richard tasker

@TheobaldTiger9 @DefenceGeek would of had to of taken off a long while ago to make it there in darkness had no tanker action above me today though which as been the norm for most of the action so far

@DefenceGeek Any reported take-offs in Fairford?

It's going to be a long night...

@Musks_a_cunt @GrimBF6 Yes and the second a tank starts taking damage the pull backwards u can fit 3 EOD bot mines that tight together u hit one all 3 go off u drop the mines start damaging tank and boom if they don't move u hop in and out of EOD bot and get another 10seconds which is enough

@bc304daedalus @GrimBF6 Once again, if you take an EOD bot out of bounds you have 10 seconds before it detonates. I dont think you have killed tanks in the enemy HQ with an EOD...

LOTS of absolute W's here, with a few minor negatives: -No more 2 shots to the rear, coupled with reduced immobilization effects, means getting hit from the rear by a rogue engineer from behind once doesn't mean certain death. -Repair stacking meant an MBT could live an absurd amount of time with just 2 engineers, despite a whole army trying to destroy it -Mobility and driving in general has been very clunky, glad it's being improved! -Turret rotation buff + fixing 1st/3rd person aim behavior is great. I mostly stopped playing armor after they changed with the sensitivities. NEED to stop messing with it after this. -HUGE W on immobilization. Immobilized from the front (???) happened wayyy too often. Side was unpredictable, rear was essentially automatic death. I hope they fix getting immobilized for seemingly no reason as well. -IF* it works as intended, the incoming missile icons for aircraft is very important and needed. -Didn't know I needed thermal smoke to do dmg by proximity, but i'll take it! -Mine countermeasures are massive for IFV, given there's no thermal optics. A MUST HAVE for IFV players now. Now lets talk negatives... -IGLA does NOT need to be "more reliable", it goes through flares half the time already. Make flares more reliable as well, or aircraft are even more cooked. ESPECIALLY if they buff the damage, which is how it reads. -LAUGHABLE to call the Igla "underused". Devs don't play aircraft, at least not well enough to be focused on by enemies? -Still no mention of an air radar. GET REAL. A simple "air radar is almost ready, pilots" would be a huge sigh of relief. Overall fantastic stuff here. Very happy reading this! Thanks 🙏

@JundaFPS @BattlefieldComm That's with season 3 next week

@BattlefieldComm Isn’t the weapon recoil changes in this update?

@GetCheatz @BattlefieldComm And yet they fixed a desync causing it to apear that you died behind cover the net code issues won't be fully fixed till they bring back kicking people over 150ping like older titles

@BattlefieldComm They dont fix the most important things in this shit netcode and hitboxes using AI They will milking morons for money with shitty skins that only differ in color and the game will still be fckd

@KalTam1323 @BattlefieldComm Just swop to secondary and back and you can ads again

@BattlefieldComm Can you please address and fix the issue of the reticle problem after using the HTI recon gadget? It’s extremely annoying that you can’t properly aim anymore, you’re basically more or less blinded, and it’s really ruining the experience and killing the fun. Thank you.

@Badan_KR @BattlefieldComm But naming them after banned players is peak funniest thing any company's ever done

@BattlefieldComm Rename bots again to military ranks and names. Don't like that fake player names. 😒

@xanderbarrr @theirishcowboy @BattlefieldComm That's how you control recoil by tap firing

@theirishcowboy @BattlefieldComm Yeah just add spread. I don’t want to have to control the gun going everywhere. Tap fire meta needs to return.

@FabrizioRomano The downfall needs to be studied

🚨 Nottingham Forest beat Chelsea at Stamford Bridge! Who’s been your Man of the Match?

@Musks_a_cunt @GrimBF6 ive done it multiple times so that tells me its a skill issue for you but i am a menace with an eod bot anywhere on a map the amount of tanks ive taken out with it is proberly way higher than the amount ive taken out with rpg and i am an engineer main 540 hours on it

@bc304daedalus @GrimBF6 Literally all the maps you mentioned? You cant use EOD bots in enemy HQ it counts as out of bounds. You can reset the EOD bot by leaving its conteol and re-entering it but you can only get so far doing this. Either the tanks weren't in the HQ or you or yapping.

@Musks_a_cunt @GrimBF6 which maps ive done it on mirak ive done it on firestorm ive done it on blackwell ive even taken out snipers on the mountain on firestorm with eod bot

@bc304daedalus @GrimBF6 You can't drive eod bots into the enemy spawn on a lot of the maps. Also if a heli/jet pilot has to change to a engineer with an eod bot to kill an enemy there is a cleae imbalance between the two vehicles.

@Viiksimursu1 @Uniting_ps nah bring back the bf3 suppression im all for the chaos that would cause with the people who like to sit back a mile away from everything happening

@Uniting_ps Yeah I don’t really understand this. Shouldnt they like reduce it? Strong Random recoil + spread + reticle based aiming sounds like a very bad combo. Why cant we just have BF3 system with no suppression and of course some balace changes suitable for bf6 movement

Doesn't this mean the random recoil will also feel stronger?

