stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊

1.3K posts

stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 banner
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊

stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊

@bogdanoffi

Ethereum home staker. Decentralization maxi therefore Eth maxi. #stakefromhome. Here to educate and fight ETH FUD with facts.

Avoiding centralized VC chains Katılım Ekim 2022
783 Takip Edilen1.4K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
Fun fact: The initial capital requirement for an individual to run a PROFITABLE (key word here) Solana validator is about 5500 $SOL ($935,000 at time of writing). An over 10x increase compared to running an Ethereum validator, which is 32 $ETH ($86,000 at time of writing). I’ve created a side by side comparison highlighting the differences for Solana and Ethereum. I often see comments on how Solana’s hardware costs significantly more than Ethereum’s (this is true). However, what is often overshadowed is the amount of $SOL a validator actually requires to be profitable. The reason why the profitability threshold for Solana is so high is because their validators have to pay a “voting fee” which comes out to approximately 1.1 SOL/day (see documentation). For those interested in the breakdown, each Solana epoch has 432,000 blocks which need to be voted on and each vote transaction costs 0.000005 SOL, which ends up being 2.16 SOL per epoch. Given that epochs currently take between 2 to 2.5 days, in a year, that amounts to almost 400 SOL. So every Solana validator needs to pay about 400 SOL/year in voting fees. That’s why the Solana Foundation even offers subsidizing part of the voting fees for the first year (see screenshot). Don’t have almost $1M in $SOL? No worries, you can still run a Solana validator without any of your own SOL, you just need to convince the community to delegate 55,000-75,000 SOL ($9M-12M) to you. @toly says you just need to “hustle”. Now the Ethereum community knows that while 32 ETH ($86K) is much lower than $935K, it’s still a considerable amount of money. Which is why multiple tools were built that allowed for anyone that wishes to participate to run a full Ethereum validator with only a few ETH. Examples include an 8 ETH @Rocket_Pool node, or a 2.4 ETH @LidoFinance CSM node. Or you can use any amount of ETH to run a DVT node via @squadstaking. One chain was designed and built for maximum decentralization, while the other was built as a centralized datacenter chain that only well funded VCs can participate in. There is a reason why institutions continue to focus building on Ethereum.
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet mediastakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet mediastakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet mediastakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet media
English
53
68
501
136.1K
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@DennisonBertram People don’t seem to understand that any blockchain (BTC included) can take your money if there is social consensus. It just requires coordination with the relevant parties (node operators, security council etc).
English
0
0
0
19
Dennison
Dennison@DennisonBertram·
I don’t honestly care because I am so tired of how intellectually bankrupt the space is, but if a blockchain can take your money, honest to god I would rather trust the U.S. courts to make that decision.
English
16
4
70
3.6K
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
Decentralization just means that no single individual or entity can arbitrarily alter the chain under normal circumstances. It does not mean reverting mistakes/freezing funds is absolutely impossible under any circumstance. Since any blockchain can/will fall back to coordinating with the social layer (miners/validators/node operators etc) to rectify catastrophic events (BTC value overflow incident, ETH DAO hack etc). Decentralization is a spectrum because there are various vectors (liveliness, censorship resistance, miner/validator/sequencer set etc) to consider. What most L2 users care about (not an exhaustive list) 1. can my TXs be arbitrarily censored? 2. can my TXs be arbitrarily reverted? 3. can my funds/account balance be arbitrarily modified 4. can my L2 funds escape to L1 without being censored in emergencies In this case the security council of 12 elected members (of which only 1 works for Arbitrum iirc) took action on behalf of the community. If the Arb team alone or a single employee had the power to decide then you could make a case about them not being decentralized, but they are a stage 1 rollup with a security council and it’s been publicly known for awhile.
English
0
0
0
6
John Iadeluca
John Iadeluca@johniadeluca·
@ceterispar1bus Dude Either the concept of decentralization in a project has meaning or it doesn’t. That’s fine if they can freeze funds in an emergency but then you’re just basically PayPal with some extra web3 features
English
0
0
0
42
ceteris
ceteris@ceterispar1bus·
literally shaking right now. after arbitrum froze north korea's $71m in stolen eth to fund their nuclear weapons program i'm concerned they're going to start freezing my money too.
English
34
10
320
19.1K
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@justinsuntron Well I'm sure you could have coordinated much quicker with the 19/27 validators needed to try and censor the North Korean hackers.
English
0
0
1
192
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
Yes, it's a spectrum because there are various vectors (liveliness/censorship resistance/validator or sequencer set etc) to consider, and the point of decentralization is that no single individual or entity can arbitrarily alter the chain under normal circumstances. What most L2 users care about (not an exhaustive list) 1. can my TXs be arbitrarily censored? 2. can my TXs be arbitrarily reverted? 3. can my funds/account balance be arbitrarily modified 4. can my L2 funds escape to L1 without being censored in emergencies In this case the security council of 12 elected members took action on behalf of the community. If Arbitrum foundation alone or a single employee had the power to decide then you could make a case about them not being decentralized.
English
0
0
0
39
Va♰oshi🪢BIP-110
@griffgreen You mean there is : "real 100% decentralized " "Basically decentralized " "Somehow decentralized " "Not that much decentralized" "A little bit decentralized" "Not decentralized"?
English
5
3
76
2.1K
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@byJamesMarston @griffgreen Blockchains can always fall back to the social layer in the worst case if needed during catastrophic events (the entire point of decentralization is that no single individual or entity can arbitrarily alter the chain in normal circumstances).
English
0
0
1
31
James Marston
James Marston@byJamesMarston·
@griffgreen Agreed. We even can try to compare it with DAO hack in 2016, just with different extreme level, when whole chain was forked. When someone crushed, humans intervene. Just trying to understand how far this intervention could come.
English
2
0
2
539
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
AAVE's report said 30k ETH was withdrawn by the attacker on Arbitrum AAVE, and implied a shortfall of 38.2k WETH on Arbitrum if losses were to be isolated to L2s. So it would appear the @arbitrum team has already recovered the stolen funds that occurred on their end! Major props to their team for taking quick action to mitigate the damage to their users (while Layer Zero and Kelp seem to be preoccupied with the blame game). Hopefully this means the worst case scenario of a 26% haircut for Arb depositors have been significantly reduced. As someone that's been away from CT for a while, the last thing I expected was to get news (from a good friend who took my advice of putting their ETH into AAVE as a low risk alternative rather than leaving on a CEX...) that all of my ETH that wasn't being solo staked was frozen (thankfully most of it is staked... but I still had a significant amount on AAVE mainnet and Arb thinking those were the safest options 😅). Hopefully this gets resolved soon so the industry can move forward, but it makes you question how much trust has already been eroded from users. IMO it will be hard for anyone to rationalize DeFi risk for minimal yield when there's a chance you wake up to find all your assets frozen overnight in what was supposed to be the safest protocol due to some unnecessary derivative restaking token you've never heard of getting exploited by North Korea.
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet mediastakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet media
Arbitrum@arbitrum

