Brian Park

635 posts

Brian Park banner
Brian Park

Brian Park

@brianjohnpark

Exploring how AI can personalize education | @ycombinator alum | early @notionHQ @wetransfer | imagined future of learning @joinhandshake @wonderschools

San Francisco Katılım Ekim 2014
431 Takip Edilen339 Takipçiler
sam
sam@SamuelBeek·
big news: quitting my job at @veedstudio to go all in on building @schematikio let me know if you wanna join :)
English
141
30
476
50K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
Vibe coding is a game changer for kids to spark their interest and imagination with a quicker sense of progress. With that initial spark, a big part of it is just having the inspiration and a little help on understanding software to go deeper. Just the other week I posted tutorials on how to make your own Harry Potter trivia app
English
2
0
4
488
Daniel Vassallo
Daniel Vassallo@dvassallo·
Can't wait to teach my kids game programming in cursor.
English
22
0
100
12.8K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@tunguz @shl so true and yet hard for many to apply since learning before starting creates an illusion of progress and psychological safety.
English
0
0
0
89
Bojan Tunguz
Bojan Tunguz@tunguz·
"You don't learn, then start. You start, then learn." - @shl
English
64
151
1.5K
99.4K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@CyprienRb The best way to validate is to observe people’s actions and the highest fidelity way to do that is by launching. If you’re feeling demoralized, it might be worth trying to scope down the MVP. You can validate a lot by launching a landing page with an email capture.
English
1
0
2
82
Cyprien Rubio
Cyprien Rubio@CyprienRb·
Hi, I'm a beginner, I've launched 3 projects (expected to make money) within 6 months, But every ones revealed as failures! What was the error? I didn't validate the idea before launching it, so I end up losing 6 months of my life, it's painful. I don't want to ever live this again, I want to validate my ideas BEFORE launching. But I don't know how to actually do it.. Should I harass people on Reddit? Spam on X? Build a MVP and try to sell it? Go on LinkedIn (god no..) ? I don't know.. So in your case what do you think/do to validate your ideas? Do you also think you can validate the same way a website and a service?
English
13
1
15
2.7K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@dvassallo Application layer feels like where a lot of the value capture is going to be
English
2
0
11
1.2K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@SullyBillions Planning feels the most important. It’s like a rising tide that lifts all boats making coding, debugging, designing etc easier/better
English
0
0
0
8
Sully
Sully@SullyBillions·
Builders, which one's the hardest? - Coding - Planning - Debugging
English
357
13
348
120.6K
Marc Lou
Marc Lou@marclou·
Entrepreneurs underestimate this dead-simple marketing strategy: 1. Build tiny apps to solve your own problems 2. Find new problems on the way 3. Build tiny apps to solve these new problems @jackfriks did that for 1 year and now makes $10K/month. It works if you're disciplined and iterate often.
English
92
66
1.2K
103.4K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@bentossell A vibe coder with the right specialization outside of making software can be pretty powerful. The domain knowledge plus the ability to build can unlock a lot of
English
0
0
0
45
Ben Tossell
Ben Tossell@bentossell·
vibe coding jobs are on the up
Ben Tossell tweet media
English
6
1
23
4.9K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@boringmarketer Marketers are best positioned to build for marketers. Nothing quite like building for yourself. It’s the ultimate edge.
English
1
0
3
188
The Boring Marketer
The Boring Marketer@boringmarketer·
Marketers can just build things. Example, this is an audience growth workflow that will save us at least 15-20 hours of research per week. Full breakdown below:
The Boring Marketer tweet mediaThe Boring Marketer tweet media
English
5
0
71
8K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@petergyang This is where knowing how software is made can save a lot of headache. Stuff like workflow is part of the learning curve.
English
0
0
0
98
Peter Yang
Peter Yang@petergyang·
lol I'm glad I learned how to use Github
Peter Yang tweet media
English
13
1
62
11.4K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@rauchg especially those that can clearly articulate those ideas in detail. clear and specific writing is incredibly high leveraged.
English
0
0
2
146
Guillermo Rauch
Guillermo Rauch@rauchg·
People who are good at coming up with ideas will enjoy great leverage in the age of AI
English
205
364
3.8K
567.9K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
