alone

.@koboateng I took time to go through your page from when you created it until now, and these are my observations: 1. In the past 8 years, you never criticized former Communications Minister Ursula Owusu. 2. In the past 8 years, you never mentioned Ursula Owusu on your page. There isn’t a single post bearing her name. 3. In the past 8 years, you subtly supported Bawumia but branded it as “jabs.” 4. Not once did you post a video mocking Bawumia over his economic promises or his failure to deliver. None of the past appointees had their videos dissected! 5. You didn’t actively participate in major demonstrations like #OccupyJulorbi, #FixTheCountry, or #StopGalamsey. In fact, you have never been involved, either offline or online. 6. In the past 8 years, there hasn’t been a single time you criticized a govt appointee for more than a few minutes, yet you’ve spent days on Sam George! Obviously, he brings in the numbers. 7. You never supported critiques of the NPP govt by people like Bongo Ideas. In fact, when I was kidnapped and nearly killed for criticizing the previous govt, you replied to a friend’s post saying, “he deserves more than that!” 8. Your online activism only started after 2026. During the first year of this govt, when certain taxes were scrapped and the economy stabilized, you largely ignored it. 9. In your criticism of Sam George, you focus on personality rather than tangible issues. You haven’t called him out for incompetence or failure in office. It’s mostly mockery and unrelated content, because as they say, “give a dog a bad name and hang it.” 10.You label others who aren’t participating as “bought by NDC,” yet you never supported their activism until your preferred party went into opposition. Many of your followers now are NPP sympathizers. Could it then be said that you’ve also been “bought” and that your activism is a real life faux pas? If you want to be seen as a credible critic or venture into online activism, you cannot be one sided or only find your voice when it suits your interests. The principles of critique require that you praise when necessary and call out when needed. Overindulging in one side or focusing primarily on personalities rather than issues is shallow and easy for anyone to do. Since we are demanding accountability, don’t you think it would be more appropriate to compare apples to apples by evaluating Sam George alongside his predecessor, whom you never criticized, even after all the 5G related atrocities, MTN-SMP controversies which saw our data prices criminally ballooned and the infamous $89M Kelni-GVG scandal? Open a space and let’s have this discussion properly, probably we could situate your “Dzata-induced howling” in proper context. I’m on standby! 🤝