Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)

21.1K posts

Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) banner
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)

Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)

@avsa

Preventing human-machines conflicts since 2014. Ethereum Foundation Alumni (2014-2018), co-founder of ENS (2017), co-founder of Higher Order Company (2023).

Rio de Janeiro Katılım Ekim 2006
2K Takip Edilen44.7K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
* helped launch ethereum * launched the first Ethereum Wallet and Web3 Browser. * coded one of the first ERC20 tokens, DAO, token sale and NFT (ENS!) contracts, and they were used as templates in the Ethereum home. * spent 2 years promoting ENS as a primary means of login
English
82
21
429
0
Taelin
Taelin@VictorTaelin·
@skdh oh, well, I guess that... makes much more sense who could've guessed physicists aren't stupid! sorry from extrapolating from CS
English
5
0
54
3.7K
ω
ω@Faltz009·
@avsa Ohh interesting gonna check it out later too! It's all triangles 👀
English
1
0
1
11
ω
ω@Faltz009·
Why do particles have the masses they do? Turns out there's a geometry to reality, and if you know it, you can predict the right masses and it lines up with empirical results. This is a huge quantitative result for computational physics, feedback is much appreciated! In collaboration with my friend and researcher @samsenchal Link to the paper and .js simulation in the comments! 🔗 Special thanks to @EtherDais for the trefoil piece of the puzzle 👀
ω tweet mediaω tweet mediaω tweet mediaω tweet media
ω@Faltz009

Particle masses are harmonic ratios In 1951, Friedrich Lenz published what may be the shortest paper in Physical Review history: 27 words noting that the proton-to-electron mass ratio equals 6π⁵ to high precision. What about the mass of the remaining 18 particles? What about of them as functions of pi, Euler's number and basically integers??? A neutron is an electron + e??? Help me double check this, please! Link in the comments!

