Q҉n҉J҉v҉V҉3҉J҉l҉b҉j҉Y҉4҉N҉g҉=҉=҉

@WhiteHouse BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAA *gasp* HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAA what XD Dude, that is just. HAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA Can you say "please track my phone" ANY HARDER XD

🇺🇸 🚀 LAUNCHED: THE WHITE HOUSE APP Live streams. Real-time updates. Straight from the source, no filter. The conversation everyone’s watching is now at your fingertips. Download here ⬇️ 📲 App Store: apps.apple.com/us/app/the-whi… 📲 Google Play Store: play.google.com/store/apps/det…

@ashtom Code "written" by an AI trained with even one line of GPLed training is derived code and therefore GPLed. Code "written" by an AI trained with even one line of AGPLed code can't be hidden behind a web service. Code "written" by an AI can't be copyrighted. Good luck with that.

The evidence is clear: Either you embrace AI, or get out of this career. Our latest field study with 22 developers who are integrating AI deeply into their workflows reveals a striking trend: those who persist beyond early skepticism emerge with dramatically higher ambition, technical fluency, and job satisfaction. They’re not writing less code – they’re enabling more complex, system-level work through orchestration. And that’s as true for educators as it is for developers themselves. This shift isn’t hypothetical. It’s happening now. Developers move through clear adoption phases – from dabbling skeptics to strategic AI collaborators – and those who reach the final stage say their identity as developers has transformed. Their focus is no longer on producing code, but on designing systems, directing agents, and validating outputs. “My next title might be Creative Director of Code,” one developer told us. That’s not hyperbole – it’s real. Here’s what we’re seeing: • AI is on track to write 90% of code within the next 2–5 years. • Developers aren’t worried. They’re optimistic and realistic about the changes ahead. • New skills matter now, e.g. agent orchestration, iterative collaboration, and critical verification. • Time savings? Sure. But the real shift is ambition. Developers are raising the ceiling, not just lowering the cost. This also has massive implications for education. Teaching syntax alone is obsolete. Students must now learn to guide AI, critique its work, and think across disciplines. Assessments should measure collaboration with AI, not isolation from it. This is no longer a question of productivity. It’s a question of reinvention. The job of the software developer isn’t disappearing. It’s being reborn. ✨ ashtom.github.io/developers-rei…

WHAT!?!? I NEED IT EXPEDITIOUSLY

AI disrupt to, word post in order random scraping understand the will humans spoiled but is AI data garbage garbage in out :P

get yourselves 1, or even better 2 SSD external harddrives w at least 2 TB of space. Dont put pics/videos/documents etc on your actual computer. Put it all on the external harddrives.

@TheOmniLiberal Good job turning out your own base, centrist scum :)

If it were super close? Perhaps it'd be time to reconsider. By these margins? Your lot is worthless; you should be ignored both by politicians and by people in the world of media. You are one of the most disgusting propagators of and profiteers of misinformation in this space.

@GeoRebekah If you voted for genocide, fuck you.

if you are someone who was able to overlook the genocide and cast a vote for kamala harris, then you already understand how a conservative was able to overlook Trump's extremism to vote for him.

Democrats: “of course I’m willing to vote for genocide. All that matters is that we beat Donald Trump.” But you didn’t beat Donald Trump. All you did was normalize genocide and let everyone know genocide wasn’t a deal breaker for you. And in exchange you got nothing.

america was angry in 2016, ppl had lost faith in the institutions, they voted for a sledgehammer. dems have acted like those institutions are fine since then. never learned the lessons. blamed the left. ran to the right. here are the results.

Biden is still the president, and like Reagan did in 1982, can still end this genocide with one phone call. Remember how he said if the ‘humanitarian crisis’ wasn’t resolved, he would do so? Your move Joe.

If, upon being filled with disappointment from the election results, your go-to school of thought is something like “Well, the Palestinians will get what they deserve now [after opposing Harris],” then let me tell you that you are an absolutely irredeemable scumbag

🇺🇸 Democrats spent 4 years desperately trying to get "moderate" Republicans to break from Trump. The result? 94% of Republicans voted Trump - exactly the same as in 2020, while Democrat vote dropped. (Via @CNN)

Democrats are throwing everyone under the bus except their corrupt corporate party, which is precisely why they lost and will continue to lose. Also, this is pure evil and fascist. ⬇️

Guest on CNN: 'The Lincoln Project was utterly useless. They just built themselves a bunch of beach houses on Dem donor money.'

If Dems lose a second time to the worst candidate in history, the only guarantee is that no one in the elite DNC-media-donor syndicate will accept responsibility, & the only question is who they'll blame: Putin; Muslims; Black misogynists; white podcasters; all of the above

You are every bit as responsible for the person you helped elect, as you held others responsible for the person they helped elect.

There is no such thing as a "spoiler". What there is, is a person promising to do something people want, that your politician is not promising. Your politician should fix this by doing that thing.

@NickKnudsenUS Weird how you're not wearing your vote for genocide. Gonna include blame for that? Gonna include the children still in border prisons? The other Trump policies Biden didn't change? Not gonna hold Biden responsible for his big fat signature on the 2002 AUMF that made Iraq happen?

I have a confession and a plea to folks who are flirting with voting Jill Stein. When I was a 20 year old college student in 2000, I voted for Ralph Nader instead of Al Gore. I loved the progressive message Nader offered, and Bush and Gore seemed kinda the same to someone who was paying peripheral attention. I've regretted that vote for my entire adult life. Ultimately, George Bush won by a margin of 500+ votes in the state of Florida over Gore. And that was the ballgame. Ralph Nader peeled 97,000+ votes away from Gore. If only 600 of those 90,000 had voted for the major party candidate that more aligned with their values, things would have been very different. When I was in my senior year of college, 9/11 happened. The country and western world rallied around Bush's resolute response to the traumatizing terror attacks. I was in NY at the time, and it was a terrifying moment for the nation. But the consequences of Bush being in office at that moment were immense. Bush's disdain for his dad's nemesis, Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, led him to invent a rationale to invade a country that literally had nothing to do with 9/11. End result? He killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi people, thousands of American troops, and spent over a trillion dollars of taxpayer money in the process. Beyond the completely immoral and indefensible Iraq War, Bush was a complete disaster as a president. His "No Child Left Behind" effort turned public schools into standardized testing centers. He tripled down on fossil fuels and ignored climate change. His tax cuts for the rich helped contribute to the 2008 economic downturn that led to the Great Recession. He was a terrible president. In an alternate reality, Al Gore would have been president in 2001 when terrorists attacked America. Would he have gone into Iraq? Absolutely not. Would he have ignored global warming? 100% no! Gore was perhaps the preeminent proponent of fighting climate change at that time. Would he have passed massive tax cuts for the wealthy? No way. This is a sliding doors scenario. What would have happened? We can't be sure. But one thing is for sure: those votes for Ralph Nader (in Florida in particular) were EXCEPTIONALLY consequential for the lives of millions around the world. Gore would have offered a more forward-facing, environmentally conscious & peaceful presidency that wasn't so rooted in grievance and privilege. My point is: Either Kamala Harris or Donald Trump will win the election. That is a fact. You might feel the need to submit a "protest vote" as I did in 2000. Just be ready to wear it when Donald Trump wins, strips away reproductive rights from all Americans, implements an economy-destroying tariff, dismantles the entire federal government, eliminates the Department of Education, prosecutes his perceived enemies, and devolves America into chaos. There are no perfect choices. But rest assured, there are only two. Trust me - I've been wearing my vote for a quarter century.