しなもん

重金属の解毒

また騙されちゃってますね〜(笑) 彼らは何キロも泳いでないみたいだよ〜(笑)

風が吹いて 雲が湧いて 君を想って 僕の夏が過ぎていく

🚨🚨🚨 【避難者無料受け入れ】 👶【被災した妊婦さん・産後ママ・赤ちゃん・ご家族 　　　　　　　※完全予約制】 他、避難者無料受け入れ。

🔥 炎の魔法使いと風の魔法使いが協力 オーストラリアで、炎の竜巻が撮影されました。この炎の竜巻は、森林火災が発生した場所で発生しました。 Science | Наука 🤓 t.me/c/1449658723/2…

>ヒトパピローマ「ウイルスワクチン」HPV（9～12歳児向け）の開発において、ナノボット、自己組織化ハイドロゲル、ポリマーメッシュが確認された。 *DeepL翻訳

－全く雨が降らない時と、雨が止まない時に絶対にしてはいけない農作業－ 畑をお持ちの方へ 異常気象時の大切な心得最近、雨が全く降らない地域もあれば、逆に雨ばかりで農作業が進まない地域もあるのではないでしょうか。 そんな極端な天候のときにこそ、守るべき「絶対にしてはいけない作業」があります。 1. 雨が全く降らない極端な乾燥時 大分県の石井ピュアファームでも、梅雨明け後ほとんど雨が降らず、土がカラカラに乾いています。 草刈りをするだけで砂ぼこりが舞い上がるほどです。 【この状態で絶対にしてはいけないこと】 → 土を動かす作業（草刈り・耕起など）「雨が降らなくて暇だから、草刈りや耕起を済ませておこう」と思いがちですが、これは厳禁です。 ・表面は乾いていても、土の奥深くにはわずかな水分が残っています。 ・耕起などで土をひっくり返すと、その貴重な水分が一気に蒸発してしまいます。 ・水分を失った土は高温になり、作物を支える微生物が死滅します。 結果、土は「ただの砂」のようになり、作物がまともに育たなくなります。 【おすすめの対応】 雑草は土を守る「自然のマルチング（日よけ）」として役立っています。 畝（うね）はそのままにしておき、土の奥で耐えている微生物たちを守る気持ちで、ぐっと我慢して見守りましょう。 2. 雨が降り続いて畑がいつまでも湿っている時 関東や東北など、雨続きで土が乾かない地域では、別の作業が厳禁です。 【この状態で絶対にしてはいけないこと】 → 畑の中に足を踏み入れる（畝間や畑の周り以外） ・水分をたっぷり含んだ土は非常に崩れやすい状態です。 ・人が歩いたり、重機を入れたりすると、土の良い粒構造（団粒構造）が潰れてしまいます。 ・潰れた土は乾くとレンガのように固くなり、「硬盤層（こうばんそう）」ができます。 ・こうなると水や空気が通りにくくなり、作物は根腐れを起こしやすくなります。 －異常気象時の基本的な考え方－ 極端な乾燥も、長雨も、どちらも土にとって大きなストレスです。 大事なのは 「農作業が遅れる焦り」よりも、「未来の土を守ること」を最優先にする ・予定が遅れるとどうしても無理をしたくなりますが、強引な作業は今まで育ててきた肥沃な土を一瞬で壊してしまいます。 ・作付け計画を変更したり、今シーズンの栽培を諦める決断が必要なときもあります。 それは辛い選択ですが、農業の歴史ではよくあることです。 【一番大切なこと】 焦りに負けず、自然のペースに合わせること。 土の中の生態系を守ることが、結局は一番の近道です。 #種と土の奇跡 #無肥料栽培 #自家採種 #自然栽培 #石井ピュアファーム #未来の食卓

Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides on Earth. It's also what most people reach for when a dandelion pokes through a driveway crack. That's a significant chemical response to a very small problem, and there's a better one sitting on your stove. Boiling water kills weeds on contact. The heat ruptures cell walls all the way down to the root, and unlike herbicide sprays, it leaves no chemical residue, produces no runoff into storm drains, and poses no risk to the soil biology around it. Pour directly onto the weed and into the crack around its base. A kettle works better than a pot because you can direct the stream precisely. For established weeds with deep roots, a second application usually finishes the job. For new seedlings, once is typically enough. Glyphosate applied to a driveway crack runs into the storm drain with the next rain. From there it goes directly to your local waterway with no treatment step. The EPA classifies glyphosate as a possible carcinogen. The IARC classifies it as a probable one. Researchers continue to debate the exact risk level. What isn't debated is that it ends up in waterways. The dandelion doesn't know the difference.

