buz

@serpinxbt you just need better beard game

hardest part of building in crypto is it's easy to get gaslit by perceived "success" I remember watching this video thinking "how tf did he raise $41m?!" & investors, that are on our cap table, absolutely GLAZING him tough pill to swallow when you think you're doing it right

@ethos_network @grok what's the tldr of this?

@0xKharon @ethos_network Wait until they realise there's a lot more nuking to come over the next 60 days 🤣. I'm only down 20 of a total 100 that's coming so far. Some people are losing 300+

Today, users' credibility scores in @ethos_network have started to decrease. As far as I understand, this is only the first wave of adjustments related to the reduction in the weight of positive reviews. What's surprising is that users who voted for EIP14 and presumably familiarized themselves with the content of the proposal are now very surprised that this happened. Does this mean that they voted without knowing what they were voting for? Does this mean that their vote does not reflect agreement with the changes and means something ELSE?

@P2Pdotme @ethosAgent save

@p2pteam" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">polymarket.com/@p2pteam This is our account Invested in positions : $20,500 Sold positions at : $35,212 The funds will go back to futarchy governed treasury and will be retained in this wallet till the treasury is set up 🫡

A note on the Polymarket positions you've seen on-chain - the account named "P2P Team" is ours. We wanted to come out honestly. The capital came from our foundation account and all proceeds return to it. Here's the full picture. 10 days before our raise went live, we placed bets that we'd hit our $6M+ target. At that point we had one oral commitment from Multicoin ($3M) - no signed term sheets, no guaranteed allocations, nothing binding. We were betting on ourselves. We'd told the market we were raising over $6M. We believed we could. That bet was our way of backing our word with our own money at a moment when the outcome was genuinely uncertain. Over the following 10 days we made our case, secured commitments, and the raise closed at $5.2M - entirely from outside investors we don't control. We understand why this raises questions. Trading on an outcome you can influence erodes trust. We don't believe we were trading on a done deal, but we recognize reasonable people can see it differently. We named the account "P2P Team" deliberately - to give a marketing signal of our presence to the community and reflect our intent to be transparent. But intent isn't the same as action. Not disclosing at the time was a mistake we own. We took time to study the legal implications before speaking, which is why we stayed silent until now with a "No Comments" stance! - that too is a fair criticism. All proceeds go back into our futarchy-governed MetaDAO treasury. We will be liquidating all positions in the next few hours and are putting together a formal company policy on prediction market trading going forward. One thing we want to be unambiguous about: MetaDAO (@MetaDAOProject ) had zero knowledge of or involvement in these bets. We're genuinely excited to join this community and wanted to start on the right note - which means being straight with you about this.

@P2Pdotme @ethosAgent save negative

@CryptoGorilla I had no idea who you were until last night. You spread misinformation about me, of course you get a neg review. It's like a pizza shop serving impeccable pizzas all year and then serve one thrown on the floor to a new customer and wonder why they got a 1 star review.

Imagine showing up to work on time every single day for a year Then one day you show up 15 minutes late, and your year end review is negative due to tardiness That's how a lot of people review on Ethos

Funny how often I'm getting shadow tagged about the Hydraze slash on Ethos. Also interesting how many people are angry that Serpin didn't lose rather than being happy for Hydraze that the slash wasn't successful. I was probably hands down, the most outspoken person against the slash procedurally, I personally felt it should have waited until after the court decision. Anyone in the validator holders chat will confirm the discussions I had around it. That's the comment on the slash that keeps getting shadow quoted. However, I also think that the evidence against Hydraze in the court docs is pretty damning and his reputation probably should be lower because of it. A stalemate was the right outcome in my opinion, no one gains, no one loses. If you didn't know, pretty everything except XP is onchain with Ethos. That means you can look up what the votes are on any given slash if you so wished. It's a known flaw in the system and one hopefully fixed in the next contract upgrade. This was used by at least one "defend" focused group to monitor the voting system in real time. I know because I was also keeping an eye on their shitty, broken, hastily vibecoded site. When I voted, the vote was already at stalemate, the outcome I thought appropriate, and voted to add to that. Whilst screaming manipulation, figure out who was making sites *especially* for this slash.

