Brian S

829 posts

Brian S banner
Brian S

Brian S

@bschaf12

Currently a golf account

Katılım Aralık 2009
374 Takip Edilen444 Takipçiler
Thwack Nicklaus
Thwack Nicklaus@thwacknicklaus·
Everybody on here get over yourselves and just root for Blockie. I’m sure he’s not gonna do it, but.. Damn! How awesome would that be!?
English
6
1
22
1.1K
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@acaseofthegolf1 The least subjective rule in golf. What is there to argue? Were you late? Yes/No
English
0
0
2
65
Monday Q Info
Monday Q Info@acaseofthegolf1·
There are a lot of stupid rules in golf, a lot rules that have too much room for debate. Being on the first tee on time isn’t one of them.
English
63
21
711
24.1K
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@Hildebeest24 @Top100Rick Probably has to be a dramatically smaller driver head or possibly driver+ball (different than this ball implementation clearly)
English
0
0
0
24
Donald Hilenbrant
Donald Hilenbrant@Hildebeest24·
@Top100Rick So, what’s the solution then, Rick? I ask that honestly. Cause you can’t create land to extend courses.
English
3
0
1
115
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@BucksBrowns @thwacknicklaus After the Cam announcement, I don’t think anyone’s still arguing that the current ball rollback proposal makes sense. We are saying avg distance should be brought back to scale with every course in existence through other methods though
English
1
0
1
40
Words
Words@BucksBrowns·
@thwacknicklaus I get it but I just watched Cam Young say he switched to the roll back legal ball and did not loose any yards and won. It was about a lower spin ball. If that is true and it won’t affect distance, why go through the hassle of pissing the players off by the rule change?
English
1
0
2
164
Thwack Nicklaus
Thwack Nicklaus@thwacknicklaus·
Truly aghast at the comments on here from the anti-rollback crowd. Poor analogies. Even poorer understanding how the game is played at the professional level. And they want to redesign all the courses!
Thwack Nicklaus tweet mediaThwack Nicklaus tweet mediaThwack Nicklaus tweet mediaThwack Nicklaus tweet media
English
13
1
16
2.5K
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@thwacknicklaus Why would we simply reduce club head size when we could …checks notes… move all of the bunkers at every pro venue every ~10 years?
English
0
0
2
78
Jamie Kennedy
Jamie Kennedy@jamierkennedy·
What are we doing here? The R&A said in December 2023 that top players would lose about 13 to 15 yards with a rolled back ball. Cam Young has been using a ball that would pass the new "rolled back" regulations. He averaged 302.7 yards (all drives) last season. He's averaging 302.7 yards this season. Adam Scott also said he has tested a conforming ball (via @RexHoggardGC) and lost... around 2 yards per drive. (Sigh.....)
Jamie Kennedy tweet media
English
79
13
276
235.2K
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@TomLoughrey_LFE @jamierkennedy IMO yes, the back tees at most public courses are too short for high level amateurs given current equipment, but that's not my main concern. My primary concern is the pro game. So I think bifurcation should be considered
English
1
0
0
58
MM🇺🇸
MM🇺🇸@MMGOLFSTUDIOS·
@bschaf12 @pj_sullivan93 @jamierkennedy Augusta is fine fuck sake. There are 16000 golf courses in the U.S. and just using abandoned farmland room for 100,000 more. The PGA tour plays 40. There is NOT a lack of space.
English
1
0
1
43
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@kkilstrom @jamierkennedy Courses already have strategic bunkers that have become irrelevant. You can keep adding more and they'll keep becoming irrelevant over time. Long hitters should be rewarded, just like speed/athletism is rewarded in other sports, but the professional game is out of scale IMO
English
1
0
1
138
Kevin
Kevin@kkilstrom·
@bschaf12 @jamierkennedy Just grow the rough, speed up greens, narrow fairways and add strategic bunkers to make the “bomber” weigh the odds. Rolling back technology is not the answer. Will only favor the long hitters even more than now
English
1
0
1
76
Thwack Nicklaus
Thwack Nicklaus@thwacknicklaus·
Why a ROLL BACK? Imagine a hole. 450yd par 4. Straight. Bunkers on each side — 275 carry from the tee. Medium rough. EVERY SINGLE MODERN TOUR PLAYER Will send it over those bunkers with driver. EVERY TIME. LEAVING SAND WEDGE IN. Now for the roll back… (read on) Imagine a reduced-sized driver head. 200CC—similar to the size of a persimmon driver. Can/will players still be able to hit it 300 yards? Sure. And they should! The difference is this: THEY CAN’T ALL DO IT EVERY TIME. It’s a harder shot, mostly because the penalty for missing just slightly (with a head that size) is: A) fairway bunker from 175 out or B) rough from the same distance SOME PLAYERS WILL STILL GO FOR IT for the following reasons: 1) they are just really good ball strikers and trust that they consistently have that shot in the bag (Rory/Scottie). 2) they’re under the gun trying to make a cut or chase someone down on Sunday and want to apply pressure. BUT MANY PLAYERS WILL LAY BACK! Why? 1) They don’t want to hit a 175 yard bunker shot or 175 shot from the rough 2) They’re more comfortable hitting a mid iron from the fairway 3) They’re just not feeling it that day. Swing is a little off (wouldn’t matter with modern driver—they’d still send it…) ESSENTIALLY, Rolling the ball back takes a simple hole and introduces many different outcomes and complexities that are essentially gone from the game right now. If Rory ships one over that bunker with a tiny club head to keep the gas pedal down on Sunday, that’s a brave and admirable shot! (b/c we now know what could happen if he misses) If another player chooses to hit 3 wood to keep it in the fairway and flags a 5 iron and makes birdie, we know what a remarkable play that was (b/c it’s more difficult that hitting a lob wedge from 103 yds out of medium rough!) To close, golf a the professional level is better when there are more outcomes, not fewer. The better players will rise to the top—those who hit the ball better or (AND THIS IS KEY) those who make better decisions. The modern game has taken most of the strategy out of professional golf. It can easily be brought back! But you have to reduce club head size to do it.
English
53
8
130
26.7K
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@MMGOLFSTUDIOS @pj_sullivan93 @jamierkennedy Who's suggesting going back to 6300y courses? The point is that it's not as easy as just putting in an extra tee box. That land has to come from somewhere. Look at Augusta #13. Idk what's so hard to understand about that
English
1
0
0
47
MM🇺🇸
MM🇺🇸@MMGOLFSTUDIOS·
@bschaf12 @pj_sullivan93 @jamierkennedy This is always the dumbest argument… more land and maintenance? We’re not going back to building 6300y tipped out courses. And maintaining an extra tee box is not busting the budget anywhere.
English
1
0
0
38
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@pj_sullivan93 @jamierkennedy 1. Avg distance in 2013 when he won was 288 yds, now it's 303. More than +1 yd/year 2. That type of golf is only exciting because we see it ~once per year at the US Open. Firm greens are great but completely weather dependent 3. Augusta usually doesn't have any of those things
English
0
0
0
24
PJ Sullivan
PJ Sullivan@pj_sullivan93·
@bschaf12 @jamierkennedy Justin Rose shot +1 to win the US Open at sub-7000 yard Merion. Golf courses don’t need lengthening. They need narrow fairways, penal rough, and firm greens.
English
1
0
3
132
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
Thwack Nicklaus@thwacknicklaus

