




stakeyour.eth 🦇🔊
1.3K posts

@bogdanoffi
Ethereum home staker. Decentralization maxi therefore Eth maxi. #stakefromhome. Here to educate and fight ETH FUD with facts.













The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.






The Arbitrum Security Council has taken emergency action to freeze the 30,766 ETH being held in the address on Arbitrum One that is connected to the KelpDAO exploit. The Security Council acted with input from law enforcement as to the exploiter’s identity, and, at all times, weighed its commitment to the security and integrity of the Arbitrum community without impacting any Arbitrum users or applications. After significant technical diligence and deliberation, the Security Council identified and executed a technical approach to move funds to safety without affecting any other chain state or Arbitrum users. As of April 20 11:26pm ET the funds have been successfully transferred to an intermediary frozen wallet. They are no longer accessible to the address that originally held the funds, and can only be moved by further action by Arbitrum governance, which will be coordinated with relevant parties.


1/ as a follow-up to @iampaulgrewal's comments, I want to provide more detail on how the @base sequencer actually works — and fully shut down the FUD that folks are actively spreading around the role sequencers play



Friendly reminder that the first US government backed stablecoin (on a state level via Wyoming) is supposed to announce on February 27th which blockchain they will initially launch on. Candidates were Ethereum (+ L2s), Solana, Avax, Sui, and Stellar. This is way more interesting than short term price action. It'll be a huge win for the chain selected, especially if it sets a precedent for other states that decide to issue their own stablecoins. No outcome would surprise me, despite believing Ethereum is the best choice, simply because Alt L1s have VCs that are not afraid to spend $$$ on business development and aggressively fight for market share. Case in point: Ethereum was ranked second to last (only ahead of Stellar) on Wyoming's scoring criteria (which heavily favored metrics for centralized chains). Solana was ranked first (nice job @toly). This isn't 2016-2020 when you could passively ignore competitors gaslighting you and just focus on building, because no one was ready to adopt blockchain tech at that time anyway. If you think the non crypto native boomers that make these types of big decisions can't be misled by "advisors" or BD teams, and will intrinsically know which chain is the best you are probably extremely naïve. Relying solely on "build it and they will come" (for the sake of avoiding conflict, or maintaining a neutral image etc) while your competitors are actively trying to sabotage you is wishful thinking. I hope the entire $ETH community wakes up, and that everyone (esp @VivekVentures @Etherealize_io) will do their best to advocate on Ethereum's behalf in these crucial junctions of adoption.

BlackRock's Head of Digital Assets, Robbie Mitchnick ft. Joe Lubin The ticker is $ETH x.com/Taylorlikeseth…



Why I joined @sharplink as Co-CEO:





Here's an image to help everyone visualize the paradigm shift happening in crypto and why it's different now. 2016-2024 was just a kid's playground for VCs and grifters to fleece clueless retail with alt L1s, while Saylor piled billions into BTC, and ETH quietly built. All while operation chokepoint 2.0 discouraged any large players from entering. This was "the market" that dominated the space for almost the last decade. This isn't a subjective opinion. When you take away everything pre 2024 such as the ETFs (that opened the door to TradFi & pension funds etc, such as Michigan's pension fund being the first state to buy ETH ETFs in Nov 2024), DATs buying $8B+ of ETH in 2 months (@sharplink & @BitMNR), the influx of institutions building on Ethereum (Blackrock's BUIDL fund, Robinhood's L2 etc), who were the remaining market participants? It should only take a few seconds for anyone above room temp IQ to understand why ETH underperformed for so long. There are 3 types of conclusions people will have when they look at this image. Left curve: You unironically refer to "the market" deciding that BTC is special and therefore will always be a better SoV. You believe the crypto market was efficient, a mature industry, and comprised of sophisticated investors with no information asymmetry. Mid curve: You think ETH underperformed due to whatever backfilled narrative attempts CT KOLs/VCs came up with such as value accrual issues, loss of REV to parasitic L2s, Solana stealing the memecoin market etc. While not applying those same standards to assets like BTC/XRP/ADA that still trade at huge valuations but have no onchain activity. Right curve: You realize "the market" as it existed in 2016-2024 never traded on fundamentals. It was just a very limited set of participants where 99% were driven by short term financial gain. Meaning they were financially incentivized to buy everything EXCEPT ETH. If you were a risk averse or less informed crypto investor = buy BTC because Saylor was piling billions into it, while Gensler was threatening to label everything else a security If you were a crypto VC (almost none of which participated in or even existed during ETH's ICO) = bid/shill your own vaporware that you bought in at seed rounds, rinse and repeat If you were a retail investor = gamble on the next low cap meme or alt L1 trading sub $10 hoping for a 100x Nothing in that period of time was ever going to convince the above participants that ETH was the right choice besides those with conviction in Ethereum's long term vision. A decade later the regulatory fog has finally lifted with the GENIUS + Clarity act, the SEC's Project Crypto, and governments + institutions are fully embracing blockchain technology. The previous 2016-2024 era investors may not have cared, but this new wave will likely care about which blockchain has the best track record with zero downtime, the most decentralized, credibly neutral, and with the largest onchain economy. The ticker is $ETH.








It's possible that Ethereum co-exists with Bitcoin and both succeed. The problem is that realistically it won't happen, and it won't be due to ETH maxis. A bet on BTC is a bet against investors becoming informed over time, being irrational, and failing to see SoV+utility > SoV. For the last 5 years when friends and family asked me what the logic behind buying BTC was, I'd tell them "the price keeps going up because they have a billionaire obsessed with buying, and they have institutional flows, so people buy to profit off that". Now that ETH is finally getting the same treatment, what value proposition does BTC have left? NGU was the one thing it had (no stablecoins/tokenization/application narrative). If everyone sees that ETH is also capable of NGU, then I think it'll be extremely unlikely for both to succeed. It's just part of the natural thought process for a rational investor to see Ethereum as the evolution of Bitcoin. See the flow chart below. It took TradFi 15 years just to make it to Stage 2. We're starting to see some institutions reach Stages 4&5 though, and I'm expecting that as Ethereum becomes more widely adopted for stablecoins and tokenization, the more likely rational investors realize there is no fundamental reason to hold BTC (even if it takes the next decade to fully play out).