The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.

English
0
1
6
395
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
Back then almost 70% of them were subsidized by Solana Foundation. Last year they announced they were changing requirements to remove a lot of the fake validators with no skin in the game (back then people could basically provide 0 of their own SOL and receive the rest from SFDP). x.com/bogdanoffi/sta…
English
0
0
1
62
DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth
DeFi Dad ⟠ defidad.eth@DeFi_Dad·
Can anyone ELI5 why the Solana validators count is down ~70% since 2 years ago? And is this the new norm? Or a is it being addressed and expected to go up back up sooner?
English
43
4
128
13.4K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Base is doing things the right way: an L2 on top of Ethereum, that uses its centralized features to provide stronger UX features, while still being tied into Ethereum's decentralized base layer for security. Base does not have custody over your funds, they cannot steal funds or stop you from withdrawing funds (this is part of the L2beat stage 1 definition). You can see Base's status as an L2 on l2beat: l2beat.com/scaling/projec… I feel like many people have been confused by recent cynicism and think that things like L2beat are a weird sort of nerd-sharia compliance authority. This is NOT what is going on. The security that L2s provide, that L2beat measures, reflects concrete properties that protect you as a user from being rugged. Here is an explanation of how, if an L2 shuts down, users are automatically able to withdraw funds even without that L2's involvement: x.com/l2beat/status/… Here is an example of how L2s prevent the operator from censoring transactions, that happened on Soneium earlier this year: x.com/gauthamzzz/sta… This is what we mean when we say that L2s are non-custodial, they are extensions of ethereum, not glorified servers that happen to submit hashes. There are concrete pathways implemented in smart contract logic on Ethereum L1, that have been successfully used in the wild, that ensure that the L2 users' funds are ultimately controlled by L1, they cannot be stolen or blocked by the L2 operator.
jesse.base.eth@jessepollak

1/ as a follow-up to @iampaulgrewal's comments, I want to provide more detail on how the @base sequencer actually works — and fully shut down the FUD that folks are actively spreading around the role sequencers play

