, how is ANYONE doing causal inference???? 😅
English
10
7
136
20K
Isabella R. Ghement
Isabella R. Ghement@IsabellaGhement·
@ChelseaParlett I may get heat over this, but my own feeling is that causal inference will one day be frowned upon as much as stepwise model selection is frowned upon today. 🫣
English
2
0
6
423
David Lockhart retweetledi
Dr Ellie Murray, ScD
Dr Ellie Murray, ScD@EpiEllie·
Do you want to use causal graphs to improve your research but never know where to start? In a series of papers, we used the same data and research question—one where we are pretty darn sure we know the real causal effect is that there isn’t one—to compare graph drawing methods.
GIF
English
3
19
87
13K