lil’bit (paradise)
503 posts


@DesireeAmerica4 Does the stream say to no record or use for media purposes? I have seen most judges adding that to their live stream lately- so could possibly be why.
English

Update: This is Judge Nathan Milliron. He went viral last week for berating a Harris County IT worker who was just trying to help him. But today, the story took a dark turn. A local attorney who criticized the judge’s behavior online has officially been ordered to appear in court.
Think about that. A judge is using his bench to target a private citizen for a social media post. When those who wear the robes start acting like they are above the law, they aren't protecting the courtroom, they’re protecting their own egos.
Is this "Contempt of Court," If a judge can summon you for a tweet, none of us are safe.
Is this justice, or is it a judicial power trip?
English

@BrittHapp3ns @MazzaMedia @LorenKatie @lauriemullenesq @KYMaverick1 @DoctorTurtleboy @BigWi111977 @AlibiProLLC @Stormy_skies11 What scares me most about a situation like this (think if not in the eyes of media but just an average Joe)…the amount of money you pay to fight against something that shouldn’t be charged with. Lawyers, fees, house being sold, the stress, ect…majority of ppl can’t afford/do
English

CORRUPT! 🚨
The Commonwealth, according to Bradyl, told Martha Coakley that that they did not intend to ask for Kelsey to serve more time in jail had she been convicted.
If they TRULY believed that she had fired at a police officer, do you think they would have been content enough to only ask for time served & maybe probation as a sentence? This gives me the impression that the entire prosecutorial pursuit, the tax dollars, Kelsey’s pretrial detention, etc. was disingenuous and politically driven. What a waste!
From tonight’s interview on @DoctorTurtleboy with Kelsey Fitzsimmons and Attorney Tim Bradyl. 💜🦋💜
#JusticeForKelseyFitzsimmons
English

@breel03 @CourtTV It's not that he's saying he can't rule in favor of one way or the other.
It's that either there's evidence to convict beyond a reasonable or it's not guilty.
Not going to give an "you're innocent.."
He did rule in the favor of the defense, otherwise she would be found guilty.
English

A judge has found Kelsey Fitzsimmons not guilty, bringing the trial to a close in the case where she was accused of attempting to shoot her colleague. After hearing testimony—including Fitzsimmons taking the stand in her own defense and denying the allegations—the judge ultimately ruled in her favor. The decision marks a significant turning point, ending the case without a conviction.
English

@mekimpossible @SarahJuror13 Yes she claimed he was on the steps. He claimed he never let his eyes off her. Once again- just explaining how it is he said vs she said.
English

@breel03 @SarahJuror13 Didn't she claim he was on the steps, so why would she need to hide the gun..if her intention was to shoot herself in the head, wouldn't she just do it in that location where she obtained the gun verses moving around the room for what? Him to witness it?
English

I just don’t think there’s any way Kelsey would’ve been able to get the gun out of the chest if Noonan never took his eyes off her. #KelseyFitzsimmons
English

@DonutsBaga The intent to murder charge was thrown out and it def wasn’t proven to me bc it’s a he said vs she said…however the intent of her charge is what actions occurred (lying about weapons and pulling it out on officer) he reacted in panic
English

@DonutsBaga I’m no lawyer and only listen to judges who are explaining it and then try to decipher what law is saying….so my opinions only… however I don’t believe in law if one thing isn’t fact that means it cancels other. Noonan isn’t on trial here. It’s just If KF commuted assault…
English

@Lamplighter1630 I agree. The assault with intent charge was thrown out by the grand jury. She admitted she pulled a gun out after lying about weapons. Her actions of the above are the element of intent…not intent to murder which was dropped.
English

@pissedoffPOA @Mp5miles13221 @LethalLauren904 Defense lawyer did say the detective had been in that house at one time and knew it didn’t have a basement…not sure when he went in there prior or what for, but def in motions and depositions the warrant info was shady and another reason afro super pissed
English

meth head ex
i just see more to it than that...for example, what was this house used for before afroman got it
was this a known house for trafficking women and then when afroman got the house--all of a sudden the sheriffs are ready to do something
i know cops are stupid--but 1st allegation, and they show up asshole deep...shit ain't math'n
English

@Mike_Debruyn @Mp5miles13221 @LethalLauren904 Afros lawyer said after the verdict that the main detective who got warrant signed did some shady stuff with the warrant and changing stuff (so it was shady)…I don’t know exact details
English

@breel03 @Mp5miles13221 @LethalLauren904 That's not how it works for regular officers though. They get briefed in the morning as we got a possible drug location where we will go, we got a warrant I want you to do this and that
Is it up to the individual officers to research the validity when a judge has given a warrant?
English

@jewels_Jewels77 @yeahkhrista @TuesdayGazette Yea he knew yesterday her story didn’t match the evidence so he didn’t go in deeper in order to let her say something different.
English

@yeahkhrista @breel03 @TuesdayGazette Now I know why they didn’t. That closing by the prosecutor summed it up perfectly
English

Great point. If Noonan wasn’t there when Kelsey lunged to the trunk area behind the door to grab the gun, then how else would he know where the gun came from?
He had to of seen her grab it.
Karly@kbeans713
@TuesdayGazette If Noonan wasn’t in the room like she claims, how did he know where the gun was and that she went to retrieve it.
English

@justice4kelseyf @BradlLawPC There were two different charges initially- assault with deadly weapon with intent to harm and just basic assault with deadly weapon. There is obviously some different elements between the two in the eyes of the law and what “intent means” to without that standard
English

Yes, @BradlLawPC, she had NO intent - a required element of the crime. The CW must prove that BRD.
English

@mezmerelda007 @DonutsBaga Assault with a deadly weapon (ADW) requires using a dangerous instrument to threaten or injure, focusing on the danger created. Assault with intent to murder (AWIM) requires proving the specific intent to kill and a substantial step toward that goal
English

@DonutsBaga I think you're missing the point. SHE has been charged with intent to murder Noonan = INTENT. Noonan isn't on trial here, SHE is. Her testimony is that her intent was self-harm - that is her defense. It has nothing to do with what Noonan did/didn't do
English

@mezmerelda007 @DonutsBaga Actually tha charge was dropped after grand jury. She is charged with assault with a deadly weapon.
English

@jewels_Jewels77 @yeahkhrista @TuesdayGazette Yes that is what he stated and the fired shot that went into ac could prove that claim. Her lying that no weapons were upstairs and then producing a weapon would haven’t taken him by surprise- he didn’t have his gun out and pointed at her while she was gathering items
English







