Barry McCardel
3.7K posts

Barry McCardel
@barrald
co-founder and CEO of Hex (https://t.co/hbgguInF1h / @_hex_tech) - former @PalantirTech @formationbio - personal site: https://t.co/c38nDG5Dfl
San Francisco, CA Katılım Ağustos 2011
981 Takip Edilen3.7K Takipçiler


from Information Dashboard Design by Stephen Few
amazon.com/Information-Da…
Hilariously, it looks like he expanded on the acknowledgments in the digital edition
public.magendanz.com/Temp/Informati…
English


@barrald @mttrdmnd @martin_casado @JenniferHli We weren’t joking about a screening party for dune 3! Let’s gooo
English

brb planning a Dune 3 viewing party
CC @martin_casado @JenniferHli
Timothée Chalamet@RealChalamet
DUNE PART THREE
English

@mttrdmnd @sarahdingwang @martin_casado @JenniferHli Wait, I actually forgot but a16z literally did a screaming for Dune 2 two years ago!
English

Yes, keep wondering when Linear is going to get creative because at the moment they are just a slightly better Jira (when you zoom out).
While Cursor positioned to be a critical part of the code lifecycle.
But then counter to your point is that Coding is a subset of the "codification" of the entire knowledge work economy, and I think Claude with the pincer movement of Cowork and Opus kinda smothers Cursor in that .
English

The Cursor vs. Claude/Codex feels very flawed and missing the bigger picture
The labs have ~infinite money and specialized talent, and are going to win on coding models – that's a runaway train. Composer is impressive, but ultimately more for margin protection / defense than playing to win that game.
But to quote Stringer Bell, "there are games beyond the game" and I believe Cursor's destiny is different: becoming the new Github – the place where the whole engineering process lives. Their real competition is with them and Linear, not the labs.
Bugbot is a great start. We find it super valuable, no matter what coding agent is used, and is a nice wedge into Cursor getting beyond the coding itself.
And of course acquiring @graphite. PR review is the single most essential workflow in Github and very ripe for disruption – Cursor is in an amazing position for this.
More on the horizon. The cloud sandbox thing is going to be huge. The new Automations thing aims at GH Actions. And it wouldn't surprise me to see them start getting more into security, observability, etc.
Could Anthropic/OpenAI try to compete here? Sure. But I don't think customers want them to. I want my coding agent to be a coding agent and would be happy to pay for another model-agnostic system that sits across the whole menagerie and help me manage it.
My prediction is that in a year we'll look back at the "Claude Code is great, therefore Cursor is cooked" discourse as misguided, and understand Cursor as playing a different game entirely.
English

@_colemurray I don't know if it makes the valuation math pencil out, but I think the TAM might be 10x the size as when Github exited, in terms of number of people developing software, commits being pushed, etc.
English

@barrald Have you tried other AI Code Review tools? bugbot is by far the least impressive of the paid tools we find (close to the bottom even compared to free tools)
English

it's not just that the takes are AI generated — it's that they're bad (and here's why it matters)
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz
It’s not X — it’s Y I cannot unsee how so much of the writing on this site (and online, in general) is increasingly AI-generated. It’s still pretty easy to recognize. Probably not for long tho Just alarming that ppl outsource even typing 3 sentences for a reply on this site…
English

@mihail_eric What do you think GitHub would be worth today?
What if the TAM of developers was 10 times as large?
🤷♂️
English

@barrald I don't think Cursor can allow for that to be the outcome they land on. Github was acquired in 2018 for ~$8B. Cursor's last val round was already $30B. Even if they became the next Github that would barely justify their valuation. They have to think bigger.
English

@meansoabstractn It depends on the order of magnitude. If you just look at seats, we don’t pay that much for cursor, and I’d be happy to pay that much or more for a system that helps us build and ship things faster
English

@barrald What if it was 1/100th the price? Surely that must mean something to you as a CEO
English

As I say above, sure they can try, but:
a) as a corporate buyer do I want my entire SDLC infrastructure to come from a company I'm also buying the tokens from? If my team came to me and said "hey our entire dev infra is moving to OAI/Ant" I actually think I'd shoot that down because I don't want to be locked in
b) This is 100% focus for Cursor, and Ant and OAI have a lot of other things they're trying to do
English

@barrald Why can’t Claude and Codex also do PR review, automations, security & observability work?
Not sure any of us follow your argument here
English

@_ianwatts_ they can try, there's just a lot of workflow and mechanic through the SLDC
English

@su_lin_liu Why? What mechanic would lead to this? Where's the lock-in? Just continual model benchmark dominance?
English