【夏の活動支援カンパのお願い】 いま、食と農の正念場。 私たちの手で未来を選択するために この食の危機を乗り越え、活動をさらに強化し、私たちの食と農、そして子どもたちの未来を守るために、「夏の活動支援カンパ」へご協力をお願いいたします。 ◆寄付で応援する v3.okseed.jp/news/8595

【NEWS！】ゲノム編集トマトジュースの販売が始まっていた！ ゲノム編集トマト「シシリアンルージュハイギャバ」を原料とする加工品には、これまでピューレー、ドライトマトがありましたが、2026年5月に新商品トマトジュースの発売が始まっていました。 ◆記事はコチラ  v3.okseed.jp/news/8656

【OKシードプロジェクト８月のオンライン学習会：「ゲノム編集だけじゃない〜大転換を迎える食と農」】 日時：8月19日 午後8時〜9時30分 講師：印鑰智哉（OKシードプロジェクト事務局長） Zoomによるオンライン（参加費無料） ぜひご参加ください！ ◆詳細、申込みはコチラv3.okseed.jp/event/okseed26…

【２分で分かる！】「何が問題!? 種苗法再改正と育苗新法」その③！ ショート動画の最後のテーマは…「タネは誰のもの？―地域で守るみんなのコモン」です。 明日、7月14日参院農林水産委員会での審議に印鑰智哉が登場！ご注目を！ #タネはみんなのコモン #食と農を守ろう #種苗関連法案

【２分で分かる！】「何が問題!? 種苗法再改正と育苗新法」その②！ 今日のテーマは…「法案の狙いのひとつはやはりゲノム編集、AI育種！」です。 そうです、やはりココが肝。 7月14日、参院での審議には印鑰智哉が登場します！ご注目を！

【２分で分かる！】 「何が問題!? 種苗法再改正と育苗新法」 今、国会で今後の私たちの暮らしの根幹が揺らぐほど、重要な法案の審議が進んでいます。 とはいえ、法律のこともタネのことも消費者にはすごく分かりにくいものです。 そこで今回、印鑰智哉による解説を短くまとめました！

すげぇな 日本のトップと東京都のトップがどちらも経歴詐称のペテン師なんだぜ 何なんだよこの国😑笑 #そこをどけ

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Three U.S. States Introduced Legislation Declaring Covid mRNA Injections BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION. Arizona HB 2974. Minnesota HF 3219. Tennessee SB 1949. These ARE NOT resolutions. These ARE criminal statutes. They define the modified mRNA products, specifically the N1-methylpseudouridine substitution that makes the synthetic RNA evade normal immune detection and persist inside cells; as biological agents and weapons of mass destruction. Manufacture, possession, or distribution becomes a serious felony under existing WMD and terrorism codes. Officials who refuse to enforce can themselves be charged. Private citizens are given standing to sue. The bills stalled in committee. They were never publicly destroyed with superior data. They were simply buried by silence. The product they target was built this way on purpose. Natural mRNA is unstable and quickly destroyed. The uridine-to-N1-methylpseudouridine swap was the key engineering decision that turned it into a high-output, long-duration protein factory. The protein chosen was the full SARS-CoV-2 spike the same protein that binds ACE2, damages endothelium, and triggers inflammation. Lipid nanoparticles carried it throughout the body. Animal biodistribution studies showed accumulation in liver, spleen, ovaries, and other organs. Human autopsy and biopsy series later found spike protein in heart muscle, brain, vessels, and other tissues days to weeks after injection. Early safety signals were not subtle. Myocarditis and pericarditis in young males after dose two appeared within months in multiple countries and in military data. Other signals followed: thrombosis, neurological injury, autonomic dysfunction, autoimmune flares. Senior officials were briefed. The program expanded anyway... into healthy children, into pregnant women, into people with recent prior infection, while the liability shield (PREP Act and equivalents) kept manufacturers almost entirely protected from ordinary civil discovery and damages. The institutional network that authorized, promoted, and defended this sequence had overlapping roles across regulators, manufacturers, academic advisors, philanthropic funders, and media. Dissenting clinicians faced professional punishment. Data access stayed restricted. Compensation systems remained slow and limited. Excess mortality stayed elevated in multiple countries after the main viral waves; attribution is still fought over because the linked individual level records required to settle the question have never been fully opened to independent teams. The most extreme numerical claims OF death and disability tolls exceeding one hundred Hiroshima scale events... are generated by applying large under reporting multipliers to passive surveillance systems or by specific excess mortality models. Those numbers are not proven. Official figures claiming only rare serious harm are also not proven at the scale of the intervention. Both extremes survive because the transparent, large-scale investigations that could bound the true human cost were never done. This is the sequence: Emergency rules. Reduced evidence standards. Near-total liability protection. Early clear safety signals. Continued expansion into low-risk groups. Narrative enforcement and professional punishment of dissent. Permanent data gaps. State legislators finally writing the strongest legal accusation available. Institutional silence in response. The injuries ARE real. The design choices ARE real. The liability shield IS real. The stalled bills ARE real. The refusal to open the full data IS real. A society that accepts this operating system once will be asked to accept it again. The only remaining restraint is memory, independent records, state level legislative attempts that refuse to forget, and the demand that any future novel genetic product face ordinary standards of evidence, liability, and age-stratified risk-benefit analysis before it is injected into healthy populations. The three states put the accusation on the official record. The rest of the apparatus has so far chosen not to answer it. That is where it stands. If the modified mRNA products were truly as safe as repeatedly claimed, why did three separate state legislatures feel the need to introduce bills classifying them as biological weapons of mass destruction? When clear myocarditis signals in young males appeared within months of rollout, what exact risk-benefit calculation justified continuing to expand the same product into even lower-risk age groups? Why was near-total liability protection for manufacturers considered necessary for a product described as “safe and effective”? If passive reporting systems are too unreliable to trust when they show large numbers of serious events, why were those same systems previously treated as sufficient to declare the products safe? What specific evidence would be required for health authorities to publicly admit that the risk-benefit ratio was inverted for healthy children and young adults? Why do the original randomized trial placebo groups no longer exist for long-term comparison, and who decided that unblinding them was acceptable? If spike protein persistence in tissues is either rare or harmless, why has there been no large-scale, standardized, publicly released autopsy program to settle the question? When excess mortality remained elevated in multiple countries after major COVID waves had passed, why was independent access to fully linked vaccination and death records so tightly restricted? If dissenting clinicians were simply “spreading misinformation,” why were professional punishment and deplatforming used more often than open data debates? What institutional incentive existed to treat early safety signals as public-relations problems rather than as triggers for immediate restriction in low-risk groups? If the emergency was real and justified extraordinary measures, at what precise point did the emergency end and why did the extraordinary legal protections largely continue? Why has no major federal agency issued a detailed, point-by-point scientific rebuttal of the core claims made in the Arizona, Minnesota, and Tennessee bills? When a product forces human cells to produce a biologically active protein for an extended period, should the burden of proof rest on those who claim this is harmless, or on those who claim it is not? What level of documented harm would have been required to pause or narrow the campaign once it was already underway? If this sequence of emergency authorization, liability shielding, signal management, and narrative control is considered acceptable once, what principle prevents it from becoming the template for every future novel medical intervention? Tag Everyone You Know, It's Time For The World To Know The Truth. Quote This Post With Your Honest Thoughts. Bookmark It For Later To See What Others Think. And If You Are Not Already Following @TrueOnX... What In The Absolute World Are You Waiting For?

