Peter Aylott

2K posts

Peter Aylott

Peter Aylott

@aylott_peter

Executive leadership with experience of maritime, offshore energy and fisheries. Special interest in education and training especially vocational outputs

London, England Katılım Ocak 2014
684 Takip Edilen361 Takipçiler
Peter Aylott retweetledi
Captain Singh, FICArb, 73K
Captain Singh, FICArb, 73K@captsingh·
An Odia seafarer is stranded near Ras Laffan. His wife is appealing for help. Bikash Maharana's vessel—anchored off Qatar's LNG terminal—has been unable to move for over three weeks. Food and supplies are running low. No crew change. No repatriation . Mrs. Mithila Maharana: "The ship has been anchored for so long. I don't know when he will return." 23,000 seafarers are trapped. This is one family's story. ⚓
English
6
37
88
10.3K
John Ʌ Konrad V
John Ʌ Konrad V@johnkonrad·
I don’t know Rosemary, don’t vouch for her work but this post is dead accurate. As @mercoglianos and I have been saying since the start of the Red Sea, modern tankers aren’t as easy to sink as the Navy thinks they are. One of our tankers carrying jet fuel got tanker by a Russian captain last year, massive flame, massive heat, massive release of energy and not only did she not sink but much of her cargo remained intact.
Rosemary Kelanic@RKelanic

The U.S. Navy doesn’t understand how resilient oil tankers are, according to comments from former CENTCOM commander in this TWZ interview. It’s surprising and not. USN rarely deals with commercial shipping issues. But could be why we’re still talking about naval escorts rather than air power to reopen Hormuz. Here’s Votel’s comments: “But the mines, I think, are a really, really hard issue. And when we think about one of these big tankers, so they are just really vulnerable, they’re thin-hulled, getting into this very narrow traffic scheme that’s there – two miles wide, right in the middle of the Strait and then hitting a mine and being disabled on the spot. Not only will we have a mine problem, we have a disabled ship problem and an ecological disaster, and a whole bunch of other things there. So in my view, I think the worst case situation kind of looks like a deliberate mining effort by the Iranians.” Wrong info: —Oil tankers today have double hulls, neither thin nor vulnerable. But even when tankers had single hulls during the Iran-Iraq war, they were so resilient to mines that U.S. navy destroyers sailed BEHIND the tankers for protection. *The tankers protected the destroyers from mines.* —The narrowest navigable passage is 20 miles, not 2 miles. The traffic lanes are 2 miles wide to reduce accidents in a congested waterway, but it’s not a physical barrier. It’s like the difference between the physical width of a whole highway vs. the lanes painted for cars. Tankers can sail outside the lines for 20 miles. Multiple disabled tankers couldn’t block the strait. To be fair, Votel called it a traffic scheme but I think this point is easily misunderstood. —Spilling oil isn’t ecologically good, obvs, but oil cargoes in VLCCs are stored in 15-17 different cells (depending on ship design) and if you rupture one, you only spill its contents — maybe ~120,000 barrels — on a total cargo of 2 million barrels. Still not good but not total emptying. —Even ruptured tankers, even incinerated tankers, usually stay afloat and can often be repaired so they can sail away under their own power. That happened with the MV Limburg off the coast of Yemen in 2002. It was struck by a suicide boat, lost 50k barres of oil and burned for 2 days. On day 3 it was repaired and sailed away on its own power. It was subsequently renamed the Maritime Jewel and was in service until at least 2009. Any mission to open the Strait of Hormuz under Iranian fire would be costly and risky. But it’s shocking to me that the USN @USNavy @CENTCOM doesn’t know the basics of oil shipping when they’ve been preparing this contingency for years. They need to talk with industry, stat. The Coast Guard @USCG might have this knowledge because they DO deal with commercial shipping issues but they’re so far down the bureaucratic prestige chain I’m not sure people would listen (sorry USCG, you rock and I’m a big fan). This lack of understanding might be why the USN and U.S. policymakers keep talking about using naval escorts rather than air power, as if this was still WWII. @defpriorities @haltman twz.com/news-features/…

