Brittany C. Bakek

@gianwirth @ArtificialAnlys Using with cursor CLI. It is really amazing. Fast af and amazingly good, kinda in a unbelievable way

@ArtificialAnlys Looks like finally someone is really competing with OpenAI and Anthropic. Makes me almost want to try Cursor again.

Cursor's new Composer 2.5 takes third on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index and is ~10-60x lower cost than the higher-effort Opus 4.7 and GPT-5.5 variants above it. This release puts Composer among the leading coding agent models, something that wasn’t clear for past releases @cursor_ai has released Composer 2.5, the latest model in its Composer line. Composer 2.5 scored 62 on our Coding Agent Index, a 14 point gain over Composer 2 (48). This puts it in third place of our tested agents, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code (66) and GPT-5.5 (xhigh reasoning) in Codex (65). These cost $4.10 and $4.82 per task respectively, ~10x the cost of Composer 2.5 Fast ($0.44) and ~60x the cost of Composer 2.5 standard ($0.07). Key results for Composer 2.5 in Cursor CLI: ➤ Cost-quality Pareto frontier: At $0.07 (standard) and $0.44 (Fast) per task, Composer 2.5 is cheaper than every other agent scoring above 60 on the Index. Medium-effort peers cost $1.24–$2.21 per task; higher-effort variants land 3-4 points above at $4.10–$4.82 ➤ Per-benchmark gains vs Composer 2: +35 points on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA (12% → 47%), +2 points on Terminal-Bench v2 (64% → 66%), and +3 points on SWE-Atlas-QnA (69% → 72%). At 47%, Composer 2.5's score on SWE-Bench-Pro-Hard-AA is comparable to Claude Opus 4.7 (max) in Claude Code ➤ Among the fastest coding agents: Composer 2.5 Fast runs at an average wall time of 6.7 minutes per task, the third-fastest agent on the Artificial Analysis Coding Agent Index, behind only Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) in Claude Code (5.8m) and GPT-5.5 (medium) in Cursor CLI (6.2m) ➤ Fast mode enables better responsiveness at 6x pricing: Fast runs 30% faster than standard Composer 2.5, but is ~6x the cost per task ($0.44 vs $0.07). Token pricing is 6x higher for Fast: $3.00/$15.00 vs $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens Model details: ➤ Base model: Continued training on @Kimi_Moonshot's open weights Kimi K2.5 as with Composer 2, with Cursor reporting ~85% of total compute from its own additional training and reinforcement learning ➤ Pricing: $0.50/$2.50 per million input/output tokens for the standard variant; $3.00/$15.00 for the Fast variant (the default in Cursor) ➤ Available exclusively in Cursor: both Cursor IDE and Cursor CLI, an externally accessible API is not available Congratulations @cursor_ai and @mntruell on the impressive release!

@github trillion dollar company btw. you have all the excuses in the world when you little app has this problem

2/ Our current assessment is that the activity involved exfiltration of GitHub-internal repositories only. The attacker’s current claims of ~3,800 repositories are directionally consistent with our investigation so far.

1/ We are sharing additional details regarding our investigation into unauthorized access to GitHub's internal repositories. Yesterday we detected and contained a compromise of an employee device involving a poisoned VS Code extension. We removed the malicious extension version, isolated the endpoint, and began incident response immediately.

@OfficialLoganK @clanker_ you must pay for feedback. it's not free. you are a trillion dollar company and you are still receiving money from us for a garbage product AND still want free feedback?

@clanker_ no plan on giving up, but feedback welcomed as you try out everything we shipped at IO : )

Google should give up now, I/O was embarrassing

@OfficialLoganK it's complete trash bro, grok level. delete this twitter

Gemini 3.5 feels like the start of a new era for Gemini, we spent the last 2.5 years putting the infrastructure, products, team, etc in place (learning lots of lessons along the way). The model is the product, please keep the feedback coming!