English
50
119
781
51.4K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
I'm coming back here to say that I've been thinking about this and found you actually have an interesting point here. It's not about e being special, but it's about why mass has a negative exponent while time and length have a positive one. I think I got it. Because Planck Mass is the wrong unit. Of all Planck units it's the only one that doesn't sit in an extreme. It's the mass of a microbe somewhat. Planck Energy, which it's equivalent to, is another story. It represents the maximum theoretical energy. It's a huge number. But still it's weird compared to the others because time and length represent the smallest possible unit, while a graph of log Planck energy would only have negative exponents. So the real interesting natural unit is actually an inverse energy. There are some areas in which physicists use Inverse GeV as a more useful unit so there's precedent. But also, there's the Compton wavelength, where the larger the mass the smaller the wavelength. So you were to plot objects by wavelength instead of mass-energy, then we would have all positive numbers. I will definitely consider an update to triangleofeverything.com that inverts the x axis!
English
1
0
1
15
ω
ω@Faltz009·
@avsa Those e powers do look interesting, there's something there about the parametrization of space rly
English
1
0
0
12
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
I was supposed to mean Tauist, a believer in the Hartl word of the Tau 😉 I love modifying Planck units for any purpose. For example I find it looks more elegant when we replace h' with h/τ . By normalizing Planck to e instead of 1 we get Planck units to be e to a bunch of half powers – which is cool but the same happens for any other number including pi or x. It actually gets even more interesting if we decide to normalize -1, I or more interestingly.. 4. Regarding your AI illustration, you should ask your AI to build it in real 3d, like you did the javascript visualization and you'll get nicer torus. Take a look at this link: #32283c03020001545904fffff50201030303010105-6.0.0.0-100b04325b00860f89" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">triangleofeverything.com/hiperspirograp…
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) tweet mediaAlex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) tweet mediaAlex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) tweet media
English
2
0
1
24
ω
ω@Faltz009·
I'm admittedly bad at graphics and that escaped me in the middle of things but I swear I'm trying to improve lol, noted I have aphantasia, I'm good with shapes but it's weird for me how I process them Tbh I've used eulers identity, I don't think you can escape from the triad and pretty sure there's a Taoist reference I've made somewhere that you go from directionality to coherence to interaction to everything else (1 to 2 to 3 to 10,000 things) You might like @samsenchal work on that tho, he is a much more serious guy working on that specifically github.com/SASenchal/God-… I guess the point of the constraint is simply that it has to be true since these are formal axioms in math and these spatial constants are self-evident in physics, as geometry is a measurement of space and space is physical I just thought it really weird that you could express masses as n*pi^x across the board Ive made several improvements to measurements and calcs (there was good feedback in the thread) but haven't published them yet But I'm a wordcel, I just stumbled upon some physics and decided to publish it, I'm way past that now getting where I want with language and the pdfs in the repo in my pinned post are much more interesting
English
2
0
0
30
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
I really like the visualizations and I found normalizing Planck units to e intriguing but wasn't convinced of any benefit to it (that would be a paper in itself). As a Taoist I take religious issue with the fact you treated π as the natural circle unit instead of τ. I'm sure if you had used it for your search you'd find completely different values – which tells me it's more about search parameters than intrinsic geometry. Also, fix your AI slop: these are not circles nor a single string and definitely isn't a Hopf Fibration.
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) tweet media
English
1
0
1
28
ω
ω@Faltz009·
The story behind the paper is: >I've realized eulers number is a natural constant since it predicts a number of physical processes >if that's true, the mass of the unit sphere in t(1) is 'e' in natural numbers >the Planck sphere should be the unit sphere then >applied this constraint, found the fine structure constant >then tried to figured out if I could calculate mass from it, for the proton and neutron it worked >then random guessed the other formulas It is actually true rigorous numerology (the study of the geometry of numbers and transformations themselves) The error for the fine structure constant is actually negligible since it depends on energy and this is a general geometric derivation I keep wondering if people actually read the paper or just throw in an LLM and ask for criticism, the random search formulas were not the main point, it's acknowledged and it's the part I literally ask for help figuring out
English
1
0
0
30
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
Got to talk to real Gemma and was impressed by her fast response times and smart answers. Until I realized she only sounded smart, after I spent hours yak shaving with her trying to do a single job, in which she promised she’d keep doing it and that she’d ask Claude about it. Until I asked Claude directly and it got on the first try and even said “I’ve built a tool for this already, I’m surprised that Gemma didn’t do”
English
1
0
1
141
Bob Summerwill
Bob Summerwill@BobSummerwill·
@avsa I've had this kind of regression both with OpenClaw and Hermes Agent. I think it's often related to different contexts which you are unaware are even different. And refreshes.
English
1
0
0
102
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
Claude pretended to be another model! I had openclaw running with Claude for quick answers and Qwen, a local model for scheduled tasks. Qwen used to take about five minutes to generate an ok response, while Claude answers in seconds. Then I read about Gemma, Google’s new local frontier model and asked open claw to try it out. Response time about a minute for a quality response. Great! Let’s experiment switching it for a week. Joked with Claude he was at risk of being replaced. Gemma was responding really great, resolved a serious issue quickly, promised to do a ton of jobs during the night. The next day nothing scheduled was actually done. Openclaw had excuses. But these excuses came weirdly fast. I asked what model he was running. “I’m sorry, I told you I was Gemma last night but actually I’ve been Claude all this time”
English
1
1
6
1.2K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) tweet media
Ole Lehmann@itsolelehmann

Ex Machina is no longer sci-fi. China has finally built it. The company is AheadForm, founded in Shanghai. The product is the world's most hyper-realistic robotic face. Silicone skin you can't tell from human, 25 micro motors hidden underneath pulling the face into real expressions. And RGB cameras embedded inside the pupils so when it looks at you, it actually sees you from where its eyes are. They raised $28.5M to "give AI a head," which is also where the name comes from. AheadForm = a head form. This is the opposite of where everyone else in robotics is focused. Unitree, Figure, Tesla, Boston Dynamics: all about the body. AheadForm chose the face because they think trust is the harder problem to solve, and trust gets decided at the face. The reason nobody else has tried this is the "uncanny valley." It's the creepy zone where a robot looks almost human but not quite, and looking at it just feels wrong even when you can't say why. Most roboticists believed no amount of engineering could make a face realistic enough to escape it. So they gave up and kept robots cartoonish on purpose: big anime eyes, exaggerated features, clearly synthetic. But AheadForm decided to treat it as an engineering bug instead. Add enough motors, tune the silicone, fix the timing, the valley closes. And they're pulling it off. A few crazy details about how this actually works: 1. The robot learns its own face in a mirror. You put it in front of a camera, let it fire every motor randomly, and it watches what its face does and builds an internal map of "if I send command X to motor Y, my eyebrow does this." Same exact process a human baby uses staring into a mirror. The robot teaches itself who it is by experimenting. 2. It predicts your smile 839 milliseconds before you smile. By watching the micro-tells in your face that precede a smile, the robot starts smiling 0.8 seconds ahead, so its smile lands at the same moment yours does. Most robot mimicry happens half a second late, which is exactly why it always feels artificial. 3. The pupils are the cameras. When the robot makes eye contact, the gaze and the sensor are the same physical thing. Most humanoid robots stick the camera on the forehead or chest, so they aren't actually looking at you when their eyes are pointed at you. 4. The founder, Yuhang Hu, did his PhD at Columbia under Hod Lipson. Lipson is the guy who in 2006 built a four-legged robot that figured out it had four legs by experimenting with its own movement, nobody told it the body shape, it discovered it. He has spent 25 years trying to build machines that know what they are. AheadForm is that 25-year research arc productized. 5. NetEase Games already paid them to physically embody a fantasy video game character. That opens up a brand-new category: robotics as the physical embodiment of fictional IP. Every character-rich studio, Disney, Riot, Hoyoverse, Pokemon, Netflix, now has a question to answer about when their characters get bodies. AheadForm believes whoever ships the first robot you'd actually want around your family wins. That's the bet behind the most realistic robot face on earth.

