Matthew

I'm 17. Spent the last months building an AI agent solo. I got tired of reading walls of text from chatbots — so Mateflow answers with interactive cards and charts instead. Building in public from now on.

@yacineMTB Totally agree, Anthropic didn’t think about the price for users

Literally why use fable at this point? Something that secretly sabotages your AI research? Like at most it's an overpriced gimmick, a toy. Like the diamond grills those rappers wear. Chatgpt 5.5 sol on the other hand? It's the thinking man's tool.

@anupamrjp I think he'll stay subscribed, GPT 5.6 Sol is too good

imagine Claude Code shuts down tomorrow. Do you already have a replacement… or are you starting from scratch?

@hqmank I'm thinking about that too

My bet: Fable 5 will stay in the Claude subscription plan. GPT-5.6 Sol is nearly as good as Fable 5, for half the price. Give it another day.

@DavidOndrej1 Why is raw model power the only thing that matters to you? Why aren’t you thinking about the price, which is several times higher, but the result is similar? I mean, just think about it

Fable >>> 5.6 and it’s not even close

Honestly, I think yes, but still, if we're talking about choosing between Fable 5 or GPT 5.6 Sol, I would pick Fable 5. But I think Fable 5 + GPT 5.6 is a great combo, because Fable 5 is just amazing at planning, and the code needed to implement the plan can be written by almost any model

Fable / GPT-5.6 < Fable + GPT-5.6

@bridgemindai I think they'll keep Fable 5, taking it away from Anthropic leaves only Opus 4.8, which loses to GPT 5.6 Sol. Even keeping Fable 5, they still have to compete with GPT 5.6 Sol because Fable 5 itself is very resource-hungry compared to GPT 5.6 Sol, literally 2x.

Fable 5 CANNOT be removed from Anthropic subscriptions. The new Artificial Analysis Coding Index shows exactly why. Without Fable 5, Anthropic's best subscription model is Opus 4.8. It loses to GPT 5.6. It even loses to GPT 5.5. The OLD GPT. At that point there is no reason to pay for Claude. None. Fable 5 is not a perk. It is the entire case for the subscription.

@chaosengineerr Just for planning a project with Fable 5

I am a Codex user, Why should I switch to Claude code?

@markproduct .com is a classic, it literally fits any project

Which domain is the most expensive today? • ai • com • io

@rezoundous Honestly, I haven't tested GPT 5.6 Sol yet, but the limits there are definitely higher through Fable 5

Fable 5 as orchestrator GPT-5.6 as executor this has been the best setup for me currently. what's yours?

@theo OpenAI works for Claude Code users😂

I would like to thank OpenAI for putting out a model exactly good enough to force Anthropic to keep bundling Fable in the Claude Code plan

@markproduct Bro, AI has already done this, some developers are just too shy to admit it

AI will replace 95% of devs & designers by the end of 2027

Honestly, in my opinion, Anthropic makes the strongest model, but at the same time, they don’t think about users in terms of $50 output—that’s really a lot. I get the AI race, but honestly, over the past few months, I’ve started preferring OpenAI models. That said, the claim that the Mythos model series can really handle very complex tasks is true, but I agree—what’s the point of such a strong model if it’s not economically viable? Like, a few prompts for fixes—sure, but as a main work tool—not really. For example, Muse Spark 1.1 is top-notch in terms of price-quality, same with GLM 5.2 and GPT 5.6 Sol, Terra, Luna—well, for most tasks, that’ll be enough. If you need maximum accuracy available right now, Anthropic models are perfect

Too early to tell right now but I wonder if History will look back at this $7.5-40B Anthropic/SpaceXai deal as the biggest unforced error of the AI era. Did the management team thought XAI was too far from the frontier to be a real threat ? Otherwise why give so much money to a direct competitor? Grok 4.5 is impressive and lands exactly where I thought it would few months ago: close to top intelligence at a fraction of the cost. Actually SOTA in quite few areas. There is a scenario in which users move to SpaceX for most token exchange and Claude is only used for the top tasks. Meaning Anthropic massive growth would be transferred to SpaceXAI. This would seriously complicate their IPO & ability to produce SOTA after that (need compute $$$). During that time SpaceXAI is getting their datacenters reimbursed, premium data and gets to build the space AI infrastructure with the money.

@PashaBorsai themateflow.com because we literally have 0 haters (and almost 0 users 😭)

Name a tech company that has literally zero haters

Mateflow update — the agent can now read your Google Drive: 🔗 connect once in Settings — read-only access, disconnect anytime 📂 ask "what's in my budget spreadsheet?" — it finds the file itself and reads it: Docs, Sheets, Slides, PDFs 🔭 Deep dive got an upgrade too — researches in two waves and reads full pages, not just snippets Solo-built, shipped today.

@SeHozaifa I think yes for design, no for code

New King in the market is Gemini 3.5 Pro 🔥 Do you guys think It's better than Claude Fable 5 and GPT5.6?

@rezoundous AI Safety First Strategy

The fact that Anthropic extended Fable means that they are worried about GPT-5.6. NOW I'M EVEN MORE HYPED.

@argofowl That sounds exactly like something an "AI Safety" company would do. Generous on paper, completely useless in reality

anthropic will reset the usage limits 30 min before fable 5 gets taken off the subs on 12th

@0ailab Exactly. It’s an engineered trap. Subscriptions became a paid waiting room, and if you actually want to finish your project before July 12, you're forced to hook up your card for usage credits today

Claude’s folks know exactly what they’re doing. I’m convinced that 80% of users are in the exact same situation as me.

This is exactly what the business model of the AI Safety concept looks like where OpenAI is the bad Thank you Anthropic for extending my 0% left Fable quota for a few more days! Truly life-changing. 😭🙏 This is exactly what the "AI Safety" business model looks like. At least OpenAI is honest about being a profit machine

thank you anthropic for extending my 0% left fable quota for a few days

Anthropic's business model (briefly): Scare everyone - Release the model - Block the model - Unblock it with 50% of the weekly limit - make people buy a subscription - make users use up all their limits by July 7 - extend it to July 12 without resetting the limit - what's next? Where is the AI Safety concept, positioning themselves as the good guys who don’t chase profit at any cost, unlike OpenAI? OpenAI never really tried to play the saints; they came in straight away as a huge business machine

anthropic baited everyone again: redeployed fable 5 on july 1 with 50% weekly limits until july 7 employee said the limits would end today most people burned 100% of their quota now anthropic extends it until friday without a reset and everyone claps... :)