D Hamilton

49.1K posts

D Hamilton banner
D Hamilton

D Hamilton

@bluediamond62

United Kingdom Katılım Ocak 2012
344 Takip Edilen486 Takipçiler
Philip Patrick
Philip Patrick@Pbp19Philip·
@RJKH51 @DPJHodges @bluediamond62 Celtic fans protesting a bit too much I think. Some insecurity there. Match should clearly be awarded to Hearts due to pitch invasion by home fans. No neutral (I am neutral) will ever accept this as Celtic’s title.
English
0
0
0
2
(((Dan Hodges)))
(((Dan Hodges)))@DPJHodges·
This whole debate is utterly ridiculous now. Celtic v Hearts was prematurely abandoned because of a pitch invasion that put player safety at risk. The evidence is indisputable. If people want to then have a separate debate about appropriate sanctions, fine.
English
175
178
1.5K
70.4K
D Hamilton retweetledi
Super Tony Bloom 🖥 ⚽️🖱🔍📄💰
John Beaton was intimidated after years of Celtic abuse He made the ridiculous decision based on fear for his well being You see a pattern forming here Abuse and intimidation just have to look at the pitch invasion to see who's guilty
Gerry Hassan@GerryHassan

OFFICIAL: Celtic's dodgy penalty against Motherwell should not have been a penalty as the whole world knew. The SFA's Key Match Incident Review has adjudicated that it was WRONG of VAR to intervene. This wrong decision is what decided the title. thescottishsun.co.uk/sport/16295110…

English
31
13
105
5.7K
D Hamilton retweetledi
D Hamilton retweetledi
Chris Philp MP
Chris Philp MP@CPhilpOfficial·
Sky News forgot to mention that they are all Afghan illegal immigrants A bit of honesty about what’s happening would help Hiding the truth is how the mainly Pakistani-origin grooming gang scandal was covered up for so long
Sky News@SkyNews

BREAKING: Seven men, allegedly part of a grooming gang in Norfolk, have been charged with rape and child sex abuse offences, says the Crown Prosecution Services trib.al/go6x30u 📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube

English
186
2.1K
9.4K
251.7K
D Hamilton retweetledi
Calum Crowe
Calum Crowe@CalumCrowe10·
Three key points. Willie Collum's position is now untenable. John Beaton's reputation will forever be tarnished despite the fact he made the correct decision initially. Andrew McKinlay, the Hearts chief executive, has to resign from his role as SFA vice-president.
English
135
84
521
59.4K
David Atherton
David Atherton@daveatherton·
It needs confirmation, but 3 South Asian, possibly Muslims ☪️ were on the jury. There's a concept in Islam called the Ummah where a Muslim's first duty is to Islam and other Muslims, not the law of the land they live in. If true, we're in trouble.
English
930
4.8K
20.8K
486.8K
D Hamilton
D Hamilton@bluediamond62·
@TheRefsView @esta_x4 You have to wonder what could possibly be influencing his decision making 🤔🇻🇦
English
0
0
3
86
D Hamilton retweetledi
The Ref’s View
The Ref’s View@TheRefsView·
So Willie Collum backing John Beaton to award penalty after only 17 sec review on advice of Andrew Dallas to award penalty to Celtic v Motherwell has been adjudged to be wrong by KMI. The WORLD knew it was wrong. What an awful look for Collum & shows Dallas has too much influence
English
193
277
2.1K
109.2K
D Hamilton
D Hamilton@bluediamond62·
@GrahamSpiers Scottish game is in disrepute less than a month before World Cup. The minute there's a VAR intervention which can favour Celtic the outcome is a guaranteed affirmative because referees live in fear. It's decision making influenced by intimidation
English
1
3
6
93
D Hamilton
D Hamilton@bluediamond62·
@GersnetOnline Scottish game is in disrepute less than a month before World Cup. The minute there's a VAR intervention which can favour Celtic the outcome is a guaranteed affirmative because referees live in fear as I've said above. It's decision making influenced by intimidation
English
0
0
0
20
Frankie
Frankie@GersnetOnline·
Given the sheer number of errors we see on a weekly basis, it was inevitable VAR would be a deciding factor in who won the title. Collum should of course resign but this incompetence reaches much higher up the tree. Indeed, Scottish football needs root and branch change.
Hearts Standard@HeartsStandard_

BREAKING: The KMI panel has ruled that Celtic should not have been awarded a penalty versus Motherwell last week The panel said that John Beaton was right not to award the penalty initially and that VAR should not have intervened 🔗onlrl.co/yp9nya

English
4
8
34
2K
D Hamilton retweetledi
freddiemac
freddiemac@freddiemac1·
Jens Askou, brilliant interview from a brilliant manager, thought he had seen it all. Didn't realise the open corruption in Scottish football as the refs 'hand' Celtic the title. Good luck in Tolouse.
Sky Sports Scotland@ScotlandSky

🗣️ “I’m in total shock. I’d thought I’d seen it all this year, but apparently I haven’t.” Motherwell boss Jens Berthel Askou on Celtic’s late penalty call, while also talking about the race to secure fourth ⤵️

