Adam Boland
2.4K posts


@betterfuture73 @bowtiedstocks @crushthemarket Nope.
Tradies worked on towers of empty units of 'luxury' for years and it's about to collapse because nobody would be able to afford a rent on a 2m unit. It was all speculation
Especially not the low IQs brought in
English

With 7% mortgage rates, assuming $1000 a week rent less agent fees the property needs to sell for around $650 too $700k to be neutrally geared approx.
Reserve Bank of Property@RBASHAGGER
This property would have fetched $2m by the end of the year before negative gearing was axed. Utter tragedy.
English

@bowtiedstocks @crushthemarket 50% is my general rule for SE Qld.
Each time I see a property advertised for a win by one of the art unions, rsl etc it's always needs about 50% vs rent
English

@JeremyPoxon Really dumb take. What do you make of the huge Companies that treat, food, water, medicine, power, gas etc like an “asset class”? If there is no investment in a sector, it doesn’t happen
English

"The government is right to wind back a system where taxpayers spend billions lining the pockets of those who treat housing like an asset class, not a basic need" 🫡
theguardian.com/commentisfree/…

English

@DrCameronMurray Show us a chart that proves that supply and demand dynamics no longer apply. BTW, most normal people don’t blame the migrants who have come here and got a Govt. Incentive to buy a home. They blame traitorous Govts who have undemocratically and surreptitiously migrated millions
English

LNP planning to introduce a TAX on winnings
Lotto
Lottery
Casino
Racing
I Can see this being really popular 🥴
Dave Sharma@DaveSharma
Under Labor’s new tax: — You can walk into a casino, come out $1000 ahead, and pay $0 tax — but if you make $1000 on shares/ETFs, you will pay $300-470 in tax — if you build & sell a business, the ATO now takes 30-47% of your gain Gambling is tax-free. Investing is punished.
English

@dodona777 I don’t understand your argument Companies profit on food water and basic medical care. That is every bit, if not more important than housing. Where is the outcry against that? Companies and Investors need to profit off housing, otherwise it doesn’t happen. That is a fact of life
English

@Markyles @GibberCapital Property was sold by Auction “back in the day” too. It’s the most transparent method for the market price to be determined. There is no RRP for real estate. You can’t control how much a Vendor should accept just the same as you can’t for what a Buyer should pay.
English

@GibberCapital Ok … take your advice. Back in the day houses were advertised with set price sales. Buyers negotiated lower prices and sales became a compromise. That also happens now. But you’re saying that just lends itself to the seller manipulating buyers and that doesn’t happen in auctions
English

@gt65dusk @TopherField For starters there will be less supply as developers won’t have the confidence to bring more stock to market. That will create more demand, even if sale prices are suppressed, there will be more competition for rentals. Immigration will continue, fuelling demand.
English

@TopherField Why would rents spike if all properties currently negative geared are grandfathered in and won't change?
Investors aren't buying and first home buyers might be holding off, hoping for bigger falls.
English

It's amazing to watch people celebrate this as if it's proof that the changes to housing taxation are working.
Lowered clearance rates means no one bought... it doesn't mean a first home buyer bought.
Yes it might lead to a softening of demand which will then mean a few more first home buyers get a house, that's likely in some small way... but for the REST of the renters who either:
1. don't have a deposit
2. don't have serviceability
3. want to rent for lifestyle / location / flexibility reasons
it's going to be VERY bad.
Expect rents to spike in the next 18 months between now and the election, irrespective of what happens with house prices.

English

@DougCameron51 Corrupt. How does she explain her Property Portfolio?
English

@allwright99 @IFM_Economist Yea, I think that’s the point. The Marjet is crying out for motivated young participants in a range of sectors.
English

@betterfuture73 @IFM_Economist I know my 18yo son isn’t really looking for work
I think the saying is necessity is the mother of all invention
How many 15 year olds (or older) chose employment/unemployment with real consequence ? It’s hardly as if they’re choosing or eligible for jobseeker or youth assistance
English

@allwright99 @IFM_Economist It sounds like a high number of young people are unemployed, that is not my experience. Anyone who wants a job can get one as far as I can see.
English