@Musks_a_cunt @GrimBF6 nah there not impossible to destroy ive killed so meny tanks in spawn your just going about it the wrong way eod bot ftw sometimes ill get my friend to load it with a spicy suprise and strap some c4 to it if its deeper inside there base

@bc304daedalus @GrimBF6 Its designed to sit bsck and control the air yes. But when Aircraft are fairly useless against AA and the AA has effectively godmode because it cant be killed it makes for lame gameplay. Either force the AA away from the spawn protection or remove it for the AA.

@Musks_a_cunt @GrimBF6 its an aa tank what are u expecting it to do move around with everyone else its designed to sit back and control the air

@GrimBF6 Also no mention of a nerf/restriction to people who camp all game in the AA at base. They either need to remove the ability for the mobile AA to fire in base zones or make it so the base AA doesnt shoot down rockets.

@MorticonBlack @EndersFPS first battlefield game every other titles required burst fire and control after around 50m which increases the skill gap even today fast tapping is more accurate long range than holding the trigger down and it shows when some people struggle to get 2 kills out of a mag

@EndersFPS Why would you want more recoil? It's like wishing for more slack on the wheel in GranTurismo

Literally pull the thumbstick Down Down left Or down right Equip recoil attachments. You’re going to be fine.

@CurtleElite @EndersFPS add another fact into this argument 80% maybe more of pc players use a controller these days there's very few using k&m

Ya that’s a great spiel . However, Mouse and Key is a mechanical advantage. In a 1 v 1, assuming both players are the best at their respective input device, M&K is always winning. Move your thumb down is a lazy and bait response. They gave controller a boost to lesson the gap. Not because they thought that it would be cool.

Controller players in my comments acting as if every PC player is Thanos when the vast majority are just as bad as the vast majority of console players. News Flash! Games giving you recoil reduction just for being on controller isn’t normal, it’s very abnormal! All controller players have to do is slightly change weapon setups after this change. On top of that, the VAST majority of Battlefield’s gameplay isn’t even input dependent. It’s like 90% positioning, timing, map knowledge, ect. Imo Battlefield has coddled the controller playerbase for so long that they’re used to it. Hate me if you want, the nerf was needed. Welcome to the real game.

@thescyph @BattlefieldComm and yet every night i sneak around as an engineer and solo kill enemy tanks for fun in conquest to meny people dont understand the best ways to deal with tanks and make them look stronger than they actually are shooting them from the frount is a waste of rockets

@BattlefieldComm Terrible changes, tanks do not need a buff in any way shape or form when played correctly. tank vs infantry damage needs to be scaled back massively based off damage range obviously these devs don't even play the game

@W4rhe4rt @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield they are the counter play u mortar them back

@BattlefieldComm @Battlefield If you are going to allow mortars in the uncap, then why can't enemy recon drones fly in the uncap? Why does a mortar in an uncap have no counter play?

@TheRooster does look good for 30fps which is what cutscenes run at in bf3

This game is 15 years old. > No ray-tracing > No AI upscaling > No frame-gen > Takes only 20gb > Developed in just 3 yrs GTX 580 ran BF3 on Ultra with 1.5gb VRAM Now you drop $1200 on a GPU and can barely hold 60 FPS in modern games without DLSS Why did we go backwards?

@ArmchairAdml Might be jdam conversion kits being sent in feels weird to fly bombs in when they have a ammunition storage place 30mins down the road

#USAF United States Air Force - Iran War 2026 RAF Fairford Logistics Activity 19 April Since the start of operations at RAF Fairford we have seen around 144 total logistics flights, with 44 being commerical U.S. Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM) charter flights, and 100 Air Mobility Command. There have been 45 flights in April so far. C-130s have been flying from Aviano Air Base and Ramstein to Fairford, along with USTRANSCOM flights from Hill Air Force Base. These are likely carrying munitions. Further C-5, Boeing 747 and Boeing 777/Airbus A330 flights likely carrying supplies for maintaining and supporting the deployment have originated from Dyess, Minot and Ellsworth. @MATA_osint @DefenceGeek @sipjack1776 @TheIntelFrog @Andyyyyrrrr @vcdgf555 @Andyyyyrrrr

@Fahadnaimb never let the italains see you talk bad about the spartan they have turned them in to multirole systems including as an attack aircraft

Australia is retiring its entire fleet of 10 C-27J Spartans after just 11 years in service. The RAAF announced it as part of the new 2026 National Defence Strategy... the planes will be replaced by commercial aircraft for moving people and cargo around the Pacific. No specific type picked yet, though something like an ATR 72 has been floated. Some of the tactical stuff will shift over to the bigger C-130J Hercules fleet, which Australia is expanding. The Spartans had ongoing headaches with maintenance, spare parts, availability rates, and high costs (partly tied to the U.S. FMS process). They never quite hit the mark for battlefield airlift the way they were originally intended. On the flip side, they were really good at humanitarian work... landing on short or rough strips during bushfires and floods where bigger planes couldn’t go. It’s basically a rethink: instead of one versatile but pricey platform, split the jobs between heavy military transports and cheaper civilian options for routine regional support. Makes sense on paper for saving money, but it’s a shame to see them go so soon.