Dueling Kitties

18 posts

Dueling Kitties

Dueling Kitties

@buttguy80085

Katılım Haziran 2023
1 Takip Edilen0 Takipçiler
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@_ueaj So you mean paying per token? Thank god we've got geniuses like you to point that out to our simple minded AI labs.
English
1
0
3
444
will hsu
will hsu@cowboykaizen·
@bayeslord are u familiar with the theory of constraints anon?
English
1
0
4
383
bayes
bayes@bayeslord·
People are seriously underestimating how quickly and easily apparently major bottlenecks to progress will be resolved
English
19
16
300
11.4K
Samswara
Samswara@samswoora·
I think when it becomes clear to normies what the Labs have done there will be blood in the streets.
English
23
6
301
34.7K
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@shae_mcl @MinuteMovies3 There’s nothing persisting between the different frames of your life, it is all impermanence. Thus a perfect physical copy of you is in fact you, even if the original is not destroyed. Same with a perfect digital representation of you. A lot rests on “perfect” here, though.
English
0
0
0
5
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@shae_mcl @MinuteMovies3 The mind is separable from the body, but the self is not. I think you are believing your mind is your self. Regarding perfect copies - we each only exist once every instant before we are destroyed and replaced by one who thinks they are us, with our memories.
English
1
0
0
5
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@IamSean90 You’re complaining that the insider trading platform bans insider trading on a person’s death? Not often I’ve seen a pro-“murder of all public figures”stance.
English
0
0
2
484
Sean Fitzgerald (Actual Justice Warrior)
This is insane. The betting market was for whether or not he would remain in power after a point in time. Death was always a high possibility, even just factoring in his age. This is straight up fraud. I hope you pay through the nose & people abandon your site
Tarek Mansour@mansourtarek_

On Khamenei: We don’t list markets directly tied to death. When there are markets where potential outcomes involve death, we design the rules to prevent people from profiting from death. That is what we did here. I know some of you disagree and prefer that we list these markets without a death carveout because it keeps the rules simple and because many traditional markets, like oil futures, can be proxy markets for war and death. But we believe that’s different than having a market directly settling on someone’s death, which is not allowed for US regulated entities. What’s the point of the market, then? A market on Ali Khamenei out as Supreme Leader was important because leadership changes in Iran have major impact on the world order: • geopolitical implications • economic consequences • national security considerations • oil and commodity prices, many of which move based on news and expectations around this outcome And it’s always possible for a ruler to step down or transition power without death, even in autocracies. It just happened in Venezuela. In these instances, we make the caveat clear in the rules and in the market page, but today is a good learning that we can do more in terms of improving the UX and adding more ways to surface the rules. We are committed to improving. In the meantime, here’s what we’re going to do: • We are reimbursing all fees from this market • If you have a position from before Khamenei died, you will be paid out on the last-traded price before his death. (This was clear in our rules) • If you have a position from after he died, we’re going to fully reimburse your cost of entry

English
54
115
5.4K
454.8K
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@MLSophist I’m an Anthropic enthusiast, and I still think this take is moronic. 6 months of shitty service is what the DoW will get. Cutting off service would only strengthen the DoW’s position in the upcoming legal battle (or to spell it out, it would prove Hegseth right)
English
0
0
5
157
MLSophist
MLSophist@MLSophist·
Now that they have dubbed Anthropic a supply chain risk, the strongest move Anthropic could make here would be to immediately turn off all access to the DoD. They could immediately gain broad public support by declining the offer to continue with the 6 month phase out
English
8
0
67
3.5K
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@Tatiana1 @barkmeta @pinedegen The plan is to let the poor die. Without their labor as a lever of power, then those with resources have no reason to cater to them.
English
0
0
2
34
Tatiana
Tatiana@Tatiana1·
What’s the plan? Plug in UBI just before masses are ready to revolt? How about inflation - when they gave checks to everyone during Biden days inflation skyrocketed. But that was because they printed more money. Can you give checks without printing money? I don’t think so. Taxes will remain the same. So how exactly UBI will work?
English
2
0
0
262
Bark
Bark@barkmeta·
Genuine question… if AI takes all the jobs and everything keeps getting more expensive, what’s the plan for regular people?
English
1.8K
210
4K
477.4K
Cole
Cole@coIedeb·
@Myth_ @BasedBidoof Goat knows ball. If you want to mix in IPTV in the future, check out Dispatcharr
English
1
0
4
236
Myth
Myth@Myth_·
self hosted media server thats all I want to say tonight
English
20
4
445
94.7K
Cairo Smith
Cairo Smith@cairoasmith·
Yes, Alyssa Liu seems like an ebullient person overall, but I find it strange a lot of people are specifically using stills from her performance itself as evidence of joy. Like, when you're doing that figure skating routine, you're acting. Your face is part of the performance. This feels like some sort of undersocialized context-blindness that people can't differentiate between the way she smiles in her post-victory interviews and the way she smiles on the ice. Totally different eye and mouth tension. Worlds apart.
Sierra@Sierra_rak

The greatest contribution of Alyssa liu wouldn't be the gold medal or the countless pledges of loyalty but the fact that she made JoyMaxxing cool again. Imagine someone so happy on the skating rink. Does it really matter if they win a gold at all?

