BJV511

@Stoiiic Missed this link, I’m ngmi

another 50 spots because the other 50 got filled in 10 seconds lol t.me/+PoQJOGCASLFlN… again none of the links in the comments are mine.

@PGATOUR Bigger fist pump for shooting a 59 than winning the players lol

The best shots of Cameron Young’s PGA TOUR career (so far…)

@Zeneca Did you do any back testing with it?

In today's newsletter I wrote 5k words on How to Vibe Code a Prediction Model If you want to read it, your first challenge is finding my newsletter If you can't do that, I don't have any faith you'll be able to build a prediction model anyway I cover the following topics:

@Stoiiic Pls stop, the fake out after a breakout like the other day hurts so much

hello.

@Stoiiic Daily close today seems pretty important, Waddu mean of it if we end up in between 70/72?

BTC Overview TLDR: > not a fan of deep retracement or picture perfect retests after a break of 1 month of consolidation. CB premium flipping slightly negative currently as CB spot continues to sell for the past 5-6 hours. That being said ~70k line in the sand for textbook acceptance back inside range. > ltf pivot - 72k

@DonAlt @awawat Can’t wait to see what happens if we get to the gay range

$BTC Bad news, decent response Interesting spot, think you can make a good bull case here Weekly support, negative macro news entirely disregarded Maybe time for some up for at least a little bit, we have room up to $80k without flipping bullish

@goodalexander I don’t trust a lot of people or entities, but tech ceos are at the absolute bottom of my trust list

Not to victim blame but if Anthropic didn’t want to interact with the Department of War / national security ppl they probably shouldn’t have rolled their product out at (checks notes) Palantir and then tweeted monthly about how their tool could be used to make bioweapons

@Stoiiic Looks like it’s ready to drop off a cliff

prev. week low and mid range is a pivot (rejected currently). if unable to reclaim - trade lower to retest wick.

@Trader_XO Based XO even outside of trading posts, this is so true

I’ve been in the AI trenches for a few months now, and it’s never been more evident as to why clean code still matters, just as it did prior to agentic coding. Eg when I’ve set up a project the way any seasoned senior engineer would, with clear structure, solid conventions and defined boundaries, the codebase grows in a much healthier way. It sounds obvious, but AI makes the difference more extreme. AI does not fix weak structure or semantics, it builds on whatever is already there. What has worked well for me is keeping a clean directory structure from day one, building shared utilities such as consistent error handling, enforcing tight naming conventions, and defining clear rules for APIs and design patterns through lifecycle hooks - pre and post. When the foundations are in place, new features are ‘simpler’ to roll out. When the basics are rushed, the problems scales just as quickly. Small inconsistencies turn into bigger ones. Technical debt builds faster than it used to, 1000 lines of code grows very quickly to 10000 lines of unstructured mess. What’s helped before building is having a common framework for using AI tools, because early structure matters more than ever. Code reviews need to be tighter, not looser. Moving fast and fixing later becomes more expensive. Senior engineers matter because they set the patterns the AI will copy. AI speeds up whatever direction you are heading from the base up.

@sircalebhammer The best part about that graph is they make it impossible to actually understand the information. “Let’s just throw a big red bar on there and make it seem bad.” Bunch of idiots

I’m honestly just so bored of accounts that are supposed to be politically savvy and interesting ending up just being slop. It is not an invalid policy proposal to increase taxes on wealthy people, people can agree or disagree on that policy. But to suggest that the rich are just not being taxed? It’s just so boring.

@chumbawamba22 Wish I had a better timeframe on this tho, has felt this way for a while and markers can remain stupid longer than some can remain solvent

@icobeast Stick to trying to get people to gamble their life away on kalshi’s “prediction market.” Aka just a wrapped up version of sports betting along the gray lines between regulated and unregulated betting

Looking back ordinals were probably the funniest scam we’ve ever seen in gripto Imagine: >some random dude sees that people were willing to give up dollars for jpegs on eth >thinks “hmm i bet i can get those same ppl to give up the most valuable form of currency ever created for more jpegs if i make up a good story” >completely fabricates an entire protocol that has no relationship to bitcoin functionality and requires an entirely separate set of non-standard indexers and image renderers to even see the existence of >tricks people into thinking they’re valuable because they’re “early” to something “new” ON BITCOIN in 2023 😂 >smart operators realize how dumb their counterparties still are and come in and make up a bunch of useless projects with useless jpegs and take your bitcoin >and then they run it back again with fake ERC20 token imitations that are more difficult to use than reading braille while wearing oven mitts Generational scam, only made possible bc of NFTs. We need a new batch of nft-style people with fresh money in crypto

@scaling_shields Tell me you haven’t had a wedding or even been to a wedding without telling me. There is so much more shit that goes into a wedding than “events” it’s laughable to try to say the extra money is just made up for calling it a wedding. Be more out of touch with reality, you can’t

the wedding industry relies on a $15,000 "politeness tax" that 83% of couples blindly pay you pay it the second you say one word wedding photographer: $4,000 "event photographer" same work same hours: $1,200 wedding cake: $800 "celebration cake" same size same design: $250 wedding flowers: $3,500 "party flowers" same arrangements: $1,100 wedding venue: $8,000 "private event rental" same space same date: $4,000 the word "wedding" is a 200-400% markup trigger vendors hear it and mentally double the quote before responding you're not paying for better service you're paying because you were too polite to ask for the real price first here's how to stop being the sucker: step 1: never say "wedding" in the first message "hi, i'm planning a formal dinner party for about 100 guests on [date]. could you share your pricing and availability?" get the quote in writing step 2: reveal after you have the number locked "thanks for this. just to confirm, this is for a wedding celebration. does that change the pricing?" what happens: 1. price stays same = you just saved thousands 2. price increases = you negotiate from the lower number 3. price doubles = you walk and find someone honest the markup by vendor: photographers: "corporate event" = 40-60% less florists: "party flowers" = 60-70% less cakes: "anniversary cake" = 50-60% less venues: "private event" = 30-50% less djs: "birthday party" = 40-50% less catering: "formal dinner" = 30-40% less the numbers that should piss you off: - average wedding cost: $35,000 - percentage that's pure "wedding tax": 30-50% - couples who negotiate: 17% - couples who get a discount when they try: 64% 83% of couples never question the first quote they just pay it because asking feels rude the wedding industry built a $70 billion business on your politeness one word. one script. $15,000 back in your pocket. stop paying the tax