English
25
119
865
61.9K
The Angry Gunner
The Angry Gunner@TheAngry53586·
Ok so it’s a great graphic…in theory. But there are more practicalities to this that make it somewhat harder to project accurately. Let’s look at some of the questions you’d have to ask /1
Modern Royal Navy@ModernNavy

Options for US convoy escort op through the Strait of Hormuz. Between 8 and 12 destroyers would probably be needed, possibly up to 16. Any escort operation is not expected to start until the USS Tripoli reaches the region from Japan @FT @ModernNavy #Iran archive.is/2026.03.20-064…

English
22
34
117
28.1K
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@BenGoldsmith And how do you know how many fish there were before industrialised fishing? Unless they are caught no one can possibly have known.
English
3
0
0
259
Ben Goldsmith
Ben Goldsmith@BenGoldsmith·
Jaw-dropping how people are so quick to accuse seals, sea lions, dolphins, whales of decimating fish stocks (“Corolla-sized vermin”) when before the advent of industrial fishing there were vastly more of all of these, and the seas were heaving with fish.
Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez@RepMGP

Our fishermen in Southwest Washington have spoken loud and clear—sea lions in the Columbia River are decimating our salmon and steelhead runs. My provision to explore more cost-effective and efficient ways to remove these Corolla-sized vermin from our rivers and tributaries was just signed into law. I enjoyed brainstorming with SW WA fishermen on next steps to return our runs to their former glory.

English
24
354
1.6K
33.4K
Heart of Oak ⚓️
Heart of Oak ⚓️@HMWarships·
Guess the ship! Can you identify the capital ship depicted here?
Heart of Oak ⚓️ tweet media
English
69
22
401
32K
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@_HenryBolton I am afraid you understand little about this issue and the Royal Navy. Perhaps talk with the Italians and find out how they do it?
English
0
0
0
75
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧
Henry Bolton OBE 🇬🇧@_HenryBolton·
Calls to use the Royal Navy to intercept small boats in the Channel and force them back to France resurface regularly in UK politics. I explain why it's an unrealistic, unworkable and ineffective idea⬇️ (Please subscribe to my substack🖊️📬🔊📺) open.substack.com/pub/henrybolto…
English
24
4
20
22.8K
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@NickStanley3 @DrChrisParry I was trying to convey the approach of business vice politics. He doesn’t portray any signs of sophistication, but operates in a totally different way to Davos politicians - not scared to make mistakes, ruffle feathers or “lift the mace”. Just different I think
English
0
0
1
44
Nick Stanley
Nick Stanley@NickStanley3·
@aylott_peter @DrChrisParry Hi Peter - I think you attribute to Trump a level of sophistication in strategic thinking that just doesn’t exist.
English
1
0
0
18
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@NickStanley3 @DrChrisParry It was about a demonstration of hard power not purely about an outcome. The art of dealmaking for the President is about international reaction when he considers the USA is the only real military superpower. It is not ignorance, but granted it does not seem to be helpful to all
English
1
0
0
22
Nick Stanley
Nick Stanley@NickStanley3·
@DrChrisParry Got to disagree with you on this one Chris, he’s got nothing that wasn’t already available via NAC & the Military Committee. He’s further damaged his international standing and credibility by choosing threats, bluster and all-encompassing ignorance.
English
1
0
3
57
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@Tom1Powell84 @afneil When the EU and UK bring in a CBAM and the operators have to pay for the carbon in manufactured and transported equipment, how much will this cost and where does it feature in carbon footprint comparisons? #wedonotknow
English
0
0
0
71
Tommy P
Tommy P@TomPowell6742·
@afneil Neil is still wrong, and the deletion doesn’t change why. If you are choosing what to build for the next 30 years, new wind at £91/MWh is cheaper than new gas at £140+/MWh.
English
62
1
14
145.6K
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@vgroupmaritime I did know and there is nothing new here. The international industry has been managing this for decades. Welcome to offshore in Brazil - lots of opportunity but comes at a cost!
English
0
0
0
8
V.Group
V.Group@vgroupmaritime·
Did you know? Brazilian law requires a share of Brazilian seafarers on foreign flag vessels trading more than 90 days in the cabotage trade. V. Ships Brazil provides qualified Brazilian crew for our clients. We have c450 crew across all ranks on >20 vessels for major clients.
V.Group tweet media
English
1
0
1
154
Simon Harley
Simon Harley@simonharley·
Men want only one thing …
Simon Harley tweet media
English
12
14
251
10.1K
Ben Obese-Jecty MP
Ben Obese-Jecty MP@BenObeseJecty·
@DrChrisParry If you want to become a politician you’re going to need to develop a less fragile temperament Chris. You bite every single time.
English
2
1
18
630
Chris Parry
Chris Parry@DrChrisParry·
If you’d have done the staff course, you would have learned how to do research before you play with the big boys. Now run away. If you want to play political fire and counter fire, you’re going to need more than a pop gun.
Ben Obese-Jecty MP@BenObeseJecty