being able to sustain mundane work and keep showing up with the same enthusiasm is a big part of building something meaningful. its the less sexy work that can be inordinately impactful, but its not talked about because its frankly not exciting. another reason why agents are so exciting: freeing up humans for the more creative/fulfilling work
English
0
1
3
357
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@bentossell @Replit replit's credit based pricing feels limiting compared to cursor's as you're building out more complex things
English
0
0
1
150
Ben Tossell
Ben Tossell@bentossell·
Tool rank for vibe coding: The best is @Replit - use the agent to kick off the project, then switch to assistant for more complex things If you want something fairly basic, fast - use bolt/create/lovable if you want complete control and flexibility; cursor (or replit) all subject to change within minutes/days?
English
20
11
151
23K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@rileybrown_ai value here is only going to compound as agents get better and more apps are designed for agent interaction
English
0
0
1
332
Riley Brown
Riley Brown@rileybrown·
you can just build apps that use other apps now.
English
12
8
159
11.1K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@SullyOmarr some types of moats (data, network effects) feel more important than ever since the software alone can be replicated quite easily/affordably
English
0
0
1
105
Sully
Sully@SullyOmarr·
markets haven’t priced in how over it is for traditional CRUD SaaS per-seat pricing doesn't make sense anymore. eng cost is basically 0 (SWE agents) by the end of 2025, gpt-5 will build you the same tool in a day, at 1/1000 the cost + fully customized to you
English
65
15
261
45.4K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@SullyOmarr 100%. Knowing how software works still feels important but eventually that’ll be abstracted away where folks completely outside of the software world can make software too.
English
1
0
1
165
Sully
Sully@SullyOmarr·
It’s 2025 and you don’t need to be a dev to build stuff
English
14
2
78
8.9K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@nathan_covey I’ve started asking if it’s the same issue to make sure I’m not going insane 😂
English
0
0
0
33
Nathan Covey
Nathan Covey@nathan_covey·
this is my life now
Nathan Covey tweet media
English
95
29
1.1K
74.1K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@sonny8s @gregisenberg Right now there are different UX patterns for agents (eg flow diagram) but it’s easy to miss out on a lot of nuance. If you can just share your screen, you can give the agent all the context without documenting each painstaking detail
English
1
0
0
33
Sonny Lowry
Sonny Lowry@sonny8s·
@brianjohnpark @gregisenberg this sounds like key workflow brian, could you expand this in a bit more detail? as way im interpreting it i might be wrong? thanks
English
1
0
0
29
GREG ISENBERG
GREG ISENBERG@gregisenberg·
Last week I saw the future of how we'll all work with AI. Logan (Google's AI Studio lead) was showing me Gemini's new“real time streaming” feature. He had his code editor open, and casually said via voice 'hey, should I change this function?' The clip below is wild - you have to see it to believe it. The AI was watching his screen. Like literally watching - seeing his cursor move, understanding his code, giving real-time feedback. Like pair programming with an AI that never gets tired. I've been playing with Claude, ChatGPT, building with v0/Bolt. They're all powerful but this was different. This was like having an AI co-pilot actually seeing your screen, understanding context, and helping in real-time. Different use-case but really bent my mind. Think what this means: • Coding – Ask about any line you're looking at • Debugging – It sees the error in real-time • Learning new tools – It watches you struggle and helps • Writing – It sees what you're typing and suggests edits The tech behind it is really cool: • Processes entire screen in real-time • Understands spatial context • Can handle 500K+ tokens (like reading a book in seconds) • Remembers your entire session Google's giving this away free in AI Studio. Yes, they're competing with OpenAI. But for makers, this is massive. Thanks to @OfficialLoganK for the time and the demo. It really blew my mind. This is a clip from the full episode of the Startup Ideas Pod which I’ll link below. In that episode he gives 2 more demos so it's worth watching. youtube.com/watch?v=6h9y1r… Happy building.
YouTube video
YouTube
English
170
221
2.4K
283.9K
Brian Park
Brian Park@brianjohnpark·
@PrajwalTomar_ Iteration is key. A lot of folks ship a first version and discard it if it doesn’t get traction but in reality their initial version gets the “minimum” part while forgetting the “viable” part
English
0
0
1
72
Prajwal Tomar
Prajwal Tomar@PrajwalTomar_·
Most founders overthink launching their MVP. You don’t need a perfect product. You need a working product in front of users. Ship fast, gather feedback, iterate. That’s how winning startups are built.
English
13
3
74
4.6K