Owen

234 posts

Owen banner
Owen

Owen

@bad_auth

Just shifting bits to make the number go up Hyperliquid.

Katılım Ocak 2021
667 Takip Edilen603 Takipçiler
JJ
JJ@hyperliquidbull·
@bad_auth @HyperliquidX super cool! for some reason, hip3 markets are stuck on this loading screen for me
JJ tweet media
English
1
0
1
257
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
Ever wondered where your order actually sits in the @HyperliquidX queue? I built a live L4 orderbook visualizer this weekend so you can see: • Your exact queue position • Other MM quotes updating in real time • Individual order details bad-auth.github.io/l4book_visuali…
English
26
28
421
31.5K
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
Still working on adding un-triggered trigger orders and spot asset support. repo: github.com/bad-auth/l4boo… Anything else I should add?
English
0
0
9
1.2K
hersch
hersch@tittyrespecter·
i’d let rick fuck me for some owens
English
2
0
37
2.3K
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
@svbmrgd @QubesOS How’s the UX recently? Ran it for a bit but got tired of poor performance and things breaking. Thinking to test it out again though
English
1
0
1
46
submerged
submerged@svbmrgd·
.@QubesOS is so great. I'm surprised this hasn't been mentioned or talked about in the context of crypto security. Everyone talks about airgapped devices, this is superior
English
7
0
10
562
hersch
hersch@tittyrespecter·
four more shitty photos im proud of from 2025
hersch tweet mediahersch tweet mediahersch tweet mediahersch tweet media
English
25
3
254
14.1K
Owen retweetledi
Dan Robinson
Dan Robinson@danrobinson·
This paper is simply wrong about its central topic: how Hyperliquid’s ADL works. Tarun is describing a different (much crazier) algorithm, which also might explain how he calculated that traders somehow paid $653m to cover a $23m deficit. 🧵
Tarun Chitra@tarunchitra

Did @HyperliquidX autodeleverage (ADL) $650m of PNL that it didn’t have to? Was this 28x more than the minimal necessary? Did almost every exchange (incl. @binance) copy-pasta a Huobi heuristic from 2015? Can we do better in 2026? 𝐘𝐞𝐬 (+ a new paper)

English
37
51
499
192.2K
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
@krinza Checks out
Owen tweet media
English
0
0
30
2.3K
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
@_tradernico @deedydas You’re so right, because as everyone always says the nasdaq would be nothing without Citadel, Jane Street, etc.. Wait, how many employees would that be then? 🤡
English
0
0
16
1.8K
Nico
Nico@_tradernico·
@deedydas Impressive margins, but 11 employees doesn't count the HFT infrastructure they're built on. Without their ultra-low latency provider relationships, this doesn't exist.
English
10
0
32
24.2K
Deedy
Deedy@deedydas·
The most efficient business in the world makes ~$1.1B/yr net income with just 11 employees. Their founder, Jeff Yan, is a ~30yo ex-HRT International Physics Olympiad (IPhO) gold & silver from Harvard. It is a decentralized crypto derivatives exchange called Hyperliquid.
Deedy tweet media
English
295
473
5.6K
1.1M
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
Yeah that's fair, if the spreads are that wide from data providers that makes more sense. I gotta dig more into the Notice docs. It still feels a bit aggressive to have funding rates that low though. I like the 50% 8h EMA baked into the oracle price and with a standard funding rate it would still allow natural price discovery just over a longer time period without as much turbulence. We'll see how it goes as the markets mature though, happy we get to play around with them either way.
English
0
0
1
37
Alvin Hsia
Alvin Hsia@alvinhsia·
there aren't "source of truth" prices for private cos in the secondary markets – spreads are regularly 10-30% wide, and data providers will quote different prices so the funding rate needs to be flexible enough to allow for some range of deviation, while still imposing some economic cost if the price gets too out of whack e.g. 1/500th of standard funding rates equates to 20-25% annualized funding if there's a 10% mark-to-oracle deviation
English
1
0
0
57
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
@ventuals Genuine question: What's the point in an oracle price if the funding is 1/500th of the standard funding rates? What are we trading here?
Owen tweet media
English
3
0
1
279
Owen
Owen@bad_auth·
SPACEX hasn't even touched the current oracle price since launch and there's barely any incentive for traders to move it. Are we just trading meme-coins with the names of private companies?
English
0
0
0
218
Owen retweetledi
Luke Cannon
Luke Cannon@lukecannon727·
"He's not broke, he's just temporarily illiquid while waiting for his partial refund from MegaETH"
Luke Cannon tweet media
English
12
3
84
5.7K