Charles Watson

@BTyler55899 @KleverKid12 Not liking pedophiles makes a person a liberal fag? And you think that’s an insult?

@KleverKid12 Nah it's cuz he's a liberal fag

For context, this greentext was made because James didn't want to cover a movie made by someone who raped a 12 year old on camera on the kill count

@CTownEnjoyer @SetPixels Specifically butthurt because you think this has to do with your religion, which it doesn’t. It has to do with people stealing and then using their ties to local police to harass and threaten someone they don’t like.

@CTownEnjoyer @SetPixels He was not on the property so being trespassed means nothing as a counter argument. If he knocked on the door constantly and continued to go on the property than yeah, he’s in the wrong. But staying off the property to have papers served is valid and legal. You’re just butthurt.

Reckless Ben didn’t have to serve Josh Johnson in person. In fact, an officer told him that directly. But he ignored this and omitted it from his video because he was there to make YouTube content.

@jogadorDfrifrai Which is somehow more pathetic.

Fãs de GOW não estão reclamando pq a prota é mulher, estão reclamando pq ela é feia

@_santabeliever So you wrote all that just to say they’re right? Weird way to go about it but good job I guess.

Segundo o banco de dados da Universidade de Oxford, existem mais de 130.000 vasos gregos pintados catalogados e preservados até hoje. Desses 130.000, cerca de 600 vasos apresentam artes consideradas homoeróticas. Desses 600 vasos, apenas 30 mostram atos explícitos entre homens, ou seja, menos de 0,03 do total... Vocês são muito forçados, na moral.

@CTownEnjoyer You’re the liar and it hilarious given recent news.

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING RECKLESS BEN v BRICKS AND MINIFIGS UPDATE It's been said by most reporting on the story that the consignment deal between Chrystal Gorman and Brian Mansell was permitted by BAM in their franchising agreement. THIS IS FACTUALLY FALSE ❌❌❌ According to Section 8 C (first image) of that very same agreement, franchisees are expressly PROHIBITED from selling products not purchased from approved vendors/suppliers. Section 1 A (second image), which has been collectively misinterpreted as permission to consign product as Chrystal did, permits franchisees to consign SERVICES (such as third-party labor for birthday parties), not PRODUCTS (physical inventory). This is a key difference which completely changes what most have been told up to this point. It should also be noted this document was released ALTERED with wording cropped out that any consignment SERVICES must be approved by BAM. So even if this WAS permission to consign as Chrystal and Reckless Ben have falsely claimed, it would STILL invalidate Chrystal's LEGO consignment. This CONFIRMS BAM's claim that they do not allow consignment at their stores. Reckless Ben has been CAUGHT LYING once again!

@TobyTurner @IGN We get it. You don’t like digital women being assaulted. We all know your feelings on regular women though.

@IGN Or keep the protagonists that build the series, and not gender switch to a woman for a violent videogame where you’re constantly beaten to death in vivid detail

It's a risk to leave a beloved protagonist behind, but God of War Laufey's perspective switch and the gameplay changes it brings is the bold move that more PlayStation Studios games need to make. bit.ly/4ukm0a1 #IGNSummerOfGaming

@ReviewsPossum Where did anyone claim it was a dolphin and not a dolphin fetus? You probably should have posted that interaction and not this one where no one claimed it was a dolphin.

So a dolphin fetus is a dolphin, but a human fetus is not a human?

@ShakeDrizzle I can’t begin to tell you how grateful the world is that you had no involvement in the videos.

No one asked but if I’m editing that Reckless Ben series I’m cutting out like 50 instances of him incriminating himself and blurring pretty much every person involved If you’re not gonna hire a lawyer at least hire an editor bro 😅

@JrDeonsmit7024 @OtakuNokt @TobyTurner @oncloud_e No they actually don’t care if it’s true or not. That’s the crazy thing about transphobes. They’ll support a pedophile financially if the pedophile say trans people are bad.

@charknukles @OtakuNokt @TobyTurner @oncloud_e it better not be true either

im not gonna lie to you man that is the gayest shit ive ever heard and im a transgender lesbian

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist To prove that it’s been used that way for at least the past thirty years. At this point you’ve argued over one word that you can’t get right. This is my last reply. This is genuinely sad. Like I said, in the future at least use Google and try to grasp what a word means next time.

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist Actually entirely relevant to the concept of colloquialisms. If you wanted something specific, you should have been specific. However I’m not going to scour forums for you to prove that a word that outside of video games means to use something someone else made for an advantage,

Notice how there’s never a push for a male Tomb Raider game?

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist If I said I was hangry, what would you take that to mean?

@charknukles @DefiantBaptist That doesn't demonstrate the amount of people using it understand the meaning you do. So, I'm still waiting for you to substantiate it.

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist That’s again, a failure on your in either attempting to refute a claim properly or by simply back tracking now that you’ve learned what colloquially is. Whichever is true.

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist You responded to me asking if you were familiar with the term colloquial by saying so it’s a proprietary definition. That’s not refuting. That reads more as you assuming the two words are linked directly. That my claim colloquialism means that it’s a proprietary definition.

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist Hangry, ghosting, binge-watching, meme, fomo, literally any colloquialism before it’s added to the dictionary even with an informal definition. Kid referencing a child and not a goat. You could have just said no to my question before.

@charknukles @DefiantBaptist Demonstrate "generally everyone using it understands the meaning".

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist When I asked about colloquial you claimed it was the same as a proprietary definition. Implying, even if not directly claiming, that the two are similar.

@charknukles @DefiantBaptist I never said they were similar

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist You’ll notice I’ve been specific in my requests of you. You do the same.

@charknukles @DefiantBaptist Demonstrate it

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist You just aren’t capable of continuing the line of questioning, to give you some credit, possibly undeserved, you understood why I was asking and you believed as long as you refused to answer you wouldn’t have to accept colloquial and proprietary are not similar concepts.

@NedKellysReveng @DefiantBaptist You’re claiming that I’m using a definition I created, which would not be something used colloquially with an understood conformal definition backing it. Generally everyone using it understands the meaning, but someone from the outside of that group may not.