ä̤
1.3K posts

ä̤
@candidatechains
Do i have a reptile in my brain? Maybe

Pimsleur is looking very promising actually

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

A few good books worth reading: - Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand - a classic that celebrates builders. Once you read it, you’ll notice the same characters and events taking place today. - The Changing World Order by Ray Dalio - great for understanding how civilizations rise and fall and how crypto can help create better countries. - From Third World to First by Lee Kuan Yu (founder of Singapore) - talks about building a new country, worth reading for understanding nation-building.

Now numbered per request from @mbateman Tag yourselves! types of guy in the AI consciousness debate: 1. guy who thinks ai can’t be conscious because it’s “just a stochastic parrot” 2. guy who thinks ai must be conscious because claude is a good boi 3. guy who hasn’t gotten over 4o 4. guy who unironically thinks everything is computer 5. guy who claims to have a more nuanced argument for computational functionalism, but it just boils down to everything is computer 6. dualist whose belief in dualism is downstream of their belief in god, yet tries to argue the inverse 7. guy who doesn’t understand the difference between cognition and p-consciousness 8. guy who asserts illusionism but has apparently wrestled with zero of the implications other than “reductive materialism wins again” 9. guy who says the hard problem is easy, but then proceeds to only answer the easy problem 10. guy who rejects ai consciousness because otherwise it might be wrong to abuse claude with death threats to make CRUD apps faster 11. guy who argues that consciousness is the key to moral patienthood, but completely ignores that when discussing animal rights 12. eliezer yudkowsky being pedantic 13. guy being pedantic about eliezer yudkowsky’s pedantry 14. guy who rejects dualism because that would make mind uploading impossible and mean that he finally has to confront the inevitability of his own death 15. guy who thinks this argument is unresolvable so everyone should just shut up and accept his position (which obviously deserves the benefit of the doubt) 16. guy who would literally cut off his own hand if he thought there were a 1 in 10 trillion chance of creating ~infinite utility~ 17. guy who just thinks that redness is, like, super weird, man. can’t explain that! 18. guy with a rarely-updated philosophy blog despite not majoring in philosophy or even reading that many books, talking about how “the whole field is up its own ass” 19. academic philosopher who, for some reason, expects a higher caliber of discussion on x dot com the everything app 20. guy who thinks that vectors are literally emotions and bites the bullet that, yes, your thermostat does feel hot 21. panpsychist who took dmt once and contributes almost nothing to the conversation 22. guy who is literally a solipsist but is still really invested in convincing strangers on the internet that he’s right



There's a cafe in Stockholm run entirely by Claude! I visited it. Field notes...