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: U.S Government Admitting CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY Against American Citizens in The Second Most Important Video You Will EVER See 🚨 A senior DARPA adviser, Dr. James Giordano, publicly stated that non-surgical brain interfaces using nanomaterials and aerosolized agents are not science fiction; they are already viable. He described: - Nano-particulate agents that can be inhaled to disrupt neurological networks... - Techniques to place electrodes and sensors inside the head without surgery... - Neuroscience deliberately leveraged as weapons... This is not a conspiratorial claim. It comes straight from a Georgetown neuroscientist who has advised DARPA and the Pentagon. Public programs exist: - DARPA’s N³ (Next-Generation Nonsurgical Neurotechnology) - Funded teams at Battelle, Carnegie Mellon, Johns Hopkins APL, Rice, PARC, and Teledyne. - Related patents on wireless implants, carbon-nanotube arrays, and external neural interfaces. The research is documented. The dual-use potential is openly discussed by the people building it. Why was this research framed primarily in military and intelligence terms rather than purely medical ones? If non-surgical, bidirectional brain interfaces are achievable, who decides the limits on reading from or writing to the human nervous system? What oversight exists when the same agencies funding the technology also classify large parts of the work? Why do discussions of free will, cognitive liberty, and bodily autonomy almost never appear alongside announcements of these programs? If aerosolized or remotely deliverable neuromodulators are technically feasible, what prevents their use outside declared conflict zones? Who is accountable if these tools move from lab prototypes to operational systems without public consent? Watch the full admission. Then ask yourself the one question almost no one in power wants answered: Once the ability to influence the brain without surgery exists… who gets to hold the remote? Demand the full record. Tag Everyone You Know, It's Time For The World To Know The Truth. Quote This Post With Your Honest Thoughts. Bookmark It For Later To See What Others Think. And If You Are Not Already Following @TrueOnX... What In The Absolute World Are You Waiting For? THE ABSOLUTE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO YOU COULD EVER WATCH IS THE ATTACHED POST.

🚨 BREAKING: THEY'RE FEEDING US TRAFFICKED CHILDREN'S MEAT... AND YOU'VE BEEN EATING IT. 🚨

これは簡単そうで 難しいかも😅

子供が喜ぶだろうと思って買った結果、まさかの夢中になったのは猫だったwww