English
32
91
453
118.9K
D Hamilton retweetledi
Trevor Phillips
Trevor Phillips@TrevorPTweets·
My thoughts on the @EHRC guidance laid yesterday; this is not about non-existent "rights". It is about the safety of women - mothers, sisters, wives, daughters. We men need to hear their voices. Virginia Woolf : "Though we see the same world, we see it through different eyes". My intro on @TimesRadio yesterday: Where I live there are two different routes to and from the tube station. One, let’s call it Acacia Avenue, is quiet and residential. The other, London Road, is a busy major route with lots of traffic. At all times of the day, I automatically head for Acacia Road. It’s just much nicer. The women in my family, on the other hand, will never willingly make that walk after dark. They live with an anxiety that most men find it hard to imagine, and frankly, rarely think about unprompted. Last year 739,000 women were sexually assaulted in Britain. Virtually all such assaults - nine out of ten - are perpetrated by men. One in four women have been attacked at some time in their lives. Acacia Avenue is exactly the sort of place in which most women fear that they become vulnerable, and they are right. As the author Virginia Woolf once wrote " Though we see the same world, we see it through different eyes". I think this is the right context in which to understand the furore over the guidance being laid today by the government, over the meaning of the words man and woman when it comes to providing services and facilities in workplaces. Many men think this is about a rather arcane dispute about who gets to use what loo. For their mothers, sisters, wives and daughters, it isn’t. In a previous life, as Chair of the Equality and Human Rights Commission, I had a hand in writing this country’s equality laws, in particular the 2010 Equality Act. It never occurred to any of us that there could be any confusion or dispute over the meaning of the words man and woman. But it has taken a decade of campaigning, a Supreme Court judgement and now hundreds of pages of guidance to settle the issue. This is not about so called trans rights, which are completely unaffected by this guidance, since no-one has ever had the right to walk into a changing room reserved for teenage girls. What it does mean is that women and girls are guaranteed the protection they deserve, and that their safety, which we spent half a decade drafting law to ensure, is protected. But the whole business illuminates some serious issues in our politics. First that many of our institutions, in spite of the fact that they always knew what the right thing to do was, decided to ignore the fears of their women customers and employees, under pressure from noisy pressure groups. Instead, the people who were supposed to be the grown ups behaved as though the law said what campaigners wanted it to say, rather than what it actually said. They settled for what they hoped would be a quiet life. In a democracy, there’s little point in Parliament deciding anything if the law is then made an ass by activists intimidating bosses in companies, schools, universities and the media into doing something different. Second, at the heart of the campaign to undermine the Equality Act is an idea that we specifically rejected in 2010, so called self-identification. That is to say, that it should be up to the individual to decide whether they have what’s called a protected characteristic - are you male or female, are you black or white. The problem is that self-ID would destroy the operation of any law against discrimination. Look, it would almost certainly have been to my advantage as a young man to self-identify as a handsome, white public schoolboy. None of those things is true of me. And at various points I am pretty sure it’s been to my disadvantage. It is certainly statistically likely to have been to my disadvantage. But according to the logic of those who say that self-ID should be the rule and that anyone should be able to decide for themselves whether they are male or female, black or white or Asian, were I to complain about racial discrimination, it would be difficult for anyone prove that I’d been discriminated against because of my race since anybody to whom I’d lost out could just tell the courts that they too were black. I know that sounds like Alice in Wonderland but you can google the case where a chap, both of whose parents are white, insisted he should get money from the Arts Council because he so identified with the black struggle that he considered himself black, and everyone should accept his point of view. In the United States and Brazil exactly such outlandish claims have been made and people rewarded to the disadvantage of people actually born into minority families. I have even been told about firms who, when reporting their gender pay gaps have put men who just happen to like wearing dresses at weekends - nothing wrong with that, let me be clear - into the female column and told their women employees that they really haven’t got anything to moan about because statistically they are paid equally, and they should get back in their box. So today’s guidance isn’t just another tiresome chapter in culture wars. It is , I hope, a halt to the efforts to undermine one of the most important pieces of legislation on the statute book, by people who, for their own reasons, would prefer us to be living in the 1950s world of Mad Men.
English
413
1.6K
5.7K
240.6K
WRN Scotland
WRN Scotland@WRNScotland·
Yesterday @DalgetySusan you could find out how many female, male and non binary MSPs there were in the current session of the Scottish Parliament. Today that option has been removed. Why is that @ScotParl @scotgov? Would you rather eliminate everyone's sex rather than acknowledge reality
WRN Scotland tweet mediaWRN Scotland tweet media
Susan Dalgety@DalgetySusan

This is really important because only by categorising MSPs by sex (as per the Supreme Court ruling which says "woman" and "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refer exclusively to biological sex) will we know the balance of men and women in Holyrood. Sex matters. Facts matter.

English
16
129
380
73.5K
D Hamilton retweetledi
The Rangers Archives
The Rangers Archives@OldRangersVideo·
#OTD 22-May-2005, @RangersFC defeated Hibs 1-0 in the League MatchDay 38 at Easter Road. Goalscorer was Novo 59. Crowd was 17,450 Helicopter Sunday!
English
0
6
43
2.2K
D Hamilton retweetledi
Kiera Diss
Kiera Diss@KieraDiss·
French police are now refusing to tackle boats leaving their shores because ARMED MEN are guarding them. This is a military-style operation against us so it’s time to use the military against them. There cannot be any more excuses.
English
869
7K
22K
452.6K
Rangers Banter
Rangers Banter@RangersBanter17·
A Celtic fan ran on to the pitch and called Cammy Devlin an Orange B and he doesn't think there's anything wrong with that? Change the Orange for a word beginning with F and he'd be saying something different.
Sky Sports Scotland@ScotlandSky

🗣️ "That's a fairly severe allegation... that's not been proved." 🗣️ "I don't think I would condemn supporters..." Martin O'Neill responds to Tony Bloom's claims that Hearts players were "assaulted" by Celtic fans during Saturday's pitch invasion ⤵️

English
231
54
955
225.4K