Birbal

538 posts

Birbal

Birbal

@birbal478

Katılım Eylül 2025
50 Takip Edilen2 Takipçiler
Birbal
Birbal@birbal478·
@bcasual263105 @jacksonhinkle India doesn't do flip-flops like the US. India always said that they are on 'India's Side'. US is the master in doing flip-flops.
English
0
0
0
14
Robb …… “Z”
Robb …… “Z”@bcasual263105·
@jacksonhinkle Watch Modi. He’s a master at flip-flop. He was just talking to Marco Rubio on the same subject. He was to buy some SU from Russia changed his mind on the number of then he changed his mind again then he didn’t buy any at all. This guy is a flake. BRICS, should toss him.
English
2
0
2
306
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸@jacksonhinkle·
🇷🇺🇮🇳 India and Russia strike deal on rare earths.
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 tweet mediaJackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
43
124
1.4K
40.3K
Birbal
Birbal@birbal478·
@EK_GeoPolitics @jacksonhinkle Because the world doesn't revolve around the US. As Xi Jinping said US is a declining power, Modi is showing that to Trump admin
English
0
0
2
20
E.K.
E.K.@EK_GeoPolitics·
@jacksonhinkle Modi is sneaky fuck. I don’t get his worldwide popularity. He kept doing business with Russia though, I give him that.
English
2
0
0
95
Lokesh Nara
Lokesh Nara@naralokesh·
Dear Sir, Under Article 81 of the Constitution of India, the allocation of seats in the House of the People has remained frozen based on the 1971 Census. This constitutional freeze is set to end after the first Census conducted post-2026. Once the freeze is lifted, reapportionment becomes inevitable. Every South Indian state - without exception - stands to lose relative representation compared to the northern states. That is precisely the concern we have consistently raised, and the very imbalance the NDA sought to address through the Delimitation Bill and a proportionate increase in parliamentary seats for all states. Surely, a distinguished legal mind such as yours is fully aware of this constitutional position. Which raises an important question: why did the Congress party oppose the Delimitation Bill in Parliament? Was it political posturing at the cost of South India’s long-term interests? The Congress party must answer the simple questions: under Article 81, as it currently stands, what happens after the 2026 Census? Does the South not lose relative representation vis-à-vis the North? If that is indeed the case, why oppose a constitutional mechanism intended to prevent precisely that outcome?
P. Chidambaram@PChidambaram_IN

My young friend, Mr Nara Lokesh, Minister in Andhra Pradesh should do his math before talking about delimitation (interview to the HINDU) The Opposition parties opposed and defeated the Constitution Amendment Bill because the math showed that the five Southern states will lose representation in the LS in terms of RELATIVE strength (if Art 81 is applied without a change) The gainers will be some of the North Indian states The BJP tried to mask the outcome by increasing the representation in LS of each State by 50%, but that was exposed as an illusion Whether you take the representation of AP in LS at the current level of 25 seats or increase it to 38 seats, if Article 81 is applied without a change, the RELATIVE representation of AP will diminish or reduce I urge Mr Lokesh to please do the math again

English
280
1.5K
7.8K
861.2K
AnAlienOnEarth
AnAlienOnEarth@AnAlienOnEarthX·
@birbal478 @naralokesh I didn't mentioned to freeze, I said amend Article 81 with meaningful ratio and minimum amd maximum seats, also allow people to register voting rights at place or work and consider them domicile quicker. A lot north Indian and east Indians are migrated to West and South.
English
1
0
0
18
Birbal
Birbal@birbal478·
@AnAlienOnEarthX @naralokesh But why will the opposition parties from North India vote to freeze delimitation if the government decides to freeze delimitation once again as you said?
English
1
0
0
11
AnAlienOnEarth
AnAlienOnEarth@AnAlienOnEarthX·
@birbal478 @naralokesh Make Logical Amendments through proper process and it can have more than 2/3 votes, Women Reservation Bill 2023 had all votes except few against it.
English
1
0
0
14
Birbal
Birbal@birbal478·
@basaham @naralokesh Because when the woman reservation bill passed in 2023 there was a clause that the woman reservation bill will come into force after the new census & delimitation. That is why they were clubbed together.
English
0
0
0
20
Birbal
Birbal@birbal478·
@Concernedcitzn3 @naralokesh Nope u will understand it in the future. For now look at Japan, South Korea & even China u will understand why they are announcing it. Yes our population is high for now but our TFR is below replacement rate now. If it goes like this it will be the biggest threat for our economy
English
0
0
0
51
ChembuAppa
ChembuAppa@Concernedcitzn3·
@naralokesh Is that why your govt is incentivising more children per family? Just for political gains?
English
1
0
0
4.5K
AnAlienOnEarth
AnAlienOnEarth@AnAlienOnEarthX·
@naralokesh Did you missed... "(if Art 81 is applied without a change)" So isn't it better to amend Art 81, bring in new formula - Minimum and Maximum representation state wise after a threshold based limit and change domicile rule for voting rights, migration across state should be allowed.
English
2
0
1
2.3K

Keşfet

@bcasual263105 @jacksonhinkle @EK_GeoPolitics @kumar81051971 @naralokesh @AnAlienOnEarthX @elonmusk @BarackObama