Matt Millar

2.1K posts

Matt Millar banner
Matt Millar

Matt Millar

@cello2econ

Decision Scientist and life enthusiast. My posts are my opinion and are not investment advice nor do they reflect the opinion of my employer.

Wisconsin Katılım Ekim 2013
100 Takip Edilen417 Takipçiler
Matt Millar
Matt Millar@cello2econ·
@Rory_Johnston Whoa! I can imagine that would be intense. Peace be with you brother.
English
0
0
0
307
Rory Johnston
Rory Johnston@Rory_Johnston·
It’s been a really weird weekend.
Rory Johnston tweet media
English
37
10
479
19.5K
Matt Millar
Matt Millar@cello2econ·
@MattG_PE Agree with your logic - disagree with your conclusion. The market will price oil sufficient to destroy demand. $100 isn't that number. Neither is $200. It's $440. $440 is enough to cause a recession, which is required to destroy more than 2 mbd.
English
0
0
1
45
Matt Gallagher
Matt Gallagher@MattG_PE·
5/ Add in the shale revolution: US domestic crude production exploded from 5.5 mb/d in 2010 to a record 13.6 mb/d in 2025 — nearly 2.5x higher. America transformed from heavy importer to energy powerhouse. Higher prices now support domestic production, jobs, investment, and energy independence Thoughts? Is the market underpricing America’s energy resilience? #Oil #Energy #USEconomy
English
7
0
14
1.2K
Matt Gallagher
Matt Gallagher@MattG_PE·
🧵$100 oil will not cause demand destruction or a US Recession. The numbers prove it. 1/ From June 2011–June 2014, WTI averaged $96.16 per barrel. Global oil demand kept growing steadily: ~87.1 mb/d (2010) → 91.5 mb/d (2014).
English
30
10
89
22.5K
Matt Millar
Matt Millar@cello2econ·
@EconstratPB I love James Hamilton. But I don't think we get a -0.06 elasticity inside of 30 days with oil <$200 [I think it is more like -0.025]. Recent JPM research supports so not just me saying it.
Matt Millar tweet media
English
1
0
1
60
Matt Millar
Matt Millar@cello2econ·
@TheRealDanSaedi unpopular view: oil should be 300+. 180 still barely dents demand - want proof? Look at the demand past 45 days for Singapore Jet Fuel. It's at $225/barrel.
English
0
0
1
56
Matt Millar
Matt Millar@cello2econ·
@EconstratPB 💯 short term elasticity below $90/barrel is essentially zero. Elasticity from 90-150 is gonna be around -0.02. Each product has a different elasticity and Each elasticity is non-linear. But yeah, -0.1 is easily disproved just by looking at data from the last month.
English
0
0
9
4.6K
EconstratPB
EconstratPB@EconstratPB·
It comes down this stupid little number: the elasticity coefficient. Get that and you get the oil trade. Link in bio.
EconstratPB@EconstratPB

@robin_j_brooks has low end price elasticity of .1, which is the same as @paulkrugman I’ve modeled it with a much lower estimate bc of this.

English
6
3
41
7.3K
Markets & Mayhem
Markets & Mayhem@Mayhem4Markets·
Powell after realizing he gets to step down from leading the Fed before shit really hits the fan 💀
English
15
90
877
59.5K
Matt Millar
Matt Millar@cello2econ·
Does Hormuz really matter for domestic natty? Meaning if the TTF differential is 400% instead of 750%, dont we export the same? (Just limited to capacity). And...this is a little more nuanced but aren't we to the point in the shoulder season where TDDs are essentially irrelevant? Seems likely the market is over its skis WRT trading bearish April weather. This second point is more of a flows comment - weather can't get more bearish...ergo it can only get more bullish (just by becoming more neutral). Positioning reflects that bearish weather, so likewise there can only be 'buyers' in the market (e.g. mainly folks who will cover their shorts).
English
1
0
2
72
Shale Analytics
Shale Analytics@ShaleAnalytics·
This week’s injection forecast above +50 Bcf is less bearish than last week’s. The EIA recalibration of the April 16 norm (+33.4 Bcf) means a +50 Bcf print is only +17 above norm, requiring +60 Bcf+ to add meaningful points. #natgas
Shale Analytics tweet media
English
2
0
9
1K
TankerTrackers.com, Inc.
TankerTrackers.com, Inc.@TankerTrackers·
This month, Iran has chosen to keep 23 million barrels of crude oil afloat at all times in the Gulf of Oman, even as their tankers rotate in and out of the country. They are doing so while also maintaining fairly strong exports. #OOTT #IranWar #Tankers
TankerTrackers.com, Inc. tweet media
English
14
97
372
129.3K
Sal Mercogliano (WGOW Shipping) 🚢⚓🐪🚒🏴‍☠️
An uptick in traffic through the Strait of Hormuz, with the ships avoiding the international channel and utilizing the Iranian designated lanes. The inbound tankers included two Pakistani ships and one for China and India. Also, are a batch of Iranian containerships & bulkers.
Sal Mercogliano (WGOW Shipping) 🚢⚓🐪🚒🏴‍☠️ tweet mediaSal Mercogliano (WGOW Shipping) 🚢⚓🐪🚒🏴‍☠️ tweet media
English
14
50
242
25.9K
Rory Johnston
Rory Johnston@Rory_Johnston·
Current Middle East Gulf production shut-ins stand at ~13 MMbpd (out of a ~105 MMbpd market) If Trump blockades the Strait and forces Iran to shut in production that total rises to ~15 MMbpd. It’s been strange to see Iran continue to export through the war so this isn’t a shocking move, per se, but it, too, will come at an additional cost to the global economy starved by the Hormuz stoppage. The Strait of Hormuz has been closed for 6 weeks, more than 400 million barrels of oil that should have been produced this year have been lost to the market.
Rory Johnston tweet media
English
34
67
382
36.4K
Chris Martenson
Chris Martenson@chrismartenson·
@Rory_Johnston "13 MMbpd (out of a ~105 MMbpd market)" I score it more severely than that because the 105 number is "all liquids" and the 13 is for C+C exclusively. On that basis, the proper number is 13/86 = 15%
English
5
8
75
5.7K
Matt Millar
Matt Millar@cello2econ·
2020: COVID lockdown 2021: Stimmies & vaccine 2022: Supply chains 2023: ChatGPT 4.0 2024: AI CAPEX 2025: AI CAPEX & Tariffs 2026: Ballast VLCCs Ras Tanura bound Until empty tankers are inbound to load, everything else is noise. What am I missing? @TankerTrackers @LukeGromen @PeterSchiff
Matt Millar tweet media
English
0
0
0
84