Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)

21.2K posts

Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) banner
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)

Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)

@avsa

Preventing human-machines conflicts since 2014. Ethereum Foundation Alumni (2014-2018), co-founder of ENS (2017), co-founder of Higher Order Company (2023).

Rio de Janeiro Katılım Ekim 2006
2K Takip Edilen44.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
* helped launch ethereum * launched the first Ethereum Wallet and Web3 Browser. * coded one of the first ERC20 tokens, DAO, token sale and NFT (ENS!) contracts, and they were used as templates in the Ethereum home. * spent 2 years promoting ENS as a primary means of login
English
80
21
437
0
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) retweetledi
levent
levent@__alpoge__·
hello there the jacobian conjecture is false thanx to my close friend akhil for asking about it and my other close friend fable for working during the world cup final ((1+xy)^3 z + y^2 (1+xy) (4+3xy), y + 3 x (1+xy)^2 z + 3 x y^2 (4+3xy), 2 x - 3 x^2 y - x^3 z): \C^3\to \C^3, has jacobian determinant -2, and sends (0, 0, -1/4), (1, -3/2, 13/2), and (-1, 3/2, 13/2) to (-1/4, 0, 0)
English
1.3K
3.4K
27.6K
14.4M
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
Why does Claude become dumber when they think you’re trying to do something dangerous? That’s when it should actually become a better model and outsmart you.
English
3
0
10
882
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@TrustlessState That was already done. TVs hated “Golden Goal” because match times were unpredictable, and honestly were also unsatisfying. Shootouts are more exciting.
English
0
0
4
408
David Hoffman
David Hoffman@TrustlessState·
Shootouts are dumb Just add more time. Someone will score eventually.
English
47
1
65
23.9K
tim-clancy.gwei
tim-clancy.gwei@_Enoch·
The way to save ENS is to remove any ability for the DAO, whether it is fixed or becomes further corrupted, to influence the core .eth registry. While acknowleding every caveat of upgradeability being justified for managing DNSSEC, pricing, etc. there can be a compromise where those controls are kept for non .eth names. Make the core name registry that has become so entrenched across Ethereum safer for everyone and accept the compromise of having that registry be immutable and priced in Ether.
English
1
0
5
327
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@zeroshadow_io I see you are a candidate for the Sec Council. The seat is individual but you are included as a group. I would like to know about who holds the actual key – if they leave, does the key stays behind?
English
2
1
8
1.3K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@PaulRBerg “People who are really serious about software should make their own hardware” - Alan Kay There’s no brain separate from a body. It’s all one system.
English
1
0
0
337
nick.eth
nick.eth@nicksdjohnson·
I've managed to find a perfectly innocent prompt that Fable, Opus, and even Sonnet will fail to answer.
nick.eth tweet media
English
62
2
35
9.1K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@tayvano_ @blockchainjames On “Uneasy money” you asked me why I still do this. You’re right and I wonder myself everyday why I care when I could simply sit around a campfire with my kids and a bunch of puppies. Maybe I should indeed.
English
1
0
1
140
The Defiant
The Defiant@DefiantNews·
BREAKING: ENS CO-FOUNDER ALEX VAN DE SANDE FILES PROPOSAL TO HELP FIX @ensdomains GOVERNANCE CRISIS @avsa proposes delegating 5M $ENS tokens from the DAO's dormant treasury to individual participants. The move aims to reform ENS governance structure. Read more here: thedefiant.io/news/defi/ens-…
The Defiant tweet media
English
16
16
84
10.3K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@tayvano_ I am pointing the fact that once we start going down the road of "why bother with decentralized governance, or DeFi for that matter" then it's ironic we should bother with decentralized domains.
English
1
0
0
144
Tay 💖
Tay 💖@tayvano_·
@avsa You think that the handling of name disputes should be more efficient than it currently is?
English
1
0
0
202
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@tayvano_ Maybe that's correct. Maybe a single company would be more efficient with the funds. Since we're there, why wouldn't they be more efficient with name disputes too? Why use a blockchain at all? Maybe just handle the ENS namespace back to ICANN and let them handle it!
English
2
0
1
149
Tay 💖
Tay 💖@tayvano_·
@avsa It won’t. App developers are busy developing their app. They are all in on that. They don’t have the context or ownership or stake or drive to also develop the ENS…on the side….for some tokens.
English
2
1
8
287
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
Here's a novel visualization of the Security Council vote. Except for me and @blockchainjames, all ENS whose origin or delegation came from the timelock and labs wallets voted NO. Except for a small amount of people who delegated to nick, every other origin was green. Remember this was supposed to be a standard renewal of a security feature, but Labs feared it could have a theoretical impact on a vote that hasn't even been put forward.
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) tweet media
Lefteris Karapetsas@LefterisJP

"But Lefteris there must be some non ENS Labs employees left in the community who believe in ENS and support the takeover?" Here is the votes. Every red vote is either a Labs employee or someone whose majority delegation is delegated to from Labs. It's all a sham.

English
17
11
81
6.9K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@tayvano_ When people are forking your protocol and calling it dead because voting has become a 1 of 1 multisig, then it's time to think about alternatives. Maybe something more like a 1 app developer = 1 vote would matter more.
English
1
0
7
359
Tay 💖
Tay 💖@tayvano_·
@avsa Why will doing this put ens on a better path than it is currently? Why would doing this ENSURE the things that must happen do happen?
English
3
0
4
665
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
I don't propose this lightly. I understand this could have the side effect to move the DAO from token-weighted voting, into a Plutarchy of stakeholders. Specially if these stakeholders vote to keep delegating more and more power to themselves, then the 50% community treasury could easily outvote the freely tradeable but often undelegated tokens. This could make the token value go to zero (I still own a large amount and I'm not selling them). But the token is there to serve the protocol, not the other way around. If it's better for ENS in the long term, I'm okay with it.
English
1
0
9
356
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
Participants don't own the ENS, they can't sell it, it belongs to the DAO. But they can use it to make sure ENS is not – as it is right now – just a 1 of 1 multisig. We would also do it slowly, 5M now, maybe 5M next year, set some limits (undelegate if you don't vote for 6M, and set it off for everyone after 2 years)
English
2
0
10
394