Adam Boland

2.4K posts

Adam Boland

Adam Boland

@betterfuture73

Katılım Ağustos 2024
134 Takip Edilen63 Takipçiler
We want TRUTH
We want TRUTH@We_want_truth26·
@betterfuture73 @bowtiedstocks @crushthemarket Nope. Tradies worked on towers of empty units of 'luxury' for years and it's about to collapse because nobody would be able to afford a rent on a 2m unit. It was all speculation Especially not the low IQs brought in
English
1
0
1
26
We want TRUTH
We want TRUTH@We_want_truth26·
@bowtiedstocks @crushthemarket 50% is my general rule for SE Qld. Each time I see a property advertised for a win by one of the art unions, rsl etc it's always needs about 50% vs rent
English
1
0
3
202
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@JeremyPoxon Really dumb take. What do you make of the huge Companies that treat, food, water, medicine, power, gas etc like an “asset class”? If there is no investment in a sector, it doesn’t happen
English
0
0
4
29
jeremy poxon
jeremy poxon@JeremyPoxon·
"The government is right to wind back a system where taxpayers spend billions lining the pockets of those who treat housing like an asset class, not a basic need" 🫡 theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
jeremy poxon tweet media
English
32
119
430
5.8K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@DrCameronMurray Show us a chart that proves that supply and demand dynamics no longer apply. BTW, most normal people don’t blame the migrants who have come here and got a Govt. Incentive to buy a home. They blame traitorous Govts who have undemocratically and surreptitiously migrated millions
English
0
0
0
9
Cameron Murray
Cameron Murray@DrCameronMurray·
This is a sign of unserious tribal nonsense. Who is blaming individual migrants for following our own migration rules? People are blaming their politicians for not regulating immigration to maximise benefits for existing residents.
Cameron Murray tweet media
English
36
23
157
4.5K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@dodona777 I don’t understand your argument Companies profit on food water and basic medical care. That is every bit, if not more important than housing. Where is the outcry against that? Companies and Investors need to profit off housing, otherwise it doesn’t happen. That is a fact of life
English
0
0
2
15
Stavros™ = Σταύρος©
So, what's wrong with getting rid of negative gearing so that people can buy a HOME discouraging those who want to buy houses for profit? A home is essential. An investment in a house is not essential. It can be seen as greed.
English
14
9
37
509
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@Markyles @GibberCapital Property was sold by Auction “back in the day” too. It’s the most transparent method for the market price to be determined. There is no RRP for real estate. You can’t control how much a Vendor should accept just the same as you can’t for what a Buyer should pay.
English
0
0
0
9
Mark Eyles #VotedYes
@GibberCapital Ok … take your advice. Back in the day houses were advertised with set price sales. Buyers negotiated lower prices and sales became a compromise. That also happens now. But you’re saying that just lends itself to the seller manipulating buyers and that doesn’t happen in auctions
English
1
0
0
36
Mark Eyles #VotedYes
Would be home owners have been outbid at auction by investors with very long pockets. That may be turning around thanks to cgt proposals. But what would happen if auctions were scrapped for domestic residences and simply sold with a set price?
English
7
2
12
976
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@gt65dusk @TopherField For starters there will be less supply as developers won’t have the confidence to bring more stock to market. That will create more demand, even if sale prices are suppressed, there will be more competition for rentals. Immigration will continue, fuelling demand.
English
0
0
2
21
Worker 🇦🇺 🇬🇷
@TopherField Why would rents spike if all properties currently negative geared are grandfathered in and won't change? Investors aren't buying and first home buyers might be holding off, hoping for bigger falls.
English
2
0
1
78
Topher Field
Topher Field@TopherField·
It's amazing to watch people celebrate this as if it's proof that the changes to housing taxation are working. Lowered clearance rates means no one bought... it doesn't mean a first home buyer bought. Yes it might lead to a softening of demand which will then mean a few more first home buyers get a house, that's likely in some small way... but for the REST of the renters who either: 1. don't have a deposit 2. don't have serviceability 3. want to rent for lifestyle / location / flexibility reasons it's going to be VERY bad. Expect rents to spike in the next 18 months between now and the election, irrespective of what happens with house prices.
Topher Field tweet media
English
32
10
131
5.2K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@allwright99 @IFM_Economist Yea, I think that’s the point. The Marjet is crying out for motivated young participants in a range of sectors.
English
0
0
0
10
Tim Wright
Tim Wright@allwright99·
@betterfuture73 @IFM_Economist I know my 18yo son isn’t really looking for work I think the saying is necessity is the mother of all invention How many 15 year olds (or older) chose employment/unemployment with real consequence ? It’s hardly as if they’re choosing or eligible for jobseeker or youth assistance
English
1
0
0
21
Alex Joiner 🇦🇺
Alex Joiner 🇦🇺@IFM_Economist·
The kids aren't alright. Youth unemployment edges over 11% leading the overall unemployment rate higher.
Alex Joiner 🇦🇺 tweet media
English
23
13
75
12.2K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@allwright99 @IFM_Economist It sounds like a high number of young people are unemployed, that is not my experience. Anyone who wants a job can get one as far as I can see.
English
1
0
0
17
Tim Wright
Tim Wright@allwright99·
