Chase Peeler
1.6K posts

Chase Peeler
@chasepeeler
I mainly tweet everything from @thebravesblog because I'm lazy. However, I do still tweet here from time to time.
Atlanta, GA Katılım Mayıs 2009
151 Takip Edilen67 Takipçiler
Chase Peeler retweetledi

Spirit Airlines died tonight at the hands of the socialist crusader, Elizabeth Warren
She must be so proud to add another casket to her achievements.
Tonight at 3am, Spirit turns off the lights. 14,000 jobs gone. 30+ smaller airports lose service.
JetBlue offered $3.8 BILLION in cash to buy Spirit in 2022. Shareholders, flight attendants union, literally everyone voted yes.
The combined company would have held 9% of the US market against a Big 4 that already owned 80%.
For anyone who understands numbers: 9% isn’t a monopoly against 80%.
Warren said no.
She wrote letters. She pressured Buttigieg. Biden’s DOJ sued. A federal judge killed the deal in January 2024.
Her argument: the merger would cost consumers $1 billion a year.
Now look at her collateral damage she dusts under the rug.
510 pilots gone in the months after. 1,800 flight attendants furloughed in December.
14,000 jobs in 2023. 7,500 last week. Zero tonight.
And that’s just the people in Spirit uniforms.
Catering goes. Fuel guys go. Baggage crews, gate agents, airport coffee shops, hotels and rental cars in 70 cities Spirit flew to. Every airline job carries 3 more on its back.
40,000 people out of work because of one woman’s moronic crusade against the market.
And the math ain’t mathing.
Spirit abandoned 90 routes during the death spiral. Fares on those routes are up 14% on average. Oakland to Newark: $135 to $288. Fort Myers to San Juan: $92 to $219. Kansas City to Newark up 66%.
That’s reality. Not some BS number from a “study.”
So @SenWarren tell me how this saves the consumer money?
Cheap carriers in a market drop fares 21% across the board. Southwest did this in the 90s and saved Americans $68 BILLION over 20 years.
Warren killed it. That’s what moronic politicians led by socialism do.
Then with her own blind arrogance, she tweeted Spirit’s collapse is “a Biden win for flyers.”
A win.
14,000 people are reading termination letters tonight.
And she’s taking credit.
This is socialism in 2026.
A senator who’s never made payroll thinks she knows how to run a market better than the people who own and work in the company.
She saved you a billion on imaginary paper.
She cost you ten times that in real life.
She didn’t protect consumers from anything.
14,000+ will go from working to welfare.
She will make sure to blame billionaires, hardworking tax payers, AI, capitalism and whatever monster they will make up tomorrow hiding under your bed.
Higher taxes. Fewer jobs. More expensive everything.
She called it a win. I hope you enjoy winning.
English

@kevin_nealon @adhdmode_ No, I'm pretty sure it's just a TV show.
English

@JerryBones8 @JohnnyL81397757 @mhmck Which is 18 billion USD. So, more than 8 million, but still a lot less than 180 billion.
English

@JohnnyL81397757 @mhmck Did Trump or Putin tell you those lies Comrade?
"As of early 2026, Canada has provided over $25.5 billion CAD in milotary assistance to Ukraine since February 2022."
English
Chase Peeler retweetledi

Pride Month has come early! Tonight, we hear the latest on the epic love story of @DrMaleekk and @BruceSaiFun. Sorry @Iamthewarner, it seems your boy toy has a new master. youtube.com/watch?v=oxxv0O…

YouTube

English
Chase Peeler retweetledi

@metallimacrules @JohnCleese Reading that sentence makes me wonder if you ever made it to the 3rd grade
English
@JohnCleese Noted: I don't know how the lil d tatorial wannabe and minions ever were promoted to the third grade
English

He mixed them up
Has anyone so inadequate ever had so much power ?
Nick Reeves #RejoinEU #NAFO #FBPE@nickreeves9876
If Biden had made this kind of mistake the media would have seething with talk of mental incapacity. Needless to say, Trump wants Ukraine to be defeated, which, combined with mental incapacity, almost certainly accounts for his error.
English

@cowincrisis Horses are the worst. What do you think of my halloween costumes? chasepeeler.com/cows.html
English

So now we’re just making accusations with zero evidence… and targeting people by race while pretending to defend “democracy”?
“White liberal women unite” isn’t a policy argument… it’s racial bloc politics. The same people who claim to oppose division are openly organizing around it.
As for “stealing the election with mail-in ballots”…
Mail-in voting is legal. It’s been used for decades… including by military, elderly, and absentee voters. The real debate isn’t its existence, it’s about verification standards… signature matching, chain of custody, ballot harvesting laws, and auditability.
If you’re serious about election integrity, you debate process and safeguards.
If you’re not… you throw out emotional claims and hope people don’t ask questions.
This post does the latter.
No evidence presented… no mechanism explained… just fear language and identity politics.
That’s not how serious people argue.
#SilentMajoritySpeaks #AStoneGroove
English

Episode 382 | 05/02/26 | Calling Scammers LIVE twitch.tv/bullracksin
English

Never seen me so silent? I was live on my channel last night, and the night before that, and the night before that, and the night before that. I'll be live tonight, and tomorrow night, and the night after that. That's what you mean by "silent"? Yeah, you and Sam were MADE for each other. Two delusional narcissists obsessed with the Dizzle. Just ask me for my autograph already!
English

