Barry McCardel

3.7K posts

Barry McCardel banner
Barry McCardel

Barry McCardel

@barrald

co-founder and CEO of Hex (https://t.co/hbgguInF1h / @_hex_tech) - former @PalantirTech @formationbio - personal site: https://t.co/c38nDG5Dfl

San Francisco, CA Katılım Ağustos 2011
981 Takip Edilen3.7K Takipçiler
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
I love imagining the customer for whom SOC 2 was vitally important – but who was also paying an enterprise contract for Cluely
English
1
0
38
1.3K
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
there's something truly sublime about cluely being scammed on their SOC 2
Ryan@ohryansbelt

Delve, a YC-backed compliance startup that raised $32 million, has been accused of systematically faking SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR compliance reports for hundreds of clients. According to a detailed Substack investigation by DeepDelver, a leaked Google spreadsheet containing links to hundreds of confidential draft audit reports revealed that Delve generates auditor conclusions before any auditor reviews evidence, uses the same template across 99.8% of reports, and relies on Indian certification mills operating through empty US shells instead of the "US-based CPA firms" they advertise. Here's the breakdown: > 493 out of 494 leaked SOC 2 reports allegedly contain identical boilerplate text, including the same grammatical errors and nonsensical sentences, with only a company name, logo, org chart, and signature swapped in > Auditor conclusions and test procedures are reportedly pre-written in draft reports before clients even provide their company description, which would violate AICPA independence rules requiring auditors to independently design tests and form conclusions > All 259 Type II reports claim zero security incidents, zero personnel changes, zero customer terminations, and zero cyber incidents during the observation period, with identical "unable to test" conclusions across every client > Delve's "US-based auditors" are actually Accorp and Gradient, described as Indian certification mills operating through US shell entities. 99%+ of clients reportedly went through one of these two firms over the past 6 months > The platform allegedly publishes fully populated trust pages claiming vulnerability scanning, pentesting, and data recovery simulations before any compliance work has been done > Delve pre-fabricates board meeting minutes, risk assessments, security incident simulations, and employee evidence that clients can adopt with a single click, according to the author > Most "integrations" are just containers for manual screenshots with no actual API connections. The author describes the platform as a "SOC 2 template pack with a thin SaaS wrapper" > When the leak was exposed, CEO Karun Kaushik emailed clients calling the allegations "falsified claims" from an "AI-generated email" and stated no sensitive data was accessed, while the reports themselves contained private signatures and confidential architecture diagrams > Companies relying on these reports could face criminal liability under HIPAA and fines up to 4% of global revenue under GDPR for compliance violations they believed were resolved > When clients threaten to leave, Delve reportedly pairs them with an external vCISO for manual off-platform work, which the author argues proves their own platform can't deliver real compliance > Delve's sales price dropped from $15,000 to $6,000 with ISO 27001 and a penetration test thrown in when a client mentioned considering a competitor

English
13
23
732
39.3K
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
most savage book acknowledgement of all time, no notes
Barry McCardel tweet media
English
4
1
77
4.1K
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
as of last week, agents are creating more cells in @_hex_tech than humans directly
Barry McCardel tweet media
English
0
4
38
4.2K
Matt Arderne 🌊
Matt Arderne 🌊@mattarderne·
Yes, keep wondering when Linear is going to get creative because at the moment they are just a slightly better Jira (when you zoom out). While Cursor positioned to be a critical part of the code lifecycle. But then counter to your point is that Coding is a subset of the "codification" of the entire knowledge work economy, and I think Claude with the pincer movement of Cowork and Opus kinda smothers Cursor in that .
English
1
0
1
89
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
The Cursor vs. Claude/Codex feels very flawed and missing the bigger picture The labs have ~infinite money and specialized talent, and are going to win on coding models – that's a runaway train. Composer is impressive, but ultimately more for margin protection / defense than playing to win that game. But to quote Stringer Bell, "there are games beyond the game" and I believe Cursor's destiny is different: becoming the new Github – the place where the whole engineering process lives. Their real competition is with them and Linear, not the labs. Bugbot is a great start. We find it super valuable, no matter what coding agent is used, and is a nice wedge into Cursor getting beyond the coding itself. And of course acquiring @graphite. PR review is the single most essential workflow in Github and very ripe for disruption – Cursor is in an amazing position for this. More on the horizon. The cloud sandbox thing is going to be huge. The new Automations thing aims at GH Actions. And it wouldn't surprise me to see them start getting more into security, observability, etc. Could Anthropic/OpenAI try to compete here? Sure. But I don't think customers want them to. I want my coding agent to be a coding agent and would be happy to pay for another model-agnostic system that sits across the whole menagerie and help me manage it. My prediction is that in a year we'll look back at the "Claude Code is great, therefore Cursor is cooked" discourse as misguided, and understand Cursor as playing a different game entirely.
English
14
2
133
15.8K
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
@_colemurray I don't know if it makes the valuation math pencil out, but I think the TAM might be 10x the size as when Github exited, in terms of number of people developing software, commits being pushed, etc.
English
0
0
1
77
cole murray
cole murray@_colemurray·
@barrald there’s a $3.8B (thus far) problem with that outcome
English
1
0
0
92
henry
henry@henrycoo0·
@barrald You can set up Claude easily on github repo
English
1
0
0
75
Chase McDougall
Chase McDougall@ChaseMcDou·
@barrald Have you tried other AI Code Review tools? bugbot is by far the least impressive of the paid tools we find (close to the bottom even compared to free tools)
English
1
0
1
117
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
@mihail_eric What do you think GitHub would be worth today? What if the TAM of developers was 10 times as large? 🤷‍♂️
English
1
0
0
210
Mihail Eric
Mihail Eric@mihail_eric·
@barrald I don't think Cursor can allow for that to be the outcome they land on. Github was acquired in 2018 for ~$8B. Cursor's last val round was already $30B. Even if they became the next Github that would barely justify their valuation. They have to think bigger.
English
1
0
1
358
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
@meansoabstractn It depends on the order of magnitude. If you just look at seats, we don’t pay that much for cursor, and I’d be happy to pay that much or more for a system that helps us build and ship things faster
English
1
0
0
66
meansoabstractn
meansoabstractn@meansoabstractn·
@barrald What if it was 1/100th the price? Surely that must mean something to you as a CEO
English
1
0
1
62
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
As I say above, sure they can try, but: a) as a corporate buyer do I want my entire SDLC infrastructure to come from a company I'm also buying the tokens from? If my team came to me and said "hey our entire dev infra is moving to OAI/Ant" I actually think I'd shoot that down because I don't want to be locked in b) This is 100% focus for Cursor, and Ant and OAI have a lot of other things they're trying to do
English
1
0
0
290
meansoabstractn
meansoabstractn@meansoabstractn·
@barrald Why can’t Claude and Codex also do PR review, automations, security & observability work? Not sure any of us follow your argument here
English
1
0
1
485
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
@_ianwatts_ they can try, there's just a lot of workflow and mechanic through the SLDC
English
0
0
0
340
Ian Watts
Ian Watts@_ianwatts_·
@barrald idk i would definitely like (and expect) Codex to expand into these areas as well. why would the ChatGPT company, whose moving evermore towards agents not move towards task management? Codex and Claude already have the native PR preview as well.
English
1
0
1
524
Barry McCardel
Barry McCardel@barrald·
@su_lin_liu Why? What mechanic would lead to this? Where's the lock-in? Just continual model benchmark dominance?
English
1
0
0
289
Sulin Liu
Sulin Liu@su_lin_liu·
@barrald But there is the winner take all story that at last only one frontier model company will take the whole coding market
English
1
0
0
498