English
1.1K
1.2K
6.8K
1.8M
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
This was announced in August, but I'm glad 5/7 of the Blockchain networks Wyoming ended up selecting were Ethereum L1+L2s. This is despite SOL/AVAX/APT/SEI/SUI all scoring higher than ETH+L2s (with the exception of Polygon). The Ethereum ecoystem remains the default choice! For those wondering, the final scores were: SOL: 37 AVAX: 34 APT: 32 SEI: 30 SUI: 30 ETH L1: 29 Arbitrum: 28 Base: 28 Optimism: 24 Polygon: 32
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet mediastakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet media
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi

Friendly reminder that the first US government backed stablecoin (on a state level via Wyoming) is supposed to announce on February 27th which blockchain they will initially launch on. Candidates were Ethereum (+ L2s), Solana, Avax, Sui, and Stellar. This is way more interesting than short term price action. It'll be a huge win for the chain selected, especially if it sets a precedent for other states that decide to issue their own stablecoins. No outcome would surprise me, despite believing Ethereum is the best choice, simply because Alt L1s have VCs that are not afraid to spend $$$ on business development and aggressively fight for market share. Case in point: Ethereum was ranked second to last (only ahead of Stellar) on Wyoming's scoring criteria (which heavily favored metrics for centralized chains). Solana was ranked first (nice job @toly). This isn't 2016-2020 when you could passively ignore competitors gaslighting you and just focus on building, because no one was ready to adopt blockchain tech at that time anyway. If you think the non crypto native boomers that make these types of big decisions can't be misled by "advisors" or BD teams, and will intrinsically know which chain is the best you are probably extremely naïve. Relying solely on "build it and they will come" (for the sake of avoiding conflict, or maintaining a neutral image etc) while your competitors are actively trying to sabotage you is wishful thinking. I hope the entire $ETH community wakes up, and that everyone (esp @VivekVentures @Etherealize_io) will do their best to advocate on Ethereum's behalf in these crucial junctions of adoption.

English
1
0
9
728
Captain Jack
Captain Jack@iPursueLife·
@bogdanoffi @VitalikButerin @KyleSamani @justinsuntron @saylor I appreciate this. I also think this has happened throughout history. If u look at railroad infrastructure, in the early days they didn’t have standardization. All these various rail systems fighting each other with different incentives. That’s what happens at the “protocol”…
English
2
0
1
66
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
Here's an image to help everyone visualize the paradigm shift happening in crypto and why it's different now. 2016-2024 was just a kid's playground for VCs and grifters to fleece clueless retail with alt L1s, while Saylor piled billions into BTC, and ETH quietly built. All while operation chokepoint 2.0 discouraged any large players from entering. This was "the market" that dominated the space for almost the last decade. This isn't a subjective opinion. When you take away everything pre 2024 such as the ETFs (that opened the door to TradFi & pension funds etc, such as Michigan's pension fund being the first state to buy ETH ETFs in Nov 2024), DATs buying $8B+ of ETH in 2 months (@sharplink & @BitMNR), the influx of institutions building on Ethereum (Blackrock's BUIDL fund, Robinhood's L2 etc), who were the remaining market participants? It should only take a few seconds for anyone above room temp IQ to understand why ETH underperformed for so long. There are 3 types of conclusions people will have when they look at this image. Left curve: You unironically refer to "the market" deciding that BTC is special and therefore will always be a better SoV. You believe the crypto market was efficient, a mature industry, and comprised of sophisticated investors with no information asymmetry. Mid curve: You think ETH underperformed due to whatever backfilled narrative attempts CT KOLs/VCs came up with such as value accrual issues, loss of REV to parasitic L2s, Solana stealing the memecoin market etc. While not applying those same standards to assets like BTC/XRP/ADA that still trade at huge valuations but have no onchain activity. Right curve: You realize "the market" as it existed in 2016-2024 never traded on fundamentals. It was just a very limited set of participants where 99% were driven by short term financial gain. Meaning they were financially incentivized to buy everything EXCEPT ETH. If you were a risk averse or less informed crypto investor = buy BTC because Saylor was piling billions into it, while Gensler was threatening to label everything else a security If you were a crypto VC (almost none of which participated in or even existed during ETH's ICO) = bid/shill your own vaporware that you bought in at seed rounds, rinse and repeat If you were a retail investor = gamble on the next low cap meme or alt L1 trading sub $10 hoping for a 100x Nothing in that period of time was ever going to convince the above participants that ETH was the right choice besides those with conviction in Ethereum's long term vision. A decade later the regulatory fog has finally lifted with the GENIUS + Clarity act, the SEC's Project Crypto, and governments + institutions are fully embracing blockchain technology. The previous 2016-2024 era investors may not have cared, but this new wave will likely care about which blockchain has the best track record with zero downtime, the most decentralized, credibly neutral, and with the largest onchain economy. The ticker is $ETH.
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊 tweet media
Joseph Chalom@joechalom