@KingBootoshi brother what

PROMPT: "Luffy coding on a Macbook on the Thousand Sunny, RAGING, then throwing it overboard." - Seedance 2.0 WOOOOOOOW

Your take is awfully dismissing, I think someone simply has really to try to use it, or build something with it, to see how crazy it really is. I would argue the internet changed the world, social media changed the world.. all of these inventions changed the world quite a bit. Ai is just the next thing that will bring on drastic change. It’s also a little disingenuous to compare IPOs flopping to whether or not this new tech is going to be massive. Just because an over inflated IPO goes down in price doesn’t mean it was a failure?

Anyone who thinks this is “scary” is just trying to sound smart, and likely didn’t read the article either… As soon as OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs flop later this year. The majority of the world is going to get an earth shattering revelation you’ve been getting fed propaganda slop for 2 years shoved down your throat. It’s not so black and white. It’s not gonna end the world. It’s not gonna make the world unrecognizable in 10 years, it’s just a helpful tool. That reminder, Currently makes no money. The greed to be in on the next thing early is rampant. Because the majority of it is fueled by a greed for money, along with the desperate want to be smarter than the next guy. The IPOs will pop the bubble, everyone will try and full back track their statements among friends. Quickly the tables will flip into making it seem worthless and a waste of time and corporate slop pushed onto all of us. Which is also not true, it is useful and a good invention and worth having around, just like algorithms made social media a lot more streamlined and enjoyable/useable for all. It streamlines information, and skill sets and makes it more accessible and digestible and interactive. It’s the next generation of Google search. Google, Microsoft, Tesla, Meta, didn’t alter the course of our world and society so dramatically, they were simply advancements in already existing fields. Just as AI is an advancement in efficiency but as well as accessibility, so it’s a net neutrality on job count as a whole, it might harm specific industries but that’s just life. Stream services killed movie theaters, social media killed printed media, Uber hurt taxi drivers, the internet/cell phones, hurt the postal service. The advancements we’ve made today since the Industrial Revolution, has streamlined everything so much beyond anyone’s wildest beliefs from back and then, that if the entire factory in 15 years had ZERO employees it would be basically the same trajectory we’ve been on the entire time. Since the population of the US increased greater than seven times over this duration, AND YET… there is still JOBS. Job opportunities, fields come and go, without jobs, money and, social status you get societies that don’t succeed and don’t last. The internet propagates the want/need for these more than ever, people’s drive is higher than ever before. AI cannot and will not change the structure of our society this deeply. THERE WILL ALWAYS BE JOBS. it’s human nature. As far as advancements go, if you just take something trained on everything we believe to be true, at its core it’ll never be able to make major steps forward humans didn’t initiate. We are nowhere close to AI being able to interact with the real world in a meaningful way, where it can learn explore and form thoughts concepts and conjectures without stealing from us. We created it, we live in the world, we gather all the information, we give the instructions, we build it for a certain reason with a certain motive. Without us, not only does it not know anything but it wouldn’t service our interests. Net nothing. End of story, Google search is out, AI search is in. People’s obsession with AGI. Just be real with yourself for 10 seconds. It can’t exist it’s an oxymoron. And if it did. So what? What on earth would this do for you? Other than be a thought experiment. Everyone says it’s gonna be the future, but almost no one has an actual grasp on what’s going on. When people swear something is great, so important, going to change the world, but when met with simple questions about how or why, fail to answer it’s never a good sign. It’s all just one massive citation circle, sourcing from a few, circulating because it makes a great headline.

@FranVezz What’s your normal go to for deciding when a trend actually breaks?

Every single one these stocks broke: The 10ema Then the 21ema Then the 50sma It’s simple, but it works. Ride trends, then get off the train when it’s time.

@Loopify Quite a pessimistic takeaway from the article

I don’t actually disagree with this article but I feel like it misses a big point. To assume AI will continue increasing at this pace and quality would mean it’s useless to even try learn about it. It’ll get so good being ahead of the curve for 1 year doesn’t matter. So why even try to learn about it if it eventually replaces most people and we end up in a world of UBI? The rich should preserve their capital, and I am not sure what the rest of the world should do. A time of true uncertainty.

@fejau_inc @0xkyle__ This is such an amazingly good comparison. Those who maybe didn’t prepare but at least had some foresight made out a lot better. Really need to think what to do to prepare the same way. Already using the models but want to think a level deeper than that.

@0xkyle__ It feels like February 2020

i cannot understate how early you are, the turbo normie knows nothing about this. grabbed lunch w a couple of classmates, none of them talk about this shit. twitter is the fringe of the fringe, and this gives you an advantage. it's been 3y since cgpt, and people still think AI hasn't made any advances. glhf

@Zeneca This article was really eye opening for me

Great article. Last month I met a partner at a law firm in India. He said that they’ve gone from hiring 20-30 graduates per year, to literally 1-2. AI is disrupting the world at breakneck speeds, but most people still aren’t seeing it Educate yourself before it’s too late

If you have 5 minutes to read something, read this. My world view is mostly changed now