I never have seen @Acts17David so quiet since @BruceSaiFun has been muzzling and exposing him. I think it’s safe to say David shekels wood is being owned on Zionism by Sam. And all David can do is call @ReasonedAnswers to do boring lives. Keep exposing them Sam good job!
English

@Soteriology101 Jesus never mentions one single time grafting a gentile in, Paul was no different than any other person on twitter trying to get a followup
English

I asked Grok this crucial question about Romans 9:
“In Romans 9 when Paul poses the question, “Who are you oh man to talk back to God,” is he most likely referring to someone created by God for damnation questioning why God made them this way? Or is Paul most likely referring to an Israelite who has grown hardened despite God’s patience toward him who God is now molded for an ignoble purpose, like crucifying his own messiah so as to engraft the gentile people?”
What do you think of the answer:
Paul is most likely referring to the second option: a hardened Israelite (or the Jewish objector representing that group) questioning God’s right to mold him for an ignoble historical purpose, despite God’s prior patience. This fits the immediate literary context of Romans 9, its Old Testament background, and the larger argument of Romans 9–11 far more naturally than the first option (an individual created from the start for damnation). Here’s why, step by step from the text itself.
1. The immediate question and objection (Romans 9:19-20)
Paul has just explained God’s sovereign choices in redemptive history: Isaac over Ishmael, Jacob over Esau, and mercy on whom He wills while hardening Pharaoh (vv. 6-18). A hypothetical objector then pushes back:
“Why does He still find fault? For who can resist His will?” (v. 19)
Paul’s reply is exactly the line you quoted:
“But who are you, O man, to answer back to God? Will what is molded say to its molder, ‘Why have you made me like this?’” (v. 20, ESV/NIV similar).
The “you, O man” is addressing the one raising the objection—someone who feels God is unfairly blaming people for a resistance that God Himself willed/hardened. In the flow of Romans (a letter full of imagined Jewish interlocutors in diatribe style), this objector represents the unbelieving or hardened Israelite who is grumbling about God’s current dealings with ethnic Israel. Paul is not picturing a generic person predestined to hell from eternity past wondering why God created him that way. He is rebuking the attitude of the very group Paul has been grieving over since 9:1-3 (his “kinsmen according to the flesh”).
2. The potter-and-clay metaphor comes from the Old Testament—and it’s about Israel as a nation, not individuals created for damnation
Paul draws the image primarily from Jeremiah 18:1-11 (and echoes in Isaiah 29:16, 45:9). In Jeremiah, God sends the prophet to a potter’s house:
• The potter is working with a lump of clay (explicitly called “the house of Israel,” v. 6).
• When the vessel is marred (spoiled by the clay’s own resistance), the potter remakes it into another vessel “as it seemed good to the potter.”
• God then applies this directly: He has the sovereign right to reshape nations (especially Israel) based on their response, but the clay can be “remade” if it repents. The metaphor emphasizes God’s authority and the clay’s accountability.
Paul is not inventing a new picture of God arbitrarily creating some people as “trash vessels” from the outset. He is applying the familiar Jewish image: Israel is the clay. It has become hardened/marred in rebellion (see also Acts 28:23-28, where Paul quotes Isaiah about Israel’s calloused heart). God therefore has the right to mold part of the same lump (ethnic Israel) into “vessels for honorable use” (believing remnant) and part into “vessels for dishonorable use” (hardened majority prepared for judgment/destruction). The “making like this” is remolding a previously patient, longsuffering people for a new redemptive purpose.
3. Verses 22-24 confirm the “patience” and redemptive purpose—exactly as you described in option 2
• “Endured with much patience” directly echoes God’s historical longsuffering toward Israel (see Romans 10:21, quoting Isaiah: “All day long I have held out my hands to a disobedient and contrary people”). This is not language of “I created you evil from the womb.” It is the language of a potter who has patiently worked with marred clay
English

@TheRawEvidence @Soteriology101 I have never seen any evidence that @Soteriology101 has a grudge against God. I see exactly the opposite. He loves the Lord and wants everyone to experience that love as well.
English

@Soteriology101 Nothing happened, but you obviously have a grudge against God, which is why you try to twist scripture. So what happened?
English

@monkgoblin @wassielawyer There is hope for the future afterall
English


@TexasAnCap Not quite the same as the button scenario since you have visibility into the action of others.
English

@Avagitarian @SirBylHolte @catturd2 I thought the movie with Jim Caviezel was horrible, but I love the book and the recent mini-series was really good as well.
English

@SirBylHolte @catturd2 The count of monte cristo definitely the best revenge movie/book ever created . That man was patient and played the long game. Took everything from him
English

@SirBylHolte @catturd2 Count of Monte Cristo is by far the best revenge story, but the movie (assuming you mean the Jim Caviezel one) is horrible. The mini-series that just came out was really good though.
English

@GraceAloneSaved @catturd2 Which is why they are good. I don't want to see a realistic depiction of someone getting revenge - that would just be depressing.
English

@Nickisbackbaby I like Elijah too. He shows you don't have to give up your sense of humor to follow God. I think it's easy to fall into the trap that we must be meek at all times and never rock the boat. I mean, Elijah straight up mocked the prophets of Baal.
English

I identify with Peter and his ability to screw things up! I think he's a wonderful example because he shows that someone that made a lot of blunders was still able to become a powerful witness for Christ.
I don't know if I'd say I "connect" with him, but I've always really liked Daniel and the courage he showed by not compromising his beliefs.
English