Why I joined @sharplink as Co-CEO:

English
15
17
92
19.2K
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@ec265 Can confirm this strategy works. Might take 5-10 years though, but it works.
English
1
0
4
146
Etc.
Etc.@ec265·
How to become a millionaire: Step 1: Buy $ETH Step 2: Wait Congratulations on making it!
English
22
23
332
10.9K
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
You still don't get it. >As always said eth is a tech platform not money if it succeeds then its suceeds for that reason" Fidelity & Goldman Sachs already call ETH a SoV. People see BTC as a SoV bc they see number go up over time. The same thing can happen for ETH as well. >But this move is not it - when xrp or anything else moves it’s speculation but for some reason eth is fundamentals apparently even if onchain has not changed I'm not saying ETH is moving because of fundamentals or onchain usage has changed etc (since you love to always refer to ETH "GDP"). ETH is moving because DATs+ETFs are bidding billions. What you seem to not understand is WHY they're bidding. It's because they've finally caught on to the narrative of ETH's fundamentals (how the overwhelming majority of stablecoins + RWA tokenization + institutional adoption are on Ethereum), just as the US is beginning to embrace blockchain tech (Clarity/Genius act + the SEC's Project Crypto's goal to tokenize the financial system) after years of fighting against it. Which is what Ethereans have been saying for years, while people like you claimed it would never happen or reflect in the asset price.
English
1
0
0
111
Kun
Kun@0x_Kun·
There is nothing to left curve As always said eth is a tech platform not money if it succeeds then its suceeds for that reason But this move is not it - when xrp or anything else moves it’s speculation but for some reason eth is fundamentals apparently even if onchain has not changed Also if few yrs ago I said btc would hit high of 120k within few yrs but eth won’t be at 5k you would have said that’s cope Enjoy but nothing to do with left curve
English
1
0
1
118
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@Cryptoyieldinfo Everyone's a genius in a bull market, but what matters is if you can survive a bear market, and most assets don't. Imagine the people that bought Cardano between $2-3 in 2021.
English
0
0
1
73
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
Yesterday was the first time I encountered a XRP maxi in real life. Guy was probably late 40s/early 50s and a small business owner. He honestly thought XRP was the future. TBH I was surprised these types of people still actually existed. I thought the XRP army were mostly bots/fake. It was a good reminder that information asymmetry still exists on a wide scale outside of our CT bubble, and many of us should feel fortunate that we ended up where we are now (whether it was your own due diligence, luck, or the guidance you received). It must be extremely easy to be led down the wrong path depending on how one was introduced to crypto. I can only assume there are still tons of clueless retail investors out there (though I don't believe they can make a material impact on the market nowadays). I'm hoping this cycle where Ethereum finally has proper representation (via @VivekVentures @ethereumJoseph @fundstrat and so many others) in mainstream media will allow people to become more informed!
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi

Here's an image to help everyone visualize the paradigm shift happening in crypto and why it's different now. 2016-2024 was just a kid's playground for VCs and grifters to fleece clueless retail with alt L1s, while Saylor piled billions into BTC, and ETH quietly built. All while operation chokepoint 2.0 discouraged any large players from entering. This was "the market" that dominated the space for almost the last decade. This isn't a subjective opinion. When you take away everything pre 2024 such as the ETFs (that opened the door to TradFi & pension funds etc, such as Michigan's pension fund being the first state to buy ETH ETFs in Nov 2024), DATs buying $8B+ of ETH in 2 months (@sharplink & @BitMNR), the influx of institutions building on Ethereum (Blackrock's BUIDL fund, Robinhood's L2 etc), who were the remaining market participants? It should only take a few seconds for anyone above room temp IQ to understand why ETH underperformed for so long. There are 3 types of conclusions people will have when they look at this image. Left curve: You unironically refer to "the market" deciding that BTC is special and therefore will always be a better SoV. You believe the crypto market was efficient, a mature industry, and comprised of sophisticated investors with no information asymmetry. Mid curve: You think ETH underperformed due to whatever backfilled narrative attempts CT KOLs/VCs came up with such as value accrual issues, loss of REV to parasitic L2s, Solana stealing the memecoin market etc. While not applying those same standards to assets like BTC/XRP/ADA that still trade at huge valuations but have no onchain activity. Right curve: You realize "the market" as it existed in 2016-2024 never traded on fundamentals. It was just a very limited set of participants where 99% were driven by short term financial gain. Meaning they were financially incentivized to buy everything EXCEPT ETH. If you were a risk averse or less informed crypto investor = buy BTC because Saylor was piling billions into it, while Gensler was threatening to label everything else a security If you were a crypto VC (almost none of which participated in or even existed during ETH's ICO) = bid/shill your own vaporware that you bought in at seed rounds, rinse and repeat If you were a retail investor = gamble on the next low cap meme or alt L1 trading sub $10 hoping for a 100x Nothing in that period of time was ever going to convince the above participants that ETH was the right choice besides those with conviction in Ethereum's long term vision. A decade later the regulatory fog has finally lifted with the GENIUS + Clarity act, the SEC's Project Crypto, and governments + institutions are fully embracing blockchain technology. The previous 2016-2024 era investors may not have cared, but this new wave will likely care about which blockchain has the best track record with zero downtime, the most decentralized, credibly neutral, and with the largest onchain economy. The ticker is $ETH.

