

Vk
8.3K posts

@biotechinvstr
Not investment advice.May have position in names mentioned.Opinions expressed strictly my own,not representative of my employer.Factcheck urself.RT≠endorsement





Stock will do what it will do, but this $KRYS Vyjuvek launch is objectively one of the most underwhelming ones I’ve seen, for a disease clearly as severe as DEB is Only 284 *start forms*, ~18 weeks since approval. 121 in q2 and so 163 in q3 by my math . Comp to likes of RETA Skyclarys which had 500 start forms BEFORE the drug was approved. Arguably a more questionable efficacy profile with skyckarys notwithstanding. Or ACAD Daybue, which has 800 patients ON the drug already, approved only ~1 month before KRYS Vyjuvek Can’t imagine any parent won’t be rushing to fill out a simple ~2 minute start form while their kid’s skin is practically melting off and how unfortunately tortuous DEB is. Is the population smaller than what was imagined or is there something else going on? ir.krystalbio.com/news-releases/…





Digging into the $BMEA data. On first pass I agree with the general view coming out of ADA that the data are quite remarkable, with the durability of a short course of therapy and off-treatment effect pretty much unheard of for the commercial diabetes drugs, which of course are monster commercial blockbusters. Obviously early and I’ll have more once I dig further, but there’s not too many new, potentially disease modifying smid plays in diabetes. Any credible critiques of the data, now that the old bear concerns (safety, durability, rbc and Hb effects) have been quietened? Genuinely curious.









