
btcforever
5.3K posts







The delimitation debate is being framed as “penalising” southern states. That is factually incorrect. No state is losing seats. Every state gains. This is not redistribution, it is expansion with calibration designed to increase representation without abruptly disturbing the existing balance. The argument of penalising of southern states is also weak as Penalisation implies loss. There is none. The real question is whether a growing democracy can expand representation while maintaining federal sensitivity. This model attempts exactly that. Calling it unfair is not constitutional reasoning, it is political positioning/political posturing.



𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐨𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐟𝐨𝐫𝐦𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. HM Shri @AmitShah made it clear in the Parliament that there will be no injustice to southern states in delimitation. Their representation will increase from 23.76% (129 out of 543 seats) to 23.90% (195 out of 816 seats). This is a proportionate rise, not a reduction. The same principle applies to every state. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐬 𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐬𝐢𝐦𝐩𝐥𝐞. 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐧𝐚𝐫𝐫𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐞 𝐛𝐞𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐩𝐮𝐬𝐡𝐞𝐝 𝐢𝐬 𝐧𝐨𝐭.



How much do you pay your househelp, Chirag?




Mumbai, Maharashtra: Minister Pratap Sarnaik says, "It is 100 percent necessary to learn Marathi because if one has to live in Maharashtra or work in Maharashtra, knowing Marathi is essential. And this decision was not taken after Pratap Sarnaik became the Transport Minister; rather, it was taken in 2019..''


Just look at how impeccably Hon’ble Justice J. B. Pardiwala handles this matrimonial dispute - measured, composed, and precise. The future Chief Justice of India.




























