Alex

@GoldInvincibles @atrei8es That still doesn’t help, that requires city to only win next ones 1-0

@atrei8es We need to beat Burnley to a pulp. A 6-0 to take this goal difference out of sight.

imagine city bang 2 goals on the final day vs villa and we are still 0-0 at half time

@DaleJohnsonBBC @SaveConcessions Pablo was also causing Gabriel to grab his shirt on account of wearing one

@SaveConcessions Think about what this means.

Trossard is not even facing the ball. I give up.

@WestHamViews_ And didn’t even look at the Gabriel shirt pull

This shows that VAR DID flag the foul being committed by Trossard on Pablo, which then leads to the foul on Raya. Chris Kavanagh was the one who deemed it was "nothing". What an incompetent piece of shit he is! Needs sacking. 🤦🏻‍♂️⚒️ #WHUFC #COYI

@97bnf5r7rd @mancityhardcore Clip shows the same - but there is no point showing the evidence to arsenal fans, they can’t engage with it

@btcnorr @mancityhardcore Same old script, you saw the whole clip and still used a still image lol. And then proceeds to say Arsenal fans are amazing. Everyone has their opinions fairs but this idiocy of blind hate is just ridiculous man. And we are told we are insufferable lol embarrassing

🚨THE MOST INCOMPETENT DECISION BY A REFEREE ✅VAR RECORDING CONFIRMS THE REFEREE IGNORING VAR official recommendation ✅Foul by Trossard he ignores it ✅Foul by Declan Rice but DELIBERATELY IGNORES IT again

@97bnf5r7rd @mancityhardcore Arsenal fans are amazing

@btcnorr @mancityhardcore Pinned down ?! You saw the video. That lasted less than 2 secs. The West Ham keeper had already fallen on Gabriel. It made no impact what so ever.

@97bnf5r7rd @mancityhardcore

@btcnorr @mancityhardcore Pinned down ? Lol ok mate

@RkONF49 @WillyDiBa7 @Mr_BA6 You can’t honestly believe that, when Havertz has hold of his shirt. At best it’s one of those 50/50 ones they say both players are on each other

@btcnorr @WillyDiBa7 @Mr_BA6 The first ever Foul in that whole segment was that foul on Havertz - so the whole thing started off with a foul on an Arsenal player in the FIRST place.

That VAR audio is criminal. Firstly you can hear them saying “is that enough contact” then they agree there are fouls from Trossard on Pablo and Rice on Mavropanos but show the ref the wrong angle who tells them to hurry up. The ref was absolutely desperate to disallow. Criminal

@97bnf5r7rd @mancityhardcore He’s being pinned down by Gabriel shirt pull

@mancityhardcore Pablo doesn’t even look remotely under stress in that clip. He’s just chilling and said lemme grab rayas arms as this ball comes down 🤣🤣. The more you watch it. The more you see the outrage is embarrassing on all you lot parts. Thanks VAR 👍🏿

@WillyDiBa7 @Mr_BA6 They completely missed the shirt pull from Gabriel which is prior to the foul on Raya (and a penalty, amongst the others)

Criminal? I actually was shocked at how meticulously they went through it. Key points: VAR said before Wilson even kicked it that there was a potential foul on Raya Upon the very first look VAR says yeah clear foul AVAR says agree there but let’s look at possible penalty shouts Ref is shown raya foul, then tross foul (says nothing in it) then rice foul (says that was after Raya) I thought it was actually really well done all around. The one thing is they actually completely missed the shirt pull on Raya as well.

@chrisanor @talkSPORT Ball wasn’t in play, like the Newcastle fouls on Haaland

@talkSPORT Where was this same analysis the day before when Brentford players were being taken out by city defenders ? Where was this analysis when Benardo taken out Rhol in the game from corner when they were already 3-1 down ? The rage be circumstantial, not vindictive.

🤦‍♂️ Gabby: "Strange decision... Arsenal have scored so many goals from exactly that!" 😤 Jeff: "It's a foul, but Trossard has both arms around Pablo! Rice has both arms around Mavropanos!" Stelling and Agbonlahor react to #WHUFC v #AFC VAR controversy! 😳

@matovu93 @Lloyd_Smiff @themichaelowen Gabriel is pulling Pablo shirt first, that exacerbates the contact on Raya

@Lloyd_Smiff @themichaelowen Raya always does that for a quick counter. Pablo aside, Todibo is pulling his shirt and if not he catches that ball as always and starts a counter attack

It was definitely a foul on Raya in yesterday’s game. However, weren’t there fouls elsewhere in the same passage? It’s becoming virtually impossible to officiate a game at corners. The authorities are going to need to consider bringing in a rule to stop this farce that has taken the shine off this season.