@ahtoshkaa @Trigger_oi @elonmusk And then will destroy another asset, fuck. Please no

@Trigger_oi @elonmusk Cursor will soon become his property

Try it out! (Partially trained on Colossus 2)

@harpaljadeja For a data center would expect wayyyy more. Kinda normal in Europe you have 10-40 gbps fibers house plans

HOLY SHIT!!! 💀 Internet speed inside Cursor cloud agent

@PCMag With that ppi, wouldn’t pay even $1

Alienware is finally bringing OLED tech to the masses. 🖥️🔥 We’re used to seeing OLED gaming monitors go for around $1,000, but Alienware is shaking things up. Their new 27–inch display delivers the 1440p resolution and 240Hz refresh rate for only $350. It is the cheapest OLED monitor to ever hit our lab. It even undercuts recent budget–friendly models from brands like Gigabyte. 🤯👾 #Alienware #OLED #GamingMonitor #PCGaming #TechNews

@Amank1412 Nice rage bait troll

Instagram's co-founder and CTO is now just a regular engineer at Anthropic.

@thsleepyghost @GoodPoliticGuy well look at your president

@GoodPoliticGuy Why are people obsessed with strength? Are we five?

this is a video of China's strength?

@xai I would use this if you pay me at least $1000/day

An early beta of Grok Build, an agentic CLI for coding, building apps, and automating workflows is now available for SuperGrok Heavy subscribers. Through this early beta, we will improve the model and product based on your feedback. Try it at x.ai/cli

@Sentdex @marcospereeira you cant be that retard

@marcospereeira It does look to me like it is a benefit. If I'm a claude code user, you're telling me the apps and agents that have been piggybacking on a super cheap api that they get to slam for hella cheap murdering the api perf for me are going away? And I get a $200 monthly api cred? Cool

Apparently an unpopular opinion, but I don't think Anthropic owes anyone heavily subsidized tokens for their third party app.

@lydiahallie how can you be so retarded and work at Anthropic? Kinda makes me think

To add some clarity: you don't pay extra. It's the same subscription, same price per month. What's new our sub now covers two separate pools: · Interactive → sub limits, unchanged · Programmatic → new $20–$200 included(!!) credit, metered at API rates

@DrWaldmiller @BrianRoemmele yeah sure, enjoy lifetime in prison cell with your little dick energy

@BrianRoemmele Yup, and I'm loaded with Dragons Breath!

It’s happening…

@Maazi_Manny @FabrizioRomano “They cheat and then complain”

@FabrizioRomano Sour loser, like Champions league did not favour Real Madrid at some point. When the system favours you, it is ok. When it goes the other way, it is bad. 😅

🚨 Florentino Pérez: “If Barcelona want to SUE me, go ahead… let them sue me”. “For two decades they have paid them, and in the trial they are saying things that do not correspond to the truth”. “Next week we will present everything with documentations from all these years.”

@FabrizioRomano Romario, Rivaldo, Neymar, Messi etc “bUt iF iT Is ThE bEsT”

🚨 Florentino Pérez: “When there’s a great player, a top one… I go for him”. “We always signed the best. I signed Figo, Zidane, Ronaldo Fenomeno, Beckham”. “Then I signed Cristiano Ronaldo, Kaká, and Benzema. When there's a best, I will bring him in”, told Chiringuito.

@austeane @backnotprop @ClaudeDevs not API credits. programatic usage

@backnotprop @ClaudeDevs You will get $200 worth of API credits every month to use for Claude -p In *addition* to your usual subscription. Only if Claude -p/sdk is your main way of using it are you likely to have to pay more overall.

Starting June 15, paid Claude plans can claim a dedicated monthly credit for programmatic usage. The credit covers usage of: - Claude Agent SDK - claude -p - Claude Code GitHub Actions - Third-party apps built on the Agent SDK

@ilyamiskov The quality of twitter devs today is disgraceful. That’s why. Don’t try to understand

I won’t call myself an expert in micro interactions, but what exactly is exceptional here?

@imigry_com @Yuchenj_UW @grok Muted. You have very reduced brain cells. Don’t even know the AI came from fucking math

People across civilizations have been dreaming of automatons and their ilk for thousands of years but Artificial Intelligence (AI research) as a field began in the 1950s in America. This is not controversial. That's literally where the word AI (Artificial Intelligence) comes from. Foundational to the entire list above are neural nets, 1943 America. That is the core of this technology and all the work listed above. U.S. has always been central to AI. You have no brain cells. To be expected from an unhinged retard that still calls x, twitter.

I’m reporting a murder.

@full_kelly_ @theo @elonmusk that's true but it's Elon, he never fulfill his promises anyway

@bakek_c @theo @elonmusk holding people to their promises is good

Any progress on this @elonmusk?