Why a ROLL BACK? Imagine a hole. 450yd par 4. Straight. Bunkers on each side — 275 carry from the tee. Medium rough. EVERY SINGLE MODERN TOUR PLAYER Will send it over those bunkers with driver. EVERY TIME. LEAVING SAND WEDGE IN. Now for the roll back… (read on) Imagine a reduced-sized driver head. 200CC—similar to the size of a persimmon driver. Can/will players still be able to hit it 300 yards? Sure. And they should! The difference is this: THEY CAN’T ALL DO IT EVERY TIME. It’s a harder shot, mostly because the penalty for missing just slightly (with a head that size) is: A) fairway bunker from 175 out or B) rough from the same distance SOME PLAYERS WILL STILL GO FOR IT for the following reasons: 1) they are just really good ball strikers and trust that they consistently have that shot in the bag (Rory/Scottie). 2) they’re under the gun trying to make a cut or chase someone down on Sunday and want to apply pressure. BUT MANY PLAYERS WILL LAY BACK! Why? 1) They don’t want to hit a 175 yard bunker shot or 175 shot from the rough 2) They’re more comfortable hitting a mid iron from the fairway 3) They’re just not feeling it that day. Swing is a little off (wouldn’t matter with modern driver—they’d still send it…) ESSENTIALLY, Rolling the ball back takes a simple hole and introduces many different outcomes and complexities that are essentially gone from the game right now. If Rory ships one over that bunker with a tiny club head to keep the gas pedal down on Sunday, that’s a brave and admirable shot! (b/c we now know what could happen if he misses) If another player chooses to hit 3 wood to keep it in the fairway and flags a 5 iron and makes birdie, we know what a remarkable play that was (b/c it’s more difficult that hitting a lob wedge from 103 yds out of medium rough!) To close, golf a the professional level is better when there are more outcomes, not fewer. The better players will rise to the top—those who hit the ball better or (AND THIS IS KEY) those who make better decisions. The modern game has taken most of the strategy out of professional golf. It can easily be brought back! But you have to reduce club head size to do it.

