ELB
3.6K posts

ELB
@brownnation
Musician who wants power to the people. I love books, animals, and usually like persons (although *people* have proven to be dicey).
Katılım Haziran 2009
844 Takip Edilen91 Takipçiler

@BetterAmericaX @michaeljknowles Yep. And ironically, both would-be totalitarians on the left and the right love to use Orwell for their own ideological purposes.
It's very meta-Orwellian.
English

Respectfully, this reads like how a middle school student would interpret Animal Farm. The book’s main target is totalitarianism, corruption, propaganda, and the betrayal of revolutionary ideals, especially as Orwell saw it in Stalinism. Saying the conclusion is that “some communists are just as bad as capitalists” is a little too simplistic. The ending is more that a ruling class can become indistinguishable from the oppressors it replaced. The pigs start by denouncing the humans, then become just like them. Orwell’s point is less “capitalism good” or “communism bad” and more that power without accountability corrupts any system.
English

It's worth remembering that Animal Farm is not a "pro-capitalist" novel. George Orwell was a socialist. The nearest thing to a good guy in the book is a communist, Leon Trotsky. And book's conclusion is that some communists are just as bad as capitalists.
Washington Examiner@dcexaminer
.@animalfarmfilm filmmakers push back on ‘anti-capitalist’ movie criticism trib.al/rlCkfdD
English

@james_xond This historically goes really well for the people in power to consolidate their power.
English

@JacobsVegasLife Triple zero is simply greedy on the house's part. Probably a good idea to just stay away from Roulette altogether.
Maybe a single zero, but those seem to be as rare as $4.99 buffets these days.
English

@ChildOfChuck @centrist1965 @hasanthehun The US is quasi-socialist and spent the 20th century creeping down the socialist scale.
Wars were fought over commies, not socialism.
English

@centrist1965 @brownnation @hasanthehun But aren’t they also scared of countries that have socialist revolutions, because of the influence it could have on other countries around them, resulting in a sort of domino effect?
English

@SaferHaywood @reyechuss @abbythelibb_ ... and if you're allowed to discuss it beforehand, tell your loved ones to pick red also.
English

@SaferHaywood @reyechuss @abbythelibb_ These are all presumptions that are being added into the thought experiment. We don't know these things. I don't know if the designer of the question meant to literally include all 8-9 billion people on the planet, or just those sufficiently capable of doing an of "voting"...
English

@SaferHaywood @reyechuss @abbythelibb_ ... As written, you just pick red. If all the additive conditions of the "test" that the blue group are presuming is true, of course it changes the calculus.
But we don't know at this point, so it's best to be parsimonious. Pick red and live...
English

@Jree503 @reyechuss @abbythelibb_ It's of great consequence. There's no zero sum component to the problem. There's zero reason to put anyone in jeopardy in the first place. Pick red. Live.
English

@brownnation @reyechuss @abbythelibb_ Because red you need 100% to save everyone
Blue you only need 50% plus one
If your intent is for everyone to live blue is obviously the logical choice.
English

@Jree503 @reyechuss @abbythelibb_ Quit saying "save". There's no one to save. Everyone can choose red.
English

@MarkYoungTruth Yes. That's why I said so. But thanks for adding nothing to the conversation... Again.
English

@Jordjypordjy @MarkYoungTruth It's playing with definitions to make theists feel better. I assure you that I don't believe. It's obnoxious to play a linguistic game and tell me whether or not I believe in a god, that I actually do.
English

@brownnation @MarkYoungTruth Maybe. But he’s talking about atheists here. And rejecting ALL gods is still different than picking the wrong one. At least if you pick the wrong god you can at least acknowledge something outside yourself as god.
English

@ChildOfChuck @hasanthehun Your response has nothing to do with what I said.
English

@brownnation @hasanthehun Bro says this as if the US has never bombed any country that tried going socialist
English

@reyechuss @abbythelibb_ There's no one to "save". Press red. Everyone has the same option. No need for ANYONE to be in harm's way.
No one on team Blue has explained (without convaluted assumptions about babies and children voting) why anyone would be in harm's way.
English

@abbythelibb_ For me it was much simpler. Do I want to try and save everyone or just myself?
English

@theramblingfool If there was a zero sum component to the "dilemma" at hand this could be argued. There isn't. Everyone has the option to press red and live. Just press red.
This isn't difficult.
English

@FondOfBeetles @DStrungk There's no self-interest involved. It isn't zero sum. Everyone and anyone can choose to be safe with a red vote.
English

@DStrungk It really isn’t. It’s testing whether revealing self-interest nudges anyone’s choice. If it doesn’t, it doesn’t 🤷♀️
English

This is a confession that the motive for voting blue is to signal.
Emma Hilton@FondOfBeetles
Do any reds change their vote if they would be marked as “red”, should blues win?
English

@NobodymrRobert Slight perimeter gap filled in by same area rectangle.
English

@BritishTaiga @Timcast Counter: red voters have ultimate trust in society. Everyone who presses red survives. Press red. We all survive.
This isn't even a dilemma. Just hit the red button and we all move to the next level.
English

@Timcast The very people bemoaning about the loss of a high-trust society are the same one ones voting red.
Voting red is the greatest example of a person who only thinks of themselves and causing a low-trust society.
English