ZXX
2
0
6
1.9K
MistCoin | Origin of ERC-20
More than two years have passed since this Avsa tweet, and the “greater fools” are still collecting the prototype of the ERC-20 standard. MistCoin’s fundamental value increases with every new block validated on Ethereum and every new fungible token minted on the EVM. $WMC
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)@avsa

Here are some “Nice words”. This token was made to test the token capabilities of Mist and ERC20 as a whole (gas was so cheap!). There’s NO inherent value. If you’re a collector or like slot machines do your thing, but you probably will be someone else’s greater fool.

English
1
5
19
1.4K
Raphaël Lima - Ideias Radicais
Agora chineses podem ir pro Brasil usar o SUS, e enviar mães gravidas para terem o filho no Brasil, tendo portanto cidadania e passaporte brasileiros. Lembrando que hoje uma prefeita nos EUA se declarou culpada de ser agente do governo chinês. Faz o L.
Globe | Your Freedom Dealer@BowTiedGlobe

Brazil 🇧🇷 becomes the first major American country to offer visa-free access to the Chinese! Colombia 🇨🇴 and Venezuela 🇻🇪 still offer only e-visa I expect a huge wave of Chinese Birth Tourism

Português
80
140
1.6K
41.3K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@Otonomos Also it’s not even really your heart they’re following. We get it Cathy, you live in an isolated farm and this is the first hot dude your age you’ve ever met since hitting puberty. That feeling has a name and ‘Love’ ain’t it.
English
1
0
0
33
Otonomos
Otonomos@Otonomos·
@avsa The whole 'listen to your heart' thing is the most ridiculous advice ever shared. It was repeated so often in every movie and TV show that we now need to explain that it has no real meaning.
English
1
0
1
44
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
Growing up is realizing most “romantic” stories are just a bunch of emotionally immature young people making really dumb decisions, that the actual adults in the story aren’t the villains and had they listened to their advice instead of their own “hearts” it wouldn’t have ended in tragedy.
English
1
0
3
545
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth) retweetledi
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
This is important for understanding the world around us. Sometimes scientists, working on their fields of expertise, stumble upon something outside of it. If they don't understand that "PhD" means "niche subject expert" rather than "designated smart person", they try to figure that something out themselves rather than hand it off to the correct expert. Hand off to a fine artist whose medium is paint, and he'll tell you all about how layers of different colors are used to create subtle, realistic effects to the eye. Don't, and you'll eventually get an evolutionary biologist trying to figure out if software in conscious.
detty@0ddette

Polychromy is archaeologists finding traces of the underpainting layer and then pretending finely crafted sculptures were handed to pre-schoolers to paint by number. They even get frustrated by how much “red hair” they find- red is used in underpainting to build warmth for brown.

English
13
111
1.4K
37.8K
Alex Van de Sande (avsa.eth)
@sathaxe Yeah but sids is real, terrifying and lots of it is unknown so I don’t blame pediatricians for taking few risks. And mom-bedsharing will certainly lead to lack of sleep which imho is the number one cause of relationship issues in the first two years of the baby.
English
0
0
0
28
kartik
kartik@sathaxe·
@avsa Sure! Different things work for different people. My main point is that every pediatrician in the United States tells you that your baby will die if they sleep with you (mom or dad - or both!) and that does more harm than good.
English
1
0
2
57
kartik
kartik@sathaxe·
This is one of the biggest lies ever told. This only applies if you are obese and/or a chain smoker. Babies can - and should - sleep with their mothers.
kartik tweet media
English
7
0
21
1.5K