@betterfuture73 @IFM_Economist Hard to know..
Employment is 1 hour paid work a week
Unemployment is also
Without work in reference wk
Actively searching for work in the four wks prior
Available to start in the reference wk
So how many ft education, seeking pt/casual?
Work for lifestyle vs have to for living
English

@bowtiedstocks Yeah because people will pile their money into a sharemarket that’s fairly valued? People will not need housing because of AI? The Govt will stop mass immigration? Construction costs will come down? Govt overspending and inflation with money printing will come down?
English

@CraigSarg73 I have not had 1 Labor shill able to tell me why overtaxing a 19 year starting to invest in shares and prevented from rentvesting helps inter generational in equity.
Here is your chance
English

Outrage about the Budget
I’ve been watching the reaction to the Budget, especially the panic around negative gearing and capital gains tax changes. And the louder the outrage gets, the more it feels like Labor may have actually hit a nerve in the right place.
The biggest critics are exactly who you’d expect — the LNP, property lobby groups, and sections of the media that treat investor tax concessions like they’re untouchable. Yet despite all the hysteria, the housing market hasn’t collapsed, the economy hasn’t imploded, and most Australians won’t pay a cent more tax under these changes.
Funny thing is, I haven’t heard much from Pauline Hanson either. Maybe it flew under the radar, or maybe Gina told her to keep quiet. Either way, the silence says plenty.
What’s happening now was always predictable. Any attempt to reform tax settings around housing was guaranteed to trigger a fear campaign — not because the policy is necessarily bad, but because it challenges something the LNP has treated as sacred for decades: generous tax concessions for investors.
That’s why the reaction is so loud.
The strategy is simple — scare people into believing that fairness is dangerous, and convince ordinary Australians that asking investors to pay tax on real gains instead of inflation-adjusted windfalls will somehow destroy the country.
But politically, Labor’s timing may actually work in its favour. There are still two years until the next election. By then, the reforms will have settled in, markets will have adjusted, and the scare campaign will have lost momentum.
Most Australians are more worried about rent, mortgages, wages and the cost of living than whether an investor loses part of a tax discount.
So yes, the noise is loud.
But noise and real-world impact are not the same thing.
#budget #auspol
English

@purplepingers The Agent works for the Landlord and is there to manage their interests. They must do so in accordance with the relevant States guidelines. An Agent who refunded the Bond prior to a final inspection would be a fool and likely get terminated by their Client.
English

@DougCameron51 Sorry, whose lies? The profiteering is happening through your overfunded bullshit programs benefiting fat cat bureaucrats and corrupt politicians. There is no reason to over tax young people trying to get ahead by investing
English

Hue and cry over maybe having to pay a little tax as a treat
The Australian@australian
Young entrepreneurs warn capital gains tax changes will drive investment away from start-ups and force the next generation of business founders overseas: bit.ly/4dAabWJ
English

@GreenTyler27 The Labor Hacks and Flunkies are trying to pass those opposing these changes as rich boomers, saying that they are opposed to inter generational equity.
Extreme gaslighting. The young are the biggest losers out of this. I hope they figure that out and vote accordingly
English

Facts are facts. Anthony and co have made wealth creation for under 40’s in Australia even harder. The longer they take to wheel these CGT changes back, the more seats they deliver to One Nation at the coming federal election. Tick tock labor.
Do you think they will walk them back, or double down even harder?

English

@Kate3015 Rich people have not been hurt by these changes. Young people getting overcharged on growing their share portfolio and not able to get into the market by rentvesting are the biggest losers.
That is the hypocrisy of Keating and his wannabe clone
English

They’re NOT listening the ‘howls’ are not just coming from wealthy investors they’re coming from every demographic.
Keating lashes ‘howls’ of wealthy investors as he backs CGT changes afr.com/policy/tax-and…
English

@honmattkean What utter garbage. Nothing that Australia does will make any difference cost wise.
English

You can’t be a good economic manager in 2026 without being a climate realist.
APRA’s modelling is clear: climate inaction means household incomes up to 20% lower, persistent inflation & higher interest rates.
Ignore climate and you’ll pay for it. 🔥 theaustralian.com.au/nation/inactio…

English