@betterfuture73 @IFM_Economist Hard to know.. Employment is 1 hour paid work a week Unemployment is also Without work in reference wk Actively searching for work in the four wks prior Available to start in the reference wk So how many ft education, seeking pt/casual? Work for lifestyle vs have to for living
English
1
0
0
23
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@bowtiedstocks Yeah because people will pile their money into a sharemarket that’s fairly valued? People will not need housing because of AI? The Govt will stop mass immigration? Construction costs will come down? Govt overspending and inflation with money printing will come down?
English
0
0
0
58
BowTiedStocks
BowTiedStocks@bowtiedstocks·
Unemployment heading up I've observed the propadee bulls have become much less vocal now...funny that...
BowTiedStocks tweet media
English
14
4
71
2.5K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@CraigSarg73 I have not had 1 Labor shill able to tell me why overtaxing a 19 year starting to invest in shares and prevented from rentvesting helps inter generational in equity. Here is your chance
English
0
0
2
11
Dirtyleftie
Dirtyleftie@CraigSarg73·
Outrage about the Budget I’ve been watching the reaction to the Budget, especially the panic around negative gearing and capital gains tax changes. And the louder the outrage gets, the more it feels like Labor may have actually hit a nerve in the right place. The biggest critics are exactly who you’d expect — the LNP, property lobby groups, and sections of the media that treat investor tax concessions like they’re untouchable. Yet despite all the hysteria, the housing market hasn’t collapsed, the economy hasn’t imploded, and most Australians won’t pay a cent more tax under these changes. Funny thing is, I haven’t heard much from Pauline Hanson either. Maybe it flew under the radar, or maybe Gina told her to keep quiet. Either way, the silence says plenty. What’s happening now was always predictable. Any attempt to reform tax settings around housing was guaranteed to trigger a fear campaign — not because the policy is necessarily bad, but because it challenges something the LNP has treated as sacred for decades: generous tax concessions for investors. That’s why the reaction is so loud. The strategy is simple — scare people into believing that fairness is dangerous, and convince ordinary Australians that asking investors to pay tax on real gains instead of inflation-adjusted windfalls will somehow destroy the country. But politically, Labor’s timing may actually work in its favour. There are still two years until the next election. By then, the reforms will have settled in, markets will have adjusted, and the scare campaign will have lost momentum. Most Australians are more worried about rent, mortgages, wages and the cost of living than whether an investor loses part of a tax discount. So yes, the noise is loud. But noise and real-world impact are not the same thing. #budget #auspol
English
253
151
544
15.1K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@purplepingers The Agent works for the Landlord and is there to manage their interests. They must do so in accordance with the relevant States guidelines. An Agent who refunded the Bond prior to a final inspection would be a fool and likely get terminated by their Client.
English
0
0
0
391
Purplepingers ☭
Purplepingers ☭@purplepingers·
Real estate agent giving ethics advice: “It’s unethical to ask for your bond back”
Purplepingers ☭ tweet media
English
31
22
401
18.6K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@DougCameron51 Sorry, whose lies? The profiteering is happening through your overfunded bullshit programs benefiting fat cat bureaucrats and corrupt politicians. There is no reason to over tax young people trying to get ahead by investing
English
0
0
2
41
Doug Cameron
Doug Cameron@DougCameron51·
Labor must be far more articulate and aggressive in defending the CGT and -ve gearing changes. Call out the Tory lies, explain the facts and condemn blatant extortion and profiteering. Landlords who rip renters off should be exposed. Stop pretending the “market” is the answer.
Doug Cameron tweet media
English
341
153
429
18.1K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@GreenTyler27 The Labor Hacks and Flunkies are trying to pass those opposing these changes as rich boomers, saying that they are opposed to inter generational equity. Extreme gaslighting. The young are the biggest losers out of this. I hope they figure that out and vote accordingly
English
0
0
3
43
Tyler Green
Tyler Green@GreenTyler27·
Facts are facts. Anthony and co have made wealth creation for under 40’s in Australia even harder. The longer they take to wheel these CGT changes back, the more seats they deliver to One Nation at the coming federal election. Tick tock labor. Do you think they will walk them back, or double down even harder?
Tyler Green tweet media
English
28
81
269
2.8K
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@Kate3015 Rich people have not been hurt by these changes. Young people getting overcharged on growing their share portfolio and not able to get into the market by rentvesting are the biggest losers. That is the hypocrisy of Keating and his wannabe clone
English
1
0
1
8
Kate🦋M©
Kate🦋M©@Kate3015·
They’re NOT listening the ‘howls’ are not just coming from wealthy investors they’re coming from every demographic. Keating lashes ‘howls’ of wealthy investors as he backs CGT changes afr.com/policy/tax-and…
English
4
4
9
315
Adam Boland
Adam Boland@betterfuture73·
@honmattkean What utter garbage. Nothing that Australia does will make any difference cost wise.
English
0
0
0
18
The Hon. Matt Kean
The Hon. Matt Kean@honmattkean·
You can’t be a good economic manager in 2026 without being a climate realist. APRA’s modelling is clear: climate inaction means household incomes up to 20% lower, persistent inflation & higher interest rates. Ignore climate and you’ll pay for it. 🔥 theaustralian.com.au/nation/inactio…
The Hon. Matt Kean tweet media
English
491
266
591
41.7K