English
20
14
114
13.3K
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
The range is 2016-2024 since ETH mainnet launched in 2015, and mid 2024 is when ETFs were approved and operation chokepoint 2.0 was nearing its end (allowing Tradfi/Wall St to enter the playing field). So 2016-2024 reflects "the market" participants up until that time. Infinite VC L1 grifts (post 2017 ICO mania enabled by Ethereum) in that timeframe.
English
1
0
1
36
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@Mtitus6 Sad indeed. Hopefully the Ripple extraction will end sooner than later, but it wouldn't surprise me if it continues for several years.
English
0
0
1
42
titey.eth 🦇🔊🛡️🧙‍♂️
@bogdanoffi This will end up being the saddest story in crypto. I fully expect a documentary down the road once every narrative is proven undeniably false and Ripple extraction can no longer be sustained. I hope I have at least saved a few people.
English
1
0
2
61
Evan Van Ness
Evan Van Ness@evan_van_ness·
@bogdanoffi Yes, Ripple Inc insiders done a good job scamming many credulous people in middle America
English
1
0
5
190
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@zxstim Had a similar experience recently. Introduced a friend who knew nothing about crypto to ETH. A week later they were asking me about Cardano and trying to trade it.
English
1
0
3
202
ZxStim
ZxStim@zxstim·
@bogdanoffi i didn’t take the xrp army seriously until i heard a friend of mine who knew nothing about crypto asking is xrp legit
English
1
0
7
254
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi·
@pythianism Glad people are starting to ask this question (getting to stage 3 of this image) People like BTC b/c number go up. Number go up b/c Saylor bought $40B+ over last 5 years. If ETH DATs do the same and cause ETH to also go up. Why buy BTC? x.com/bogdanoffi/sta…
stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊@bogdanoffi

It's possible that Ethereum co-exists with Bitcoin and both succeed. The problem is that realistically it won't happen, and it won't be due to ETH maxis. A bet on BTC is a bet against investors becoming informed over time, being irrational, and failing to see SoV+utility > SoV. For the last 5 years when friends and family asked me what the logic behind buying BTC was, I'd tell them "the price keeps going up because they have a billionaire obsessed with buying, and they have institutional flows, so people buy to profit off that". Now that ETH is finally getting the same treatment, what value proposition does BTC have left? NGU was the one thing it had (no stablecoins/tokenization/application narrative). If everyone sees that ETH is also capable of NGU, then I think it'll be extremely unlikely for both to succeed. It's just part of the natural thought process for a rational investor to see Ethereum as the evolution of Bitcoin. See the flow chart below. It took TradFi 15 years just to make it to Stage 2. We're starting to see some institutions reach Stages 4&5 though, and I'm expecting that as Ethereum becomes more widely adopted for stablecoins and tokenization, the more likely rational investors realize there is no fundamental reason to hold BTC (even if it takes the next decade to fully play out).

English
0
0
1
659
Vance Spencer
Vance Spencer@pythianism·
Two questions for ball respectors 1. Do you really like BTC or did you like Saylor buying $42bn last year 2. Why is Tom Lee not a better Saylor on a more reflexive asset Wow
English
69
20
519
110.1K
hantengri
hantengri@hantengri·
im excited to announce that I made more money today than celestia
hantengri tweet mediahantengri tweet media
English
32
14
226
13.6K