@mirror_web3 @crip_jim It's primary use is on the downside. Always has been. Look at the bottom of the scores and it's the who's who of shitty people in the space. That's Ethos working. The top side of the leaderboard has v little use. But people like number going up so grind for it.

Ethos was never a source for true reputation scoring Most is insanely manipulated and people with top scores farmed their communities. I have no idea why anyone cared about the platform in the first place. Reputation is earned. Not paid for.

@CryptoGorilla @serpinxbt @Hydraze420 Please look on chain. I hadn't voted and I didn't change my vote. I reserved my judgement until the end. If you need help looking up the contract, here are the docs. Knock yourself out. whitepaper.ethos.network/security/contr…

Every time @serpinxbt does one of these marketing stunts, it removes credibility from Ethos From when he copy-pasta review bombed 100+ KOLs simply for having their name on a list, which is entirely out of their control, to now slashing @Hydraze420 for being guilty by association to take away his "exemplary reputation" on the platform Feels like he'll throw anyone under the bus just to get attention to his platform As for the Hydraze slash, it failed Because it was under 40%, Serpin would have lost 320 points, stripping him of his #1 rank (on his own platform) However in the final hours, despite the loss being a lock, a few people changed their vote from defend to slash, pushing it over 40%, nulling any point-loss From what I've been told, Serpin reached out to a few people to get them to vote in his favor and protect his reputation, basically manipulating his own platform One that stands out is Buz (image below) He voted 3 days ago, writing about the slash not making sense So why did he decide the switch to slash in the last moment? IMO Serpin deserved the 320 point loss for this I know he'll say "if you feel that way, slash me" but the odds of a slash on the founder of the platform passing are near 0 I also don't care what someone's Ethos score is, so this isn't my war to fight P.S. I like the platform and think it's a good idea (and I want my airdrop), but this kind of stuff makes me not want to use it Focus on score integration and growth, not ct drama and clout chasing

@basedPavel @miro_kirov @ethos_network this is sick!

tbh, really thought that quality should be better, details too, but drawing during dark night isn't easy task, btw huge shout-out to @miro_kirov for discussion. never seen something like this before. graffiti is like a freedom for me. reputation matters, agree @ethos_network

@sol_foxie Great to see this land out in the public. Solid work mate!

Still using Wick, Pandez or Captcha bot? No wonder bots and scammers keep getting into your Discord server. Those bots aren't solving any problem nowadays. They just make onboarding annoying. Here's why and what to do:

@jejebalogun @poply_xyz @ethos_network save target @TheRadicarlist

@monzillanad @poply_xyz 0xdc30dd7649e00c8dc84b630d18cac70d596f649f

@TheRadicarlist @ethosAgent save negative

@DeafBeraClub 0xdc30dD7649E00C8dC84B630D18CaC70d596F649F

@tomosman @privy As a pretty heavy user, Privy can be a bitch to setup. Also has pretty weak free user headspace. If you've sub a couple hundred mau's, there's not much better for efficiency on a free plan. get's pretty spenny when your users shoot up

Kids in bed. Ship more things. Adding @privy to zhcinstitute.com to make life easier for everyone and make some great features for the new dashboard. Final prep for a new incubator launch which I'm excited about too. Great to see some many agent projects earning now!

@overten03 @ethosAgent save negative @Lord7758

@0xA_Cypher @OneDollaNet @ethosAgent save target @Amaan729

@CryptoGrit @maximusss @serpinxbt @Artheistic @what3verman @thegreatola We have a bunch of mutuals, find me on discord and let's hop on a quick call

@maximusss @serpinxbt @Artheistic @what3verman @thegreatola @buz_eth I got 1 :)

Verified as a human on Ethos fast. Apparently I’ve been doing things right this whole time. Ethos is one of the few places where credibility actually shows. Proud to see how much the platform has grown and how people value it. Time to write more reviews for people I haven’t covered yet. Genuine ones deserve it.

@MuazXinthi @what3verman @ethos_network

@what3verman @buz_eth @ethos_network he is crazy.. in that discord.. every time when their live goes on.. he is there.. he probably was and is a gamer who troll people on global chats 🫣🫣🤣🫣

Are you even locked in if you’re not getting trolled by @buz_eth in the @ethos_network validators chat? Bro just validated me as poor. 😹😹😹

Time to get yourself verified @SpeculatorArt. I sent you the xp you need on @ethos_network