Andrew Browning
173 posts

Andrew Browning
@browninghere
Founder of @SchemeFlow (S24) - Automating the documents required to build things








Building anything in Britain now requires 3,200 pages of reports. A new report gets added to the UK planning system every year. When does the paperwork become the project?

There's a new Lords amendment that will give Mayors the power to approve new underground or tram projects instead of waiting 3+ years to get the Transport Secretary to sign off. That means Tracy Brabin could approve the Leeds tram or Sadiq Khan could approve the Bakerloo Line Extension. This amendment needs to be adopted. Mayors know their area best. They should be able to pledge to voters that they will build new infrastructure and then be able to approve, fund and deliver it. In Spain and France, local leaders have all the power to deliver local transport. In turn, they build projects 2x faster and for less than half the price.




Strasbourg in France has a comprehensive tram network of 6 lines and 35 miles of track, which serves its population of 500,000. Leeds has a population of 812,000 and it goes without. What's the difference between the two? Mayors that have the power to build 🧵

I shipped a feature to @posthog this week, except I don’t work at posthog and posthog didn’t approve it


The Government is considering requiring that everyone hire an architect in order to submit a planning application or a building control application. This would be a mistake. If the state wants buildings to meet certain standards, it should simply require that they do so. We have a system for this – two systems, in fact, namely building regulations and planning. There is no good reason to require hiring people with architecture degrees to sign off designs. This is a classic case of valuing process over outcomes. Developers could and would simply employ tame architects to rubber-stamp whatever they were doing anyway. 'Protection of function' is a completely toothless instrument for improving design standards. What it would do, of course, is add cost -- exactly what British housebuilding does not need at the moment. The Government should discard this idea immediately. Reporting in @ArchitectsJrnal.