English
1
0
1
35
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@kkilstrom @jamierkennedy I guess if you're fine with golf that's devoid of strategy, or historic venues then sure. Augusta has an unlimited budget to buy adjacent land to maintain the strategic elements of the course, but virtually no other courses can justify those costs
English
3
0
2
131
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
Thwack Nicklaus@thwacknicklaus

Why a ROLL BACK? Imagine a hole. 450yd par 4. Straight. Bunkers on each side — 275 carry from the tee. Medium rough. EVERY SINGLE MODERN TOUR PLAYER Will send it over those bunkers with driver. EVERY TIME. LEAVING SAND WEDGE IN. Now for the roll back… (read on) Imagine a reduced-sized driver head. 200CC—similar to the size of a persimmon driver. Can/will players still be able to hit it 300 yards? Sure. And they should! The difference is this: THEY CAN’T ALL DO IT EVERY TIME. It’s a harder shot, mostly because the penalty for missing just slightly (with a head that size) is: A) fairway bunker from 175 out or B) rough from the same distance SOME PLAYERS WILL STILL GO FOR IT for the following reasons: 1) they are just really good ball strikers and trust that they consistently have that shot in the bag (Rory/Scottie). 2) they’re under the gun trying to make a cut or chase someone down on Sunday and want to apply pressure. BUT MANY PLAYERS WILL LAY BACK! Why? 1) They don’t want to hit a 175 yard bunker shot or 175 shot from the rough 2) They’re more comfortable hitting a mid iron from the fairway 3) They’re just not feeling it that day. Swing is a little off (wouldn’t matter with modern driver—they’d still send it…) ESSENTIALLY, Rolling the ball back takes a simple hole and introduces many different outcomes and complexities that are essentially gone from the game right now. If Rory ships one over that bunker with a tiny club head to keep the gas pedal down on Sunday, that’s a brave and admirable shot! (b/c we now know what could happen if he misses) If another player chooses to hit 3 wood to keep it in the fairway and flags a 5 iron and makes birdie, we know what a remarkable play that was (b/c it’s more difficult that hitting a lob wedge from 103 yds out of medium rough!) To close, golf a the professional level is better when there are more outcomes, not fewer. The better players will rise to the top—those who hit the ball better or (AND THIS IS KEY) those who make better decisions. The modern game has taken most of the strategy out of professional golf. It can easily be brought back! But you have to reduce club head size to do it.

English
0
0
0
36
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@pj_sullivan93 @jamierkennedy Even if you don't care about that, longer courses require more land to be purchased and higher maintenance costs and those costs get passed to the consumer
English
2
0
0
47
Brian S
Brian S@bschaf12·
@NoLayingUp This was always going to happen, but figured it would take a least a few years post implementation. USGA/R&A/Augusta, etc should stop wasting political capital on this specific rollback strategy and start from scratch.
English
0
0
2
158
No Laying Up
No Laying Up@NoLayingUp·
It's been challenging to be: 1. Pro rollback 2. Concerned with how it's being implemented This Cam story is one of several we've heard about how easy it is for players and manufacturers to essentially circumvent the effects of the rollback based on how the rule is written.
Golf Channel@GolfChannel

An interesting story out of the PGA Championship. Multiple sources confirmed that Cameron Young has been using a golf ball that would very likely be deemed conforming under the new testing standards set out by the R&A and USGA. Read ⬇️ golfchannel.com/pga-tour/news/…

English
43
10
403
246.2K
Tron Carter
Tron Carter@TronCarterNLU·
🤌🤌🤌 Glad this is getting out there. Let’s get everyone’s cards on the table. Very much pro-rollback. But tough to be pro *this* rollback. Let’s do it right. And do more than just the ball.
Golf Channel@GolfChannel

An interesting story out of the PGA Championship. Multiple sources confirmed that Cameron Young has been using a golf ball that would very likely be deemed conforming under the new testing standards set out by the R&A and USGA. Read ⬇️ golfchannel.com/pga-tour/news/…

English
46
11
625
320.4K