broshane

@nytimes @TheAthletic The only thing truly problematic about America is the number of self-hating dipshits who refuse to appreciate its greatness. Also, GFY 🇺🇸

@QuintonJamesxxx @JayZito @GiaPaige @Gaismair You wish lil feller

all he did was smoke crack and bang chicks I don't get it

@KurtSchlichter We are a tripod. Let’s just all get along.

My suspicion is that Trump gave tacit approval for the Israeli strikes and will now play good cop. Look, I’d hit them harder. But Trump is not insane here. He’s actually got a real chance for an outcome that’s not negative for us. My bias is to kill all the jihadis, but he is not crazy with his plan to use non-military elements of national power to win this.

Disclaimer: I had grok markup this reply after I wrote draft Not a single J6 defendant was charged with insurrection, rebellion, treason, or the “overthrow the government by force” prong of the seditious conspiracy statute. So the claim that there was an attempt to overthrow the government is wholly unsupported by the actual charges. Media and politicians frequently used “insurrection” and “coup” rhetoric, but that did not match the indictments filed. I don’t want to defend them per se. I want them to be treated equally under the law. The seditious conspiracy convictions (14 total) exclusively relied on the clause prohibiting conspiracy “by force to delay execution of a law” — not the “conspire to overthrow” clause. I repeat: not a single J6 defendant was even accused of treason, insurrection, rebellion, or the overthrow prong of sedition. Not a single one. But the media has repeated the overstated portrayal so often that many people believe the protesters — basically all of them, even those who never set foot on Capitol grounds — are guilty of things they were never charged with. Roughly 70 J6 defendants were convicted of assault. 
Roughly 90 were convicted of or pled to property damage. 
Around 60 were convicted of theft. 
1,000+ were convicted of trespassing. DC prosecutors and judges gave non-violent trespassers, on average, roughly 2.5 years of probation, $1,500 in fines, and 30 days in jail. Contrast this with the $50 fines and zero days in jail that most Kavanaugh protesters received for similar disruptive or trespass conduct. There is no statutory distinction in the base trespass statutes between the actions of non-violent trespassers at the Kavanaugh protest and non-violent trespassers at the J6 protest. There is no statutory distinction between trespassing during an election certification and trespassing during a Supreme Court Justice confirmation hearing. Both are “official proceedings.” The statute contains no tiers or levels of importance for different official proceedings and provides no explicit basis for the widely disparate charging decisions. There is no statutory distinction between non-violent J6 trespassers who unlawfully entered an already-restricted area and non-violent Kavanaugh trespassers who lawfully entered an area while it was open to the public but then refused to leave once it became restricted. “Unlawfully entering” and “unlawfully remaining” are two prongs of the same criminal statute, and are generally treated similarly, yet prosecutors applied dramatically different treatment. DC prosecutors declined to invoke 18 U.S.C. § 1752 against the Kavanaugh protesters (which would have elevated the trespass from a misdemeanor to a federal felony and moved venue) even though Mike Pence was present with his Secret Service detail and protesters remained unlawfully in the same room as him. However, prosecutors invoked § 1752 against nearly every J6 defendant charged with trespass — specifically citing the presence of Mike Pence and his Secret Service detail. Despite no difference in the base elements of the trespass statutes, DC prosecutors applied far harsher treatment to the Republicans while giving their ideological allies a tap on the wrist for comparable conduct: 0 days in jail versus 30 days; $50 fines versus $1,500 fines; no probation versus multiple years of probation. Felony convictions can result in loss of voting rights and Second Amendment rights in many states. This creates a strong appearance of selective prosecution and unequal application of the law. It is a valid concern under equal protection principles if charges are enhanced against non-violent trespassers solely because other individuals at the same event committed violence. DC prosecutors treated non-violent J6 defendants as insurrections largely due to uncoordinated actions of other protestors. Enhancements should generally tie to the individual’s own conduct or foreseeable joint activity.

@broshane1 @toxicquan15 @Gaismair Why do you want to defend these people who broke the law? Kavanaugh was a protest over his appoint, not an attempt to overthrow the government. That is the difference. Going back to the mistreatment means nothing from the law's point of view, they were criminals.Keep your rapist.

I’m starting to think that we’re not that close to a deal.

@joekent16jan19 Ehh mid take.

This statement is only true if Israel can do it on their own. As of now, they cannot and they are not. Currently, Israel is only able to take action with our support and our resources—because of this, we should be calling the shots. We aren’t, and that’s the crux of the issue.

@RepFine @DefiyantlyFree Yes, it can. But we also cannot let Israel Middle East posture push us around.

Israel has every right to respond to rockets being fired at its civilians exactly as we would. Bombs away.

@elonmusk Ballot harvesting

🤔

@RepThomasMassie Thanks!

Putting up a few pounds of broccoli from the garden today. Cut, soak, steam blanch, ice bath, shake off the water, flash freeze, bag, and put in the freezer with the last batch of meat chickens, last year’s peaches, and strategic raw milk reserves).

@nick_matau @DefiyantlyFree It’s not that they control America. It’s that they have too much control.

So many people keep saying how Israel "controls America" but time and time again... Israel keeps getting told to NOT respond to attacks... If the opposite happened (Israel struck Iran) - it would be a totally different reaction... and we all know it! The IRGC knows they have leverage over Trump due to his desire to end the war... but that is DANGEROUS!!

@davereaboi When one goes, we all go so let’s just get along. We are a tripod.

Americans are no longer intelligent enough to grasp something a 4th grader used to be able to understand.

I guess if I had to put it in just a few words, I would say The United States intelligence community and Israel are essentially the same entity Israel has excessive Power over the United States and its citizens through various mechanisms like the intelligence community, the fiat currency system, central banking, finance, militarism and many others Many Muslim sects nearby raise their children to hate Jews and Christians and that it’s honorable to kill Jews and Christians, especially many at once Israel takes the overwhelming lion share/brunt of attacks from nearby and without them we would face countless more terrorism attacks ourselves. They have a thing called the Samson option which is where if they’re about to lose a war then they just nuke the entire world. All very surface level explanations that you could spend years and years digging into.

@broshane1 @Osint613 Please explain

JUST IN 🔴 President Trump told Fox News he was unhappy with Israel’s initial strikes on Beirut’s saying they were not coordinated with the U.S. (Israel was responding to Hezbollah rocket launches today) Trump added that Washington was close to reaching a deal with Iran before the attacks took place.

Why are we turning on Israel and Netanyahu tonight?  Wow.

@Kasparov63 @emeriticus Trump is mostly great

Trump is exactly what we knew he was. The harshest questions and criticisms of journalism today and history tomorrow are about how a generation of Republican politicians, partisan media, and US voters willingly chose to ignore it for power.

@Shawn_Farash All the worlds a stage

At this point if you don't think this is one big psyop you might be the dumbest person alive.

@JacobGestetner @Osint613 It’s complicated.

@Osint613 Perfect solution stop giving them money.Start paying full price for the stuff that israel produces including intelligence and let them off the leash.So to speak and let them do what they have to do

@BellaNotes_ @Osint613 @POTUS We are rounding the curve, we’re rounding the bend

@Osint613 Washington has been very close to negotiation for 4 months now. Does he think people around him have monkey IQ? @POTUS

@adamscrabble Shane’s Roadside Gender Clinic and Jerky Emporium

Adam’s Premium Cotton Anal Swabs Robotics

@akafaceUS Yes, once

Do you think there’s any real value in political debate? Have you ever actually changed someone’s mind, or met someone debating in good faith?

@mtgreenee Israel=CIA. Our government is captured by the CIA

Our government is captured by a foreign government.