@DrChrisParry @TalkTV @petercardwell @ReformUK You avoided answering the question Chris. David Lammy was born here, just as I was. Why do you think he should “go home” to the Caribbean? It doesn’t sound like you’d be a Mayor who would represent everyone in Hampshire and the Solent, irrespective of their heritage.

English
32
38
344
15.6K
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@piersmorgan Nope - it was not until 1977 that Geneva conventions were adopted to make agreements regarding the safeguarding of civilians from aerial bombardment. 1949 convention was aimed at atrocities such as the holocaust
English
0
0
0
35
Piers Morgan
Piers Morgan@piersmorgan·
What we did in Dresden was shameful. That’s why the Geneva Convention was brought in after WW2 to stop it happening again. But Netanyahu doesn’t seem to care about the GC.
Julian@OhNoezzz

@piersmorgan Tell me you don't know what we did to Dresden in WW2 without telling me you don't know what we did to Dresden in WW2. Or more likely you do know, you just have different standards for Jews.

English
394
132
1.3K
260.5K
The Labour Party
The Labour Party@UKLabour·
Rail fares frozen. Prescription charges kept under a tenner. This Labour government is committed to reducing the cost of living for you and your family.
English
2.1K
149
750
240.7K
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@BenObeseJecty Ok - but you won’t gain a better understanding of the broader picture. Service loyalty is laudable, but I don’t see any coordinated defence strategy from your party
English
0
0
0
30
Ben Obese-Jecty MP
Ben Obese-Jecty MP@BenObeseJecty·
@aylott_peter Unfortunately Peter you started the conversation with a sneering accusation that I don’t know what I’m talking about. So no, it wouldn’t be great to have a chat sometime.
English
1
0
1
124
Ben Obese-Jecty MP
Ben Obese-Jecty MP@BenObeseJecty·
“…the Royal Navy claimed it requires a greater share of the investment planned for the armed forces because of the challenges it faces” It must be that time of year when each branch starts clambering over the others for a bigger slice of the pie. The Royal Navy undoubtedly needs more funding, despite the investment in CAS-D, current shipbuilding programmes and maritime air capability, but shortchanging the Army will cost lives. Ground combat has changed more in the past three years than the previous eighty. The Army is still using armoured vehicles that came into service before the Beatles released their debut single, has no IFV capability beyond 2027, a stop-gap artillery capability, needs a new individual weapon, and is spending a pittance on infantry survivability in the face of new threats. You can’t hold ground without infantry, even today. The Army bear the brunt of casualties, more so than any other service. It’s time we prioritised those we ask to go the last 100 yards.
Ben Obese-Jecty MP tweet media
English
56
20
145
34.8K
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@BenObeseJecty I think we probably have to agree to disagree. Your comments indicate a lack of understanding of the need for naval presence. The Ukraine has changed the land piece fundamentally and the British Army is far from world class. It would be great to have a chat sometime…
English
1
0
3
227
Peter Aylott
Peter Aylott@aylott_peter·
@BenObeseJecty @oaktowers I think we would agree that defence needs more resource - 5% would be the current target. But are we really suggesting that the British Army will have more of a role to play than the Navy? The army, is I am afraid, too far behind to bring it up to world class…
English
1
0
4
396
Ben Obese-Jecty MP
Ben Obese-Jecty MP@BenObeseJecty·
@aylott_peter @oaktowers My original point was that we need to invest in the Army Peter. Which of the capabilities I outlined do you think the Army should made do with?
English
1
0
0
1.8K