@BlueWolf_09 Pablo also being pinned down by Gabriel shirt pull

If you freeze frame it’s just hilarious, 3 WHU players being grabbed by the waist so they can’t get to the ball, including Pablo who was trying to wrestle himself out of Trossard’s grip and hence ended up getting an arm on Raya 😂 Shameful from Man City, paid PGMOL to disallow that goal

@DaleJohnsonBBC Why is this shirt pull which precedes (and likely exacerbates) the foul on Raya not looked at? @DaleJohnsonBBC

BTW If there was a penalty foul before the challenge on Raya the goal would have been disallowed and a penalty award. There could be no penalty advantage to the attacking team if there was then an attacking foul before the goal. Bit like Erling Haaland and Dominik Szoboszlai.

@ESPNUK What about the foul from Gabriel (shirt pull) that happened first?

This was the reason West Ham's goal was disallowed ❌ Was it a foul on David Raya?

@eurofootcom Why is the shirt pull from Gabriel, which happened prior to the foul on Raya not looked at?

🚨🗣️ Jarrod Bowen: "When you look at the screen for five minutes you'll find something - a lot of grappling and a lot of holding. I'm sure if you look long enough you'll find something. Do I think it's the right decision? NO." "Frustration. Where's the consistency? As a fan you don't want to celebrate a goal and then wait eight minutes and it's taken off you." "Corners are physical. The Premier League is physical. That's why everyone loves it. You have to expect contact at corners. If you give that you have to give all the holding calls in the world and that's not the way people want the game to go down." "I don't want to sound bitter but last week we had one with Tomas Socuek held at Brentford and we didn't get a penalty. But then you can't give one like that today." (BBC)

@ryQuant @BigpictureBTC This is the classic, superficial understanding trap

@BigpictureBTC Categorically wrong.

Interesting. The clear objective of today’s $MSTR earnings call is to prepare, and subtly persuade, shareholders for the eventuality of selling BTC. That’s been the consistent undertone from Phong Le and Saylor throughout. It strongly suggests this is already in their plans, with bullish, financially engineered frameworks being presented to rationalise it. What stands out is the complete narrative shift compared to the past few years. Which validates my MSTR thesis: they’re approaching the structural limits of the perpetual dilution model. At a certain scale, the dilution required to sustain growth starts to outweigh the growth itself. At that point, selling BTC becomes less of a taboo and more of a necessity, hence the groundwork now being laid to justify it. Yet their guidance in today’s earnings implies a direct contradiction; Strategy believes it will not have any accumulated earnings & profits (E&P) for U.S. federal income tax purposes and does not expect to generate E&P for the foreseeable future. On that basis, distributions on its preferred equity are expected to be treated as non-taxable return of capital (ROC) for potentially a decade or more. Well that framework implicitly depends on not generating earnings, i.e. not realising gains. If they begin selling BTC to fund distributions, they risk generating E&P, which would undermine the ROC treatment. So the model effectively boxes them in: either maintain the ROC narrative and fund distributions via continued equity issuance (perpetual dilution), or sell BTC and compromise the tax-efficient structure they’ve been promoting. It’s a lose-lose and a sign of desperation imo. Just buy BTC, IBIT or Treasury 2.0’s.

@WolfRares @markgoldbridge Yeah 100%

@markgoldbridge No, no guys, just rewatch it, the refereee forgot that camavinga has one yellow. cause he shows yellow, then leaves, and then the bayern players tell the refereee is the second one. I think he wouldnt book camavinga if he knew he is already booked!

In a game of this magnitude that's ridiculous to send Camavinga off for that

I did not expect it would take just a month later for this milestone to be reached. $1.56bn in trading volume for $STRC today. If the ATM capture rate of ~79% remains, that is $1.23bn raised by Strategy in a single day. Unbelievable. I predict $2bn in a day within 60 days.

@offshorelegal99 @JSS779 Those will halve in value in the next 5 years in real terms as AI destroys the marginal bid

@JSS779 Its outlandishly incorrect.Some of us still have to live work in London so its a false economy to look at it like that.Look at all the development around waterloo and southbank for example still draws in investors looking for a yeild . I wonder if we will see a bitcoin mortgage

The author clearly hasn't looked at the price of bitcoin recently...