avidresearch

32.8K posts

avidresearch

avidresearch

@avidresearch

Katılım Ekim 2009
1.3K Takip Edilen12.1K Takipçiler
avidresearch retweetledi
Bio Stocks™
Bio Stocks™@BioStocks·
$CYTK PT raised to $100 at Mizuho
English
0
4
10
3.9K
Juan P. Serrate, DVM
Juan P. Serrate, DVM@JPZaragoza1·
$REPL advancing a bit pm. Guess it's because Cantor's note with a positive tone for approval after meeting with mgmt. They "came away incrementally more positive in the likelihood of approval". I view the reasons for optimism as fairly weak in particular that their sales team is "pumped about a potential launch" and the support from the melanoma community (?). The roles of Prasad and Pazdur in the CRL and the presenced of new team members at the FDA involved in the review remain speculative. I expect another CRL.
English
3
1
9
2.9K
avidresearch retweetledi
C. Michael Gibson MD
C. Michael Gibson MD@CMichaelGibson·
Prime Medicine seeks approval for a gene‑editing therapy after treating 2 patients with chronic granulomatous disease setting a precedent for evaluation of highly individualized therapies for ultra‑rare conditions where conventional trials are infeasible. statnews.com/2026/03/03/pri…
English
2
10
52
4.1K
avidresearch retweetledi
Night Sky Today
Night Sky Today@NightSkyToday·
🚨: There have been thousands of generations of humans, and you are alive to witness the first photo of a Sunset on another World.😮 This is a real photo of the sunset on Mars.
Night Sky Today tweet media
English
359
3.9K
22.6K
507K
avidresearch
avidresearch@avidresearch·
@ErikOtto2 Thanks! Wasn’t aware of that data. Looks gr8 on first glance.
English
0
0
0
730
Erik A. Otto
Erik A. Otto@ErikOtto2·
@avidresearch This is the embargoed data scheduled for oral presentation at 1:00 pm ET.
English
1
0
4
1.4K
avidresearch
avidresearch@avidresearch·
@nociFTW Are there any differences? “That said, there are important differences: (1) tazemetostat is dosed significantly higher (800mg BID); (2) it targets the EZH2 subunit (genetically higher-risk vs. FULC's EED”
English
1
0
0
453
avidresearch
avidresearch@avidresearch·
$KPTI Prior Ph3 SIENDO trial in broader Endometrial Cancer indication narrowly missed stat significance and the current EC trial focuses on the right subgroup (wild type p53, esp in pMMR). Yes they need financing but even if MF symptom endpoint fails (making it harder in US), it has a high probability of success in EC. Why is market not giving it credit? Its perceived as having a bad tox profile in MM (other drugs with more fav safety and efficacy). Risk benefit much different in both MF and EC trials. Selinexor showed good efficacy in both MF and EC in prior trials and they are using half of the dose used in Multiple Myeloma which should make safety much more manageable. Prior management dropped the ball on this and once a week 60mg should have been explored early in MM ph1/2 studies. Even if March read out in MF fails, it has $1B/yr potential in EC (with much higher POS given narrow miss in broader ph3). Why is it trading at MKtcap of $165M? Bizarre!
@KinatSofrim@kinatsofrim

@harrisoncn1 @peter_mpn @KartosThera @buysidebio @Biopharmaddict @bose_prithviraj @Blood_Cancers @RaajitRampal @ByMadeleineA @LongwoodLeaders @mpnadvocacy @HealthTree @mpdrc @IcahnMountSinai @pankitvachhani @OncLive $KPTI Cantor covers Xport-EC-042 puts another $1b+ in sales /359 x.com/kinatsofrim/st…

English
4
1
10
4.4K
Alexander G
Alexander G@AlexandrG1980·
@avidresearch $KPTI - current FD shrs outstanding 2x of ordinary shrs. - when convertibles mature, they dilute even further at ~$6,5
English
1
0
1
589
Adu Subramanian
Adu Subramanian@plainyogurt21·
@CloisterRes scale for manuf, administration, and lly marketing 9hence the hims stuff.
Adu Subramanian tweet media
English
3
0
1
1.1K
avidresearch retweetledi
Adam Feuerstein ✡️
Adam Feuerstein ✡️@adamfeuerstein·
New from me on $QURE and FDA. Free, no paywall. The FDA, urged to avoid controversy, creates a new headache with attack against UniQure Anonymous diatribe from a senior official plunges agency back into headlines statnews.com/2026/03/06/fda…
English
52
51
295
102.8K
avidresearch
avidresearch@avidresearch·
@dragonballchad don’t think they dilute much if MF fails. They just extended runway slightly until end of Q2, close to when EC ph3 results are expected.
English
0
0
3
112
Dragonballchad
Dragonballchad@dragonballchad·
@avidresearch because they will dilute heavily if MF fails and there's the risk of the readout not being positive either.
English
1
0
2
125
avidresearch
avidresearch@avidresearch·
@binarypharmer may be he can take one on his way out. Dont see him lasting too long.
English
0
0
0
100
avidresearch
avidresearch@avidresearch·
Its so obvious Vinay DOES NOT KNOW how to interpret clinical data and risk/benefit in rare diseases. Also, changing goal post established via prior regulatory feedback should not be treated as cavalierly as he does (utter disregard as evidenced by multiple submissions) How does he still have a job ???
English
12
9
103
7.2K