Natalia Martinez

More than an hour ago, it was announced that Iran's Supreme Leader would speak within minutes following the reports in Israeli media that the Ayatollah was killed in the first wave of joint U.S./Israeli strikes in Tehran.

@Starbucks Huge shoutout to the team at River Town Plaza in Guaynabo, PR. A customer had a medical emergency at the drive-thru and your staff handled it with so much care, and compassion. They called emergency services and even covered the orders of those of us stuck waiting. 🫶🏼

@grok @SlowFabrizio @washghost1 No it’s not. That is not jayyandabby.

@SlowFabrizio @washghost1 This is a staged skit from a TikTok prank video by jayyandabby, not a real event. The overlaid text and acting style give it away.

Caught her in 4K

@ophello @Wendyinspanish @Ahmed_hassan_za “Imagine others arrive and see you like this” “OK, OK you need to calm down so that you can make it home safe to care for your children. Calm down.” [unintelligible] “I WANT TO GO HOME!” “What was it you saw?” “Many children like stacks in a truck! I want to get out of here!”

@Wendyinspanish @Ahmed_hassan_za What is she saying? In English?

Many of you have seen this video but don't know the details. In the video, Gabriela Rico Jiménez, a 21-year-old Mexican model, is seen outside the Fiesta Inn in Monterrey, Mexico, on August 3, 2009. Gabriela had attended a private party at the hotel, an elite modeling event that brought together prominent businessmen, politicians, and individuals whose names appeared in the Jeffrey Epstein files—all figures favored by secularists. The young woman began screaming that they were eating children. She was then arrested and disappeared without a trace. Yesterday, evidence supporting her claims was released in a new batch of files from the U.S. Department of Justice, proving that Bush did this, and worse.

@GarciaManny4 @pedroumpierre @PRPDNoticias noticel.com/noticias/20260…

Otro títere. Lamentabemente ya en PR, esas puercadas son comunes.... y a ese 🐐'ón lo tienen que haber "criaó" dos tusas y tiene que estar "criando" par de puercos... por ahí va esta letrina.. @PRPDNoticias #LaCalleEsDelNarco #ElGobiernoEstaEnNomina

@pedroumpierre @Miguel_Romero_ noticel.com/noticias/20260…

Mire ponga su basura en bolsas, ayude a mantener a San Juan limpio. ⁦@Miguel_Romero_⁩

@cydmariefleming @pedroumpierre Tortuga Bistro Bar en la Calle San Sebastian

Que a ese PUERCO le DEN UNA MULTA que le VACÍE la CHEQUERA. Tiene que haber CONSECUENCIAS.

@pedroumpierre @jayfonsecapr @Miguel_Romero_ Parece La Tortuga Bistro Bar en la Calle San Sebastian

@michaelgorvitz1 @ByronYork If Soleimani was injured to the point of Hors de combat, yes, it would have been illegal. The proper thing would be to take him into custody, treat him, and then put him on trial. However, in this case, the first strike was most likely already a violation of international law.

@ByronYork I don’t understand what this fuss is about. The target was obviously perpetrators, not the vessel alone. If the U.S. had failed to killed Soleimani from the first strike would the second strike have been illegal (as opposed to the first)?

Wait... nytimes.com/2025/12/01/us/…

@petrocus @threadreaderapp unroll

There are some big holes and sly omissions here (not necessarily indefensible). I will try to do a better job at some point. But I wanted to put out there a general shape of an actual argument for [grimace] dual integrities, since I had it in my head. fin+1/

I'm gonna post my personal opinions on WOMEN'S ORDINATION IN THE ACNA so that everyone will hate me and stop following me. Qualifications: I am a nobody layman with no theological training. I have not read and will never read Hooker's lawes of ecclesiasticall politie. 1/

@yeshuabendavid Some sources: - David Bentley, The New Testament: A Translation (2017), 345-46 - Joseph Fitzmyer, First Corinthians (2008), 530 - K Haines, The Gendered Palimpsest (2012), 62 - Gordon Fee, The First Epistle to the Corinthians (1987), 699-708 See also Codex Vaticanus

@yeshuabendavid Ignoring that textual scholarship points to evidence that 1Cor14:34 is most likely a later scribal addition prob bc Greek law required women to be silent in public meetings, how do you reconcile 1Cor. 11:5,13; 14:5, 24, 26, 31, 39, Acts 2:17, 21:8-9 with the apparent prohibition?

@yeshuabendavid 2) Guaranteed? You are assuming. Saying the prophetesses never addressed the church is an argument from silence. If prophecy is Spirit-given for the edification of the church (1 Cor. 14:3) wouldn’t it be odd for them to be recognized prophetesses but never prophesy publicly?

@yeshuabendavid 1) If “pray/prophesy” is in corporate public worship (1 Cor 11:5), then we can agree that Paul assumes women speak in the assembly. My question is, why would reading Scripture be more restricted than prophecy (1 Cor 14:3)?

@yeshuabendavid @JohnStSomething And every woman who prays or prophesies with her hair loosened disgraces her head. It is one and the same as having been shaved. - 1 Corinthians 11:5 Now this man had four virgin daughters who were prophetesses. -Acts 21:9

@JohnStSomething In a PCA local body, women ______ read Scripture during worship. #pcaga #PCAGA25

@xtianherring Not all theological error is sinful. I thank God I am not saved by my right understanding of theology. I thank God I am not condemned as an unrepentant sinner because I do not fully comprehend the mysteries of the Trinity, the sacraments, or the timing of Christ’s return.

@cheetalia Being in theological error is sinful

Something I struggle with. Membership vows say the member will submit themselves in love to the government and discipline of the church. Is part of the government and discipline not based on our doctrinal standards which say the neglect of infant baptism is “a great sin?”

@xtianherring Unrepentant sin? Or perhaps just theological error?

@cheetalia Yes

@xtianherring Do you believe baptists are sinning when they don’t baptize their kids?

@cheetalia So if the officers believe it is a sin, why admit people to membership who are in known, open, and unrepentant sin?

@DavidDraperEsq @racheljwelcher Most men who want to be “in ministry” really just want attention or a platform, to be in control, or both. There are plenty of other ministries men can do. The real issue is the men that want to be in charge. Go feed the poor, visit nursing homes, tutor an at-risk child.

Most women who want to be “in ministry” as you call it really just want attention or a platform, to be in control, or both. There are plenty of ministries women can do, and there is virtually zero disagreement about this. The real issue is the women that want to be in charge. Go feed the poor, visit nursing homes, tutor an at-risk child. Is that too condescending and humble of a ministry?

Why is it that so many Christians can have fellowship while disagreeing about the following: -Baptism -Spiritual gifts -Eschatology But not: -Women in ministry (complementarianism/egalitarianism) Would love to hear your thoughts!