English
70
26
2.1K
223.3K
choof
choof@choofxd·
Dream posted a YouTube short doubling down, insisting that he's legit, basically saying that he's just consistent at tick timings. Here is the main problem with his argument:
English
84
102
7K
1M
choof
choof@choofxd·
@buttguy80085 @legowegogo Yes, a 1 tick timing window isn't difficult to hit. But it's difficult to hit when you don't even know where the 1 tick window is. Perfect tick timing execution despite the complete lack of visual cues is completely unrealistic.
English
1
0
5
474
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@legowegogo @choofxd The fact that y'all think 1 tick jumps are hard to hit just means you've never played a fighting game (and you're ass at Minecraft too). That's a 3 frame window and you guys are saying it's a macro LMAO.
English
3
0
14
927
otherlego
otherlego@legowegogo·
@buttguy80085 @choofxd There’s a reason all the actual parkour pros use the “slow” setup but if I told you youd probably get mad
English
1
0
71
998
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@choofxd Wow so he doesn’t do the slowest setup of all time like all the real parkour pros? He must have some insane reason to want to take the fast and risky option, as if it was some sort of race.
English
3
0
61
4.4K
choof
choof@choofxd·
Setups are so important for parkour, and the way Dream played is not how any parkour player plays. Compare fruitberries' Stage 8-1 to Dream's. Fruit utilises a setup to ensure making it, but Dream yoloes, basically gambling exiting the blockage, and somehow consistently does it.
English
8
4
1.5K
170.9K
Pawel Kaczmarek
Pawel Kaczmarek@Super_PK_·
@aakashgupta Calling the 45% ➡️ 85% improvement an “88% improvement” is a weird take
English
5
0
20
9.1K
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Sundar buried the real story in the cost data. Gemini 3 Deep Think went from 45.1% to 84.6% on ARC-AGI-2 in under 3 months. That’s an 88% improvement on a benchmark specifically designed to resist brute-force scaling. The number that matters: $13.62 per task. The previous Deep Think scored 45.1% at $77.16 per task. This upgrade nearly doubled the accuracy while cutting cost by 82%. Three months ago, Gemini needed 138,000 reasoning tokens to solve an ARC task that Gemini 3 Pro handles in 96. This tells you everything about where the reasoning race actually sits. Every other lab is throwing more compute at harder problems. Google just demonstrated that inference-time optimization is the dominant variable, and they’re improving on it faster than anyone expected. The Codeforces number confirms the pattern. 3455 Elo puts Deep Think in the top 0.01% of competitive programmers globally. Claude Opus 4.6 sits at 2352. That 1100 Elo gap is roughly the difference between a strong amateur and a world finalist. The benchmark Sundar doesn’t mention: ARC Prize is already building ARC-AGI-3 because ARC-AGI-2 at 84.6% is approaching saturation. Google killed a benchmark designed to measure AGI progress in less than a year. The competitive framing in Pichai’s chart puts Claude and GPT in every comparison. For enterprises building reasoning-heavy applications in science and engineering, the cost-per-insight gap between Deep Think and everything else just widened by 5x in a single quarter.
Sundar Pichai@sundarpichai

Gemini 3 Deep Think is getting a significant upgrade. We’ve refined Deep Think in close partnership with scientists and researchers to tackle tough, real-world challenges. And it’s pushing the frontier across the most challenging benchmarks, achieving an unprecedented 84.6% on ARC-AGI-2. It also sets a new standard on Humanity’s Last Exam - 48.4% without tools.

English
54
182
2.2K
422.9K
Dueling Kitties
Dueling Kitties@buttguy80085·
@BuschidoEra @j32pmxr @MorlockP Turns out that faraday's law works well with ionized particles (and the 3He-D reaction they use shoots off protons). Only problem is that they're gonna need a ton of 3He... which means they need to run a lot of D-D reactions which defeats the whole point...
English
0
0
0
372
BuschidoEra
BuschidoEra@BuschidoEra·
@j32pmxr @MorlockP I'm 99% certain it's thermodynamically impossible to get more energy out of that than you're already putting into it to create the plasma in the first place. Fusion only works when you have a star-massed gravity well making it super cheap to achieve critical density.
English
6
0
7
8.3K